Advocacy CAMS Gathering November 2010 Fiona Caniglia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA
Advertisements

Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Impact of the evaluations and follow-up activities M. Assunção, 13 October 2008 EUA Institutional Evaluation Programme, Workshop for Universities: round.
A Forever Unfinished Framework for Power and Change Valerie Miller JASS: Just Associates.
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
Module 4 Social Determinants of Financial Reporting
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
Local Government & Community Participation
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
RBM Communications Assessment Challenges and Opportunities in Ghana, Mali, Senegal, Tanzania and Uganda.
Intelligence Unit 6 - Mandates for Action Policy exerts a powerful influence on public health nutrition (PHN) practice because it affects:  service delivery.
Intellectual Property and Bilateral Trade Agreements Moving towards effective participation.
Orienting Innovation towards Grand Challenges: a real-time experiment in the application of foresight-assisted processes Professor Ron Johnston Australian.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
ADVOCACY: HOW & WHY? © 2014 Public Health Institute.
Non-governmental Actors in the Compliance with and Monitoring of Multilateral Environmental Decisions.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
THE POWER-CONTROL MODEL. POWER OF CONTINGENT VARIABLES “At best, the four contingent variables (size, technology, environment and strategy) explain only.
Transboundary Conservation Governance: Key Principles & Concepts Governance of Transboundary Conservation Areas WPC, Sydney, 17 November 2014 Matthew McKinney.
Multicultural Development Association Advocacy and Social Policy Unit Achieving Positive Change: Advocacy, Policy and Effective Submission Writing CAMS.
Learning Outcomes of the SCPHN Programme & How they Link to Practice.
State of California Executive Leadership Competency Model January 12, 2011 Presentation for the California Citizens Redistricting Commission.
The shift to programs in the LAC region. What is a program? A program is a coherent set of initiatives by CARE and our allies that involves a long-term.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
NI Critical Dialogue Social Work In Northern Ireland Paul Martin Chief Social Services Officer Office of Social Services Department of Health, Social Services.
Development Team Day 4 October EXPECTED OUTCOMES By the end of the conference, participants will have: 1.examined a range of strategies for monitoring.
Changing Development Paradigm Sofia Svarfvar Advisory Group on Development Policy and Practice.
The Health Policy Process
Dissecting an Issue Class 1 January 6, 2010 Judith Anne Shaw, Ph.D., RN.
L. Nare; J. O. Odiyo; M. B. Sekhwela; N. Potgieter Stakeholder Involvement and Participation in Water Quality Monitoring and Management in Luvuvhu Catchment.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
The Interactive Model Of Program Planning
Better Community Engagement Training for Trainers Course Day 1 This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
Public Policy Week 2: Policy Process – Analysis
Self-Directed Support. Personalisation ‘It enables the individual alone or in groups to find the right solutions for them and to participate in the delivery.
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
4.2 Understanding the target Gabriele Bammer. 2 Overview Target structure Target processes.
“Participation is a Goal, not just a Means, in NFPs.” Margaret A. Shannon, Ph.D. COST Action E-19 Vienna, September 15, 2003.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Charnwood Together AGM 1 4th September 2015 Chris Traill Strategic Director Neighbourhoods & Community Wellbeing.
IB Business & Management Topic 6 – Strategy HL ONLY.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
Advocating for public health at EU level Anne Hoel and Lara Garrido-Herrero European Public Health Alliance Moscow, 28th November 2006.
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
NICE Voice & Accountability. Voice & Accountability Strategy powered by N.I.C.E.
Chapter 14 - Analyzing a Case and Writing a Case Report 1 Understanding the Case Method of Learning What is the case method?  Applies the ancient Socratic.
Copyright Public Policy is Within-Scope Roger Clarke Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd Visiting Professor in Computer Science, ANU and in Cyberspace Law.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
Class 2 What is social work and what do social workers do ?
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
Message Strategy for Community Education and Engagement
What is PEST Analysis? There are a variety of factors external to your organization that can affect the organization’s results The purpose of PEST analysis.
BEST PRACTICES IDENTIFICATION
Summary.
Translating political objectives into sound policy proposals
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
Complexity and Evaluation Report Out
Evaluating support to capacity development
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
The Public Policy Process
Ways of looking at strategy
Community Integration and Development USP Conference May 2013
GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO ADVOCACY
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
Civic Involvement, Participation, & Skills
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Advocacy CAMS Gathering November 2010 Fiona Caniglia

What is policy? Social policy is a process of ….allocation of material and human resources according to certain theories and values for the purpose of achieving ….social, economic, cultural and political outcomes in society. Jamrozik, 2005:45

What is policy?  Social policy is not a static thing, nor is the society in which the policy process takes place a static thing. Jamrozik, 2005

What is policy? “The scope of social policy includes all areas of personal and social life which contribute to the well-being of citizens or its absence.” Dalton et al, 1996

What is policy?  Policy is at the heart of how society is organised: Who gets what? Who wins? Who loses? Who is left to fend for themselves? Who decides? Dalton et al, 1996

What is policy?  Legislation: the most explicit and formalised policy  Written policy  Programs – policy implementation. Dalton et al, 1996:7-8

What is policy?  “In a climate where economic values and indicators dominate policy debate we emphasise that every economic and political decision has social implications.” Dalton et al, 1996:7

The dimension of power  Who wins?  Who loses?  Who decides? Political economy tradition. Dalton et al, 1996:7

What is the policy process?  Static elements (structures)  Dynamic elements  A contest over social goals in which there are many players/actors. Dalton et al, 1996:7

What is the policy process? Linear:  Planning  Formulation  Implementation and administration  Monitoring and evaluation Dalton et al, 1996:7

What is the policy process? Rational decision making  Problem identification  Analysis  Informing the public  Development of public goals  Building public support and legitimation  Program design  Implementation  Evaluation Gilbert and Specht in Dalton et al, 1996:16

What is the policy process? Strategic and analytical policy process:  The analytical and strategic elements of policy process  The assumption that society is complex  Research is important but has limits  Power is significant but not absolute Dalton et al, 1996:7

Personal, social and political self awareness  Understand and articulate your own standpoint  Ask a series of questions (of yourself, the process)  Locate your own interests, purposes and relationships to the issues  Analyse personal and professional goals  Analyse relevant issues and values  Analyse which strategies are ethical in gaining some power and influence Dalton et al, 1996:7

Underpinning goals and assumptions  All policy decisions involve assumptions about the nature of human beings and how societies actually work.  All policy positions taken by other stakeholders (including the non- government sector) also involve assumptions…..

An approach to policy development  Problem identification  Analysing the organisational, systemic and broader societal context, issues, debates and opportunities: key stakeholders, decision making processes, key milestones, relationships, structures, points of influence (formal, bottom up, top down, informal ….)  Analyse key questions: who wins, who loses, who decides  Consider how power and influence might be exercised  Develop a plan  Research - evidence

An approach to policy development  Engagement with stakeholders (anecdotes, case studies, opinions, experiences, sources of evidence, solutions)  Building movements, developing a policy community, alliances, partnerships  Maintain dialogue between research and engagement  Develop alternatives, agree with proposals, disagree and propose workable solutions.  Publish/submit/promote  Negotiations / dialogue  Evaluate outcomes  Continue re implementation and monitoring. Jamrozik, 2005

An approach to policy development  Publish: Submission, statement etc. Lean and mean What you want, who is responsible, qualifying statements (if relevant), time frame.

Common problems  Over-emphasis on issues and problems and when asked, we continue to talk about issues  Lack of evidence based research  Too much consultation and not enough engagement  Struggle to articulate solutions  Recommendations are overly general.

The policy process  Community development and community action theories and practices contribute a lot to mobilising citizens to participate in policy making. Dalton et al, 1996