Federal Indian Policy OS215 Contemporary Native American Issues Tuesday, January 31, 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 1831

Advertisements

Chapter 2: Indian Peoples are Nations, not Minorities Soc 338.

Native Americans and the Denial of Treaty Rights Political Science 61 / Chicano/Latino Studies 64 October 16, 2007.

Chapter 6: Notes Summary: Native Americans Regions of U.S.A: 1. East—West of the Appalachian mountains as Indian country (1763). 2. South—Trail of Tears.

The History of Sovereign Nations in dealings with the United States American Indian Policy.

Part 3: Selecting the Colors Historical, Legal and Political Perspectives.

- Felix Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law (1941)

American Indian or Alaska Native alone 2.5 million (26% higher than 1990) (0.9%) In combination with other “races” 1.6 million (0.6%) Total = 4.1 million.

Indian Tribal Governance IPE 2012 December 5, 2011 Stephanie Swierczek.

What Happened to the Native Americans When We Bought the Louisiana Purchase By Sarah.

Westward Movement Explain how territorial expansion and related land policies affected Native Americans, including their resistance to Americans’ taking.

Native American Conflicts and Policies

Chapter 10, Section 3 Pages 332 – 335. President Andrew Jackson had become famous as an American Indian fighter. He had no sympathy with Native Americans’

1 Native American Removal Policy and the 'Trail of Tears'

USA - POLICIES REGARDING THE NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN Proclamation of 1763 (British) –L–Land to west of Appalachian Mts. For Native Americans – no colonists.

Removal of Native Americans Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism Part 5.

American Indian Federal Policy

Federal Upper Level Government Lower Level Government Lower Level Government Lower Level Government Lower Level Government Upper Level Government Unitary.

Supreme Court Cases Jackson and the Native Americans.

INDIAN REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES. Americans wanted to move west into Native American land.

Native Americans and Indian Removal Act Is Andrew Jackson doing this for the good of the Indians or for the white settlers? Do you see Andrew Jackson working.

Indian Removal Policy. Demographics 1500 = 7 million Indians in North America 1600 = 3 million 2000 = 2, 476,000 (.9% of U.S. population) Over 500 federally-

American Government and Politics (POLS 122) Professor Jonathan Day.

Termination. Purpose of Termination Time Period: The policy hoped to terminate the responsibility that the federal government had with Native.

US and Native American Relations By Robert Hamilton Fall 1999.

RIGHTS RESPONSIBILITIES uscis.gov citizens of their tribe, living within the boundaries of the U.S. part of the land would be "reserved"

State vs. Federal Powers. 2 Concurrent powers are shared between the federal government and state governments.

Cherokee Removal. A little background 2 approaches to the Native American Issue --Assimilation OR Removal In the 1790s the federal government recognized.

Tribal Sovereignty Federal Agency Relations with Indian Tribal Governments.

Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal

JACKSONIAN DEMOCRACY Key events of Andrew Jackson’s Presidential Term.

American Federalism. Constitutional Structure of American Federalism Constitutional Framework.

Treaty of Ft. Laramie (1851) Colorado Gold Rush (1859) 1 st Reservation Policy.

Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal

The Dawes Act 1887 Jonathan Tonel. Thesis The Dawes Act was an unfair policy by the American government to force the Native Americans to assimilate with.

Federal Law Principles of Tribal Sovereignty Tribes are separate sovereign governments Tribal sovereignty generally extends over tribal territory Tribal.

Indian Removal. Cherokee Nation  The Cherokee adapted well to white society  Sequoya’s invention of a system of written language  Drew up a constitution.

Westward Expansion © Mark Batik Jesuit College Prep.

Dividing Government Power Chapter 4:1. Why Federalism? New nation struggled to function as confederation Without power to raise funds, national government.

Judicial System - Case Study impartiality, weighing the evidence and the power of Reason and Justice.

Indians in America.  Since 1600, white settlers had pushed Native Americans westward as they took more and more of their land.  By the 1820s, about.

How do oppressed people survive?: Native American Indian Assimilation and Resistance By Joshua Fisher and Shoshana Good.

American Federalism.

Native American Movement Activity

Trail of Tears PowerPoint & Notes © Erin Kathryn 2015.

Andrew Jackson and Native Americans

Trail of Tears PowerPoint & Notes © Erin Kathryn 2015.

excessive celebration! Also, no arguing with the referee!

Separation of Powers Checks and Balances

COS Standard 1 Explain the transition of the US from an agrarian society to an industrial nation prior to WWI.

Good For Whom? Native American Policy

Conflicts Over Land Section Two.

Indian Removal and the Treaty of New Echota

People and Events of Indian Removal

Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL.

Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL © Brain Wrinkles.

Growth in Georgia.

Constitutional Principles

Cherokee speaking U.S. states

The Age of Jackson, : Indian Removal

Indian Removal/Trail of Tears

Two ideas among Whites about how to deal with the Indian “problem”

The Indian Removal Act of 1830

Sponge If something is not written in the Constitution, Congress can use the e______ c_______ to get it approved. Provide a situation when the government.

Thinking Question Describe your “home”.

December 4, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:

Conflicts Over Land Section Two.

Do Now (Background Essay)

Class 05 American Indian Law Today

Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL © Brain Wrinkles.

Presentation transcript:

Federal Indian Policy OS215 Contemporary Native American Issues Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Major Policy Eras s: Sovereign to Sovereign 1830s-1850s: Removal 1850s-1890s: Reservation 1870s-1930s: Assimilation 1930s-1950s: Self-Rule 1950s-1960s: Termination 1960s-1988: Self-Determination 1988-Present: Self-Determination/Self-Governance

s: Sovereign to Sovereign The United States Congress shall have power “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.” (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) (1787) Johnson v. McIntosh (1823) Treaty Signing Chief Justice John Marshall

Sovereign to Sovereign Treaty with the Chippewa, 1842, ARTICLE 2: “The Indians stipulate for the right of hunting on the ceded territory, with the other usual privileges of occupancy, until required to remove by the President of the United States, and that the laws of the United.”

1830s-1850s: Removal Indian Removal Act of 1830 Andrew Jackson

Sandy Lake Tragedy Zachary Taylor

Ojibwa Delegation to Washington, DC, 1852 Kechewaishke - Chief Buffalo

1850s-1890s: Reservation Treaty with the Chippewa, 1854 L’Anse Indian Reservation: 44,379 acres (81% of the total land mass) has been lost since 1854 to present.

1870s-1930s: Assimilation Dawes Allotment Act of 1887 Indian Citizenship Act of 1924

1930s-1950s: Self-Rule

1950s-1960s: Termination Immediate termination of Federal relationship with the Menominee and Klamath tribes in 1953Menominee Klamath Belief that Native Americans would be better off assimilated into mainstream American society

1960s-Present: Self-Determination Next Thursday…