The Role of GNSS in the GLAs’ Future Service Provision Dr Sally Basker Director of Research & Radionavigation General Lighthouse Authorities of the United.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Action Plan for the applications of GALILEO and EGNOS June 2008.
Advertisements

© David Last The Need for R esilient PNT at Sea Professor David Last Strategic Advisor, General Lighthouse Authorities of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
UKSON e-Navigation Operational & Technical Working Group 16 th February 2007.
Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas System Architecture Integrated Colin Brown E-Navigation.
E-navigation, and IHO’s role IHO, Monaco, October 2014 John Erik Hagen, Regional Director NCA Coordinator of the completed IMO Correspondence Group on.
SAFEPORT is partially funded by the European Commission and the project is carried out in the context of the Galileo FP7 R&D programme supervised by European.
PNT Advisory Board March 2008 Arve Dimmen Director Maritime Safety Norwegian Coastal Administration.
Implementing the Multi- Source Positioning Service: The Multi-Source Receiver Dr. Paul Williams General Lighthouse Authorities United Kingdom and Ireland.
RAPC Technologies Corporation Performance Computers for Challenging Marine Environments.
Christoph Amlacher October 17, 2007 E-Navigation Conference, Oslo Evolution of Positioning Services for Inland Waterways.
Resilient PNT Update in Europe
© David Last November 2014 La Coruña, Spain Satellite Navigation – Where’s it Taking Us Now? Professor David Last Picture: earthobservatory.nasa.
Setting the scene: The ACCSEAS Project Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager ACCSEAS Conference th February 2015.
Automatic Identification System
Commercial-In-Confidence © Copyright 2006 L-3 Communications Nautronix Limited Graeme Dunk Director Defence & Government Relations Convergences in Maritime.
EGNOS Service Provision Workshop, 4 July EGNOS for freight transport and logistics.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
P.P. Sinha Directorate General Of Lighthouses & Lightships Ministry Of Shipping Government Of India E-NAVIGATION: WILL IT BE AN ULTIMATE PANACEA? GEO INFRA.
On board equipment for Sea traffic Management What will be needed?
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Maritime Cyber Security: Navigation and Ships’ Systems
University of Technology, Business and Design Hochschule Wismar Department of Maritime Studies Slide 1 Dr. - Ing. Michael Baldauf Combined use of sensor.
The Impact of GPS Jamming on the Safety of Navigation Dr S Basker, Dr A Grant, Dr P Williams, Dr N Ward Presented to the Civil GPS Service Interface Committee,
AGCC CGSIC ISC Feb US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CIVIL GPS SERVICE INTERFACE COMMITTEE INTERNATIONAL SUB COMMITTEE MEETING Melbourne, Australia,
IT Strategy for Waterborne Transport Director John Erik Hagen Norwegian National Coastal Administration.
ENC-GNSS 2006 – Manchester, UK Civil GPS Interface Committee International Sub-Committee May 7, 2006 John E. Augustine Acting Director, Office of Navigation.
ROAD TRANSPORT RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION (2003 Call)
CETMEF Common Shore-Based e-Navigation Architecture
1 May 7, MTS at a Glance 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 18,000 bridges 18,000 bridges 78 million recreational.
Børge Hetland Director Sales Digital Ship Hamburg, 19 th March 2015 e-navigation from concept to reality.
Automatic Identification System
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
Vulnerability Assessment of the Infrastructure that Relies on the Global Positioning System (GPS) 13 th ITS World Congress and Exhibition 9 October 2006.
The IALA Vision for e-Navigation Nordic Navigation Conference Oslo 16 & 17 October 2007.
Domestic Space-Based PNT Interference Detection and Mitigation Captain Curtis L. Dubay, P.E. US Coast Guard Chairman, DHS Positioning, Navigation and Timing.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport Maritime transport policy 1/20 JST CETMEF PARIS, thème 6 : e-navigation.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF A NAVIGATIONAL WATCH STCW Code states that the Officer of the Watch (OOW) is the master's.
e-Navigation Architecture The present status and work ahead Nordic Institute of Navigation Bergen Rolf Zetterberg.
e-Navigation and it’s applicability to inland waterways
Chart 1> The on-board maritime PNT Module> R. Ziebold > IALA e-Nav 12 09/25/2012 The on-board maritime PNT Module – Concept & Status of Realization.
The GLAs’ e-Navigation Programme Dr Sally Basker & Dr Nick Ward Presented at CGSIC, 22 nd September 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The US Committee on the Marine Transportation System and e-Navigation PIANC Annual Meeting 27 August 2012.
Robust and Resilient PNT: Today’s Requirement Dr Sally Basker CGSIC, Savannah, 21 September 2009.
Fusion Centres in Selected Countries Borders & Globalization Conference September 25-27, 2014 Elaine Koren, Research & Analysis Division Fusion Centres.
James T. Doherty Institute for Defense Analyses 16 October 2007
Martitime Traffic Monitoring Baltic Master midterm conference Snekkersten October 2006 Łukasz Bibik, Maritime Office Gdynia.
Captain Robert Tremlett Infrastructure Communications Navigation (Light beacons, buoys, Terrestrial radio-navigation (including local GPS.
© David Last Resilient Positioning, Navigation & Timing Forum 14 April 2014 Rotterdam The Navigation of Navigation Professor David Last Past-President.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation and its benefits to the environment Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager BE-AWARE II Final Conference Ronneby, Sweden 18.
Examining the Risk Posed by GPS Jamming & Spoofing Professor David Last Strategic Advisor General Lighthouse Authorities of United Kingdom and Ireland.
© David Last October 14-15, 2010 Washington, DC The Effect of Jammers on GPS in a Maritime Environment Professor David Last Consultant to the General Lighthouse.
Munich SATNAV, Munich Satellite Navigation Summit February 21-23, 2006 Michael E. Shaw Director, U.S. National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
Legal base for harmonized data protection Stefan Jenner Meeting of IALA LAP 12 March 7-8, 2013.
European eLoran Status Dr Sally Basker & Dr Nick Ward General Lighthouse Authorities of the United Kingdom and Ireland International Loran Association,
© David Last Luftfartskonferensen Bodo, Norway 4 February 2016 Achieving Security of Positioning & Timing for Transportation Professor David Last Past-President,
CGSIC International Subcommittee Prague, Czech Republic March 14, 2005 Michael E. Shaw Director, Navigation and Spectrum Policy U.S. Department of Transportation.
19-21 February 2008 Michael Shaw, Director U.S. National Coordination Office for Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) GPS-Galileo Progress.
Differences between customs brokers and customs carriers Differences between customs brokers and customs carriers Baku, April 8, 2016 TAIEX Workshop on.
GPS Jamming and the Impact on Maritime Navigation Alan Grant, Paul Williams, Nick Ward and Sally Basker General Lighthouse Authorities of the United Kingdom.
The importance of resilient position-fixing for e-Navigation George Shaw PNT Seminar, RNN, Stockholm 18 May 2011.
CAPT David B. Moskoff, USMS Professor of Marine Transportation United States Merchant Marine Academy Master Mariner – USCG Unlimited CAPT David B. Moskoff,
1 EU funding for sustainable energy. 2 Standardisation Ivan Konaktchiev Certification Engineer.
AIS/WX Project Disseminating Environmental Information to Mariners via AIS Technology Bill Benning Chief Technology Officer Marine Exchange of Alaska.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation Test-Bed in the North Sea Region SUCG Northern Lighthouse Board 1 st November 2012.
WORLD MARITIME DAY PARALLEL EVENT
The shore based AIS Service as an e-navigation service
“e-Navigation” update
e-Navigation Overview
e-Navigation The Benefits to Ship Operators John Vonli General Manager
Presentation transcript:

The Role of GNSS in the GLAs’ Future Service Provision Dr Sally Basker Director of Research & Radionavigation General Lighthouse Authorities of the United Kingdom & Ireland International Information Sub-Committee, Civil GPS Service Interface Committee, Manchester, 7 May 2006

Content  The GLAs  Shipping trends and e-Navigation  The Role of GNSS  Securing e-Navigation Benefits

The General Lighthouse Authorities

Trinity House Commissioners of Irish Lights Northern Lighthouse board The General Lighthouse Authorities of the United Kingdom and Ireland The tri-GLA Research & Radionavigation directorate works on behalf of all three GLAs

Building on a track record of success  The GLAs shared mission is is the delivery of a reliable, efficient and cost effective AtoN service for the benefit and safety of all mariners  The GLAs operate in a “user pays” cost-recovery environment based on “Light Dues”  Light dues have reduced by 50% in real terms in the last 10 years  This has been achieved by improving the cost-effectiveness of physical aids to navigation (lights and floating aids)  Taking this further means delivering a radionavigation dividend  cost-savings that result from the introduction of radionavigation services and their take-up in the maritime sector

Shipping trends and e-Navigation

Ships are getting larger Source: MAN B&W Diesel A/S. Propulsion Trends in Container Vessels. In June 2006 the company Royal Caribbean plans to launch a vessel of 158,000 tons, with accommodation for 3,600 passengers

Ships are getting faster The SuperSeaCat is more than 100 metres long, carries 800 passengers plus 175 cars, and operates at 38 knots Source: MAN B&W Diesel A/S. Propulsion Trends in Container Vessels.

Traffic is becoming more congested On average, a ship passes through the Dover Straits every 3 minutes

e-Navigation - making safe navigation easier and cheaper  The cost-effective collection, integration and display of maritime information onboard and ashore by electronic means, to enhance berth-to-berth navigation and related services, for safety and security at sea, and protection of the marine environment  Widespread support at IMO and IALA  Delivery  GNSS underpinned by fail-safe supplementary position signals  integrated displays – communications – information management – alarm prioritisation – shore-based monitoring & intervention  It will enable new applications  virtual AtoNs for the early marking of wrecks or other hazards before they are marked physically with wreck-marking buoys

The Role of GNSS

GNSS for navigation  GNSS will be the dominant e-Navigation sensor in the maritime domain  Current GPS and DGPS is likely to continue to be the mainstay of many ships for many years  more than 30% of all ships are older than 20 years  The L1 and L5 frequencies will offer GPS/Galileo interoperability for maritime users Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2005 Review of Maritime Transport

GNSS for situational awareness  GNSS is being used for situational awareness in two ways  Automatic Identification Systems (AIS)  Long Range Identification and Tracking  AIS uses GPS for timing and positioning  ship borne and shore base stations  ship borne and shore-based situational awareness  used as an AtoN (e-ANSI, synthetic AIS, virtual AtoNs)  LRIT uses GPS for positioning  mainly shore-based situational awareness for security and safety

GNSS for timing  GPS is used for timing synchronised or sequenced lights  some AtoN lights are less conspicuous when viewed against light-polluted waterfront backgrounds  options include changing the characteristics of individual lights (e.g. flashing blue/yellow) or groups of lights (e.g. synchronise or sequence)  important safety issue  GPS is also used for timing in AIS user equipment & base stations Courtesy: Sealite

The impact of GPS on marine service provision Dependent on GPS

GPS is a key enabling technology and a target for jamming  Many of the GLAs current and future e-Navigation services are enabled by GPS  GPS is vulnerable and is a target  for people who do not want to be tracked  for people who want to disrupt society more generally  IGEB, February 2001  GPS provides many benefits to civilian users. It is vulnerable, however, to interference and other disruptions that can have harmful consequences. GPS users must ensure that adequate independent backup systems or procedures can be used when needed RADIXON HADRIAN RJ-G1575 GPS Jammer

Securing GNSS Benefits for e-Navigation

Reverting from e-Navigation to physical AtoNs  e-Navigation systems will be designed with high levels of availability and reliability to support one-man-bridge and other innovative operations  Reverting from e-Navigation based solely on GNSS to physical AtoNs will become less straightforward  Under some circumstances navigational safety might actually worsen  A second, complementary and dissimilar, multi-modal independent PNT service is needed to realise the full benefits of e-Navigation

eLoran – the right supplementary positioning signal for e-Navigation  A single source of positioning and timing is unacceptable in the marine domain  A Marine navigation and surveillance need a mixture of positioning and timing systems and e-Navigation needs a second, complementary and dissimilar, multi- modal independent PNT service is needed  eLoran is the only service that fulfils the requirement ServiceIndep’t PNT Multi- modal Independent with respect to GPS SystemSignalUser Galileo  eLoran DGPS  SBAS 3    Radar 2  1.PNT – Position, Navigation and Time 2.Including radar transponders – Racons 3.SBAS has independent time but not P or N

eLoran makes sense  The eLoran objective  the provision of an international, globally-standardised eLoran PNT (position, navigation and time) multi-modal service, based on interoperable multi-regional components both as a complement to GNSS and as a stand-alone backup in case of failure  eLoran must make sense to governments, service providers and users  improving safety  meeting IMO A.915 general navigation requirements  improving the cost-effectiveness of AtoN service provision

eLoran will secure key GNSS benefits for e-Navigation  eLoran will secure the important GNSS benefits for e-Navigation and AtoN service provision  Increased operational flexibility and improved safety from new operational concepts  Greater throughput of freight  Virtual AtoNs  earlier marking of wrecks  traffic separation schemes  marking shifting channels and sand banks  Reduced cost of AtoN service provision  Insurance against intentional or unintentional interference

eLoran at ENC  Briefing presentations  Monday – Shipping trends, e-Navigation, eLoran White Paper  Tuesday – Harwich trials, container tracking, French experience  Wednesday – GLA R&RNAV procurements in 2006/7  Papers  Mitch’s bit  GLA paper