Corridors Herald Ruijters, Head of Unit for Trans European Network, DG Mobility and Transport Brussels, 29 November 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research & Innovation Towards better access to scientific information "Strategy, policy and funding" Copenhagen June 13 th Octavi Quintana Trias Director,
Advertisements

Information - Communication 1 European Commission December 2005 Trans-European transport network policy.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Environment and transport Lessons from the Italian ERDF Operational Programme for transport 1.The EU transport.
GREEN PAPER "TOWARDS A NEW CULTURE FOR URBAN MOBILITY" EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
The Connecting Europe Facility
Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
Anna Panagopoulou TEN-T Executive Agency Head of Unit, T4
EESC HEARING Sustainable development of the EU Transport policy and TEN-T The practical example: PP17 Brussels 26 April 2011.
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Visby Transport Workshop, 12 June 2009 Priority Area 11To Improve Internal and External Transport Links Main Actions.
Transport RAIL Isabelle Vandoorne Brussels, 29 November 2012 TEN-T 2012 calls info day.
The future of TEN-T policy and transport corridors in Europe The notion of comodality: a methodology to ensure sustainability of TEN-T Prof. Dr. Jan Simons.
How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport,
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Multi-Modality Chris North TEN-T EA Head of Unit T3 – Air and Waterborne Transport, Logistics, Innovation and.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Introduction Dirk Beckers TEN-T Executive Agency Executive Director TEN-T Info Day November 2012.
TEN-T Innovation & New Technologies Annual & Multi-annual calls Nov’2012 TEN-T Calls Info Day November 2012 Helmut Morsi, Deputy Head of Unit.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Roads Yiannis Argyropoulos TEN-T EA Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport TEN-T Info Day November.
Mate Gjorgjievski, Transport Law expert 13 th SEEIC meeting, , Sarajevo.
Current Database 3. EXTRA Questionnaire. Questionnaire Proposals This is part of the evaluation task No questionnaire to be included in the short term.
TEN-T R EVIEW AND “C ONNECTING E UROPE F ACILITY ” CPMR PROPOSALS LISBON 6 March 2012.
An ecosystem for freight information services: the iCargo project
Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Green Corridors 2030 Jerker Sjögren South Baltic Foresight Debate St Petersburg 29 April 2010.
Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Getting a grip on the Green Corridors Jerker Sjögren Green Corridors Stakeholders Forum Tallinn.
FreightVision Austria 2050 ITS and Smart Logistics towards Eco-Efficency Claus Seibt, Independent Expert (formerly Austrian Institute of Technology)
Thematic Session on EU Transport Infrastructure Policy
White Paper 2011 and Development Perspectives of Transport System in Latvia Guntars Jansons Manager Development Planning.
Logistics 10 February 2012, Brussels Transport The TEN-T core Mediterranean Corridor EU Core Net Cities Barcelona Congress 19 June 2013 Vicenç Pedret Cuscó.
Alexio Picco, WiderMos Technical Manager
Analysing the Green Corridor Concept – Preliminary Results Nico Herz, Jutta Wolff Hamburg University of Technology Institute for Transport Planning and.
Trans-European Transport Network and the Connecting Europe Facility
Transport Sustainable Mobility and Integrated Planning in Urban Areas: Trade Union Dialogue with Local Authorities Day 2: 5th February 2013, SESSION 1:
1 Prof. Dr. Albert Veenstra Scientific director Dinalog (NL)
NCP Infoday, Brussels, 23 June 2010 NCP Infoday ICT for Mobility Future ICT Work Programmes Helen Köpman ICT for Transport European Commission Directorate-General.
1 Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) within the transport operational programme Marco Cecchetto
Transport Henrik Drake "Ports and Inland Navigation" European Commission, DG Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE ) Common Issues Meeting on RIS Zagreb, 13.
Vicenç Pedret Cuscó Economic Adviser European Commission – DG MOVE Future of the European Transport Policy and Green Corridors Presentation at: TransBaltic.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
THE NEW TRANS-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT NETWORK A CORE NETWORK: BLUEPRINT FOR 2030.
Greening Freight & Transportation Corridors Commission for Environmental Cooperation Mapping the road to a sustainable future.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) SESSION II Local and Regional Expectations and Contributions Towards Rail Baltica.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
Cross border obstacles in rail transport and interoperability Giordano Rigon European Commission – DG MOVE D2 ERESS Customer Forum Brussels 16 June 2011.
Financing of TEN-T projects via INEA
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines High Level Meeting Danube Commission Cesare Bernabei Budapest, 9 October 2013.
1 57th session of UNECE Working Party on Inland Transport Statistics Activities of the European Commission - Eurostat in inland transport statistics Yves.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
Short term research to support European Transport policy European Transport policypart DG for Energy and Transport DG for Energy and Transport Outline.
The White Paper from 2001 to 2010 Vision White Paper  Issued by the EC  Consultation from stakeholders, Parliament and Council  Will set out.
The project is co-funded by the European Union, Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance Project activities realisation: WP4 FB 16 – Faculty of transport.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
C4Freight. Freight Transport Corridors  Objective Demonstrate on key pan-European corridors innovative transport technologies, systems and strategies.
Transport Results of 2014 CEF calls for proposals Stéphane Ouaki, Herald Ruijters, Bernadette Frederick CEF Coordination Committee – Transport, 10 July.
he transport development progress in Slovenia the EASYCONNECTING hint
The Seventh Framework Programme
Development of the Intermodal Transport in Bulgaria
5th Regional TAF TSI Workshop SK, CZ, HU
Increasing competitiveness of rail freight undertakings – a business or political game? Jürgen Maier-Gyomlay Head International Affairs & Projects
Trans-European networks
Europe’s railways – where are you?
MISSING LINKS INFORMATION SESSION CONNECTING EUROPE FACILITY CALL FOR CROSS-BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS ON COMPREHENSIVE AND ON CORE NETWORKS Brussels,
Round table discussion on ERTMS roll-out strategy
Enabling multi-modality and efficient freight logistics
Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
"State aid and EU funding - Are they compatible?”
Smart & green mobility Workshop CEF Transport
White Paper on Transport:
Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems Directive 2010/40/EU
Cross border regions Gateways to TEN-T
Greener Smarter Better Cities - an EU perspective
Presentation transcript:

Corridors Herald Ruijters, Head of Unit for Trans European Network, DG Mobility and Transport Brussels, 29 November 2012

Outline Transport Policy White Paper Multi modal corridors EU added value Management of the corridor Greening TEN-T corridors Rail Freight Corridors In 2004 it was estimated that to complete the 30 priority axis by 2020 €225 billion is needed, however the latest estimates show that the total cost will be around €251 billion. The finalisation of the whole TEN – T network by 2020 would cost €600 billion On the other hand for the period 2007 – 2013 only €8 billion is allocated to the TEN – T out of the TEN budget. The consequence is that: There is a need to look for alternative ways of financing the other TEN – T infrastructure: Structural (€ 24 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) and Cohesion Funds (€31 billion for TEN T in the period 2007 – 2013) European Investment Bank (about € 54 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) PPP: Two options: Covering of the revenue / demand risk: The Commission and EIB are working on a guarantee instrument that will provide security for standby credit facilities aimed at covering post construction risks during the early operational phase. The objective of this instrument would be reducing one of the main obstacles to private sector participation in transport infrastructure investments - low private sector appetite to assume initial traffic revenue risk. Covering Availability risk (availability of the service or the quality of the service). Note: total TEN budget about 8.168 billion of which: 8.01 billion for TEN-T 115 million for TEN-E

Multi modal corridors Modal integration: optimal use multi modal infrastructure (nodes) Interoperability and other standards including intelligent transport systems, innovative infrastructure In 2004 it was estimated that to complete the 30 priority axis by 2020 €225 billion is needed, however the latest estimates show that the total cost will be around €251 billion. The finalisation of the whole TEN – T network by 2020 would cost €600 billion On the other hand for the period 2007 – 2013 only €8 billion is allocated to the TEN – T out of the TEN budget. The consequence is that: There is a need to look for alternative ways of financing the other TEN – T infrastructure: Structural (€ 24 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) and Cohesion Funds (€31 billion for TEN T in the period 2007 – 2013) European Investment Bank (about € 54 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) PPP: Two options: Covering of the revenue / demand risk: The Commission and EIB are working on a guarantee instrument that will provide security for standby credit facilities aimed at covering post construction risks during the early operational phase. The objective of this instrument would be reducing one of the main obstacles to private sector participation in transport infrastructure investments - low private sector appetite to assume initial traffic revenue risk. Covering Availability risk (availability of the service or the quality of the service). Note: total TEN budget about 8.168 billion of which: 8.01 billion for TEN-T 115 million for TEN-E

EU added value International cooperation and coordinated implementation Cross-border Environmental aspects and bottlenecks have to be taken into account In 2004 it was estimated that to complete the 30 priority axis by 2020 €225 billion is needed, however the latest estimates show that the total cost will be around €251 billion. The finalisation of the whole TEN – T network by 2020 would cost €600 billion On the other hand for the period 2007 – 2013 only €8 billion is allocated to the TEN – T out of the TEN budget. The consequence is that: There is a need to look for alternative ways of financing the other TEN – T infrastructure: Structural (€ 24 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) and Cohesion Funds (€31 billion for TEN T in the period 2007 – 2013) European Investment Bank (about € 54 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) PPP: Two options: Covering of the revenue / demand risk: The Commission and EIB are working on a guarantee instrument that will provide security for standby credit facilities aimed at covering post construction risks during the early operational phase. The objective of this instrument would be reducing one of the main obstacles to private sector participation in transport infrastructure investments - low private sector appetite to assume initial traffic revenue risk. Covering Availability risk (availability of the service or the quality of the service). Note: total TEN budget about 8.168 billion of which: 8.01 billion for TEN-T 115 million for TEN-E

Management Managerial structures Efficient and effective coordination Multi level management involving all stakeholders Efficient and effective coordination Investment plan Long term perspective In 2004 it was estimated that to complete the 30 priority axis by 2020 €225 billion is needed, however the latest estimates show that the total cost will be around €251 billion. The finalisation of the whole TEN – T network by 2020 would cost €600 billion On the other hand for the period 2007 – 2013 only €8 billion is allocated to the TEN – T out of the TEN budget. The consequence is that: There is a need to look for alternative ways of financing the other TEN – T infrastructure: Structural (€ 24 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) and Cohesion Funds (€31 billion for TEN T in the period 2007 – 2013) European Investment Bank (about € 54 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) PPP: Two options: Covering of the revenue / demand risk: The Commission and EIB are working on a guarantee instrument that will provide security for standby credit facilities aimed at covering post construction risks during the early operational phase. The objective of this instrument would be reducing one of the main obstacles to private sector participation in transport infrastructure investments - low private sector appetite to assume initial traffic revenue risk. Covering Availability risk (availability of the service or the quality of the service). Note: total TEN budget about 8.168 billion of which: 8.01 billion for TEN-T 115 million for TEN-E

Greening the TEN-T corridors Integrate green initiatives for multi modal corridors Identify and evaluate key performance indicators, contributing to effective greening (in particular CO2 reduction and service quality) Integrated approach (including above cited aspects such as interoperability, standards, urban nodes, passenger and freight flows) First results available by 2014 In 2004 it was estimated that to complete the 30 priority axis by 2020 €225 billion is needed, however the latest estimates show that the total cost will be around €251 billion. The finalisation of the whole TEN – T network by 2020 would cost €600 billion On the other hand for the period 2007 – 2013 only €8 billion is allocated to the TEN – T out of the TEN budget. The consequence is that: There is a need to look for alternative ways of financing the other TEN – T infrastructure: Structural (€ 24 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) and Cohesion Funds (€31 billion for TEN T in the period 2007 – 2013) European Investment Bank (about € 54 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) PPP: Two options: Covering of the revenue / demand risk: The Commission and EIB are working on a guarantee instrument that will provide security for standby credit facilities aimed at covering post construction risks during the early operational phase. The objective of this instrument would be reducing one of the main obstacles to private sector participation in transport infrastructure investments - low private sector appetite to assume initial traffic revenue risk. Covering Availability risk (availability of the service or the quality of the service). Note: total TEN budget about 8.168 billion of which: 8.01 billion for TEN-T 115 million for TEN-E

Rail Freight Corridors Regulation 2010/913 studies managerial structures terminals dissemination In 2004 it was estimated that to complete the 30 priority axis by 2020 €225 billion is needed, however the latest estimates show that the total cost will be around €251 billion. The finalisation of the whole TEN – T network by 2020 would cost €600 billion On the other hand for the period 2007 – 2013 only €8 billion is allocated to the TEN – T out of the TEN budget. The consequence is that: There is a need to look for alternative ways of financing the other TEN – T infrastructure: Structural (€ 24 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) and Cohesion Funds (€31 billion for TEN T in the period 2007 – 2013) European Investment Bank (about € 54 billion for the period 2007 – 2013) PPP: Two options: Covering of the revenue / demand risk: The Commission and EIB are working on a guarantee instrument that will provide security for standby credit facilities aimed at covering post construction risks during the early operational phase. The objective of this instrument would be reducing one of the main obstacles to private sector participation in transport infrastructure investments - low private sector appetite to assume initial traffic revenue risk. Covering Availability risk (availability of the service or the quality of the service). Note: total TEN budget about 8.168 billion of which: 8.01 billion for TEN-T 115 million for TEN-E