Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October 2012. Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Advertisements

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Overview of Wisconsin’s Waiver 1 College & Career Ready High Academic Standards Support for Individualized Learning Data-Informed Decisions Constructive.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Career & Technical Education Standards Career and Technical Education WI Department of Public Instruction.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
DPI Updates School Improvement Division Meeting March 19, 2013.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
State Assessment Results CCR = ACTE T E A E C A C T A.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Let’s Get to the Core Presenter Info: Ron Jetty, Director, PK 16 Initiatives University of Wisconsin System.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
March, Agenda 2017 Every Child a Graduate, College and Career Ready  What and how should kids learn?  How do we know if they have learned it?
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
Educator Effectiveness CFMS Staff Meeting, January 2013.
RIO OPENING DAY LET THE LEARNING BEGIN!. Today’s Agenda ◦ Becoming a Professional Learning Community ◦ WI Assessment Update ◦ Analysis of Student.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Key Initiatives to Ensure College & Career Readiness for All Students.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
ABC District Next-Generation Accountability Report March
Accountability Training Review Agenda for Today: Review of calculation changes and what’s new In depth review of Closing Gaps calculations Graduation Rates.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
ESSA and School Accountability in Alaska Brian Laurent, Data Management Supervisor.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Communication Webinar:
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Bennett County School District
Language Arts Assessment Update
School Accountability Report Cards
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
New Statewide Accountability System
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Starting Community Conversations
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October 2012

Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator Effectiveness –H–How do we ensure that students have highly effective teachers and schools? School Finance Reform –H–How should we pay for schools?

College & Career Ready High Academic Standards Support for Individualized Learning Data-Informed Decisions Constructive Accountability Balanced Assessment Support for School Improvement Effective Educators

Accountability Index AA comprehensive accountability index has replaced the AYP pass-fail system. AYP reports are gone; accountability reporting will now be done with School Report Cards ( ). TThe index is a composite of sub-scales that measure performance across four priority areas : SStudent Achievement SStudent Growth CClosing Gaps OOn-track to Graduation/Postsecondary Readiness SStudent Engagement indicators, if missed, result in 5 point deduction TTest Participation Rate AAbsenteeism Rate DDropout Rate TThe index score is on a 0–100 scale. Sub-scale scores as well as the index score will be reported to enhance transparency and differentiation.

Accountability Ratings  The index score will place schools into one of five rating levels: 1. Significantly Exceeds Expectations 2. Exceeds Expectations 3. Meets Expectations 4. Meets Few Expectations 5. Fails to Meet Expectations  These ratings serve as the new accountability determinations and determine level of support. 5

 School Report Cards provide each school’s overall score, priority area scores, and student engagement indicator performance. They also include WSAS performance over the last five years.  School Report Card Detail packets provide more information related to the accountability calculations as well as additional data to inform local conversations and school improvement efforts.  An Interpretive Guide is meant to provide information about the Report Cards.  A Technical Guide will help users interested in the specific details of index calculations. School Report Cards

State and Federal Accountability  The report cards:  Replace AYP reports  Serve as the primary reporting tool for the state accountability system  Will be issued annually  Are in addition to Title I identifications (Priority and Focus), which are federally required cohorts (every four years) 7

Summary Points The report cards reflect a better, more comprehensive way of measuring schools’ effectiveness in helping students graduate ready for college and career. The accountability index is based on multiple factors: student achievement on WSAS and the ACT, growth in student achievement, progress in closing achievement gaps, student progress toward postsecondary readiness, graduation rates, and attendance. The report cards provide valuable guidance on how our schools are doing and where to improve. In combination with other school data, they can help schools plan and evaluate their improvement efforts. The DPI will explore including more measures of college- and career-readiness in the index calculations in the future. 8

Release Schedule – Preliminary Report Cards 9 Secure Release – week of September 24 –PDFs in SAFE (educators only) –Preliminary and secure (embargoed) Updated Secure Release – week of October 8 –PDFs in SAFE (educators only) –Preliminary and secure (embargoed) Preliminary Public Release – week of October 22 –PDFs posted to DPI webpage organized by district –Preliminary but public (with redaction) –Searchable state file with determinations

New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New WKCE benchmarks established for reading, math Title I Priority & Focus schools identified Educator Effectiveness system design continues; Act 166 passed New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New WKCE benchmarks established for reading, math Title I Priority & Focus schools identified Educator Effectiveness system design continues; Act 166 passed New school report cards first issued ( accountability reports) New system of support for Title I Priority & Focus schools begins New kindergarten literacy screener administered statewide DPI provides curricular resources for Common Core State Standards implementation First districts begin pilot of Educator Effectiveness system Smarter Balanced assessment field testing Educator Effectiveness statewide pilot Smarter Balanced assessment field testing Educator Effectiveness statewide pilot Common Core State Standards fully incorporated into school/district curricula Smarter Balanced & Dynamic Learning Maps replace WKCE & WAA-SwD in math, English Language Arts (incl. reading & writing) Educator Effectiveness system implemented ASSETS for ELLs assessment in use First graduating class with higher graduation requirements (targeted –needs legislation) Timeline

11 For more information, please visit: