The FY 2006 New Starts Report Responding to the Demand for Transit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smart Growth Makes Money: Transit Oriented Development.
Advertisements

FTA’s Small Starts Program Charlotte, North Carolina October 11, 2007.
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager 2011 MN State Planning Conference September 29, 2011.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Economic Development Benefit/Cost Transit Slides.
Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension Transportation Project Advancement Agreement City Council Study Session December 4, 2014.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Presented by Economic and Tax Revenue Outlook Mark Zandi Economy.com, Inc.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
1 SAFETEA-LU Major Public Transportation Provisions of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Federal.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
THE PRESIDENT’S FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET REQUEST Federal Transit Administration.
MTF Rail Development Forum
North Shore Connector Cost-Benefit Study of Extending Pittsburgh Light Rail Transit to the North Shore Parshwanath Adiraja Dan Concepcion Nicolas Zitelli.
Broward Transformation: 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan mpo.org.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Public Transit in Sacramento
Chris Roy May 18,  135 Publically Owned Airports  Approximately 150 state owned Navigational Aids  34,000,000 Passengers  7,100 Registered Aircraft.
FasTracks Moving Forward: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment Staff Recommendation Phillip A. Washington and Team August 7, 2012.
Case Study 3 — New Rail Starts: Seattle Monorail & LRT Britta Stein Justin Scott Wenteng Ma.
FY2007 New Starts Annual Report & Introduction To Discussions New Starts/Small Starts Listening Session and Seminar San Francisco, CA February 15-16, 2006.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
Speed and Acceleration. Vocabulary DefinitionIllustration 3 Examples3 Non-examples VocabularyWord SpeedSpeed VelocityVelocity AccelerationAcceleration.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Northern Lights Express High Speed Rail: MN APA Conference September 2011.
Staying Positive: Responding to Transit Critics Eron H. Linn Federal Relations Manager Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) 1.
The State of the Public Transportation Industry Flora Castillo APTA Chair Board Member, NJ TRANSIT April 22, 2013.
QGET -- Scenarios Analysis Quality Growth Efficiency ToolsNovember 14, 1998 November 15, 1999 Strategy Analysis Prepared for: Envision Utah Prepared by:
1 Program of Projects Study The Impacts of Regional Transit Investment Forum March 21, 2013 Move LA - "LA's Got Lines"
Peaking phase Falling phase Rising phase Bottoming phase Q U.S. office clock (overall) Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Los Angeles, Miami Dallas, San.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Portland Streetcar CONNECTING PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS THE PORTLAND EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED STREETCARS THE PORTLAND EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
MAP-21: Impacts to New Starts and Small Starts Senate Transportation Finance and Policy Committee Mark W. Fuhrmann Program Director, New Starts February.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
LYNX FY2011 and FY2012 Budget Considerations Orange County Board of County Commissioners Linda S. Watson LYNX Chief Executive Officer February 23, 2010.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
New Starts/Small Starts and BRT: An Update APTA Bus Conference Seattle, WA May 5, 2009.
1 MetropolitanCouncil Transit CapitalImprovement ProgramOctober 22, 2008.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
New Starts/Small Starts Workshop APTA’s Legislative Conference March 14, 2007.
The most valuable natural resource in the 21st century is brains. Forbes Magazine Revision
Initiated the discussions that led to Measure R on the November 2008 ballot:  a ½ cent sales tax increase to raise $40 billion for LA County transportation.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Regional Transit Study Final Recommendations March 15, 2010.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
1 New Starts Dialogue Welcome to the FTA Webinar March 21, 2005 Jennifer L. Dorn FTA Administrator.
San Diego Trolley. Current Current/future expansion Propose extension.
Federal Funding Challenges and Opportunities David Vozzolo Vice President National Transit Planning and Project Development.
New Starts/Small Starts Program APTA Legislative Conference Washington, DC March 12, 2008.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS MAG Commuter Rail Strategic Plan Transportation Policy Committee December 12, 2007.
Regional Transit Framework Study Regional Council September 24, 2008.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Program “In the ground ready”
Regional Roads Committee
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager
Transit Systems Planning
Durham and Orange Transit Plan Funding Needs
Portland Economic Update Assn. of Financial Professionals
United States & Puerto Rico
Presentation transcript:

The FY 2006 New Starts Report Responding to the Demand for Transit

2 Overview of New Starts Program A Federal, state and local transportation partnership to improve mobility, promote economic growth, relieve congestion, and improve air quality Discretionary, competitive program Average Federal New Starts share: 50% $1.5 billion program requested in FY 2006 Grown steadily from $440 million in 1991 (340%) Funds new and extensions to existing “fixed guideway” systems Light rail, subway/heavy rail, commuter rail, bus rapid transit Projects are evaluated and rated by FTA For entry into Preliminary Engineering For entry into Final Design Prior to Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) And annually for the New Starts Report Projects are funded through multi-year FFGAs

3 An FFGA is a “Contract” Between the Federal Government and a Project Sponsor Assures predictable, multi-year Federal financial support for a specific project (subject to appropriation) Formally defines the project, including scope, cost and schedule; Establishes a maximum level of Federal financial assistance; Establishes the terms and conditions of Federal financial participation.

4 New Starts Partnerships Will Help Meet the Growing Demand for Transit Communities throughout the Nation want more transit FTA’s rigorous evaluation and oversight ensure that these investments deliver value for the taxpayer dollar People all over the country will benefit from the proposed New Starts investments

5 Communities Want More Transit FTA has evaluated and rated 27 projects for this New Starts Report All are locally-selected projects All are in preliminary engineering or final design Only projects seeking more than $25 million in Federal New Starts funding Additional 7 projects are exempt from FTA evaluation

6 Proposed Projects Are …Located Throughout the Country

7 …In Urban Areas of all Sizes 54% of projects in cities with less than 2 million population 46% of projects in cities with over 2 million population 34% over 5 million population < 1 million 1-2 million 2-5 million > 5 million Projects by Population Size

8 …For a Variety of Transit Modes 50 percent of evaluated projects are light rail About 20 percent are commuter rail 15 percent are heavy rail projects 3 bus rapid transit and one monorail project Light rail Commuter Rail Heavy Rail Monorail Bus Rapid Transit

9 Communities Want New Transit for Many Reasons Ease congestion in major travel corridors Connect people to jobs Support community economic and housing development goals Protect air quality Create more travel choices

10 FTA Ensures that Projects Deliver Value for Taxpayers Maximize transportation and economic benefits of Federal investments Ensure every project delivers ridership results Ensure that project costs and schedules are realistic Maintain Program Integrity and Good Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars

11 FTA’s Evaluation and Rating Process Among Most Rigorous in Government FTA evaluates and rates proposed projects annually for New Starts Report and at critical stages of project development Congress established a multiple measure approach to project evaluation 3 Finance factors Proposed State and local share Capital finance plan Operating finance plan 2 Project Justification factors Cost-effectiveness (cost per hour of travel time benefits) Land use

12 Larger Investments Must Produce More Benefits

13 New Starts is a Highly Competitive Program Only about 15 percent of 287 projects authorized in TEA-21 have made it to the finish line thus far Of 27 projects evaluated for this New Starts Report 2 Highly Recommended 12 Recommended 8 Not Recommended 5 Not Rated

14 Evaluation Results – 27 Projects Highly Recommended (2) New York, LIRR East Side Access Comm. Rail* New York, Second Ave Subway HRT** Recommended (12) Phoenix, AZ, Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT* Charlotte, NC, South Corridor LRT* Pittsburgh, PA, North Shore Connector LRT* Washington Co, OR, Wilsonville to Beaverton Commuter Rail** San Diego, CA, Mid-Coast Extension LRT** San Francisco, CA, Central Subway HRT Denver, CO, West Corridor LRT** Boston, MA, Silver Line Phase III HRT Portland, OR, South Corridor LRT Dallas, TX, Northwest/Southeast MOS LRT** Salt Lake City, UT, Weber County to SLC Commuter Rail** Northern Virginia, VA, Dulles Corridor Extension to Wiehle Ave, HRT (PE) Not Recommended (8) Las Vegas, NV, Resort Corridor Downtown Monorail Extension Santa Clara, CA, Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Fort Collins, CO, Mason Transportation Corridor Hartford, CT, New Britain- Hartford Busway Tampa Bay, FL, Tampa Bay Regional Rail New Orleans, LA, Desire Streetcar Line Minneapolis, MN, Northstar Commuter Rail Philadelphia, PA, Schuylkill Valley MetroRail Not Rated (5) Raleigh, NC, Raleigh-Durham Regional Rail Los Angeles, CA, Exposition Corridor LRT Orange Co, CA, CenterLine LRT Miami, FL, North Corridor Metrorail Extension Norfolk, VA, Norfolk LRT *Anticipated FFGA/funding recommendation ** Among 6 projects that may be recommended for funding

15 FY 06 Budget Proposes Funding for 16 Current and up to 10 New Projects $635 Million for 16 Existing Full Funding Grant Agreements $590 Million for 4 Anticipated Full Funding Grant Agreements $158 Million for up to 6 additional projects Have received a “Recommended” or “Highly Recommended” rating Are currently in final design or are expected to be in final design by early 2005

16 10 New Projects Proposed for Funding are …Located in Every Region

17 …In Areas with High Population and Employment Growth Rates U.S. Census National Population Growth Rate Forecast NortheastWestSouth

18 …For A Variety of Transit Modes 6 Light Rail Projects Phoenix, AZ, (FFGA) Charlotte, NC, (FFGA) Pittsburgh, PA, North Shore Connector (FFGA) San Diego, CA, Mid-Coast Corridor Denver, CO, West Corridor Dallas, TX, Northwest/Southeast MOS 3 Commuter Rail Projects New York, NY, LIRR Eastside Access (FFGA) Washington County, OR, Wilsonville-Beaverton Commuter Rail Salt Lake City, UT, Weber County to Salt Lake Commuter Rail 1 Heavy Rail (Subway) Project New York, NY, Second Avenue Subway MOS