Social Work Chronologies June 2014 Pauline Morris.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faculty of Health & Social Care Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews Wendy Rose and Julie Barnes.
Advertisements

A new inspection framework: The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children Jacky Tiotto Divisional Manager Social Care Inspection Ofsted.
Safeguarding Children Across Services: Messages from Research on Identifying and Responding to Child Maltreatment Authors: Carolyn Davies and Harriet Ward.
 Nationally Children’s Services work within a legislative framework. Two pivotal pieces of legislation are the Children Act 1989 and the Children and.
New Halton Levels of Need Framework Denise Roberts – Deputy Designated Nurse Mark Grady – Principal Children’s Officer.
The Children Act 1989/2004.  To discuss the background to the Children Act  To identify the key principles of the Children Act 1989  To discuss.
Serious Case Reviews – key recommendations Clare Kershaw Lead Strategic Commissioner – Standards and Excellence.
Learning from Serious Case Reviews Child B.
Donna Monk MAPPA Co-ordinator.  Understand the purpose and function of MAPPA  Understand the language and terminology of MAPPA  Explore the framework.
Safeguarding children in Essex- making a difference together
Multi Agency Inspection Briefings 27 th & 28 th March 2013 Meena Kishinani Divisional Director Strategic Commissioning and Safeguarding.
TRANSITION Correct as at March 2015
VHA Training for Staff Who Provide Information on Advance Directives and Assistance with Completing Advance Directives.
Lancashire Assessment and Planning Framework Victoria Gent.
Child Trafficking: The Glasgow Response Moira McKinnon Principal Officer Child Protection Team Glasgow City Council Social Work
GIRFEC An Overview for Schools
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Hertfordshire Single Assessment Process Briefing Sessions For Residential and Nursing Homes.
Overview of MASH MASH training. What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information)
Welcome. Suspicion, Disclosure and Discovery Helen Edwards Independent Safeguarding Advisor.
Getting it Right in West Lothian
Safeguarding Young People Barbara Williams Independent Chair of North Tyneside Local Safeguarding Children board.
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
Child Sexual Exploitation National Context Safeguarding Children And Young People from Sexual Exploitation, DCSF, 2009 Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation.
Assessment Improvement Maureen McEnaney Safeguarding & Review Manager Every Child Matters.
Early Help for Shropshire Children & Families Children’s Trust Area Forum.
CARE PROCEEDINGS REFORMS: An Overview Statutory Guidance and Public Law Outline Training.
ALL WALES PROCEDURES FOR PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE ADULTS.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
Framework for the Inspection of services for children in need of help and protection, children looked after and care leavers. Gani Martins Assistant Director.
Serious Case Reviews Local Lessons & Actions
Understanding Need and Risk. GIRFEC History and Background –Numerous policies relating to Multi-Agency working Principles –Co-ordinated Support for Families.
Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies Conference 2006 Improving Care Through Accreditation- The Role of the NSW Children’s Guardian.
Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Scotland 1.
Safeguarding deaf children Messages from thematic inspections and surveys Pat O’Brien HMI National adviser for social work practice.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P11 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Assessing children’s.
Child Safeguarding in General Practice for Sessional GPs Dr D W Jones.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
Working in the family courts – a guardian’s perspective Court Skills Training for Social Workers Manchester Civil Justice Centre 20 November 2015 Presentation.
Measuring success in Domestic Violence Services MARAC Becky Rogerson Chief Officer.
Lessons learned from national and local experience. For all practitioners and managers working with children and the adults who care for them. Central.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P28 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Understanding cumulative.
Multi-Agency Case File Audits (MACFA) Learning Briefing Nicki Pettitt, Independent MACFA Auditor 18 th September 2015.
HSCB Inter-agency Child Protection Safeguarding Children Procedures Brenda McLaughlin Head of Child Protection.
Disclosure & record keeping February
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P12 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Assessing parental.
Solihull Safeguarding Learning Faculty Wednesday 4 November Sans Souci Joan McHugh- Development Manager SSAB Denise Lewis- Training and Development Officer.
Stronger FamiliesPhase /15 Phase /20 Stronger Families Programme DCLG Troubled Families Programme Identifying, tracking and supporting.
Dudley Children’s Services Multi-Agency Briefing Stefan Chapleo Helen Ellis 1.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Safeguarding Process and Decision
Thresholds Conference
Cardiff Partnership Board
The Children Act 1989 Allocates duties to local authorities, courts, parents and other agencies in the United Kingdom to ensure children are Safeguarded.
Care into practice: the legal framework
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Cafcass’ role in supporting delivery of the family justice reform
Chronology Guidance.
Case Management Module 2
Trilogy of Risk PowerPoint – Tips on how to use it
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Effective Support for Children & Families in Essex
Cardiff Partnership Board
JIM MCBRIDE & LIZ MCSHERRY
Review Care Act 2014 This overview forms part of the suite of learning materials that have been developed to support the implementation of part one of.
Inter-Agency Referral Discussion
The Early Help Assessment Journey
Class Name, Instructor Name
Presentation transcript:

Social Work Chronologies June 2014 Pauline Morris

Learning Objectives To establish the context for improvement To confirm practice expectations about content and use of chronologies To clarify what constitutes a significant event To clarify the use of a different chronology format for social work evidence statements To introduce the RAG rated chronology concept

Context: Common Audit Findings Where chronologies are considered ‘good’ they portrayed a child/YPs journey/experience Some chronologies have key information missing. Significant events did not always indicate outcome Some chronology entries detail unnecessary SW tasks and/or processes Excessive and unfocussed entries detract from identifying and understanding a child’s journey

What is a Chronology? A chronology: Provides a prompt, concise; factual, visual outline of significant events/information Is completed in date order Highlights significant changes in a child’s life Summarises outcomes relating to significant events Helps to understand the impact on the child Contributes to risk assessment and informs decision making through all stages of the child’s journey Is based on a study of recorded information, and in social work practice its overall purpose is to support the analysis of the history of a case

Context: Revised PLO and Pre Proceedings: Was endorsed and became statute; effective April 2014 Documents filed within Legal Proceedings are restricted to a core bundle (unless Court requests further documents) All documents need to be succinct & focused on relevant details Specific emphasis on Impact and Analysis rather than narrative Whilst cases often have extensive complex histories, a Chronology must primarily refer to the past two years Chronologies should be a summary of events: with significance to the child highlighted All unnecessary detail should be avoided If an historical significant event continues to have current relevance, then this should also be included.

Why do we need a Chronology? Keeps the ‘child in mind’, at the ‘front & centre’ of our thinking Helps identify risk, emerging /established themes in child’s life Identifies connections amidst intergenerational patterns of behaviour Helps explore trends that facilitate predictions and analysis Helps understand what is significant to a child/YP and why? Facilitates identification of chronic neglect Enables us to share concise summaries of concerns with the child, family, partner agencies and the court Provides a ‘pen picture’ of each child to enhance prompt familiarity with the child’s journey With the ‘child in mind’ it provides a ‘story board’ for each child to view if they wish to do so when they reach maturity to enhance their ability to try to understand their particular journey

RAG Rating Significant Events: RAG rating: RED: used to indicate periods of High risk AMBER: used to indicate Medium – high risk GREEN: used to indicate low/no risk but where event is still significant to a child (i.e. relocation or school transfer) When colour coded, the level of risk within the child’s ‘journey’ is easier to identify.

Significant Events – helpful tips Focus on events and changes in circumstances that had a positive or negative impact on the child Only include a CP/LAC visit if something significant happened Don’t clutter up the chronology by copying and pasting case notes or including lists of dates of visits Multiple significant events may be grouped together eg: Between April – June 2012 there were 23 incidents of absconding which increased in frequency and duration each week, rather than listing all 23 separate incidents If events are significant they require a response – a chronology of incidents with no details of what was done raises questions about the SW involvement If there was no action, explain why not Where relevant, bring together information from a variety of sources and always identify the source Always reference other documents clearly All open cases should have an up to date chronology and this should be a priority if one is missing or out of date

What to include – this is not an exhaustive list! Family history, births, marriages, new partner, separations, bereavements, changes in household composition, employment/unemployment & homelessness Referral history & outcomes Evidence of engagement or non engagement with agencies Education, behaviour, exclusions admissions, missed appointments Domestic abuse incidents Substance misuse issues Criminal Justice activity, parents, carer or YP Statutory meeting i.e. ICPC/RCPC & outcome Periods subject to LAC process Missing episodes of child or family member Concerns Re suspected specific issues CSE or Trafficking History relating to violence including convictions for such Any concerns Re Vulnerable Adults CP enquiries & outcomes Court appearances, hearing and orders Key management decisions and brief reasons Any other relevant concerns or positive improvements Sex Offender Registration – known to MAPPA or MARAC Disability, illness & mental health A&E attendance, hospital Relocations School changes