A generic risk assessment approach for multiple stressors & exposures Geoff Frampton, Guy Poppy, Jamie Sutherland Funded by Ecology & Evolutionary Biology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
Advertisements

UK 2010 Biodiversity Indicators EIONET Copenhagen 30 October 2007 James Williams Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough,
European wildlife is inextricably linked with agriculture, with 75% of animal and plant species associated with farmland. Conservation of this biodiversity.
Non GM Methods of Controlling Aphids in Cereals Lawrence Woodward.
Natural capital, ecosystem services and the UK dairy industry Les Firbank Firbank Ecosystems Ltd & University of Leeds.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
The Discovery Corridor Concept and its Applicability January 13/14, 2004 workshop St. Andrews Biological Station, St. Andrews, N.B.
Anne Fairbrother Branch Chief August 2003 Anne Fairbrother Branch Chief August 2003 Risk Characterization Branch.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
SRC willow and Miscanthus Two contrasting regions (SW England and E-Midlands) Existing data & generated new data to fill knowledge gaps 1. GIS-based suitability.
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
Agri-environmental indicators and GIS-based models - Instruments to assess sustainability of land use systems on regional level Karl-Otto Wenkel and Alfred.
Ecosystems – Joining things up in floodplains Cranfield University: Joe Morris, Tim Hess, Peter Leeds-Harrison, Paul Trawick, Helena Posthumus, Quentin.
Community-Led Biodiversity Monitoring in Kalahari Rangelands Example Proposal in Review Reading time / Query time on your topic ideas! Environmental Context.
Developing Biodiversity Indicators Measuring Conservation Impact at Global and Project Scales Valerie Kapos.
Environmental Risk Assessment Part II. Introduction Eventual goal of much environmental toxicology is ecological risk assessment (ERA) Developed as a.
Exploring the world of honeybees and bumblebees Dr Juliet Osborne Dept of Plant & Invertebrate Ecology Rothamsted Research Harpenden, UK.
Introduction Barn owls (Tyto alba) are the most widely distributed species of owls in the World, but their population is experiencing a decline in Pennsylvania.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Understanding the basics of organic gardening Garden Education Experiment October 1.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Implementing Conservation Measures to Reduce Impacts to Migratory Birds.
Partnership  excellence  growth Vulnerability: Concepts and applications to coral reef-dependent regions (Work in progress) Allison Perry.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
Rural Development Plan for England (RDPE) – improving the environment through agri-environment Rosie Simpson, Natural England.
CoastalZone.com The Use of Ecological Risk Assessments in a Watershed Level Context Thorne E. Abbott CoastalZone.com.
1 Bio-energy cropping systems Agro-environmental issues Madrid, 9/10 February 2006.
Vulnerability and adaptive capacity of biodiversity in Wales Dr Clive Walmsley Countryside Council for Wales.
Farmland and the Impact of Agriculture Northern Ireland Biodiversity: (All Photographs from Northern Ireland Biodiversity Strategy Proposals June 1999.
Evaluating GM crops and foods in the UK Sue Mayer GeneWatch UK
Schools Property Planning Competition 2013 “Waitara”
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Proposed Agriculture Courses Board of Education October 6, 2015.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity Indicator Refinement: What is the state of Indicator Science? 1. Overview of the Criterion 2. Review.
1 DoD Sustainable Ranges Initiative Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) Bruce Beard ODUSD(I&E) Land Trust Alliance Rally October.
Ecological impacts of genetically engineered crops: a case study of the Farm Scale Evaluations L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger University of Nebraska.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Goals, History and Background.  What is an “environmental issue”?  What are the basic causes of current environmental problems  What does it mean to.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
PSA 28: to secure a healthy natural environment for today and the future Air free from pollutants Sustainable water use Land and soils managed sustainably.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
Monitoring Programme. What is monitoring? Environmental monitoring is the systematic observation, measurement and calculation of the condition of the.
Why We Are Here Eric Lindstrom, Co-chair Interagency Ocean Observation Committee Great Lakes Industry Workshop June 21, 2011.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.
Prioritizing Weed Populations for Eradication International Weed Risk Assessment Workshop Perth, Australia September, 2007 By Gina Darin University of.
A world where biodiversity counts Matt Walpole UNEP-WCMC Cambridge, UK.
Indicator Relationships: A Conceptual Model Forest Amount Indicators 1 & 2 Spatial Arrangement Indicator 5 Protected Status Indicators 3 & 4 Distribution.
IDEAS Integrated Dynamic Environmental Assessment System Goal: Helping learning about catchments A) Tool to help B) Process to use the tool.
Quantitative Expertise at Rothamsted Research Computational and Systems Biology (CSYS) –
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
3rd EIONET workshop on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation EEA, 30 June 2009 SEBI 2010, climate change and connectivity Katarzyna Biała.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Land-use, water management andbiodiversity Land-use, water management and biodiversity Dr Ilya Maclean Environment & Sustainability Institute, University.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
RESULTS Cont’d EFFECTS OF CROPPING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON SOIL EROSION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE IN OKLAHOMA X-C. John Zhang USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research.
Agri-environmental indicators and GIS-based models - Instruments to assess sustainability of land use systems on regional level Karl-Otto Wenkel and Alfred.
Farmland wildlife.
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
Farmer preferences Elizabeth Mattison Anil Graves Alison Bailey
Desertification in Europe
Crop Production and Principles
EU 2010 biodiversity baseline
Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Luc Feyen
MAES EU Wide Ecosystem Assessment
Presentation transcript:

A generic risk assessment approach for multiple stressors & exposures Geoff Frampton, Guy Poppy, Jamie Sutherland Funded by Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Group School of Biological Sciences University of Southampton, UK

Background (1) Limitations of the Farm-Scale Evaluations (FSE) of genetically-modified herbicide-tolerant crops: Intensive monitoring, hence expensive (£5.5 million) Monitoring unfocused, hence inefficient use of resources Can we optimize targeting of the monitoring resources to where they are needed ?

Background (2) Currently, agricultural risks are assessed routinely only for GM crops and pesticides Other more environmentally damaging agricultural practices do not require risk assessments Proposal: all new (or changed) agricultural practices should be assessed for environmental risk (UK Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (ACRE), 2006) Discrepancy in current agricultural risk assessment:

How to assess risks of new or changed agricultural practices ?

ReceptorResponse Pathway effect(exposure) Source Source – pathway – receptor principle

ReceptorResponse Pathway effect Source – pathway – receptor principle (exposure) Source REGIONAL risk assessment – e.g. invasive species in marine coastal area (Landis 2003) Risk Analysis 24 (4) 2003 invasion Imported invasive species effects 9 predicted impacts 7 receiving habitats 7 mechanistic models 23 mechanistic models effectinvasion

ReceptorResponse Pathway effect Source – pathway – receptor principle (exposure) Source Co-occurrence SPATIALLY EXPLICIT risk assessment – e.g. military landscape (Andersen et al. 2004) Risk Analysis 24 (5) 2004 Spatially explicit hazards Indicator species effects Responses

ReceptorResponse Pathway effect Source – pathway – receptor principle (exposure) Source Co-occurrence Effects depend upon resilience Responses TRAIT BASED risk assessment – e.g. arable farmland (Butler et al. 2007) Science 315 (5810) 2007 Required ecological resources Affected ecological resources

Epigeic inverts Soil inverts Seeds Plant material Vertebrates Soil inverts Seeds Plant material Vertebrates Hedgerow Crop Margin Hedgerow Crop Margin Hedgerow Crop NEST SITES DIET Summer Winter HABITAT Summer Winter Ecological resources of farmland bird species (=receptor) Margin Epigeic inverts Ecological resources affected by agricultural activity (=source) NEST SITES Summer Winter DIET Summer Winter HABITAT Trait-based risk assessment (hypothetical example)

Epigeic inverts Soil inverts Seeds Plant material Vertebrates Soil inverts Seeds Plant material Vertebrates Hedgerow Crop Margin Hedgerow Crop Margin Hedgerow Crop NEST SITES DIET Summer Winter HABITAT Summer Winter Margin Epigeic inverts NEST SITES Summer Winter DIET Summer Winter HABITAT 1 / 52 / 5 Trait-based risk assessment (hypothetical example) Score = / 32 / 3 Ecological resources of farmland bird species (=receptor) Ecological resources affected by agricultural activity (=source)

Mammals (44 spp)Bumblebees (14 spp) Declining Possibly declining Stable / increasing Risk score Declining Possibly declining Stable / increasing Validation of risk scores for past agricultural changes ( ) (spring to autumn sowing, increased agrochemicals, loss of non-cropped habitat, land drainage, switch from hay to silage, grassland intensification) Population growth = – × risk score (p = 0.001) Population growth = – × risk score (p < 0.001) Population growth = – × risk score (p = 0.001) Butterflies (24 spp): Birds (62 spp): Broadleaf plants (190 spp):

Trait-based risk assessment for introduction of Miscanthus bioenergy crops

Interpreting output from trait-based risk assessment Predict population trend Predict conservation status Individual species

Interpreting output from trait-based risk assessment Example: change from spring to autumn cereals Proportion of species Communities Predict population trend Predict conservation status Individual species

Summary Trait-based risk assessment is a potentially powerful approach for assessing agricultural risks (compatible with tiered approach) How to proceed in the absence of existing population data? Can trait-based RA be applied to ecological functions? How can risk assessment be integrated into assessment of agricultural sustainability? Risk assessors should define what they require the risk assessment to deliver (need for clear assessment endpoints and conceptual models) Questions arising…