Slide 1 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 TIGGE at ECMWF David Richardson, Head, Meteorological Operations Section Slide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RSMC La Réunion activities regarding SWFDP Southern Africa Matthieu Plu (Météo-France, La Réunion), Philippe Arbogast (Météo-France, Toulouse), Nicole.
Advertisements

LRF Training, Belgrade 13 th - 16 th November 2013 © ECMWF Sources of predictability and error in ECMWF long range forecasts Tim Stockdale European Centre.
ECMWF long range forecast systems
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) Richard Swinbank, Zoltan Toth and Philippe Bougeault, with thanks to the GIFS-TIGGE working group.
Proposed Predictability, Dynamics & Ensemble Forecasting Expert Team Richard Swinbank, with Heini Wernli, Masayuki Kyouda and Istvan Szunyogh, and thanks.
How random numbers improve weather and climate predictions Expected and unexpected effects of stochastic parameterizations NCAR day of networking and.
Exeter 1-3 December 2010 Monthly Forecasting with Ensembles Frédéric Vitart European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.
Slide 1 Bilateral meeting 2011Slide 1, ©ECMWF Status and plans for the ECMWF forecasting System.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 WE-01 Jim Caughey THORPEX IPO.
Francesca Marcucci, Lucio Torrisi with the contribution of Valeria Montesarchio, ISMAR-CNR CNMCA, National Meteorological Center,Italy First experiments.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
EGU 2011 TIGGE, TIGGE LAM and the GIFS T. Paccagnella (1), D. Richardson (2), D. Schuster(3), R. Swinbank (4), Z. Toth (3), S.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
SLEPS First Results from SLEPS A. Walser, M. Arpagaus, C. Appenzeller, J. Quiby MeteoSwiss.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
DEMETER Taiwan, October 2003 Development of a European Multi-Model Ensemble System for Seasonal to Interannual Prediction   DEMETER Noel Keenlyside,
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
Predicting global mean temperature. Developments at ECMWF Merge of monthly forecast into EPS –Medium-range EPS is now continuous with monthly forecast.
STEPS: An empirical treatment of forecast uncertainty Alan Seed BMRC Weather Forecasting Group.
Page 1 Pacific THORPEX Predictability, 6-7 June 2005© Crown copyright 2005 The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble David Richardson Met Office, Exeter.
June 16th, 2009 Christian Pagé, CERFACS Laurent Terray, CERFACS - URA 1875 Julien Boé, U California Christophe Cassou, CERFACS - URA 1875 Weather typing.
EUROBRISA WORKSHOP, Paraty March 2008, ECMWF System 3 1 The ECMWF Seasonal Forecast System-3 Magdalena A. Balmaseda Franco Molteni,Tim Stockdale.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology AGREPS – ACCESS Global and Regional EPS.
The 2nd International Workshop on GPM Ground Validation TAIPEI, Taiwan, September 2005 GV for ECMWF's Data Assimilation Research Peter
Soil moisture generation at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Interim Data Co-ordination.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
ENSEMBLES RT4/RT5 Joint Meeting Paris, February 2005 Overview of the WP5.3 Activities Partners: ECMWF, METO/HC, MeteoSchweiz, KNMI, IfM, CNRM, UREAD/CGAM,
11 Background Error Daryl T. Kleist* National Monsoon Mission Scoping Workshop IITM, Pune, India April 2011.
TIGGE and operational EPS 経田 正幸 KYOUDA Masayuki Numerical Prediction Division, Japan Meteorological Agency 9 th THORPEX GIFS-TIGGE Working Group meeting.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association Variability in forecasts of the track.
The TIGGE experience Richard Swinbank and Masayuki Kyouda with thanks to members of GIFS-TIGGE WG & THORPEX IPO S2S project planning group meeting, Exeter,
. Outline  Evaluation of different model-error schemes in the WRF mesoscale ensemble: stochastic, multi-physics and combinations thereof  Where is.
PREDICTABILITY OF WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC TROPICAL CYCLONE EVENTS ON INTRASEASONAL TIMESCALES WITH THE ECMWF MONTHLY FORECAST MODEL Russell L. Elsberry and.
MINERVA workshop, GMU, Sep MINERVA and the ECMWF coupled ensemble systems Franco Molteni, Frederic Vitart European Centre for Medium-Range.
Munehiko Yamaguchi Typhoon Research Department, Meteorological Research Institute of the Japan Meteorological Agency 9:00 – 12: (Thr) Topic.
Huiling Yuan 1, Xiang Su 1, Yuejian Zhu 2, Yan Luo 2, 3, Yuan Wang 1 1. Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education and School of.
Lennart Bengtsson ESSC, Uni. Reading THORPEX Conference December 2004 Predictability and predictive skill of weather systems and atmospheric flow patterns.
GEO - Weather Ocean Water Proposed Weather SBA and cross-linking work packages.
TIGGE Data Archive and Access at NCAR November 2008 November 2008 Steven Worley National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
Slide 1 GO-ESSP Paris. June 2007 Slide 1 (TIGGE and) the EU Funded BRIDGE project Baudouin Raoult Head of Data and Services Section ECMWF.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
ECMWF Training course 26/4/2006 DRD meeting, 2 July 2004 Frederic Vitart 1 Predictability on the Monthly Timescale Frederic Vitart ECMWF, Reading, UK.
ECMWF Meteorological Training Course: Predictability, Diagnostics and Seasonal Forecasting 1. 1.What is model error and how can we distinguish it from.
TIGGE Archive Access at NCAR Steven Worley Doug Schuster Dave Stepaniak Hannah Wilcox.
Slide 1© ECMWF The effect of perturbation re-centring on ensemble forecasts Simon Lang, Martin Leutbecher, Massimo Bonavita.
THORPEX THORPEX (THeObserving system Research and Predictability Experiment) was established in 2003 by the Fourteenth World Meteorological Congress. THORPEX.
© Crown copyright Met Office Predictability and systematic error growth in Met Office MJO predictions Ann Shelly, Nick Savage & Sean Milton, UK Met Office.
Munehiko Yamaguchi 12, Takuya Komori 1, Takemasa Miyoshi 13, Masashi Nagata 1 and Tetsuo Nakazawa 4 ( ) 1.Numerical Prediction.
Regional Re-analyses of Observations, Ensembles and Uncertainties of Climate information Per Undén Coordinator UERRA SMHI.
Recent activities related to EPS (operational aspects) Junichi Ishida and Carolyn Reynolds With contributions from WGNE members 31th WGNE Pretoria, South.
Figures from “The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System”
TIGGE-LAM archive development in the frame of GEOWOW Richard Mladek, Manuel Fuentes (ECMWF)
Current Issues and Challenges in Ensemble Forecasting Junichi Ishida (JMA) and Carolyn Reynolds (NRL) With contributions from WGNE members 31 th WGNE Pretoria,
Lothar (T+42 hours) Figure 4.
Contributing Centres to S2S database
Use of TIGGE Data: Cyclone NARGIS
Middle-Range Ensemble Forecast at CPTEC/INPE - Current Activities
Sub-seasonal prediction at ECMWF
Links with GEO.
Head, Meteorological Operations Section, ECMWF
GIFS-TIGGE project Richard Swinbank, and Young-Youn Park,
Science Objectives contained in three categories
Ensemble tropical cyclone and windstorm forecast applications
NWP Strategy of DWD after 2006 GF XY DWD Feb-19.
Update of NMC/CMA Global Ensemble Prediction System
GEOWOW update Richard Swinbank GIFS-TIGGE meeting March 2014
MOGREPS developments and TIGGE
Met Office contribution to GIFS-TIGGE / SWFDP collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 TIGGE at ECMWF David Richardson, Head, Meteorological Operations Section Slide 1

Slide 2 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 ECMWF TIGGE archive  The TIGGE database now contains five years of global EPS data  Holds more than 520 terabytes (2.6 billion fields).  There are around 1300 registered users of the TIGGE data portal Slide 2

Slide 3 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 ECMWF TIGGE archive Slide 3

Slide 4 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 ECMWF TIGGE archive Slide 4

Slide 5 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 ECMWF TIGGE archive - changes  BoM, KMA stopped providing EPS to TIGGE archive  KMA now testing sending higher resolution EPS  New data:  JMA 00 UTC control step 0 (as analysis)  CMA analysis (06, 18)??  problem with database for 1 week – needed to ask centres to resend. All gaps filled. Thanks to all who did that  Access – new batch access to TIGGE archive (python, perl)  next generation data portal under development  Planned GEOWOW developments:  timeseries for small number of fields  TIGGE-LAM, netcdf Slide 5

Slide 6 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011  GEOWOW (GEOSS interoperability for Weather, Ocean and Water) is an EU-funded FP7 project that will begin in September  GEOWOW will propose and validate a multi-disciplinary, distributed architectural model federating Earth Observation and other Earth Science data holdings and put this model forward as the European contribution to the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Common Infrastructure. Slide 6

Slide 7 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 GEOWOW  The GEO Capacity Building Strategy focuses on three elements: human, institutional and infrastructure.  The Weather component of the GEOWOW project will address all three by improving the access to THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) data and developing and demonstrating products using this data in collaboration with users in developing countries, including providing education and training.  GEOWOW will significantly enhance the accessibility of the TIGGE archive at ECMWF for the wider user community, in particular the ability to efficiently access long time series of forecast data at user-specified locations. Slide 7

Slide 8 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 GEOWOW  3 years: September 2011 – August 2014  Co-ordinated by ESA  Total funding from EU: 7 M euros  For weather: 1.1 M euros  ECMWF  Met Office  Météo-France  Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Slide 8

Slide 9 The operational forecast system  High resolution deterministic forecast: twice per day 16 km 91-level, to 10 days ahead  Ensemble forecast (EPS): twice daily 51 members, 32/65 km 62-level, to 15 days ahead extended to 32 days once a week (Monthly forecast)  Ocean waves: twice daily  Global: 10 days ahead at 28 km  Limited Area Wave (LAW): 5 days ahead at 10 km  Ensemble: 15 days ahead at 55 km  Seasonal forecast: once a month 41-members, 125 km 62 levels, to 7 months ahead a sub-set ensemble of 11 members is run for 13 months every quarter GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Slide 9

Slide 10 The operational ECMWF EPS The operational version of the EPS includes 51 forecasts with resolution: T L 639L62 (~32km, 62 levels) from day 0 to 10, T L 319L62 (~64km, 62 levels) from day 10 to 15 (32 at 00UTC on Thursdays). Initial uncertainties are simulated by adding to the unperturbed analyses a combination of T42L62 singular vectors, computed to optimize total energy growth over a 48h time interval (OTI), and perturbations generated using the new ECMWF Ensemble Data Assimilation (EDA) system. Model uncertainties are simulated by adding stochastic perturbations to the tendencies due to parameterized physical processes (SPPT scheme) and using a stochastic backscatter (SPBS) scheme. The EPS is run twice a day, at 00 and 12 UTC; the 00 UTC run is fully coupled to the HOPE ocean model after day 10. NH SH TR Definition of the perturbed ICs ….. Products

Slide 11 Summary of EPS changes  Initial perturbations:  2009 : Combination of Singular Vectors (SVs) optimised in two 48-hour windows: [t0, t0+48h] and [t0-48h, t0]  2011 : Combination of EDA perturbations (diff. between 10 EDA analyses) and SVs optimised in the [t0, t0+48h] window with reduced (50%) amplitude  Simulation of model uncertainty:  2009 : SPPT with 1 spatial scale, white-noise time variab. with 6-hour time scale  2011 : SPPT with 3 spatial and time scales, red-noise variability in time (Markov chain), plus stochastic backscatter (SPBS)

Slide 12  Since 22 June 2010, differences between 6h perturbed forecasts from the ECMWF Ensemble Data Assimilation system have been combined with singular vectors to generate the EPS initial perturbations  The ten T L 399L91 EDA perturbed analyses are generated by randomly perturbing the observations and the SST, and by running the forecast model with the SPPT stochastic scheme. The random perturbations are defined by sampling a normal distribution with the observation error standard deviation Simulation of initial uncertainty using EDA  Since 18 May 2011, the EDA has been used to specify the background errors “of the day” in the high-resolution 4D- Var U850 background error standard deviation Randomization method (ope, left) – EDA (cy36r4, right)

Slide km 6 h 1000 km 3 d 2000 km 30 d Simulation of model uncertainty: multi- scale SPPT Since Oct 1998, the EPS has included a stochastic scheme designed to simulate random model errors due to parameterized physical processes (SPPT). Since Nov 2010, the scheme includes a multi- scale pattern generator to account for parameterization errors on multiple spatial and temporal scales. (from M Leutbecher)

Slide 14 Since Nov 2010, a stochastic backscatter scheme (SPBS) is also used in the EPS:  Rationale: a fraction of the dissipated energy is backscattered upscale and acts as streamfunction forcing for the resolved-scale flow (Shutts & Palmer 2004, Shutts 2005, Berner et al 2009)  Streamfunction forcing is given by: Recent improvements/updates include:  Revised convective dissipation calculation  Revised dissipation rate smoothing  Changed pressure dependency of vertical correlations  Option to force only part of the spectrum [reduces computational cost and avoids problems detected with small scale forcing] Streamfunction forcing Backscatter ratio Total dissipation rate Pattern generator Simulation of model uncertainty: SPBS

Slide 15 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Recent operational changes  24 June 2010 (cycle 36r2) includes  Changes to EPS initial-time perturbations  9 November 2010 (cycle 36r4) includes  New cloud scheme  New surface analysis schemes are introduced for snow and soil moisture  EPS: revised model uncertainty; retuned initial perturbation amplitudes  18 May 2011 (cycle 37r2) includes  Data assimilation changes  Technical change: model-level data in GRIB-2 format Slide 15

Slide 16 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 EPS probability skill, RPSS, T850, N hem Monthly score and 12-month running mean (bold) of Ranked Probability Skill Score for EPS forecasts of T850 at day 3 (blue), 5 (red) and 7 (black) for N hem Slide 16

Slide 17 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 EPS probability skill, RPSS, T850, Europe Monthly score and 12-month running mean (bold) of Ranked Probability Skill Score for EPS forecasts of T850 at day 3 (blue), 5 (red) and 7 (black) for Europe Slide 17

Slide 18 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 EPS skill T850 NH Slide 18

Slide 19 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 EPS spread/skill 850 wind tropics Slide 19

Slide 20 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 EPS skill 850 wind tropics Slide 20

Slide 21 EPS probabilistic precipitation skill GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Slide 21

Slide 22 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Product Development  New parameters from deterministic forecast  Height of lowest cloud base  Height of 0°C level  New parameters from EPS  L, M, H cloud cover Slide 22

Slide 23 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 New EPS clustering  New clustering operational since 16 November  Graphical products on the ECMWF website at:  Cluster fields available via dissemination  The disseminated products are based on the day 5-7 time range (time steps 120, 132, 144, 156 and 168)  Old clusters will be switched off later this year Slide 23

Slide 24 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 New EPS clustering Slide 24

Slide 25 Regime transitions EPS forecast of large-scale weather regimes. Daily time series for November 2010 to April 2011 of the number of EPS clusters and observed climatological regimes (coloured circles). The climatological regime associated with each cluster is indicated by the colour of the bar: blue - positive NAO pattern, green - negative NAO, red – blocking, violet - Atlantic ridge. The EPS clusters are computed over forecast days 5-7. Slide 25 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011

Slide 26 Climatological regimes Slide 26 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011

Slide 27 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Tropical cyclones  Tracking of tropical cyclones developing during forecast (medium-range and monthly products on web)  Operational tracks – deterministic up to 1 hour earlier  Under test: replacement of operational tracker (will include tracks beyond 5 days) Slide 27

Slide 28 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Tropical cyclones Slide 28 Typhoon Songda May 2011 Operational tracker

Slide 29 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Tropical cyclones Slide 29

Slide 30 Track plumes for the TC are plotted for the EPS members, T1279 and Control. Each colour represents 24h forecast interval (EPS) 0-24h 24-48h 48-72h 72-96h h h h Slide 30 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011

Slide 31 GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Product Development  Extra-tropical cyclone products (web products)  Surface weather parameters (new web plots)  Extension of EFI Slide 31

Slide 32 ecCharts – new interactive web plots GIFS-TIGGE 31 August - 2 September 2011 Slide 32