1 ACE Diversity Interchange. 2 ADI Pilot Project Founded on Negotiation Theory: A transaction should occur if the parties involved are either held harmless.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bill Blevins Management of the West-North Stability Limit Under the Nodal Market.
Advertisements

Demand Response in Ontario Paul Grod, CEO, Rodan Energy July 11, 2013.
ColumbiaGrid Reliability Workshop October 1, 2007 Developmental and Staffing Reliability Functional Agreement (DSRFA) Details This program is the cornerstone.
RXQ Dual Billing Process Flow Distribution Company Supplier Customer Distribution Company reads meter(s) ( ) Supplier receives and processes.
1 Credit for Redispatch Small Group Review of Unconstrained MFs NAESB BPS Meeting December 14-15, 2011.
Power Control. Objectives –Understand the purpose of Power Control in CDMA. –Identify the different types of Power Control mechanisms used in CDMA »Reverse.
DYNAMIC SCHEDULES AD HOC WORK GROUP ANN DAVIS, CHAIR MARILYN FRANZ.
1 October 30, 2008 WECC Meetings Marina Del Rey, California ACE Diversity Interchange: Overview and Update.
Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff.
2009 Generators that have Achieved Certification Arizona Public Service Company ATCO Electric Ltd. Avista Corporation Basin Electric Power Company Black.
1 ColumbiaGrid Update June 27, Activities Planning OASIS Redispatch 2.
1 ColumbiaGrid Activities Supporting Integration of Renewable Generation Presentation to the Market Interface Committee At the October 30, 2008 Meeting.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report David Lemmons March 27, 2013 Salt Lake City, UT.
ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI)
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update October 2008 Gary Nolan ISAS Vice-Chair.
1 Joint Initiative Update WECC OPS Meeting San Diego, California February 2, 2010.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Evaluating Provider Reliability in Risk-aware Grid Brokering Iain Gourlay.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
Organizational Control and Change
Reliability McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2000, Independent Electricity Market Operator All Rights Reserved 1.
Parker-Davis Project FES Contract Amendment January 16, 2004.
Background T&SC V9.0: The Market Operator shall not grant the status of Under Test for the purposes of this Code to Autonomous Generator Units, Pumped.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
7. PV System Sizing Herb Wade Consultant
Brenda Ambrosi ISAS Chair OC Update August 2012 Salt Lake City, UT.
Study Results California In-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short w SWIP N This slide deck contains results from.
Enhanced Day Ahead Commitment Project: Enhancements to the DACP IESOTP 244-3d.
Chapter 11: The t Test for Two Related Samples
Congestion Management Settlement Credits December, 2002.
Western Interconnection Subregions for PSA Layne Brown Manager, Reliability Assessments.
CREPC Meeting November 5-6, 2007 Snapshot of Major Transmission Proposals and Status of Transmission Planning Presenters: Paul Arnold and Jeff Miller.
1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.
David H. Wiggs General Manager Los Angeles Department of Water and Power September 24, 2003.
Goshen Area Bus Reconfiguration
NORTHWEST POWER POOL Reliability Update
PacifiCorp-CAISO EIM Initiative Overview
Control Performance Frequency Analysis Control Standards Surveys Inadvertent Interchange Time Error Frequency Bias Settings Control Area Assistance Automatic.
9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.
System Operator Conference NERC Standards Review for: Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS.
Temperature-Sensitive Loads and Class Cost Allocation Presentation to Utah Cost-of-Service Working Group Kevin Higgins, Energy Strategies July 13, 2005.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
NORTHWEST POWER POOL Reliability Update – Summer 2010 April 2010 Jerry D. Rust.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
WestConnect Activities Charles Reinhold WestConnect Project Manager 2008 ACC BTA Workshop Phoenix, AZ May 22, 2008.
1 The Northwest Wind Integration Action Plan Status Update December 14, 2010.
Generation Inputs Workshop July 24, BPA Balancing Authority Reliability Tool.
2014 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results. Background Open for comment February 12, 2015 through March 31, 2015 for evaluation of prior year – 21 close.
1 Joint Initiative Northwest Wind Integration Forum Policy Steering Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
FREQUENCY CONTROL AND AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL
Application and Implementation of State Estimator at Idaho Power Company S. Kincic and M. Papic.
Montana Energy Summit April 22, 2008 Ancillary Service – Regulating Reserves.
Energy Imbalance Market Presented at: The Governor’s Utah Energy Development Summit 2015 Caitlin Liotiris Energy Strategies Power Through Ideas.
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
HMTF Update TAS Nov 3-4, 2015 Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Work Group - Chair.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
IRP Review  IRPs with Significant Detail on Flexibility Assessment  Portland General Electric  Puget Sound Energy  Other IRPs.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
Generation: Control & Economic Dispatch 2016 System Operator Seminar.
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Study Results California In-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short w SWIP N This slide deck contains results from.
Presentation transcript:

1 ACE Diversity Interchange

2 ADI Pilot Project Founded on Negotiation Theory: A transaction should occur if the parties involved are either held harmless or better off.

3 Purpose of Presentation Provide Background of ACE Diversity Interchange: Provide Background of ACE Diversity Interchange: –what ADI is and is not –why companies want to implement ADI –how ADI works –how ADI relates to inadvertent interchange –how ADI will be taken into consideration when reporting performance

4 ADI is the pooling of individual Area Control Errors (ACE) to take advantage of control error diversity (momentary imbalances of generation and load). ADI is the pooling of individual Area Control Errors (ACE) to take advantage of control error diversity (momentary imbalances of generation and load). By pooling ACE the participants will be able to: By pooling ACE the participants will be able to: –Reduce control burden on individual control areas; –Reduce sensitivity to resources with potentially volatile output such as wind projects; and, –Reduce unnecessary generator control movement. Participants in ADI should also realize compliance improvements in Control Performance Standards. Participants in ADI should also realize compliance improvements in Control Performance Standards. What is ADI?

5 ICCP Communication links are established between the Host and the Participating Control Areas. ICCP Communication links are established between the Host and the Participating Control Areas. ACE values are sent to the Host. ACE values are sent to the Host. The Host evaluates ACEs for diversity; if there is no diversity, there is no ADI adjustment. The Host evaluates ACEs for diversity; if there is no diversity, there is no ADI adjustment. If there is diversity, ADI adjustments are calculated and sent back to the Participating Control Areas. If there is diversity, ADI adjustments are calculated and sent back to the Participating Control Areas. The Participating Control Areas choose to either control to their original ACE or control to an ADI- adjusted ACE. The Participating Control Areas choose to either control to their original ACE or control to an ADI- adjusted ACE. How Does ADI Work?

6 Metered Net Interchange Scheduled Net Interchange Freq ACE Calc Logic Gen Control Logic Gen Pulses Gen Dispatch Original ACE Send ACE to Host Net & Allocate ACE Send Back to Utility ACE Modifier Calculation Process

7 CARaw ACEADI AdjustmentAdj. ACE A-46 MW+46 MW0 MW B-40 MW+40 MW0 MW C+60 MW-46 MW14 MW D+40 MW-40 MW0 MW Net:14 MW14 MW If there is no diversity, there is no adjustment to ACE. If there is no diversity, there is no adjustment to ACE. ADI-adjusted ACE is no greater than the pooled Raw ACE. ADI-adjusted ACE is no greater than the pooled Raw ACE. In this example, the Majority Group control areas have positive ACE values (Control Areas C and D, consistent with the Net Error); the Minority Group control areas have negative ACE values (Control Areas A and B). In this example, the Majority Group control areas have positive ACE values (Control Areas C and D, consistent with the Net Error); the Minority Group control areas have negative ACE values (Control Areas A and B). ADI Adjustments will not force a change in sign (+/-) for a participant. ADI Adjustments will not force a change in sign (+/-) for a participant. ADI Calculation

8 Estimate of improvements to negative (load exceeds generation) and positive (load is less than generation) ACE values indicate a 20% improvement on average. Estimate of improvements to negative (load exceeds generation) and positive (load is less than generation) ACE values indicate a 20% improvement on average. December 4 th, 2006; 2 hours of continuous ACE values for three participating control areas. December 4 th, 2006; 2 hours of continuous ACE values for three participating control areas. Evaluated Control Areas Evaluated Control Areas Improvements: A B C Negative ACE14%22%31% Positive ACE15%10%24% Average Improvement:20% Quantification of ADI Benefits:

9 An ADI adjustment will be calculated only if there is ACE diversity (positive and negative values) among participants. An ADI adjustment will be calculated only if there is ACE diversity (positive and negative values) among participants. An ADI adjustment will never make ACE worse, i.e., it will always move ACE toward zero or will have no impact. An ADI adjustment will never make ACE worse, i.e., it will always move ACE toward zero or will have no impact. Participants have the right to ignore (suspend) ADI adjustments; suspension means that participants control to original ACE. Participants have the right to ignore (suspend) ADI adjustments; suspension means that participants control to original ACE. Is it Safe for ADI Participants?

10 ADI is inherently fail-safe. ADI is inherently fail-safe. ADI adjustment limits can be imposed to ensure safe implementation. ADI adjustment limits can be imposed to ensure safe implementation. ADI will be settled through the existing Automatic Time Error Correction term and as such, will not have any impact on inadvertent accumulation or return. ADI will be settled through the existing Automatic Time Error Correction term and as such, will not have any impact on inadvertent accumulation or return. Host and Participants have the ability to suspend ADI, if appropriate; suspension means that participants control to original ACE which is status quo operations. Host and Participants have the ability to suspend ADI, if appropriate; suspension means that participants control to original ACE which is status quo operations. Is ADI Safe for Neighboring Systems?

11 Host Will Suspend: Host Will Suspend: –If directed to suspend by PNSC. –If ADI system fails. –If fewer than 3 control areas are participating. Participants Will Suspend: Participants Will Suspend: –If directed to suspend by PNSC. –If a frequency problem is detected. –If an OTC violation is in progress or expected. –If reserve sharing is in place. –If AGC is suspended for any reason. –If other concerns arise. Why Suspend ADI?

12 ADI Participants Idaho Power Company Idaho Power Company NorthWestern Energy NorthWestern Energy PacifiCorp East PacifiCorp East PacifiCorp West PacifiCorp West Arizona Public Service Company Arizona Public Service Company British Columbia Transmission Corp British Columbia Transmission Corp Salt River Project Salt River Project Public Service Company of New Mexico Public Service Company of New Mexico Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Seattle City Light Seattle City Light Sierra Pacific/Nevada Power Sierra Pacific/Nevada Power Bonneville Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

13 Questions?