1 Joint Programmes Require Joint Forces: the Management Aspect Francesco Girotti International Relations Division, Bologna University JOIMAN project‘s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January ERASMUS MUNDUS PREPARING YOUR APPLICATION.
Advertisements

1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Developing Joint Masters Programmes for Europe: lessons from the EUA Joint Masters Project BFUG Workshop: Joint Degrees – Further Development Stockholm,
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan Dr. Luis Sobrado 27 th May 2011.
1987 / 2007 ERASMUS 20. Erasmus - Specific objectives Support the realisation of a European Higher Education Area Reinforce the contribution of higher.
Europe and Education School Education COMENIUS. The School Education Action of the European Community’s Programme “Socrates” on Education 2 nd phase:
Doctoral Landscape for Entrepreneurship Studies in UK David Watkins.
About Joint Programmes and Joint Applications July 19th, 2012, Brussels Tabea Mager, Project Coordinator at Leipzig University.
Advices and comments on how to write successful proposals? Martina FRIEDRICH ERASMUS MUNDUS National Structure Austria TEMPUS National Contact Point Austria.
Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture Erasmus for All Erasmus for All Higher Education European Commission, DG EAC June 2013.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Education and Culture January 2007.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Prof. Angelo Presenza, PhD 3 rd cycle of the Bologna process ITALY “Modernizing the 3rd cycle at the University of Prishtina and Developing a PhD Program.
EuropeAid 1 OTHER EU PROGRAMMES IN HIGHER EDUCATION 27 November 2011 JORDAN-EU Higher Education Day Abel Piqueras, Education Programme Officer EU Delegation.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Education and Culture January 2007.
Bologna and the Third Cycle Anthony J Vickers UK Bologna Expert.
© Arthur Mettinger Rectors‘ Conference: How can UNICA help to create joint Masters? Why should UNICA universities create joint Master programs?
Logo Erasmus Mundus Information Event: Session 3-A Implementation Challenges from the Perspective of University Administrators Yoshie Takahara.
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme II Revisiting the Links between Teaching and Research.
ERASMUS MUNDUS. Genesis Article 149 of EC Treaty: enhance quality education Political aims: Lisbon, Barcelona, Bologna... Communication on reinforcing.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
EUROPEAN NETWORK OF UNIVERSITY - ENTERPRISE COOPERATION (EUE-Net) a case of Good Practice in ERASMUS Thematic Networks Dan Grigorescu Professor, University.
Anchoring Joint Masters in the Institution Lessons from the EUA Pilot Project Discussion Group B.
Page 1 Internationalization Strategies beyond Bologna.
The Erasmus Mundus programme: How international HE cooperation and mobility can build capacities Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation Unit Education,
1 Belgrade, Jan. 19, 2010 ERASMUS MUNDUS: How to apply? National Tempus Office Serbia.
The European Master in Law and Economics (EMLE) Filomena Chirico* Skopje, 31 March 2009 * European Commission. The opinions expressed represent personal.
Meeting at the Ministry of Education and Science Thursday, December 14, 2006.
Erasmus Mundus Action 2. Missions of the EACEA  Implementing Community programmes  Managing projects life cycle  Information and communication  Results.
1 t Implementing the Bologna Process in Italy Marzia Foroni DoQuP Training Seminar Roma, 13 Nov 2013.
Internationalisation and joint programmes / degrees David Crosier Eurydice World Bank Seminar 31 March 2009, Skopje.
The Finnish Strategy in Teacher Education at the 2nd cycle level
The Bologna Declaration and its implementation at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) JEP UM Zagreb, 28 October 2004 An Huts International.
Erasmus Mundus ( ) Presentation by Marie-Hélène Vareille Deputy Head of PPCA Tokyo EC Delegation 3 November 2009.
Toolbox CRC programme managers – Dag Kavlie, RCN Analysis of indicators used for CRC Monitoring and Evaluation Ljubljana, 15 September 2009.
Erasmus centralised actions and higher education policy Brussels, 23 rd January 2012 Vanessa Debiais-Sainton Endika Bengoetxea Higher Education; Erasmus.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A TOOL FOR QUALITY CULTURE EMBEDMENT: VILNIUS UNIVERSITY APPROACH Inga Milisiunaite, Roma Adomaitiene, Juozas Galginatis Vilnius.
13 May 2006Mellange Workshop Vienna1 MeLLANGE Multilingual eLearning for Language Engineering
Quality in mobility: how to measure and assess it Maria Sticchi Damiani.
ERASMUS MUNDUS / EXTERNAL COOPERATION WINDOW (Future Action 2 of Emasmus Mundus II)
Best recognition instruments for the dialogue between global experts Final Conference - Malta, October 2012 BRIDGE project Action 5 Study visits.
JOIMAN: Joint Programmes Challenges and opportunities based on presentations of JOIMAN final conference in Vilnius, October 29, 2010 Raimonda Markeviciene,
Speaker:Joachim Fronia, Executive Agency EM Programme ‘Keeping attractiveness and excellence and developing a common identity’
ERASMUS MUNDUS II Erasmus Mundus II ( ) will integrate:  Erasmus Mundus  Erasmus Mundus External Cooperation Window.
1 Erasmus Mundus Training session for NTOs, Antwerp, 9 December 2010 Promoting to HEIs Action 2 Strand 1 Erasmus Mundus & External Cooperation Education,
Erasmus for All The international dimension in Higher Education.
Info Day – 22 February 2011 Radisson Blu Hotel, Dublin Gerry O’Sullivan Eileen O’Connell.
MSCA – European Joint Doctorate – Gijs Du Laing – Information session MSCA ITN grants MSCA – European Joint Doctorate (EJD) Gijs Du Laing Laboratory of.
Date: in 12 pts Erasmus+ and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 7th ICQAHEA, Abuja, 22 September 2015 Deirdre Lennan, European Commission.
ERASMUS MUNDUS II ( ) Erasmus Mundus Action 4 Coordinators Meeting February 2008 Vito Borrelli.
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master courses How to write a good proposal ? Hélène Pinaud- 18 December 2015.
Use of Memorandum of Understanding for QA – academic and managerial aspects Andrew Skidmore GEM Consortium ITC, NL.
Updates from III cycle WG Meeting of the structural reform WG Brussels, 25 sept 2013 Marzia Foroni.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
Development and Administration of Double Degree Programmes – Seminar Governance and Quality Assurance in DD Programmes BISHKEK, 6-7 September 2016 Francesco.
Development and Administration of Double Degree Programmes – Seminar Student administration procedures in DDP BISHKEK, 6-7 September 2016 Francesco Girotti.
Development and Administration of Double Degree Programmes – Seminar Student administration procedures in DDP BISHKEK, 6-7 September 2016 Francesco Girotti.
REPORT OF THE AD HOC WG ON THE THIRD CYCLE SRWG meeting May 2014, Warsaw Marzia Foroni.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
Designing an integrated curriculum
Institutional Strategies to develop a Double Degree
Doctoral programmes in Europe
Introduction to the training
TEEP II – A Pilot Evaluation of Joint Degrees
Strategy of the Internationalisation of Slovenian Higher Education
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Training on joint doctoral studies
Doctoral Education in Europe: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

1 Joint Programmes Require Joint Forces: the Management Aspect Francesco Girotti International Relations Division, Bologna University JOIMAN project‘s coordinator 18 October 2012, Malta BRIDGE PROJECT FINAL CONFERENCE

2 STARTING POINTS Joint Programmes: Integrated study programmes offered by 2 or more institutions leading to the award of a Double, Multiple or Joint Degree JOIMAN focused on the Administration and Management of JP WHY? Because of the Erasmus Mundus impact Because of the nature of the network HOW? Surveys to JP coordinators (Master, Doctorate, EU&NonEU), study visits, international conferences, papers, discussions, networks

3 JOIMAN FINDINGS AT A GLANCE 3 main messages: 1.There are different models of Joint Programmes, with different levels of integration and different impact on the planning, organisation and management of the programmes themselves 2.Institutional strategy, support and commitment are crucial for the implementation of Joint Programmes 3.Being aware of the processes allows to think in advance

4 MESSAGE 1: DIFFERENT MODELS Highest level of Integration (EM Model) Lowest level of Integration (Structured mobility in Bilateral coop.) Joint Admnistration of students and ad hoc services Common budget and tuition fees Jointly developed curriculum (new, learning outcomes based,) Curriculum based on existing courses/ exploitation of excellences (Comparison of learning outcomes) Curriculum based on existing comparable courses (input based) Focus on international students Based on own institution tuition policies Focus on local students Jointly agreed students’ services and standards QA measures standards jointly agreed Joint QA measures

5 5 International collaboration Individual programmes Cotutelle Joint doctoral programme Joint doctoral degree and programme Research Courses Structure of cooperation Selection/admission Supervision Defence Monitoring/reporting Employability Funding/fees Double or multiple degrees Joint degree MESSAGE 1: DIFFERENT MODELS (DOCTORATES)

6 MESSAGE 1: DIFFERENT MODELS Positioning your joint programme in the appropriate level of integration has a deep impact on the management of the joint programme itself. I.E: Large integrated consortium: increase the critical mass, share of resources and expertise, increase the quality of the mobility offer BUT more coordination efforts and costs (meetings, staff mobility etc) more harmonization problems (procedures, legislations, cultures) I.E: targeting international students: more chances to attract best students, creation of a real international environment BUT more efforts in marketing the programme, more efforts in the ICT infrastructures, more efforts in services for students etc

7 MESSAGE 2: INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT Most common obstacles detected: 1.Legislation on joint degrees 2.Institutional regulations 3.Different Education Systems (length of study, accreditation) 4.Tuition fees policies 5.Funds and Human Resources

8 WHY INSTITUTIONAL COMMITTMENT IS IMPORTANT? To prepare the ground through external actions To advocate changes at national level Developing a network-based strategy To prepare the ground through internal actions Creating appropriate structures for the development and implementation of JP Creating/adapting internal rules Coordinating the efforts of the many actors involved Providing funds for new initiatives Promoting the professional development of administrators and academics involved Fostering the initiatives of academics

9 THIRD MESSAGE: KNOW THE PROCESS AND THINK FIRST First action of the JOIMAN group has been the definition of the processes in order to draft a comprehensive questionnaire for JP coordinators. Processes have been refined after the submission of questionnaires and study visits. This allowed us to draft a map which could be useful and adaptable to any Joint Programme for the planning of the management phase.

10 WHY IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THE PROCESSES? Because most of the detected obstacles in the management of Joint Programmes are at Programme level and can be approached during the development/negotiation phase Lack of information on the educational systems of the partners Late involvement of key people Confusion in terminology Late definition of procedures for the administration of students Duplication of quality assurance requirement, without a clear reflection on the harmonization of the existing – institutional – procedures with the needs of international dimension of the programme Late discussion on calendars, credits, thesis procedures, certification, phd candidate supervision etc

11 Students’ administration timeline Transversal processes Application Teaching Enrolment Admission Selection Mobility Welcoming Dissertation Diploma and DS Selection round for non EU Communication of results Visa procedures Welcoming services Enrolment procedures Language training Cultural integration Tutoring of the mobility Welcoming services Academic Tutoring Cultural integration Joint jury Promotion Receipt of application Selection round for EU Preparation to the mobility Transfer of students’ career Transfer of student’s’ career Academic Tutoring Joint signature or request of multiple diplomas QUALITYASSURANCEMEASURESQUALITYASSURANCEMEASURES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Quality in the application phase: transparency Sharing of the budget Quality of the selection Quality management tools Evaluation of teaching Evaluation of services Ex post evaluation: student’s career Ex – post evaluation: feedback from the labour market Overall evaluation of the programme Management and distribution of fees Management of scholarships Reserves for sustainability Accounting / reporting

12

13 Good practice report on the management of JP (Master EU-non EU and Doctorates) Annexes : Cooperation agreement template, Glossary, example of guidelines, national legislations on tuition fees Thematic papers Contributions from international seminars JOIMAN web site: Tangible outputs

14

15

16 HOW TO USE THE RESULTS Traditional way: Reading (adapting concepts to different contexts, adapting tools such as the cooperation agreement template to our needs) Innovative Way…