S&T foresight and government decision-making in the European Research Area Brussels, 21 November 2001 Introduction Rémi Barré OST Associate Professor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Guenter Clar, © EU - LIAISON OFFICE FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY STEINBEIS - EUROPA - ZENTRUM STUTTGART SEZ - STEINBEIS-EUROPA-ZENTRUM Trans-regional.
Advertisements

Estonian Pilot Action on Technology Assessment Rene Tõnnisson Institute of Baltic Studies.
Six Countries Programme Workshop May 2006 Shaping the future through learning from the past – Evaluation and Foresight Dr. Mari Hjelt Gaia Consulting.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Potential impact of PISA
Future Trends on Student Involvement in Quality Assurance Agencies
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region as a tool to implement the EU2020 European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy Territorial Cooperation.
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
Tailoring Foresight to Field Specificities Antoine Schoen, Université Paris Est (LATTS, ESIEE Management) and JRC-IPTS Totti Könnölä, JRC-IPTS Philine.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.
Regions for Economic Change: Networking for Results LMP Workshop 3C: When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform.
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
EURADWASTE 29 March 2004 LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT THE COWAM EUROPEAN PROJECT EURADWASTE, 29 March 2004.
Building Capitalisation in MED TNC Naples, 16 November 2009 Andrea Stocchiero, CeSPI.
URBACT II Building Healthy Communities 1 st Steering Group Meeting Brussels, 9-10 June 2008 An overview.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
The Use and Impact of FTA Attila Havas and Ron Johnston Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Australian Centre for Innovation Third.
Benchmarking Industry – Science Relationships Based on the OECD report, March 2002 Presented by: Inês Costa Vanessa Figueiredo.
ICT Work Programme NCP Infoday 23 June Maria Geronymaki DG INFSO.H.2 ICT for Government & Public Services Objective.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
1 Conference, How does research integration work? 17 June 2008 The issue of ‘research integration’ and the role of IPs and NoE in the social sciences and.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
UIA Associations Round Table – Europe 2014 Dublin, November 2014 Achieving impact and finding the funds Dr Dragana Avramov PSPC, Brussels 14/11/2014www.avramov.org1.
122 nd EAAE Seminar Ancona 17 – 18 February nd EAAE Seminar Ancona Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Session Chair: Peter Doorn Director, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), The Netherlands.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
Time to act on the Future of Europe …
DEVCO Towards a new Strategy for the Thematic Programme on Civil society Organisations and Local Authorities Preliminary core messages from the 3 working.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Dr C Svanfeldt; DG RTD K2; October 6, Support for the coherent development of policies Regional Foresight in a European Perspective Dr. Christian.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
Conference on regional governance in a global context The experience of Emilia Romagna Morena Diazzi Managing Authority ERDF ROP
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
FP7 /1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG Research Nikos Kastrinos Directorate for Research in Social Sciences, Humanities and Foresight of DG Research, European.
11/22/ The ALBI model Lucca, Knowledge seminar January 21st, 2014 Provincia di Lucca.
The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.
Stratinc Meeting –Thessaloniki Oct. 7/ A contribute to a rationale (a preliminary view) DRAFT Maximiano Martins / Scientific Board.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
Measuring benefits of European Territorial Cooperation Programmes – Piloting of Typology 22 February 2011.
Enterprise education Guzmán García González-Posada.
How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.
DESIGN & CREATIVITY WG 10, April 2013 CREATIVE AND CULTURAL INDUSTRIES EVENT.
DIME – Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe Network of Excellence in Priority 7, area 1.1, §1.1.2: “ Knowledge dynamics and economic development.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe: New Challenges, New Opportunities “The influence of the Framework Programmes in Social Sciences and Humanities.
COST Action and European GBIF Nodes Anne-Sophie Archambeau.
D Programme Level Cooperation analysis and evaluation report (DLR) Outline & main findings.
Introduction to the New Extensionist
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision-making 16th- 17th.
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!
An Introduction to STAGES
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Towards.
Strategy Processes and Foresight in Research
The Use and Impact of FTA
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
Planning process in river basin management
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Presentation transcript:

S&T foresight and government decision-making in the European Research Area Brussels, 21 November 2001 Introduction Rémi Barré OST Associate Professor, CNAM

S&T foresight activities are instruments for public decision making in the area of S&T policy : addressing questions related to the science – society relationships addressing questions related to the science – society relationships are developing at an unprecedented pace in most EU member states and elsewhere are developing at an unprecedented pace in most EU member states and elsewhere have a high potential as open-co-ordination instruments have a high potential as open-co-ordination instruments Hence the importance to understand, clarify and assess their role in public decision-making processes.

The objective is to propose an interpretative framework of such foresight activities : 1. what is meant by foresight 1. what is meant by foresight 2. the major drivers considered foresight exercise 2. the major drivers considered foresight exercise 3. a typology of foresights 3. a typology of foresights 4. acknowledged risks and limitations 4. acknowledged risks and limitations 5. open questions 5. open questions 6. challenges for foresight as goverrnment decision- making processes in the ERA 6. challenges for foresight as goverrnment decision- making processes in the ERA

1. What is meant by foresight Foresight is here definied as a potential new policy instrument, relevant to relate : - the S&T change and innovation problematique, - the S&T change and innovation problematique, - its economic, social, environmental, territorial and geo-political dimensions, - its economic, social, environmental, territorial and geo-political dimensions, - the deepening of democracy in the context of a knowledge society. - the deepening of democracy in the context of a knowledge society.

Linkage with government decision-making Such processes contribute to co-ordinating the anticipations of the institutions thus enhancing their strategic capabilities. Such processes contribute to co-ordinating the anticipations of the institutions thus enhancing their strategic capabilities. The aim of such processes is to distribute strategic intelligence of the S&T dynamics in relation to society to the actors themselves. The aim of such processes is to distribute strategic intelligence of the S&T dynamics in relation to society to the actors themselves. S&T foresight as collective learning process to support strategic decision-making S&T foresight as collective learning process to support strategic decision-making

2. the major drivers considered S&T change and the new forms of knowledge production and circulation S&T change and the new forms of knowledge production and circulation social and economic change (societal foresights) social and economic change (societal foresights) changes in professional, cultural and ethical norms changes in professional, cultural and ethical norms news forms of organisation (learning organis.), news forms of organisation (learning organis.), regional innovation systems and clusters, regional innovation systems and clusters, geopolitical change, the governance of the global systems and international relations geopolitical change, the governance of the global systems and international relations

3. A typology of foresights Axis 1 : the extensiveness of the foresight activity Axis 1 : the extensiveness of the foresight activity the number and variety of persons or the experts involved. Extensiveness class IIIIII Label classical S&Tstudy collective process societal process

Axis 2 : the intensiveness of the foresight activity quality (completeness) of the learning cycles involved in each of the four phases substance of the activities taking place, substance of the activities taking place, what is produced, how, by which methods, what is produced, how, by which methods, what impacts on the participants. what impacts on the participants. Intensiveness class IIIIII Label opinion exchanges; occasional knowledge production ad-hoc knowledge production; collective learning intensive, systematic Collective knowledge production

Intensiveness strategic analytic strategic analytic scenario scenario building buildingindustrialtechnology orientedfocussed societal the typology : the groups of foresights extensiveness macro-societal societal

macro societal foresights group high extensiveness ; low intensiveness Macro-Societal foresight is rooted in the tradition of public participation Macro-Societal foresight is rooted in the tradition of public participation The central focus is on who participates and the objectives are the creation of new networks and circulation of information The central focus is on who participates and the objectives are the creation of new networks and circulation of information such widely spread exercises may end up in rather loose exchange of opinions among participants such widely spread exercises may end up in rather loose exchange of opinions among participants

focussed-societal group medium position on both axes Like macro-societal foresight exercises, they involve a wide constituency of stakeholders. Like macro-societal foresight exercises, they involve a wide constituency of stakeholders. But they are more focused at sectoral level, which may give them the advantages of a broad approach, but without the difficulties of size But they are more focused at sectoral level, which may give them the advantages of a broad approach, but without the difficulties of size They are becoming the standard procedure for policy making in some countries They are becoming the standard procedure for policy making in some countries

strategic scenario building group low on extensiveness, high on intensiveness important knowledge production activity, leading to a data and modelling challenge. important knowledge production activity, leading to a data and modelling challenge. involve few people directly, having interactions only with a limited number of experts and, at best, some representatives of selected social groups. involve few people directly, having interactions only with a limited number of experts and, at best, some representatives of selected social groups. Each stage involves some sort of qualitative or quantitative modelling. Each stage involves some sort of qualitative or quantitative modelling. The central focus is the internal coherence and plausibility quality of the scenarios The central focus is the internal coherence and plausibility quality of the scenarios

industrial technology oriented group rather low on extensiveness, medium to medium high on intensivemess more classical view of foresight : S&T aspects are seen quite independently from societal aspects. more classical view of foresight : S&T aspects are seen quite independently from societal aspects. they are quite analytic and focused, which can bring very valuable information for technology programme setting, they are quite analytic and focused, which can bring very valuable information for technology programme setting, they are typical of industrially oriented technology promotion foresights they are typical of industrially oriented technology promotion foresights

4.Acknowledged risks and limitations too great a role for users, thus shifting objectives to short term, too great a role for users, thus shifting objectives to short term, when all opinions are legitimate, the risks of inconsistency and factual errors are high, when all opinions are legitimate, the risks of inconsistency and factual errors are high, If foresight is just for anyone to present the pieces on the table for whoever wants to use them, what is the real value added ? If foresight is just for anyone to present the pieces on the table for whoever wants to use them, what is the real value added ? Dont societal foresight put at risk the normal channels of the political decision- making, de-legitimising the political arena ? Dont societal foresight put at risk the normal channels of the political decision- making, de-legitimising the political arena ?

5. Open questions the nature and form of the deliverables and outputs of the project as a whole, the nature and form of the deliverables and outputs of the project as a whole, the nomination and exact role of the steering committee, as well as its distance from political authorities, the nomination and exact role of the steering committee, as well as its distance from political authorities, the nomination procedure for the panel members, given the socio-political nature of the whole process, the nomination procedure for the panel members, given the socio-political nature of the whole process, the method and status of the integration of the divergent views within panels, and the different pieces brought by the different panels. the method and status of the integration of the divergent views within panels, and the different pieces brought by the different panels.

6. Challenges for foresight as government decision-making processes in the ERA the handling of the political dimensions of societally oriented foresights ; questions of diversity, legitimacy, openness, the handling of the political dimensions of societally oriented foresights ; questions of diversity, legitimacy, openness, the sensitiveness to different cultures in the respective disciplinary fields and/or countries, to different rationales among the key actors the sensitiveness to different cultures in the respective disciplinary fields and/or countries, to different rationales among the key actors the design and implementation of really interactive processes the design and implementation of really interactive processes the evaluation of foresights ; validity, credibility, quality assurance, criteria, ethical norms, the evaluation of foresights ; validity, credibility, quality assurance, criteria, ethical norms,

the infrastructures needed for access to background studies and previous results the infrastructures needed for access to background studies and previous results infrastructures and mechanims for capitalisation of results, methodologies and experiences, infrastructures and mechanims for capitalisation of results, methodologies and experiences, networking and coordination mechanisms allowing for decentralised, yet coherent and self-reinforcing foresight activities in the member states. networking and coordination mechanisms allowing for decentralised, yet coherent and self-reinforcing foresight activities in the member states.