University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

Janet Bohrer Development Officer Development and Enhancement Group Student involvement in quality assurance processes of the QA agencies ENQA workshop.
Personal Development Plans (PDPs) Subject-specific PDPs in Economics.
HND Global Trade and Business Graded Units 1 and 2
QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Handbook for Academic Review Karen Czapiewski.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
1 ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT IT MEANS. 2 ORIGINS Dearing report 1997 Dearing report 1997 Proposals: Proposals: framework for qualifications and awards.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Registered charity numbers and SC Research, Development.
QAA-HEA Education for Sustainable Development Guidance Document Consultation 5 November 2013, Birmingham Professor James Longhurst Assistant Vice Chancellor.
UK Quality Code Guide: Further Education & Colleges The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Registered charity numbers and SC
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
The International Postgraduate Student Experience – QAA perspective Dr Laura Bellingham Research, Development and Partnerships Group UKCGE workshop Thursday.
Delivering Planning Education Now and in the Future Ruth Richards London South Bank University.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
The UK Quality Code for Higher Education Jenny Beaumont LTC February 2012.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Welcome Welcome and thank you for agreeing to become an External Examiner for Goldsmiths, University of London. Our External Examiners play an important.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM 2008 QAA Institutional Audit Features of good practice: the development, consistent use and presentation of the Strategy.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
QUALITY IN TEACHING & LEARNING – WHAT WORKS Anthony McClaran Chief Executive, QAA Tuesday 22 May 2012 HEPI Conference ( Higher Education Policy Institute)
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
1Induction for Subject External Examiners Nicola Clarke Academic Standards and Quality Assurance Manager.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Partnership Forum 2014 Welcome. What’s New in the QA Office? Two Dedicated Collaborative Provision Staff Tina Hagger – New Collaborative Provision
Embedding quality – a quality enhancement driven approach Jill Morgan Assistant Dean, Learning and Teaching, Quality Enhancement, School of Arts and Media.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Student Representation September 2013 Professor Patricia Price PVC: Student Experience and Academic Standards Cardiff University.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.
The UK Quality Code and Higher Education Reviews Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Catherine Kerfoot, Development Officer, QAA.
‘to safeguardthe public interest in sound standards of higher education qualifications and to inform and encourage continuous improvement in the management.
Monitoring and Evaluation Harvey Hurree David /londonmetuni londonmet.ac.uk.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND THE QUALITY SPIRAL. ETQAs + SAQA SAQA NQF.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
Recognition of Prior Learning for Individuals and Organisations Andy Gibbs October 2013.
DEVELOPMENTS IN UK QUALITY ASSURANCE Anthony McClaran Chief Executive, QAA June 2012.
Curriculum for Excellence update Current developments Trialling Response to feedback Exemplification and guidance Refinement and revision Recognition.
Quality Matters The role of the QAA and students in the assurance and enhancement of academic standards and the quality of learning opportunities Matthew.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Exploring chapter B7 of the UK Quality Code and what external examining means to Institutional Review (IRENI) The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Practice makes perfect? Implementing a whole university code of practice for placement learning Terry Dray Director of Graduate Advancement and Employer.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Quality and Standards An introduction.
The UK Quality Code and Chapter B9
Targeted Review of Qualifications: A Brief Primer
The view from the ‘regulator’
Responsibilities and engagement of an external examiner
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
External Examiner Reports
Quality Assurance and Enhancement
External Examiners Briefing Session Friday 14th December 2018
Validation and Periodic Programme Review Chairs and Panel Members
Validation Programme Developers
Presentation transcript:

University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide Maldwyn Buckland QAA Review Coordinator: REO, IQER & Access to HE

The UK Quality Code for Higher Education The UK Quality Code for Higher Education (the Quality Code) is used to assure the standards and quality of higher education in the UK and gives higher education providers a shared starting point for setting & maintaining the academic standards of their programmes assuring the quality of learning opportunities provided to students It is used by individual higher education providers to ensure students have a high quality educational experience It consists of a series of separate Chapters grouped into three parts further information:

What are the key features of the Quality Code ? the Quality Code sets out the formal Expectations that all UK higher education providers reviewed by QAA are required to meet it is the nationally agreed, definitive point of reference for all those involved in delivering higher education programmes all higher education providers reviewed by QAA must commit to meeting the Expectations that it sets out’ the Quality Code has three Parts (A, B & C) on standards, quality & information these are broken down into a series of Chapters which cover different aspects of higher education each Chapter sets out an Expectation for the topic and a series of Indicators that reflect sound practice 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code3

How has the Quality Code been developed? the Quality Code replaces the Academic Infrastructure (AI), the previous set of reference points developed by QAA in partnership with the higher education sector during 2009/10, QAA undertook an evaluation of the AI to reflect on its use, impact and effectiveness. Details of the evaluation can be found at: in response to findings, QAA developed proposals for the new Quality Code which were subject to public consultation from 14 th December 2010 to 1 st March Details about to consultation can be found at: the consultation was supported by four round table discussion events in January Consultation responses can be found at: M.Buckland/UK Quality Code417/07/2012

What is the purpose of the Quality Code? to assure the academic standards of UK higher education to assure the quality of the learning opportunities offered to students to promote continuous and systematic improvement in UK higher education to ensure that information about UK higher education is publicly available 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code5

How is the Quality Code used? Higher Education providers use the Quality Code to: help them set and maintain the academic standards of their programmes and awards assure and enhance the quality of learning opportunities provide information about higher education Student representatives & Students’ Unions can: use the code in discussion with their institution as it sets out the minimum expectations for the quality of learning opportunities provided Reviewers carrying out QAA reviews use the code as a: benchmark for judging whether an individual institution meets national expectations for academic standards and the quality of learning opportunities 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code6

What are Expectations? each Chapter of the Quality Code sets out a specific Expectation. these express key matters of principle that the sector has identified as important for assuring academic standards and quality they make clear what UK providers are required to do, what they expect of themselves and each other and what students and the public can therefore expect of all of them individual providers should be able to demonstrate they are meeting the Expectations effectively, through their own management and organisational processes 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code7

What are indicators? each Chapter of the Quality Code sets out a series of Indicators to help higher education providers meet the relevant Expectations these are actions or approaches that higher education providers have agreed reflect sound practice each Indicator is accompanied by explanatory text which shows why it is important and suggests possible ways in which it might be addressed and demonstrated 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code8

Chapters: Part A Setting and maintaining threshold academic standards These Chapters cover the issues relevant to the setting and maintaining of academic standards A1: The national level A2: The subject & qualification level A3:The programme level A4: Approval and review A5: Externality A6: Assessment of achievement of learning outcomes 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code9

Chapters: Part B Assuring and enhancing academic quality These Chapters cover the issues relevant to ensuring that the quality of learning opportunities meets expectations and is continually being improved B1: Programme design and approval B2: Admissions B3: Learning and Teaching B4: Student support, learning resources and careers education, information, advice & guidance B5: Student engagement B6: Assessment of students and accreditation of prior learning B7: External examining B8: Programme monitoring and review B9: Complaints and appeals B10: Management of collaborative arrangements B11: Research degree 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code10

Chapters: Part C Information about higher education provision This shorter Part is not subdivided into Chapters. It addresses how providers make available information that is fit for purpose, accessible and trustworthy Chapter B10: Management of collaborative arrangements Dates for consultation Cardiff: Tuesday 2 nd October Marriott Hotel Cardiff Belfast: Thursday 4 th October Queens University Belfast Manchester: Tuesday 9 th October Mercure Hotel Manchester London: Friday 12 th October Woburn House London Edinburgh: Tuesday 16 th October Apex Hotel Edinburgh 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code11

Factors for success in raising standards in teaching & learning QAA defines the standards of high education provision through a series of indicators including the new Quality Cod, Subject Benchmark Statements and the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ) This triumvirate exists to ensure parity of the student experience at all levels confirming generic abilities regardless of the subject area. For example HNC students should have basic problem solving skills, while BE students must demonstrate analytical skills. Likewise, students studying the same subject must share a core body of knowledge, which Subject Benchmarks define In other words, every programme in the UK must attain minimum standards, however, there are standards within those standards 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code12

FHEQ The FHEQ states that degree programmes must be at the current boundaries of an academic discipline When discussing the raising of standards, enhancement of higher education must focus on the enrichment of staff as well as the provision In order to raise standards one has to: 1.Raise awareness about the minimum standard 2.Enable staff to determine where they are in relation to that minimum and …. 3.Acknowledge the need for, and facilitate staff in the constant updating of their specialist subject knowledge 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code13

Teaching & Learning For tutors to remain at the current boundaries of knowledge they must be constantly learning, which in turn, informs their teaching In the current climate of the student-driven market, we must all comprehend the breadth of the educational process and claim ownership There is little point in identifying the need for a programme, writing curriculum, devising assessment and moderating the grades unless one owns that process. Therefore to raise standards in Teaching & Learning we must ensure that: 1. staff have a complete and intimate knowledge of the process of teaching and learning so that they can… 2. apply their knowledge to their teaching 3. encourage staff to become learners as well as tutors to ensure awareness of the student experience 17/07/2012M.Buckland/UK Quality Code14