Fred H. Cate Vice President for Research September 18, 2015 Grand Challenges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
The Industry-University Cooperative Research Program ( IUCRP ) University of California 1996 – 2010 Lovell Jarvis University of California, Davis.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Gregory G. Bond, Ph.D., M.P.H. Chair, Dow Fellows Program February 20, 2014 Dow Distinguished Awards for Interdisciplinary Sustainability.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
Division of Research & Economic Development Report to the URI Faculty Senate April 19, 2012 Peter Alfonso, Ph.D. Vice President for Research & Economic.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
1 MAIS & ITSS FY09 Priorities Joint UL Meeting October 27, 2008.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
1 Provost’s Report to the Board of Trustees The Pennsylvania State University Strategic Plan: through PRESENTED BY Nicholas P. Jones,
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
Responding to the changing landscape: The Innovative Learning Institute Jeremy Haefner, Provost September 2012.
1 Theme-based Research Scheme Briefing Session 12 April 2010.
Sustainable Smart Cities Symposium April 3, 2013 Richard B. Marchase Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
Creating Our Future: UConn’s Path to Excellence Open Forum March 26, 2014.
UIUC Strategic Plan Melanie Loots Ruth Watkins August 18, 2006.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Research Platforms at KTH In the service of humanity, for the society of tomorrow Björn Birgisson, Vice President for Research Structure and Content.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
February 3, Strategic Planning Update University Senate February 3, 2003.
Directorate for Engineering Engineering Education and Centers Engineering Education and Centers EPSCoR “Developing NSF Centers” Conference Lexington, KY.
Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SUSTAINABLE CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Resourcing the Mission: The New Internal Financial Model.
Steps to Advance The SUNY Research & Innovation Ecosystem Jeffrey Boyce Research Foundation of SUNY Office of the Executive Vice President SUNY Board of.
Entrepreneurial Incentives and Venture Philanthropy: Not your Grandmother’s Benevolence! Presented by Allyson Reaves July 11, 2008 International Society.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
CWRU Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee Kick-Off Meeting.
Appalachian State University Strategic Planning November 2, 2012 A look at the Higher Education landscape.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
OUR STRATEGIC INTENT: Promote a culture that demands and rewards excellence. OUR VISION: To be a world-class medical school, advancing health at the forefront.
Cedar Crest College Strategic Planning Community Day.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
2015/2016 PSIEE Seed Grant Information Session October 21, 2015.
March 12, SIGCSE Report FOCE Summit Panel 1 Getting to a Future of Computing Education Summit Joseph Urban Texas Tech University.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
Advancing Government through Collaboration, Education and Action Institute for Innovation Discussion with Shared Interest Group Vice Chairs October 14,
Local Station Grant Program Goals and Requirements.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
University Town Hall May 18, 2016 Co-Chairs: Dr. Claire M. Fraser & Dr. Roger J. Ward.
Grand Challenges Town Hall Rick Van Kooten Vice Provost for Research Sept. 18, 2015 Whittenberger Auditorium Grand Challenges: IU-Bloomington Emerging.
Provost’s Report Global Penn State: Our Ongoing Efforts to Be a Truly Global University Dr. Nicholas P. Jones Meeting of the Board of Trustees Friday,
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
4 Recognizing a Firm’s Intellectual Assets: Moving beyond a Firm’s Tangible Resources McGraw-Hill/Irwin Strategic Management: Text and Cases, 4e Copyright.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
SNA Strategic Plan #SNAleadership.
Is there another way besides accreditation?
Research Development Office
Presidential Awards for Interdisciplinary Research (PAIR)
Warren K. Wray Provost Faculty Senate
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
Topics Introduction to Research Development
Supporting Faculty Research
Presentation transcript:

Fred H. Cate Vice President for Research September 18, 2015 Grand Challenges

The Bicentennial Strategic Plan calls for the selection of Grand Challenges—“major and large-scale problems” that have the “potential to advance a discipline or address some major problems of humanity” and can “only be addressed by multidisciplinary teams of the best researchers.” In the words of President McRobbie, Grand Challenge investments will be “few, large, focused, and measured by their impact.” Key part of a collection of strategic research initiatives.

Over the next five years, the university anticipates investing $300 million in existing and new resources—the most significant investment in IU’s research infrastructure in the university’s history. Includes “base” funding (i.e., funding that continues indefinitely) for as many as 175 new faculty lines. Includes “cash” funding (i.e., must be spent within five years of the award) for faculty startup packages, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, equipment, facilities, travel, and other expenses necessary for the research. Each Grand Challenge Initiative likely to involve ~30 faculty hires and $30-50 million in additional funding. Scope

To improve in tangible ways the quality of life of the people of Indiana and the world and the economic vitality of the state of Indiana. To transform Indiana University through strategic hires and by significantly enhancing the volume, quality, impact, and reputation of research at IU. To provide critical, strategic investment in the research infrastructure at IU. To improve IU’s ability to compete successfully for more ambitious and diverse external research support. To facilitate collaboration that enables IU to leverage its extensive and diverse resources in pursuit of common goals (this is true whether or not a proposal is selected). To create valuable intellectual property, make it available to the public through appropriate commercialization, and create new sources of revenue for IU. Goals

Addresses a compelling problem or challenge, the resolution of which would significantly affect the people of Indiana and beyond. Has defined, achievable goals that deliver tangible benefits to the people of Indiana and beyond. Strategically leverages IU strengths and existing resources. Requires a multidisciplinary team that reaches across departments, schools, and, in most cases, campuses. Can attract the external competitive, philanthropic, corporate, and/or government funding necessary to sustain the work to successful completion. Criteria

In , facilitate the collaborative development of a diverse array of initial proposals, select five for further development as Grand Challenge Initiatives, and ultimately select two as initial Grand Challenge Initiatives in time for implementation to begin by Fall Preliminary proposals Invited full proposals Proposals not selected this year may be revised and resubmitted in the future, or considered for other types of funding. Significant collaboration from campus/school research staff, VPR, VPE, VPIT, and IUF. Process

Review by university-wide Grand Challenges Review Committee, comprising research faculty, supplemented by external, campus, and/or school reviews as necessary. Community Advisory Board, comprising leaders from industry, government, and not- for-profit organizations throughout Indiana, will provide guidance for program and the selection, implementation, and review of specific initiatives. Recommendations by Grand Challenges Steering Committee. Decisions by President. Process (cont’d)

Initial proposals due November 9, Decision by President announced January 8, Selected potential Grand Challenge full proposals due April 18, Decision by President announced by June 17, Initial implementation by Fall Timing

A commitment to being nimble and flexible in the implementation of Grand Challenges. A commitment to being strategic in the investment of Grand Challenges funding. A commitment to administrative efficiency and cost-effectiveness. No shifting of funds between campuses without the explicit consent of campus leadership involved. A concerted effort to reduce and, if possible, eliminate internal administrative barriers to collaboration and effective implementation. Administration Principles

1.Impact matters. Whether impact on the public, on communities, on the economy, or on quality of life, impact is the focus of the Grand Challenges program. That impact may be achieved through scientific breakthroughs or significant advances in other fields, but it must ultimately be felt outside of the university or the academy. Proposals must not only be explicit about impact, but must also include translational elements that would demonstrate impact. Observations

2.Grand Challenge Initiatives by definition must be highly interdisciplinary. One of the goals of IU’s Grand Challenges program is to help develop and support the habits of cross-disciplinary collaboration. This will require collaborating across campuses and, in most cases, between campuses. To help support the most creative, ambitious collaborations, additional funding will be available for initiatives that involve more than one campus or collaboration between IU and Purdue. Observations (cont’d)

3.Grand Challenge proposals must include a plan for sustainability. Despite the university’s significant investment, the scale of Grand Challenge Initiatives should be such that they will require external funding to complete. That funding could come from NSF or NIH, but proposals should also consider the potential for funding from other government agencies at all levels and other sources of funding such a foundations, businesses, or private philanthropy. Observations (cont’d)

4.Grand Challenge proposals will be developed and administered in a more open and collaborative way than traditional research awards. The resources come from an array of sources. All applicants, and especially those invited to complete full proposals, will have access to resources provided by the IU Foundation, the Vice President for Engagement, the Vice President for Information Technology, and the Vice President for Public Affairs and Government Relations, as well as the Provost/Chancellor and Deans. Proposals will be posted online to facilitate collaboration and transparency. And support for successful proposals will be administered in partnership with the research team and school, campus, and university administration. Observations (cont’d)

Thank you. grandchallenges.iu.edu