DASHBOARDS FOR DISTRICT-LEVEL PROBLEM SOLVING Julie Q. Morrison, External Evaluator Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative Presentation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.

Advertisements

D EVELOPING & S UPPORTING L EADERSHIP T EAMS TO E NGAGE IN A CADEMIC AND B EHAVIORAL PROBLEM - SOLVING Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Clark Dorman, Ed. S.

The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.

Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)

Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.

Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM

1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.

UNA’S QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN RESEARCH LITERACY IMAGINE... INVESTIGATE... COMMUNICATE Building Success through Discovery.

Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.

Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2011

PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.

Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010

Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.

Pat Mueller David Merves October 6, 2008 NH RESPONDS Evaluation Component.

A District Model for Integrated RtI Systems Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Shawnee Mission, KS Steve Goodman Michigan’s.

SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION

Designing and Implementing Evaluation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob HornerHolly Lewandowski University of Oregon Illinois State Board of.

Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.

Response to Intervention in School Improvement Plans Macomb ISD April, 2011.

Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.

Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.

Scaling up and sustaining an integrated behavior and reading schoolwide model of supports November 18, 2008.

School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.

Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.

A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.

Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.

Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.

Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.

Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.

Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.

Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.

Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /

Collecting and Analyzing Student Behavior Data Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey Morris University of Oregon.

NASDSE November 14, 2006 Margaret McGlinchey Kim St. Martin.

1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.

ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.

Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.

State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.

Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.

Edit the text with your own short phrases. The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.

District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.

Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.

Three Levels of Project Evaluation SPDG Evaluators PLC Anna Harms December 11, 2012.

PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.

Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.

Deepening Knowledge: MiBLSi Online Modules Melissa Nantais April 2014 Technology PLC.

MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.

Process Level Evaluation of Internal Productivity, Communication, and Collaboration SIGnetwork Grant Management PLC Anna Harms March 26, 2012.

LSSU Assessment Timeline Phase I (Completed by December 2009) –Create Institutional Assessment Structure –Create Department Assessment Teams –Write College.

1 Steve Goodman Director, MiBLSi July 2015

Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.

TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.

MiData Innovation in Data Collection and Analysis March, 2014

Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment

School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October

Pre-Reading Assignment

Application to Participate in LEA and MIBLSI Partnership

Linking Communication Protocols

Module 1: Introduction to Terminology and Implementation Research

Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)

Data Coordination in Action

RDQ 6 Designing, Conducting and Reporting PBIS Evaluation Discussion Leaders: Rob Horner, University of Oregon, Jake Olsen, California State University.

SPDG/SSIP TA Alignment, Implementation & Evaluation

Model Demonstration Projects

Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.

Planning & Evaluating Evidence-Based Professional Development SPDG National Meeting 10/5/2017 Andrew Schaper Scott Ross.

Module 3: Implementation

Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist

Presentation transcript:

DASHBOARDS FOR DISTRICT-LEVEL PROBLEM SOLVING Julie Q. Morrison, External Evaluator Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative Presentation at the SPDG National Meeting Washington, DC October 9-10, 2014

Presentation Overview I. The Context: MiBLSi and the Need for a Comprehensive, Interactive Database II. The MiBLSi Database: Four Unique Features III. The MiBLSi District Dashboard IV. The Process and Logistics of Developing a Dashboard

The Context Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative (MiBLSi) is funded by the Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Michigan’s State Personnel Development Grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.

MiBLSi’s Mission Statement To develop capacity to scale-up an integrated behavior and academic MTSS model that can be implemented with fidelity, endures over time and utilizes data-based decision making at all levels of implementation support

The MiBLSi Database The MiBLSi Database includes district dashboards that aggregate school-level information for use during problem-solving sessions.

What are District Dashboards? District dashboards were built to align with a specific set of data analysis questions and action planning steps to help districts continuously improve implementation of MTSS to maximize positive student outcomes.

What are District Dashboards? District dashboards were designed to streamline data collection and analysis so that teams can spend more time developing meaningful plans to identify celebrations and address areas of need.

Four Unique Features of MiData Feature #1 Dashboards and reports are designed for alignment with MiBLSi’s data review process at the school, district, and ISD levels.

Four Unique Features of MiData Feature #2 MiData offers a place to enter and analyze capacity and fidelity data not hosted in any other system.

Implementation Fidelity and Systems Capacity Data Incorporated in MiData Implementation Fidelity Measures: Planning and Evaluation Tool for Effective School-wide Reading Programs (PET-R) School-wide Evaluation Tool for Secondary Literacy (SWEPT) School-Wide Evaluation Tool for Reading-Self- Assessment (SWETR-S) System Capacity Measures: District Capacity Assessment (DCA) Intermediate Unit Capacity Assessment (IUCA)

Four Unique Features of MiData Feature #3 MiData creates a single point of entry (school-level) that aggregates data up to the district, ISD, and state levels.

Four Unique Features of MiData Feature #4 The MiData dashboards are based on principles for effective display of data and information processing, combined with repeated cycles of usability testing.

The MiBLSi District Dashboard Tabs 1. Reach 2. Reading/Engagement 3. Behavior Outcome 4. Reading Fidelity 5. Behavior Fidelity 6. Capacity 7. Context

Domain 1. Reach

Domain 2. Reading/Engagement

Domain 3. Behavior Outcome

Domain 4. Reading Fidelity

Domain 5. Behavior Fidelity

Domain 6. Capacity

Domain 7. Context

The Process and Logistics of Developing a Dashboard Content Knowledge/ Expertise Technical Design Expertise Capacity & Competent Usage Usability Testing

Contact Information Julie Morrison, Ph.D. University of Cincinnati College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services School of Human Services, School Psychology Program