IAMU AGA10 StPetersburg, September 21, 2009 International Round Table Accreditation of Programmes of Study at IAMU-member MET Institutions (Creating a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
Advertisements

WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan Dr. Luis Sobrado 27 th May 2011.
Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
1 Bologna Process Seminar Friday 12 May The Mobility Challenge Sorbonne Declaration, May 1998 “At both undergraduate and graduate level, students.
TEMPUS SCM Form N. C032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters Network Podgorica September, 2007.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
ERASMUS + Key Action 2 Cooperation for innovation and exchange of good practices Capacity building for higher education.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Bologna Process in Finland (Observations on the Bologna Process in Russia) Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and international comparability.
Tempus “QUASYS” Dubrovnik, October 11-12, Harmonization with European Trends in Higher Education Prof. dr. Pero Lučin Vice-Rector University of Rijeka.
Vasyl Shynkaruk Deputy Minister of Education and Science of Ukraine “Qualifications Framework in Higher Education of Ukraine” International Seminar «National.
University of Zadar, Croatia. University of Zadar The University of Zadar is the youngest Croatian university in organisational sense (it was established.
The 10th European Manning & Training Conference, Dubrovnik, 23th & 24th May 2007 The 10th European Manning & Training Conference On recent developments.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
BOLOGNA PROCESS - A Challenging Process for Albanian Universities Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lindita MILO (LATI), Vice-Rector of University of Tirana, ALBANIA.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Azerbaijan Seminar Baku, 12th June 2007 Stuart Garvie National Qualifications Authority.
TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH BERGEN – LONDON PHASE Tempus Information Day, Sarajevo, June 7, 2006.
STRATEGY OF LIFELONG LEARNING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NIS
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Quality Assurance System at Azerbaijan University of Languages Jala Garibova Baku.
DG MOVE/C - Maritime Transport Fotis KARAMITSOS, Director 10/06/2010 The EU's Maritime Transport Strategy until 2018.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 I.2 Relevant Documents
The national system of qualifications and interests of the stakeholders in the development of higher education Rimma Seidakhmetova Bologna Process and.
University of Novi Sad Quality, curricula, credit system short overwiew Radmila Marinkovic-Neducin
A successful proposal – in the eyes of an evaluator Tempus Information Day 14 January 2011 Annika Sundbäck, External expert,Tempus selection 2009 and 2010.
Faculty Ensuring competency and integrity. Faculty The university employs competent faculty qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
Tuning of Higher Education Programmes on the Basis of Profiles, Competences and Learning Outcomes WHYHOWWHAT.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Bob Johnson, ECBE, SEEC 11 Nov Qualification Frameworks and Credit - Articulation with Europe Bob Johnson Commissioner for Credit Rating European.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET - PIU Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO RO2006/
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
University of Rijeka QUASYS, Dubrovnik – October 11-12, 2003 Petar Bezinović Quality Promotion Office QUALITY PROMOTION AT RIJEKA UNIVERSITY.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
QUALITY, ICTs AND « LICENCE-MASTER- DOCTORATE »(LMD) REFORMS Juma SHABANI Abuja, September 22nd, 2015.
Bologna Declaration Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment in SSH (PHOENIX) Bishkek,
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
Two categories: Academic, Professional Issues: Level and nature of programs consistent with mission Well defined, differ from undergraduate programs Doctoral.
Internal Quality Assurance System in Armenian HEIs Tempus JEP “ARMQA” Dr. Prof. Alexander Markarov Deputy Vice Rector, YSU
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
Recommenations of the external evaluation of the Polytech Site visit.
The EQAVET Framework – supporting quality and relevance of VET
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Belgrade, 1 November.
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
University of Rijeka Faculty of Civil Engineering
Development of qualifications system in Ukraine:
Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training in Kosovo
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
European Union Public Policy Lecture 10
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
DIRECTION OF TVET POLICY IN LAO. PDR
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Introduction to the training
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
Cape Peninsula University of Technology
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
The Perspective of a Professional Body (HPCSA) on National Standards & Reviews. the SAAIR CONFERENCE at UJ Prof K Mfenyana 03 July 2019.
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Yerevan, 8 September.
Presentation transcript:

IAMU AGA10 StPetersburg, September 21, 2009 International Round Table Accreditation of Programmes of Study at IAMU-member MET Institutions (Creating a new world common MET area of excellence) by Boris Pritchard & Pavao Komadina University of Rijeka, Croatia Faculty of Maritime Studies

Creating a new world common MET area of excellence 1.Introduction 2.Main stakeholders and their needs, requirements and expectations (MET institutions + Shipping Industry + Maritime Administrations) 3.The role of IAMU & IMO policies 4.Objectives: recognizable qualifications (degrees, CoC) + mobility of CoC and degrees 5.How to achieve this goal? 6.Conclusion

1. Introduction  Globalization of shipping industry – main challenges (quantity, quality)  Requirements and demands on QUALITY: Industry and MET System as a single unified system

Principal goal of MET: Quality Human Resources as a main contributor to:  Safety  Security  Environmental protection  Efficiency of shipping industry

2. The Main Stakeholders:  Shipping Industry  Maritime Administrations  IAMU MET Institutions

3. The Role of IMO & IAMU policies  The Go To Sea Campaign – to become an integrated part of national policies  Optimum balance between education and training vs international and national requirements by the shipping industry  Role, interest and motivation of IMO, IAMU and member-MET institutions in creating, setting (and enforcing) high standards of undergraduate and graduate maritime education  Role, interest and motivation of National Administrations in promoting and enforcing high standards of undergraduate and graduate maritime education  IAMU Policy (Section 15 of the proposed Saint Petersburg Statement of 2009) – necessity to go beyond IMO minimum standards: creating / establishing and World AREA OF EXCELLENCE (cf. the 4 E’s of the GLOMET Project)  IAMU strategic plans

4. Objectives:  recognizable qualifications:  degrees,  CoC  mobility of CoC and degrees  Conditions: QA through a unified system of accreditation of Programmes of Study  Implementation of the system of credits – role of IAMU vs IMO

5. How to achieve this goal?  Setting internationally agreed and recognized standards of IAMU excellence (STCW +) (4E’s)  Establishing an IAMU-based unified system of accreditation for MET institutions and their programmes of study  learning outcomes, competences, student workload, curricula, syllabuses,  evaluation and assessment standards;  credit system

How to achieve this goal? Setting an IAMU-based audit system (principles and standards of audit; body or pool of auditing experts from among the three stakeholders): SHIPPING INDUSTRY MARITIME ADMINISTRATIONS IAMU MET INSTITUTIONS

How to achieve this goal?  Implementation of a system of credits (IAMU-CTS) – role of IAMU MarADs  Standards to be met by MET institutions: mission statement, comparable and compatible, programmes of study, learning outcomes, technical standards (space, equipment), simulators, labs, training vessels, involvement of MET institutions in on-board training

How to achieve this goal?  Professional qualifications of the teaching staff; a common system of training the MET trainer – ‘marinization’; pedagogical and technical standards on teaching  Mobility: programmes of study (curricula, syllabi); students; teachers

How to achieve this goal?  IAMU-CTS should provide an instrument to create transparency, to build bridges between institutions and to widen the choices available to students.  The system makes it easier for institutions to recognise the learning achievements of students through the use of commonly understood measurements - credits and grades - it also provides a means to interpret national systems of Higher Education.

6. Conclusions  Comparable and compatible degrees. The tools for achieving this are IAMU-CTS (IAMU Credit Transfer System) and the Diploma Supplement.  Uniform degree structures. The degree structure is to be based on a three-cycle model.  The first cycle, lasting three years, ends in a Bachelor-level degree, which should also be relevant to the world shipping labour market as an appropriate level of qualification. This may be extended to include a six-month or one-year sea- service.  The second cycle consists of Master's degrees  The third cycle - postgraduate studies (PhD degree)

Conclusions  Increased mobility - free movement of students, teachers, and researchers.  Promotion of IAMU-based co-operation in quality assurance with a view to developing comparable criteria and methodologies. (e.g. establishing The IAMU Network of Quality Assurance in Higher Maritime Education)  Setting IAMU requirements on auditing the programmes of study (BSc, MSc and PhD degrees)  Setting and adopting IAMU recognized standards on auditing and evaluation of MET institutions (programmes, faculty – teaching staff, train-the-trainer systems, space and equipment, CBT, etc.)  Establishing a body of IAMU auditing experts.

Faculty of Maritime Studies University of Rijeka, Croatia full support to Saint Petersburg Statement of 2009 as an international instrument for establishing and promoting standards of excellence in the area of MET