Los Osos Community Services District Basin Management Planning and Proposed Work Program June 5, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Borrego Valley Borrego Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Integrated Regional Water Management Planning.
Advertisements

THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
Status Update on Future Water Quality Strategies for the Refuge Kenneth G. Ammon, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Everglades Restoration and Capital Projects.
Environmental Law. CARCD Annual Meeting & Conference November 13, 2014 PRESENTED BY Steve Anderson Partner Key Components of California Groundwater Legislation.
Calaveras County Water District Capital R&R Program Funding Options March 25,
Groundwater Management Jason Moeckel Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study To determine whether the Town will vote to adopt a resolution supporting the Town Manager’s allocation of.
Prepared by: Earth Data N.E., Inc. August 19, 2008.
City of St Helena Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project April 28, 2015 St. Helena City Council Meeting.
Groundwater Management in the San Gabriel Valley Tony Zampiello Main San Gabriel Basin & Raymond Basin Watermaster Watermaster.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Water Resource Division San Joaquin County Water Resource Management Planning Update C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
West Contra Costa USD Update on Bonding Capacity Waiver Presentation to the Board of Education May 28, 2014.
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
1 Draft NYISO 2003 Budget Report BS&P Report to Management Committee October 16, 2002.
B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Adoption Hearing May 19, B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Adoption.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – March 12, 2013 HLVRCD.
NC Water Resources Congress Annual Meeting Raleigh, NC October 30, 2014 State Water Infrastructure Update: The State of NC and Water, Wastewater and Stormwater.
Eastern Snake River Plain Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan (CAMP) Progress Report ESHMC January 13, 2009.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #3 May 15 – June 18.
LOS OSOS WASTEWATER PROJECT UPDATE March 4, 2008.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
Inyokern Senior Center 1247 Broadway, Inyokern February 12, 2014 Lorelei H. Oviatt, Director, AICP Kern County Planning & Community Development Department.
Cedar Valley/ Northern Utah Valley July 9, Agenda   Background   Groundwater Hydrology   Current Conditions   Water Rights   Proposed.
Status of Regional Water Supply Plan Updates John Mulliken Director, Planning Division Water Supply Department Water Resources Advisory Commission January.
1 Water and Wastewater Capital Charges Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners April 5, 2011.
June 10, 2008 Board of County Commissioners B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Transmittal Hearing.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Drinking Water Source Protection Ministry of the Environment Source Protection Programs Branch March 2010.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Draft Cease and Desist Order Community Leader Workshop March 28, 2008.
Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 Orange County Code Utilities Department October 21,
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Final Water Supply Plan Update July 2014.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Situation Assessment Jay Jasperse, Sonoma County Water Agency Gina Bartlett, Center for Collaborative Policy January.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
St. Johns River Water Management District Central Florida Water Initiative Water Supply Plan Mike Register, P.E., Director Division of Water Supply Planning.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250, Sacramento, CA fax presented to Fort Ord Reuse Authority.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Amendment. Overview Background Statutory Requirements Meeting the Requirements Identified Issues Timetable.
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #5 July 15 – September 15.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT San Jacinto Groundwater Basin Numerical Flow Model Update Brian Powell Director of Planning March 17,
REGION H Water Planning Group Freese and Nichols, Inc. | LBG-Guyton Associates | Ekistics Corporation DEVELOPING THE REGION H 2016 REGIONAL WATER PLAN.
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update July 23, 2014.
> Las Vegas Valley Watershed Advisory Committee Regional Water Quality Plan.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
Water Resource Management Planning Update
Large scale development groundwater balance
Recycled Water Discharge into Los Osos Creek
Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Program- Prop 84 Grant Funding Contract Kelley Gage March 9, 2017.
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Activities in Butte County
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update May 28, 2014
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
Cost of Service Analysis & Rate Design
Springbrook Estates Sewer Improvement Area Informational Meeting
Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Program: Program Development Phase Costs Brian Powell, P.E. 8/17/2016.
Shasta Valley Groundwater Basin
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study
Water Resource Management Planning Update
Delta Water Supply Project
CP-TXT Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Amendment
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
Presentation transcript:

Los Osos Community Services District Basin Management Planning and Proposed Work Program June 5, 2008

Background  Los Osos Groundwater Basin Supplies Water to:  LOCSD  Golden State Water Company  S&T Mutual Water Company  Other Ag and Private Wells  Groundwater Recharge Comes from Many Sources Including:  Rainfall  Creeks  Irrigation return flow  Septic System Discharge  Leakage from Other Aquifer Zones

Background, Cont.  Safe Yield - the Amount of Well Pumping that Maintains Groundwater Levels Safely Above Sea Level, Even During Dry Periods  If Exceeded, Sea Water Becomes an Unlimited Source of Unwanted Recharge  Deeper Zones are More Prone to Intrusion  The Lower Aquifer Currently Supplies 77% of the Water Delivered by the Three Water Purveyors  Much of the Upper Aquifer is High in Nitrates, Blending or Treatment is Required

Area of Sea Water Intrusion into Lower Aquifer LOCSD Palisades Well

Sand Spit Downtown Creek Upper Aquifer (Zone C) Lower Aquifer (Zone D) Lower Aquifer (Zone E) Bedrock

Background, Cont.  Los Osos Groundwater Basin is Broken into Two Compartments  Urban Area – Comprised of the East and West Compartment  Creek Compartment

ISJ Agreement  September Water Purveyors and the County of SLO Entered into an ISJ Agreement  ISJ – Interlocutory Stipulated Judgment  Equitable Sharing of Costs Related to Data Gathering and Analysis, and Development and Implementation of the Basin Management Plan

ISJ Meetings  ISJ Group Members have been Meeting Monthly  A Mutually-Agreeable Work Program has been developed that:  Meets the Intentions of the ISJ  Maintains a Schedule that Facilitates Timely Input Into the County Wastewater Project

ISJ Meetings, Cont  County Applied for a $250,000 Department of Water Resources Grant  To Partially Fund ISJ Group Efforts  Application Did Not Receive Funding  Cooperative Efforts Between ISJ Group  Pursue Water Conservation Education Programs  Inter-ties Between Purveyor Distribution Systems

Undeveloped Property  In July, 2007, the County adopted a policy relating to wastewater assessments for vacant properties  A second wastewater assessment vote will be held for vacant and underdeveloped properties  Water supply and infrastructure projects necessary to serve development may be included  Funding from proceeds of the assessment vote can reimburse purveyors for costs relating to development

Work Program  Steps Required to Reach the Goal of the ISJ – Prepare a Basin Management Plan  Analyze the Existing Condition of the Groundwater Basin  Assess various methods for maximizing basin resources, including conservation  Evaluate the potential benefits of various wastewater disposal options

Work Program  Steps Required to Reach the Goal of the ISJ – Prepare a Basin Management Plan  Analyze the Existing Condition of the Groundwater Basin  Assess various methods for maximizing basin resources, including conservation  Evaluate the potential benefits of various wastewater disposal options

Work Program  Goals of the Work Program  Define improvements and related costs that are necessary to achieve a balanced basin under current demand  Explore opportunities for increasing the efficient, sustainable use of the basin with the County’s wastewater project  Define improvements and related costs necessary to achieve build out without importing water  Provide input to the County for wastewater project decisions and the future vacant property assessment vote

Work Program, Cont.  Proposed Program in Five Tasks (Tasks 1, 2, and 3, Staff is Requesting to Proceed with at this Time)  Task 1  Update Steady State Hydraulic Model  Adjust Build-out Projections of the Basin Water Demand, including water conservation  Preliminary Evaluation of Nitrate Removal Unit  Assess the potential of the upper aquifer before and after the wastewater project  Task 2  Evaluate and Determine Creek Compartment Safe Yield  Perform Sampling Analysis for Water Quality of Creek Compartment

Work Program, Cont.  Task 3  Prepare Groundwater Basin Infrastructure Master Plan  Evaluate Groundwater Recharge Opportunities  Evaluate Options for Beneficial Re-Use of Reclaimed Water  Prepare a Draft Basin Management Plan  Task 4  Prepare a Transient, Dual-Density Hydraulic Model of the Groundwater Basin  Task 5  Annual Groundwater Monitoring  Transient Model Updates Every Two Years

Funding  Funding Sources for These Tasks Depend on the Objective  Tasks 1 & 2 Address Existing Deficiencies Related to Current Development  Funded by the ISJ Group (Ultimately by Rate Payers)  Percentage of Total Costs Based ISJ Agreement  District Share – 39%

Funding, Cont.  Task 3 Benefits Future Development,  Task is Completed Prior to Assessment Vote  District to Fund Up Front Costs  Will be Reimbursed if Assessment Vote is Passed  Tasks 4 & 5 Benefit Future Development  Tasks to Commence Following Secured Funding Source

Work Program Costs  District Share (39% of Work Program)  Task 1$ 8,500  Task 2$ 7,500  Task 3$45,000  Contingency$10,000  Total$70,000

Schedule  June 2008 through August 2008 – Water Purveyors Approve Work Program and Authorize Consultants to Proceed with Tasks 1 & 2  August 2008 through February 2009 – Completion of Task 3  March 2009 – County’s 2 nd Proposition Vote

Recommendations  Board to Approve Funding of Purveyors Basin Management Planning and Proposed Work Program in Accordance with the ISJ Agreement

Questions