CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Advertisements

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3 through 8 and 11 September 6, 2007 For Haddonfield Public Schools.
BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District.
Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS Summary of 2012 Achievements in Testing BOARD PRESENTATION.
1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)
DLT September 28, State Indicators and Rating for OFCS (have) Key Factors and Points to Keep in Mind (have) This power point presentation (will.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
2009 MCAS Analysis & Adequate Yearly Progress Report Mendon – Upton Regional School District.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District October 18, 2012.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL Alex Anemone, Ed.D. October 6, 2014 NJ Testing Report Spring 2014.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Quality Annual Assurance Report 2005 What you believe is what you achieve.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
1 New Jersey Department of Education Division of Educational Programs and Assessment Office of Evaluation and Assessment 2006 Statewide Assessment Results.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
District Assessment Report School Year.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
EHT Grades K to 2, Thanks and Congratulations! You Accomplished! Pacing guides based on NJCCS! Quarterly tests! Ton of work for NJ PASS! Professionalism!
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Mount Olive Township Public Schools PARCC Results.
Student Achievement in Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Assessment Report Board of Education 2014
District Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION

CINNAMINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT TEST SCORE PRESENTATION 2011 The following are some points to consider as you review the test data. Education in New Jersey ranks close to the top in national achievement as measured by NAEP, the National Assessment of Educational Progress. NJ ranks 2nd in the nation in grades 4 and 8 reading. NJ moved from 5th to 4th place in grade 4 math and from 5th to 3rd place in grade 8 math. Nearly all subgroups have improved since 2003, but there is still a gap in achievement between the total population and subgroups. State tests, as required by No Child Left Behind, are different in every state. What do the questions look like on NJ state tests? Neither teachers nor administrators are permitted to see the actual test questions. Within the slideshow, there are sample questions. While scores have been fairly steady in many areas, there are some notable changes in 2011.

This year our scores are higher than our DFG* and the state average in total scores for every test. Other changes: We have seen a 4 year upswing in math 8. There has been a 3 year upswing in math 5. There has been a 3 year decline in LAL 5. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is the state scale for indicating that schools are meeting requirements. The number indicates the percentage of students achieving scores of 200. Those expectations increased considerably in 2011 over While AYP improved over the report of 2010, and all total scores met requirements, three building subgroups failed to make AYP. There has been a decline in SAT scores. This situation is being addressed at the HS with The Princeton Review providing services to students and teachers along with other changes to the program. Cinnaminson has developed plans to recognize what practices supported increased scores so that we can continue those practices. We have also developed plans for improvement in areas where we have not seen insufficient growth. *DFG is the District Factor Group, a measure of income, education and other factors to compare communities. Our DFG is FG.

Grade 5 Sample Question - Math

Grade 8 Science: Sample Test Question

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 3 – MATH Percentage of Total Population Passing ** Test was redesigned for 2009 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 3 – LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Total Population Passing ** Test was redesigned for 2009 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 4 – MATH Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2009 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 4 – LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2009 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 5 – MATH Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 5 – LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 6 – MATH Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 6 – LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 7– MATH Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

5 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 7 – LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

4 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 8– MATH Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

4 YEAR TREND: NJ ASK 8 – LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Total Population Passing **Test was redesigned for 2008 administration

HSPA – 5 YEAR TREND (2007 – 2011) MATH Based on Total Population Scoring Proficient and Advanced Proficient for First Time Test Takers

HSPA – 5 YEAR TREND (2007 – 2011) LANGUAGE ARTS Based on Total Population Scoring Proficient and Advanced Proficient for First Time Test Takers

ASK 3 – 5 COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient ASK 6-8 MATH COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE: 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient

ASK 6-8 LANGUAGE ARTS COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE: 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient

ASK 3 – 5 COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient ASK 3-5 MATH COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE: 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient

ASK 3 – 5 COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient ASK 3-5 LANGUAGE ARTS COMPARISON TO DFG AND STATE: 2011 AND 2010 Percentage of total population scoring proficient and advanced proficient

Sp Ed Econ Dis N/A African American N/A 2011 – STATE TESTING: MATH Percentage of Sub-group Populations Scoring Proficient and Advanced Proficient

Sp Ed Econ Dis N/A African American N/A 2011 – STATE TESTING: LANGUAGE ARTS Percentage of Sub-group Populations Scoring Proficient and Advanced Proficient

2011 ASK TEST RESULTS Math Scores for SPECIAL EDUCATION – District: DFG: State Based on Total Classified Population Scoring Proficient and Advanced Proficient

2011 ASK TEST RESULTS Language Arts Literacy Scores for SPECIAL EDUCATION District: DFG: State Based on Total Classified Population Scoring Proficient and Advanced Proficient

NJ ASK 8 SCIENCE – 3 YEAR HISTORY Compared to DFG and State Percentage of Total Population Passing

NJ ASK 4 SCIENCE – 3 YEAR HISTORY Compared to DFG and State Percentage of Total Population Passing

Content AreaGrade Span Starting Point Language Arts Literacy – Mathematics – New Jersey State Benchmarks for Adequate Yearly Progress Effective November 2009

RUSHMIDDLE SCHOOLHIGH SCHOOL LALMATHLALMATHLALMATH TOTAL POPULATION: YES *YES YES *YES CLASSIFIED STUDENTS: YES * YESNO AFRICAN- AMERICAN STUDENTS NOYESYES * N/A ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED: NOYESYES * N/A 2012 AYP STATUS by Building Based on Test Scores * Made Safe Harbor

SAT 5 YEAR TREND: Year Number of students DIST TOTAL VERBAL STATE TOTAL VERBAL NATL TOTAL VERBAL DIST TOTAL MATH STATE TOTAL MATH NATL TOTAL MATH DIST TOTAL WRITING STATE TOTAL WRITING NATL TOTAL WRITING

SAT® Participation Relative to High School Population Cohort Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors Total Group Report; WICHE (2008)

NJ ASK - Grade 7 Performance Level - LALProficient Performance Level - MathProficient Scaled Score - LAL240 Scaled Score - Math200 LAL Cluster Score - Reading39.0 LAL Cluster Score - Analyzing Text22.0 LAL Cluster Score - Working With Text17.0 LAL Cluster Score - Writing12.0 LAL Cluster Score - Persuasive Task8.0 LAL Cluster Score - Explanatory Task4.0 Math Cluster Score - Data Analysis6.0 Math Cluster Score - Geometry7.0 Math Cluster Score - Number Operations9.0 Math Cluster Score - Patterns4.0 Math Cluster Score - Problem Solving NJ ASK - Grade 6Performance Level - LAL Proficient Performance Level - MathProficient Scaled Score - LAL 220 Scaled Score - Math NJ ASK - Grade 5Performance Level - LAL Proficient Performance Level - MathProficient Scaled Score - LAL 214 Scaled Score - Math NJ ASK - Grade 4Performance Level - LAL Proficient Performance Level - MathProficient Performance Level - ScienceAdvanced Proficient Scaled Score - LAL 241 Scaled Score - Math238 Scaled Score - Science NJ ASK - Grade 3Performance Level - LALProficient Performance Level - MathProficient Scaled Score - LAL233 Scaled Score - Math223 Through NJ Smart, we can see all testing history for any student.

Using EdAnalyzer (NJ Smart Component), we can see how students who score partially proficient one subject compare to their performance in another subject. SamplePerformance Level MATH Performance Level LAL Student APartially Proficient Proficient Student BPartially Proficient Student CPartially Proficient Proficient Student DPartially Proficient Advanced Proficient Student EPartially Proficient Proficient SamplePerformance Level LAL Performance Level MATH Student APartially Proficient Proficient Student BPartially Proficient Proficient Student CPartially Proficient Student DPartially Proficient Proficient Student EPartially Proficient Advanced Proficient