Reclamation Bureau Interagency Forum Local Agency Planning Process City of Rancho Cordova December 6, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marin Coastal Permit Coordination Program North Bay Watershed Association January 18, 2011.
Advertisements

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
Analysis of Dike 14 CDF to Public Greenspace. Who owns Dike 14? State of Ohio holds Dike 14 as a public trust land Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.
Interested in Neighbourhood Planning in Cotswold District?
Presentation for the Policy Advisory Committee California Transportation Plan 2040 April 15, 2014 Agricultural Land Stewardship Planning.
| 1 The Municipal Farm Sustainable Reuse Plan Project funded through a Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Pilot Grant from the United States Environmental.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Overview of SMARA Responsibilities for Lead Agencies California Department of Conservation Office of Mine Reclamation Leah Gardner Senior Environmental.
Illinois RC & D Introduction to R esource C onservation & D evelopment Module 2: Who are the players?
 Meeting Administration and Objectives  The Partnership  Understanding the Study Area  What We Heard  Alternatives to be Evaluated  Participant.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
The South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (SSHCP)
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy.
WESTCAS 2011 Winter Conference Fort Worth, Texas February 24, 2011.
Candidate Briefing and Update. 45 minutes. Not a lot of time for most, for me IMPOSSIBLE ! ◦ Personal background ◦ Vision ◦ Development of a comprehensive.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Water Resources Development Act WRDA 214 Joy Keniston-Longrie City of Seattle Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, (PNWA) October 2008 US Army Corps.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) DECEMBER 20, 2011.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
City Manager’s Office Approval of Public Monument Policy City Council August 31, 2015 Item 20.
BUILDING STRONG SM 1 Columbia River Salmon and Federal Columbia River Power System Rock Peters Senior Program Manager.
Conservation means development as much as it does protection … I recognize the right and duty of this generation to develop and use the natural resources.
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Partnerships.
Background Claremont residents and officials have voiced concerns over the water rate increases imposed by the Golden State Water Company (GSWC). On average,
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Incorporation and Annexation Process A Comparison November 1, 2005.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Marin Coastal Permit Coordination Program. Why do we need a program? Called for in Watershed Plans: As many as 9 permits to consider for restoration.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Planning and Permitting Part II: Permitting Overview S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 636 Hedburg Way, Suite 22 Oakdale, CA
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
Wildlife Agencies Government Organizations that Work for Wildlife.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Conserving Bird Habitat in California’s Central Valley Bob Shaffer, CVJV Coordinator JVC Meeting Austin, Texas December 2006.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
POS Regional Transportation Investments Viaduct/Seawall Discussion September 15, 2004.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Role in Timber Harvest Review.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
Kitsap County ▪ Jefferson County ▪ City of Bremerton Naval Base Kitsap ▪ Naval Magazine Indian Island
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
The Rezoning Process CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING.
Eagle Heights Development Proposal Consists of two sets of development applications and two property ownerships: Paletta and Taylor lands. Paletta is applicant.
Development of Regional Impact Created by the Department of Community Affairs and edited by Jeffrey P. Gellermann.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Montgomery County Capital & Operating Budget Process Briefing
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
FY 2012 Status Report on the North Mainland (Ormond Crossings CRA)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

Reclamation Bureau Interagency Forum Local Agency Planning Process City of Rancho Cordova December 6, 2007

2 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Before we begin… A brief review of the process for local project development

3 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective What Does It Take To Build A Development Project? City policy and direction Private investment Supportive market Public facilities and infrastructure Community support

4 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Stages of Review and Approval for a Development Project Prior to Application –Developer Application Review –Developer, City, Affected Agencies Local Action –City Council Post Approval Permits –Developer, Affected Agencies

5 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Prior to Application Market Analysis Due Diligence Conceptualize Project Financial Pro Forma Property Negotiation Preliminary Design and Engineering

6 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Application Review Submit initial application City review for completeness Initial routing to affected agencies Initial input and direction from City and affected agencies Project refinement Input from agencies and public Environmental review

7 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Key Concerns of City Land Use Transportation Infrastructure Public Services Parks and Open Space Schools Public Safety Legal Defensibility Economics and Revenue Maintenance and Operations Community Approval

8 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Local Action Staff prepares recommendation –Includes comments and recommendations from public and affected agencies Planning Commission hearing City Council hearing Appeal period

9 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Post-Approval Permits Army Corps of Engineers – Section 404 U.S. Fish and Wildlife – ESA Consultation California Dept. Fish and Game – Streambed Alteration Agreement, CESA Consultation

10 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective What Makes Development Such a Confusing Process? Weighing competing benefits Local interests vs. citywide interests Complexity of providing services and facilities Sequencing of project approvals Fiscal implications Many layers of regulations

11 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Competing Interests Political Arena Pursuing the Community Vision Local vs. Citywide vs. Regional interests Fiscal implications Weighing competing benefits

12 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Sequencing of Project Approvals Developers naturally want to complete individual stages of review Permitting issues are not always resolved before City action The further into the review process, the more developers resist changes to their projects Late approval requirements can invalidate earlier approvals

13 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Environmental Regulations Water Consultations Air Quality Management District - SMAQMD Caltrans Consultation California Environmental Quality Act Streambed Alteration Agreement – DFG California Endangered Species Act - DFG National Environmental Policy Act Federal Endangered Species Act - USFWS Section 404 Permit – Army Corps of Engineers

14 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective So, what does this all mean? For successful project reviews, our mutual agencies need effective coordination

15 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Common Concerns of the City and Reclamation Bureau Public safety Land use compatibility Recreation and circulation Asset protection Maintenance and operations

16 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Keys to Successful Partnership City relies upon many partners in building the community Understand each other’s priorities and operational needs Conduct early reviews and consultations Try to avoid surprises late in a project review

17 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective What do developers need? Early identification of what we will require from their project Responsiveness within the permitting and project review process Avoid changing position on project requirements whenever possible Time is money, really!

18 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective When to Provide Input Prior to application, if developer is wise Formal application submittal Routing to affected agencies Initial input and direction from City and affected agencies Project refinement Input from agencies and public Environmental review

19 Reclamation Interagency Forum 2007 City of Rancho Cordova – Local Agency Perspective Questions and Comments