WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
Advertisements

WLTP Validation 2 Assessment Criteria WLTP-DTP
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-061
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-053 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi WLTP-DTC
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests WLTP IWG at Geneva in June JAPAN WLTP-11-20e.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
Audi AG EA-52 Draft Vers WLTP Validation 2 Evaluation Issues ACEA Guidance Document after Bern.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-088 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by DHC Secretary the 18 th DHC meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 th Jun.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory JAPAN NTSEL OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
1 Discussion paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2 Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group November 2011 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-108.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-034 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests at WLTP Tokyo IWG in 2015 JAPAN WLTP-12-15e.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP validation test results for BEV(i-MiEV) & OVC-HEV (Prius PHV)
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
WLTP-14-15e Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-14-15e) 14th WLTP IWG 26 April 2016.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 11/11/2018.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
R101 amendment Proposal from German
Open issues 3 bis12, 20, 25, 26 bis, 30, 31 and 33 O.I. 12 (EV) :
Positions on open points WLTP DTP subgroup LabProcICE
Annex8  ( ) CD-CS break-off criteria Proposal from Japan with ACEA Comments ( )
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
WLTP DTP Lab Process EV sub group
Submitted by the expert from OICA
ACEA Comments from ACEA still does not understand the reasoning for this proposal. This proposal increases the test burden disproportionally.
OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
Mode selectable switch
Proposal EV/PHEV/HEV/FCV Lab Process Sub-Group
1. Summary # items RESULTS status remarks EV_1 HEV system power
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
ACEA Comments from ACEA welcomes the idea to develop a shortened range test procedure based on MCT However, ACEA does not support JP proposal.
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-11e
Proposed actions for gtr development
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Problem with Rcda and suggestions for them
Analysis for WLTP UF development
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-028
Japanese position Emission compliance In each cycle
Discussion document on Mode Construction
E-lab group’s suggestion for the development of Utility Factors
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
Palais des Nations, Geneva
OIL# 52: End of PEV range criteria
Proposal for optional procedure of All Electric Range test (BEV)
Presentation transcript:

WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi

Open issues Color means state of each issue on Open issue list 17 open Issues are To be discussed 2 (UF, Battery charging time) =>To be discussed during V2 Depends on new cycle 1 ( AE city for Low speed EV) => To be discussed during V2 Depends on Validation results 5 (ex,EV range, CD /CS test,)=>TBD after V2 Follow ICE group 3 (R/L, multi gear box, Runin mileage ) 1. gtr draft study (to be reported by drafting coordinator) 2.Preparation for Validation Phase 2 Test matrix:ACEA-LabProc-EV-TestMatrix_VP2_ Test guidance:WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-065_Parameter_for_Validation2_V2.ppt State of E-lab sub group activity from DTP #9 in April

Proposed actions for gtr development E-Lab action Validation 2 Confirmation Round Robin test sequence WLTC completed Validation 2 Round Robin Draft gtr2 Modify gtr reflection [ Background ] 1. Draft gtr 1 is the portion exclude Validation phase Some of open issues need to be evaluated during the validation program. 3. Draft gtr 2 is reflected the result of Validation 2. Parameter set Short V1 Draft gtr1 Procedure for V2 Confirmation Road map will be revised

Preparation Validation Phase 2 in JAPAN Test vehicles Schedule

Day 1Day 2 (EV: Day 1)Day 3 (EV: Day 2) Consideration items on E-Lab. Gr. Battery condition [Ah} Precondition Pre-con cycle Soak 2 Options 12~36hr 6hr 25+/-2 Confirm tire pressure Prepare RCB measurement Discharge CS cold Charge sustaining (CS) mode test (cold) Full charge max. 12 hr ⊿E⊿E within 1hr Plug OFF CD mode×n Charge depleting (CD) mode test CS hot Soak 12~36 hr ⊿E⊿E AER EAER RCDR Full charge Charging voltage 100 / 200V (PL12) End of charge criteria (PL1) Order of CD/CS (PL4) Interruption condition (PL5) RCB break off criteria (PL2/9) Termination condition for EV range (PL6/7) Charge sustaining (CS) mode test (hot) Prepare RCB measurement CO2/FC calculation (PL8/10) Performance of Watt-hour meter, Am-meter (PL3) Multi mode gear box (PL11) ◆ Test flow (independent test for L/M/H/ExH) *) EAER: Equivalent All Electric Range *) RCDR: Charge Depleting Range *) NEC: Net Energy Change = RCB * nominal voltage of RESS *) RCB: RESS Charge Balance (=SOC) *) RESS: Rechargeable energy storage system *) AER: All Electric Range

OVC - HEV Number of test ※ No.7: Impossible to conduct due to a lot of tests

Appendix: RCB Compensation Discharge(+) Charge(-) CO2/Fuel consumption/Additional pollutants) 0 ∆RCB (Ah) Cycle StartEnd EU) ECE101 Annex8 Start ±x%of fuel energy? OIL No.27 RCB correction criteria NOVC - HEV Number of test

BEV Number of test ※ No.7: Impossible to conduct due to a lot of tests

Appendix : Open issues Green color means “agreed or deleted” White color means “to be discussed “. Yellow color means “ to be evaluated in Validation phase 2”. Blue color means “proposed”.

Proposal Step 3 Charge Sustaining Mode Unknown SOC operation switch initial discharge pre-conditioningSoak time Charge sustaining test Charging OIL No.8 Charging method EVn/a ConsumptiontestOILNo.2 Charging time: OIL No.9 Condition: OIL No.7 end of charge :OIL No.10,10bis OVC HEV without OIL No.14 discharge condition MR follow ICE follow ICE OIL No.26,27 RCB correction Ex; correct emission? With NOVC HEV Without n/a follow ICE follow ICE n/a with Cold start of ICE Charging Condition Battery [Ah] Performance of Watt-hour meter, Am-meter OIL No.15,16,17 Validation test

Proposal Step 3 Charge Sustaining Mode (bis) OIL.10bis Charge complete Plug off Test start (OIL10) 1hr End of charge criteria Validation test

Proposal Step4 Charge Depleting Mode operation switch charging after CS test Charge depleting test/EV range test OILNo.11Interruption Condition Charging EVn/a Test termination Condition OIL No.12 Stop Condition OILNo.13 Same as Step3 OVC HEV without refer to step3 RCB break off criteria: OIL No.25& 25bis Deceleration condition; OIL No.13bis EAER determination OIL No.21 To be discussed based on validation result. Same as Step3 with NOVC HE V without n/a n/a n/a with Test 1Test 2 CO 2 RCDA calculated with k factor Driving cycle [/] All Electric Range Equivalent All Electric Range Charge Depleting Range RCDA Fully Charged Recharging 12h max Charging Condition [Ah] Alternative (in case of CD test has to be retested) : ICE precondition ing at chronologica l separation from step 1 and 2 Recharge 12h max First start of ICE Test n (transcient) Test n+1 (needed for calculations) 36h soak max 1h max from plug off charge and start of CD CO 2 hot CSCO 2 Transcient CO 2 avg CD Spak time+battery charge OIL.No31 Low power vehicle What is Low power vehicle? How to validate? To be raised DTP level

Proposal Step5: Calculation Operation switch Pollutants Fuel Consumption Electric Energy Range RCB(DC) Chaege Duration others AEREAERRcdaRcdcAERcity EVn/a applicable n/a Applicabl e OVC HEV Without applicable Applicable With NOVC HEV Without applicable n/a With Pollutants : CO2/Fuel Consumption : Range : Detailed calculation formula is developed based on validation test results.

Proposal Appendix: Utility Factor Operation switchUtility Factor EVWithoutn/a OVC HEV With (incl. pure EV) OIL. No.1 SAE method is acceptable. But to get the traffic data of all country is too difficult. Political issue what should be discussed in DTP meeting. With (no pure EV) Without NOVC HEV With (incl. pure EV) n/a With (no pure EV) Without OVC range (km) Utility Factor JPN US (EU) US: SAE J1711 with US data JPN: SAE J1711 with JPN data EU: CS weight is 25km (fixed) OIL No.1: WLTP UF SAE 1711 with Opt.1) based on reagional data Opt.2) based on worldwide data To be discussed later stage

Annex: Open issue list 1

Open issue list2

Open issue list3

Open issue list4

Open issue list5

Open issue list 6