Online Faculty Development Modules Abstract Utilizing student feedback on effective instructional practices, Online Faculty Development Modules are designed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Elements of an Online Syllabus Contact: Melody Buckner Instructional Designer.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
Digital Library Resources Instructional Design (5100:631) Dr. Savery April 27, 2010.
A Case Study Rebecca A. Croxton, MLIS Anthony S. Chow, PhD
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
UDL Strategies for Creating Motivational Learning Modules and Assessment Tools David Robinson, Ed.D. Towson University.
Data Collection and Preliminary Analysis Our survey addressed the first two of the questions presented in this study. The Qualtrics survey was framed by.
Uncovering the Promise of Faculty Success Online Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus NERCOMP Boston 2005.
Introducing the Fractions and Decimals Online Interview
A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR.
NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT LEARNING TECHNOLOGY GRANT Pam Berger, Director of Information and the School Library System.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Help or Hindrance: A Blended Approach to Learner Engagement A presentation to The Ako Aotearoa ‘Research in Progress’ Colloquium.
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Strategies for Transforming Face-to- Face Courses to Hybrid or Fully Online Courses David Robinson, Ed. D. David Wizer, Ph. D. Lilly Conference- Spring.
Glen Hatton Introduction to Financial Accounting TURNING THE ACCOUNTING CLASSROOM UPSIDE DOWN Randy Hoffma n Introduction to Managerial Accounting PHASE.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
Faculty Development at ASU: Kate Brinko, Nigel Davies, Amanda Phillips, Rebecca Gildea, Tracy Smith, Brian Smentkowski Summer 2013 Completed Phase.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Introduction to Summarizing. What is Summarizing? Summarizing is finding the key ideas and supporting details to get the “gist” of a piece of writing.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
Updates to Program Approval Process and Graduate Faculty Nominations Dr. George Hodge Assistant Dean for Program Development.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
Abstract College STAR Online Faculty Development Modules are designed around the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) for the purposes of.
Faculty Development at ASU: Kate Brinko, Nigel Davies, Amanda Phillips, Will Canu Spring/Summer 2012 Established Appalachian’s Core Implementation.
My Impact on Student Learning Brooke Neal 8 th Grade Indianola Middle School Miss Webber.
1.  Assuring that all students with disabilities have access to and participation in the general education curriculum  Recognizing that special education.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Department of Education Professional Learning Institute GOOD TEACHING Differentiated Classroom Practice Learning for All Module 1.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Assessing Progress on the QEP: Status Update Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
© 2012 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY T WENTY YEARS OF ENHANCING ONLINE STUDENT S UCCESS Amy Buechler-Steubing & Siri Sorensen Capella University – Learning Assistance.
Beyond The Classroom Alternative Assessment Strategies Peter Hatherley-Greene Dubai Men’s College TESOL Arabia Conference Dubai, March 2004.
Working With the Instructional Development Team Presented by Heidi King 20 November 2002.
Project Management Plan Howard Community College Canvas Training Course Instructional Designer Ruddhi Wadadekar Presented to The Dean: Teaching and Learning.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Deborah Lee James Nail Gail Peyton Mississippi State University Libraries Supporting Graduate Education: A Library – Wide Approach.
Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D., Penn State’s World Campus Mount St. Vincent University April 12th 2005.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
Cross-Institutional Collaboration for Sustainability
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
Integrating Instructional Strategies: Overview of ISLES
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Overview for Alternate Assessment
Common Core State Standards
A Two-Phased Approach to Online Faculty Development
Presentation transcript:

Online Faculty Development Modules Abstract Utilizing student feedback on effective instructional practices, Online Faculty Development Modules are designed around the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) for the purpose of sharing effective teaching methods. Electronic modules allow faculty to showcase their effective teaching methods and provide other instructors with new ideas for enhancing the student classroom experience. Each module contains a description of how the instructor implements the instructional practice, a brief summary of the professional literature that supports the instructional practice, and will contain the option to print a certification of completion. Background Information These online faculty development modules provide information about effective instructional practices for diverse learners. Creation of the online faculty development modules relies on student voice. Students are provided an opportunity to share their instructors’ effective teaching practices. Using student nominations has allowed us to “hear” student voices about effective teaching practices at ECU. Our initial attempt to obtain nominations via paper forms resulted in only 3 nominations. We then converted the nomination process from paper form to electronic form, in an attempt to acquire more student nominations. On the electronic nomination form, students write a description of the instructional strategy they believe helps them to learn more and the name of their instructor. Reporting student name is voluntary. Students who disclose their name are eligible to win a $25.00 gift card to the student store if their nomination is used in the development of a module and, if they consent, may be invited to participate in a future focus group. The student electronic nomination form, instituted March 26, 2012 and sent to targeted populations of undergraduates generated 66 nominations overnight with a total of 135 nominations. We broadened the survey Spring 2013 by including ECU graduates and all undergraduate students enrolled during 2013 resulting in approximately 180 nominations, primarily from undergraduates. Module Components The College Star Faculty Development Modules are designed around the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and they attempt to model UDL, providing multiple ways to access the information. The modules are freely available in the Faculty section of the College STAR website. Each module contains the same six components which cover information about the instructional practice, its link to the UDL principles, research support for the practice, and an opportunity for the viewer to provide feedback about the module. Viewers will be able to print a certificate of module completion for their professional records. Contents of each component are described below. Introduction: Rationale for the module, photo of contributing faculty member(s), and graphic representation of module content UDL Principle: Description of the UDL principles associated with the module content and how the instructional practice aligns with the UDL principles Instructional Practice: Detailed description of the instructional practice highlighted in the module provided through the use of text, photos, videos, and charts Literature Base: Brief summary of research and professional literature that support the importance and effectiveness of the instructional practice Learn More: Bibliography of references cited in module, additional resources, and Shared Success feature. Shared Success is a new addition to the Learn More section of the module. Viewers are invited to share ways they have used the instructional practice and add to the module information. Certificate: A brief survey about the effectiveness of module components and future interest in participating with College STAR and a brief quiz covering module content will be followed by the option to print a certificate of completion Module Team Sue Steinweg, Ph.D., Instructional Consultant, College STAR Tanner Jones, BFA, Technology Specialist, College STAR Fatima Rana, Graduate Assistant, College STAR Karen J. Williams, Graduate Assistant, College STAR Evaluation Two types of evaluation are incorporated in development and use of the modules. 1.After a module is written, it goes through several levels of editing for clarity, grammar, content, and accuracy. This includes having the first drafts read by multiple individuals. Once corrections are made and the module content is placed online, the module is reread and edited by multiple individuals. External reviews are conducted by individuals with expertise in UDL using a 13-page evaluation form, which includes a Likert scale of items and open response items. Additionally, 15 faculty members from multiple departments on campus were asked to review the two pilot modules and revisions were incorporated. 2.Individuals who access the modules are asked to complete a survey upon completion of each module. Questions ask the viewers to evaluate the effectiveness of module elements and possible impact on their future instructional practice. The option to participate in future focus groups is included. A multiple-choice assessment covering module content will evaluate mastery of the information. References College STAR Faculty Development Modules National Center on Universal Design for Learning Timeline Two pilot modules were created during the first year of the project, sent for external review, and, extensively refined. During this academic year we have completed one module and are working on four additional modules. A design is in the works to incorporate existing related modules. Dr. Sue SteinwegTanner JonesFatima RanaK. J. Williams