Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, 2105 3:00-4:00.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Accountability: Current Issues Friday, April Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! Shauna Lane, ESC Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator
OLMOS ELEMENTARY. WHOOOO WE ARE SCHOOL FACTS: ENROLLMENT: 657 RATING: IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED GRADES: PK-5 SPECIAL PROGRAMS: PK, BILINGUAL/DUAL, ALE CAMPUS.
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
MEADOW WOOD ELEMENTARY. “GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT. AND THAT IS ONE OF THE KEY REASONS WHY WE HAVE SO LITTLE THAT BECOMES GREAT. WE DON'T HAVE GREAT.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
Every Student Matters Understanding the Indexes, the Tests, and Targeted Goal for STAAR 2016.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Accountability Overview 2016
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
Student Success Initiative 2013
Texas State Accountability
2013 Texas Accountability System
A-F Accountability and Special Education
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2014 State Accountability Ratings
Accountability Updates
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Presentation transcript:

Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00

What does it mean to be a Title 1 school? Title 1 is the name for a government program that gives additional federal money to qualifying schools. Timmerman qualifies as a Title 1 campus this year. All students at Timmerman are eligible to receive Title 1 assistance.

* Increase academic achievement * Requires that schools be held accountable (CIP) * Requires that parents are provided assistance in the understanding of how well their school and their children are performing Goals of Title 1

How are decisions made to spend Title 1 money The campus uses data results from the following resources to set the academic goals of the school year in the areas of Math, Science, Reading, and Writing: – STAAR Results – End of the Year reading and math assessments – Universal Screener Data

Four Index Scores Index 4: Post Secondary Readiness 1 Index 1: Student Achievement 2 Index 2: Student Progress 3 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 4

Index 1: Student Achievement Most like TAKS, measures performance, calculated for all subjects tested (Reading, Math, Writing (4), Science (5)). This year our performance standard was measured at level 2, phase 1 for the following groups: 7 races (ALL students, AA, AI, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White and 2 or more races, and ELL, SPED, and EcoDis) Target for 13-14

Index 1: Student Achievement All Student Percentages Reading 87% Math 85% Writing 85% Science 85% Academic Distinctions Math and Reading

Student Achievement Continued… Grade LevelDIBELS Composite ScoreDRA (K-2) ISIP (3-5) Kinder * 87% at or above benchmark * 9% below benchmark * 4% well below benchmark 82% at benchmark level 1 st * 78% at or above benchmark * 8% below benchmark * 14% well below benchmark 78% at benchmark level 2 nd * 75% at or above benchmark * 16% below benchmark * 9% well below benchmark 79% at benchmark level 3 rd * 84% at or above benchmark * 4% below benchmark * 12% well below benchmark * 39% at or above benchmark * 24% below benchmark * 38% well below benchmark 4 th * 72% at or above benchmark * 13% below benchmark * 14% well below benchmark * 44% at or above benchmark * 28% below benchmark * 27% well below benchmark 5 th * 76% at or above benchmark * 16% below benchmark * 8% well below benchmark * 45% at or above benchmark * 30% below benchmark * 24% well-below Universal Screener Reading Data

Student Achievement Continued… Grade LevelTEMI O Percent Meeting Satisfactory Kinder 92% 1 st 99% 2 nd 89% Math Universal Screener Data

Index 1: Student Achievement Calculations Provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across ALL subjects for ALL students Target for Met standard

2 Index 2: Student Progress 33 Target for Measures progress (how much value did we add to each student), earn one point for each student who made one year’s progress and 2 points for each student who exceeded one year’s worth of progress in reading and math, groups: 7 races, All students, ELL, and SPED, rank ordered with like schools

Index 2: Student Progress Calculations % of students who MET progress or EXCEEDED progress Tests included: – STAAR and STAAR Spanish – Reading – Math – Student groups: 10 – All students – 7 race/ethnicity (minimum size 25): African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, 2 or more races – 2 program groups (minimum size 25): SpEd and ELL

2 Index 2: Student Progress Target for Met standard

3 Index 3 Closing Performance Gaps Emphasizes the advanced academic performance of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups. 28 Target for 13-14

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps % passing (Phase-in 1 Level II and above) in performance GAP groups: Eco Dis and 2 lowest performing race/ethnicity groups from 2013 STAAR. – Across all subjects – Minimum group size Eco Dis = 0, others = 25 – Groups different for every campus – (New for , one additional point added for each percent of tests at Level III.) Tests included: – STAAR, STAAR Sp, STAAR M, STAAR Alt – Reading, Math, Science, Writing

3 Index 3 Closing Performance Gaps Emphasizes the advanced academic performance of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups. 28 Target for Met standard

4 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Target for  46 Postsecondary Readiness, measures progress, % of students who met level 2 final on two or more subjects tested, groups all students, 7 races, and SPED

System Safeguards: Math, Reading, Writing, and Science must score at least 55% (state), math and reading 79% (Federal), participation rate 95%, and failure to meet a safeguard target for any reported group must be addressed in the CIP

Questions??? Thank you for attending our Public Hearing!!!!