MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: Deborah Swensen Assessment Director Utah State Office of Education Aaron Brough Educational Data Specialist Utah State Office of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
AdvancEd District Wide Accreditation
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Analyzing Student Work
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Integrating Ethics Into Your Compliance Program John A. Gallagher, Ph.D Center for Ethics in Health Care Atlanta, GA.
Principal Professional Development project
Educational Platform Cheryl Urbanovsky. I believe education is a calling. As educators, we are called to walk with our children as they begin their journey.
Designed to help leaders identify the key elements that support a district-wide improvement strategy and to bring these elements into a coherent and integrated.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Person Centered Planning
Power of Professional Learning Communities
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
PLT Professional Learning Teams Weaver Elementary School January, 2013.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
MSTP PLC Facilitator’s Training Linda Harvieux Cristy Bloch.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Collaborative Data Teams
Creating a Learning Community Vision
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Creating SMART Goals Refer to pgs in spiral conference binder.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Counseling Practice in Schools The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 3 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use and can.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Empowering the Team.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
R.B. STEWART MIDDLE SCHOOL REFINING OUR FOCUS BULLDOG 20/20 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
N C B S S H.
Bringing About Change Using Professional Learning Communities OSPI Winter Conference 2006 Dave Colombini – Principal, South Kitsap High School Dan Whitford.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Interagency Collaboration: Transition’s Reality Show Sharon deFur Jeanne Repetto coe.ufl.edu.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Big Idea and Characteristic #2: Collaborative Teams.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Rosenwald: Creating a Positive, Proactive, and Joyful Climate.
Professional Learning Communities Supporting Student Achievement Supporting Student Achievement.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
BY: STACEY CLARK, JENNA MORRIS, BRIAN OGBIN, JENNIFER TUPPENY SEA Project.
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
A New Paradigm.  What Do These Case Studies Teach us About Effective Schools?
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Reigniting Your PLTs: A Leadership Perspective
Introduction Introduction
February 21-22, 2018.
Introductions Introduction
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: Deborah Swensen Assessment Director Utah State Office of Education Aaron Brough Educational Data Specialist Utah State Office of Education Creating a Culture that Cares – about Data

WHY ARE WE EVEN HERE?

Culture  Culture Norms and Beliefs  Personal  Organizational - shared structural systems that provide legitimacy and a rationalizing structure  resilient  How created paradigms formed for organization’s adaptations to external environment coalitions based on shared values which each member must assimilate voluntarily

Sustained Change  Culture established Purpose  Provide meaning  Provide direction Process  Formal  All stakeholder know how and to whom, who leads and who influences whom (Darling-Hammond, 1993; Schein, 1982).  Informal  Social system of interaction and sharing of beliefs (Schein, 1984)  Loosely coupled weak or infrequently with minimal interdependence.

Organizational learning  Double loop learning  Intertwined with power and control  Adaptation to External environment  NCLB: standards based accountability  High School Accreditation

Why Culture of Data  Demonstrate post High School readiness  Accountability for academic progress Diagnose strengths and weaknesses Assess student performance with respect to expectation  Uniform instruction of state core skills Professional development Pre-service teachers  Basis for school wide decisions

Step One  Know where you are  Look for connections to the work already doing in schools/districts/classrooms  Determine what you need to know

Step Two  “If you don’t’ know where you are going, any road will take you there”  Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland  Vision Common purpose Roadmap Grounded on in-depth review of variety of assessment and evaluation measures Integration of an amorphous collection of goals, dreams, challenges, and ideas in a concrete direction Validates core of the power and authority of legitimate ideas in the school

Reality Vision

Data for Learning  “We are data rich and information poor”  Rick Dufour  “Abandon belief that adults represent most important assessment consumers or data-based decision makers in schools.”  Rick Stiggins

Participants  Who are the stakeholders?  What are their understanding of reality?

Explore your school  Assume role  Look at the data What does it tell you Does it answer your questions  Determine your own beliefs for your school Reflect what and how students learn  Develop a profile and school vision Does this include the beliefs of all stakeholders?

Share about your School  What do you know?  What else do you need to find out?  Who else needs to be involved?  How was the experience? Positive Barriers

The Leading E.D.G.E. & Stages of Team Development  Four Stages of Team Development Forming Storming Norming Performing  Instructional Behaviors Explain Demonstrate Guide Enable

FORMING Stage  Low Skills  High Enthusiasm  Limited Productivity  EDGE Style Explaining FORMING

STORMING Stage  Low Skills  Enthusiasm plummet  Slight Increase of Productivity  EDGE Style Demonstrate STORMING

NORMING Stage  Increasing Skills  Enthusiasm grows  Significant Increase of Productivity  EDGE Style Guide NORMING

PERFORMING Stage  Highly Skilled  Enthusiastic Group  Productive Team Work  EDGE Style Enable PERFORMING

Stages of Team Development

Conclusion  If we operate individually rather than from a collective set of beliefs, our effort to improve student learning is fragmented.  Keep relevance, coherence and power of creating data culture  Keep collegial environment for participating in schools

Utah Programs for Culture of Data  Accreditation Process  Data Mentors

Data Mentor Program The purpose of the grant is to:  Assist local educators in working with Assessment and Accountability data to improve professional practice and student achievement. The focus will include two major purposes of using data  To assist educators in evaluating previous years’ data to evaluate student achievement and instructional effectiveness.  To assist educators in accessing and analyzing longitudinal data for current students to facilitate instruction. Areas of Emphasis

Accreditation School profile Vision and DRSL (Desired Results for Student Learning) Analysis of Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness  Curriculum, Instructional Strategies, Leadership, Assessment, Community Building, Continuous Improvement and Learning, Community Building Action Plan

High School Accreditation Benefits  Promotes collaboration and Collegiality  Focuses on student learning  Continuous improvement of school efforts  Represents a school/community effort  Continuity in school programs  Periodic self study and analysis

S.M.A.R.T. goals  Specific- focused on tangible performance areas  Measurable  Attainable stretching beyond what is being done, yet reachable  Relevant central to the school’s mission and purpose  Trackable capable of being counted and time bound