The MIDCAS Program is to be considered as one of the strategic components of the UAV Roadmap 2012 Health Monitoring ATOL Sense & Avoid Frequency Spectrum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATO FINAS Cdr Max Snow, Royal Navy Chairman, NATO FINAS
Advertisements

Project Cycle Management
Employability and Employer Engagement
EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
Timothy E. Gowen NATO Ad Hoc Airworthiness Group
1 UAS INTEGRATION & FREQUENCY SPECTRUM Mike Lissone EUROCONTROL UAS FOCAL POINT 2nd EU UAS PANEL WORKSHOP 2011 September , 2011.
The EDA approach to ATI. A European civil/military way ahead Brussels, 9th February 2012 Giampaolo LILLO, EDA Armaments Director.
Marc Deboeck ADQ Implementation Workshop 29 May 2013 Directorate Single Sky (SES) Support to CAA-NSA Single Sky Implementation Support to NSAs.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
Casa RPAS regulatory Development
COSCAP -NAApril direction générale de l ’Aviation civile 8th Steering Commitee meeting COSCAP- NA (Beijing, April 2008) direction générale de l’Aviation.
Data-Sharing and Governance Consultation ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES.
Making Sense of the WIC EBT IAPD IAPD Session of the 2014 WIC EBT User Group Meeting July 23, :00 AM to 12:00 PM Presented by Cheryl Owens, MAXIMUS.
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
16 March 2015 Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation Jordan Response Plan 2015.
International Civil Aviation Organization Unmanned Aircraft Systems International Standards Progress Leslie Cary Secretary UAS Study Group Technical Officer,
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
International Civil Aviation Organization Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology (Bangkok,
1 ENISA’s contribution to the development of Network and Information Security within the Community By Andrea PIROTTI Executive Director ENISA Cyprus, 28.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
David Bowen Head of ATM Operations and Systems
Why we should manage projects professionally Better outcomes (benefit & risk) Better decision-making Better management of expectations More efficient.
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
6 April Research for a secure Europe Christiane BERNARD European Commission - DG Enterprise and Industry Athens.
WMO Blue Peace - Water Security in the Middle East: Strategic Management of Hydrological and Meteorological Data and Information Product Generation Al-Hamndou.
1 CAA Offshore Helicopter Review Mark Swan Group Director, Safety and Airspace Regulation.
Rev. 0 CONFIDENTIAL Mod.19 02/00 Rev.2 Mobile Terminals S.p.A. Trieste Author: M.Fragiacomo, D.Protti, M.Torelli 31 Project Idea Feasibility.
1 EUROCAE EUROCAE Dedicated to Aviation Standardisation ASAS Standards: “From concept to equipment” David Bowen (Technical Secretary) April 24 th 2007.
3rd ASAS TN Workshop 19 April – 21 April rd ASAS TN Workshop Session 4: Strategy and Implementation Package I Requirements Focus Group (“Rapid.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
10/18/20151 Coordination and Partnership is the management of interdependencies between activities 10/18/20152.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Safety Management in Europe European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Dr. Erik Merckx EUROCONTROL Directorate ATM Programmes Head of Business.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Defense Information Systems Agency A Combat Support Agency E3 Engineering Division 13 December 2011 Defense Information Systems Agency A Combat Support.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
ENAV S.p.A. 1 AENA / ENAV / DFS / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Malmoe, ASAS /ADS-B: SAMPLE ANSPs STRATGIES & EXPECTATIONS.
SSAP The European Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP) The History & Rationale.
Certification Considerations for the Implementation of ASAS Applications on Aircraft Kevin Hallworth: UK CAA ASAS-TN Seminar – October 2004.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
Flygteknik 2010 Oct 19 MIDCAS – Sense and Avoid for UAS Bengt-Göran Sundqvist, Saab AB.
1 From Planning to Implementation. 2 Aviation Needs ECIP Institutional Arrangements EATM Programmes Implementation & Operations Europe wide Planning LCIPs.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
GEO Implementation Mechanisms Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
“AIRborne information for Emergency situation Awareness and Monitoring” AIRBEAM Project Kaci Bourdache.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Signalling Programme External Stakeholder Meeting on September 17, 2009.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Sri Lanka's Experience with ICAO TCB Projects
Loftur Jónasson, ICAO 11 March 2013
Safety Management in Europe
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
1 Million+ UAS Registrations
The Single European Sky Implementation Programme: SESAME
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
COSCAP – SOUTH ASIA 19th MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
ESF Evaluation Plan England
Portfolio, Programme and Project
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
INTEGRATION OF DRONES IN NON SEGREGATED AIR SPACE
Presentation transcript:

The MIDCAS Program is to be considered as one of the strategic components of the UAV Roadmap 2012 Health Monitoring ATOL Sense & Avoid Frequency Spectrum Allocation UAV Crew Licence Security CNS/ATM Airworthiness Certification MIDCAS … MIDCAS and EDA proposed MIDCAS and EDA proposed strategic objectives 2012 The objective of the MIDCAS program is to solve the critical sense&avoid issue and, hereby, together with other activities, enable the operation of UAVs in non-segregated airspace.

The MIDCAS demonstrator MID Air Collision Avoidance System for UAV Systems Control Station MIDCAS Flight Control System Separation provision Avoid function Module Imminent risk Collision avoidance Air vehicle performances model (if needed) Data link (ground terminal) Ground Air vehicle Cooperative sensors (TCAS, ADS-B) Non-cooperative sensors (radar, EO/IR, …) Data processing “intruders mapping” Sense function module Data link (air terminal) Non-imminent risk Analysis & decision Intruders position Semi Automatic flight mode Inputs (heading/altitude) Separation assistance

MIDCAS Overview Start of work : 2008 Duration : 4 years Value : To be negotiated Technical Input : EDA R&T “Demonstration study on Sense & Avoid technologies for long-endurance UAV” National studies from Participating Nations Technical Output : Deliverables open to all pMS and UAV stakeholders to provide the technical back-up needed for the establishment of a Sense & Avoid standard. A Sense & Avoid technological demonstrator that will enable the use of UAV Systems in non-segregated airspace

Status of Countries April 2008 : FR, ok. SE, ok - government check before signing PA. GE, proposal on the program content, discussions initiated. IT, expressed interest, has requested clarification from EDA in order to avoid duplication. SP, recently asked for information about the current program status and possibilities to participate.

Ad hoc category B “Join in” conditions 1/ Demonstrated know-how and expertise on technological aeronautical skills directly applicable in the “Sense & Avoid” area, 2/ Contributing Members are committed, in 2008, to a minimum budget of 10 M€ during the 4 years period of the program (This budget might be mixed Gov/Ind). 3/Agree and respect basic MIDCAS IPR principles.

MIDCAS Basic IPR Principles list of deliveries Class 1 System level (mid-air collision avoidance) outputs Project progress synthetic data CONOPS & ATM compatibility Mid-air collision requirements Mid-air collision system architecture Operational procedures Performance assessment through simulation and demonstration (& associated environmental conditions) Safety analysis results Human factor study results MIDCAS system features (for integration purposes) Class 2 (MIDCAS eyes only) All other deliverable outputs Justification of the system level output

Class 1 (open to all UAV stakeholders) Feeding the regulatory & standardisation bodies with pertinent inputs To obtain their feedback To ensure consistency of the MIDCAS project with ongoing standardisation works To allow CAAs to prepare information for the manned aviation community Informing the aviation community (manned & unmanned) pilots &ATC associations, airlines… To make them aware of the proposed system solutions (transparency) To obtain their feedback Class 2 (MIDCAS eyes only) All other deliverable outputs MIDCAS Basic IPR Principles delivery purposes

01/08 09/0703/08 Programme definition & convergence (industries & pMS) Outline Description Form Submitted to EDA 06/08 Programme Arrangement preparation EDA Steering Board approval Silence procedure EDA contract award no later than fall 08 EDA R&T study Contract preparation Project Presentation to EDA by initiating pMS Project Presentation to NAD Steering Board EDA ad hoc category B process Presentation to potential European Participants 06/07 Programme set up at EDA 09/08 CONTRACTAWARDCONTRACTAWARD

+ Totally in line with EDA intentions for UAV-traffic insertion and development + Visibility and leverage relative airworthiness agencies + Visibility and leverage relative major stakeholders + IPR rules and contract template are in place + No money across borders + MoU in place EDA as contracting agency

MIDCAS contacts Tomas Eriksson Program Manager MIDCAS Joint Materiel Command – FMV Régis Brigaud Head of the UAS management department DGA/DSA/UM MID/UAS