The eViP Consortium www.virtualpatients.eu. What is a Virtual Patient? “An interactive computer simulation of real-life clinical scenarios for the purpose.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October2008 PREVIEW: Virtual Patients in Second Life Learning in Immersive worlds Emily Conradi, Sheetal Kavia, Luke Woodham, Terry Poulton St George’s.
Advertisements

Development of the Consumer Professional Partnership Program (CPPP) Thilo Kroll NRH CHDR Steve Towle SCI Network RRTC on SCI: Promoting Health and Preventing.
September 2006 eViP. To create a shared online bank of VPs, adapted for multicultural, multilingual use: for the improved quality and efficiency of healthcare.
Standard 6: Clinical Handover
The Microinsurance Innovation Facility A collaboration between the ILO and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
® Practical Steps for Moving Forward: Virtual Patients Chris Candler, M.D. MedBiquitous Annual Conference.
Policy recommendations for the use of Open Educational (Media) Resources in Europe Giles Pepler – Sero Consulting Media & Learning Conference, 12 December.
Challenges and Opportunities in Sharing Virtual Patients Dr Angela Miller St. George’s, University of London Gabrielle Campbell Association of American.
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Danijela Milošević University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
1 EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop 13/14 January 2009 Rob Davies, Scientific Co-ordinator.
Networks ∙ Services ∙ People John DYER TF-MSP Video Conference Community Procurement Support Building on the SPOT-ON Proposal Smart Procurement,
Harnessing Technology: Meeting the needs of London’s Learners November 2006 Lewisham College Dame Ruth Silver.
European University Presses take the initiative to develop an Open Access model for peer reviewed books in Humanities and Social Sciences.
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
Building Sustainable Networks for technology standards in medical education Sean Hilton.
Brings together 7 programmes in the fields of education, training and youth under a single heading.
GEM Presentation April 29`th Global Education in Manufacturing GEM.
® MedBiquitous Orientation Valerie Smothers MedBiquitous MedBiquitous Annual Conference May 2, 2012
Evangelia Mitsopoulou Luke Woodham Chara Balasubramaniam Describing Diverse Resources in Medical Education Using Metadata within the mEducator Project.
Dawne Gurbutt, Discipline Lead, Health Related Studies 11 th July 2013 Enhancing the student learning experience through Patient & Public Involvement Practice,
Exploring Europe's Television Heritage in Changing Contexts Connected to: Funded by the European Commission within the eContentplus programme
Geoff Payne ARROW Project Manager 1 April Genesis Monash University information management perspective Desire to integrate initiatives such as electronic.
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
European Commission Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Maja Bozovic University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
September T. Calinici, D. Davies, J. Donkers, I. Hege, J. Heid, A. Kononowicz, L. Woodham, N. Zary (Technical reference group.
Virtual Patient: Opportunities and Limitations Virtual patients are notoriously hard to author, adapt and exchange. Historically this has limited their.
MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Specification Status: Draft The opportunity Virtual patients are notoriously difficult to author, adapt and exchange. Historically.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
National Digital Resource Bank EdReNe Expert Workshop WS3.2 - Educational Repository Strategies, general level September, 2008, Tallinn, Estonia.
This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula Partners and Consortium is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Permissions.
Needs analysis for virtual patients: a report from the eViP programme David Davies, The University of Warwick, UK Chara Balasubramaniam,
® Advancing Health Education: A MedBiquitous Update Peter S. Greene, MD Executive Director, MedBiquitous CMIO, Johns Hopkins Medicine MedBiquitous Annual.
V. Proudman, OR09, Atlanta 18 May 2009 The plan WhoThe Project Manager Goal and corresponding tasks today Interim results, and sneak preview of a new service.
Note. Many of the URLs and contact details in this presentation no longer work. But the content is still excellent and informative. Viv Rolfe 10 th October.
September Zary N, Hege I, Heid J, Kononowicz A, Woodham L, Donkers J Enabling Interoperability, Accessibility and Reusability.
September 2006 eViP By Chara Balasubramaniam on behalf of the eViP team St George’s University of London The story so far Introduction.
NASCE: Programme requirements Paul Ridgway. Need for NASCE? Cost of Skills training Pressures for training outside service hours Pressures for training.
Date, location Open Access policy guidelines for research institutions Name Logo area.
WP6 – Dissemination Project Name: Enhancing Students Participation in Quality Assurance in Armenian HE- ESPAQ Ref TEMPUS BE-TEMPUS-SMGR.
Introduction to Concepts and Principles of Learning ( Medical Education) (CMD 211) Dr. Muhammad Ghauth Qureshi Dr. Muhammad Nour-El-din Saleh Dr. Khadija.
EUNetPaS is a project supported by a grant from the EAHC. The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the author(s). The EAHC.
Co-funded by European Commission eContentplus Sharing Practices and Experiences on the Authoring and Adaptation of Open Educational Resources Alexander.
Co-funded by the European Union Ref. number: LLP FI-ERASMUS-ENW WP2: Identification of Industrial Needs for Open innovation Education in.
About the NDLR What is the NDLR? The NDLR is a HEA funded national service promoting and supporting the sharing and creation of digital learning.
1 Open Discovery Space Overview Argiris Tzikopoulos, Ellinogermaniki Agogi Open Discovery Space [CIP-ICT-PSP ][elearning] A socially-powered and.
Co-funded by the European Union Ref. number: LLP FI-ERASMUS-ENW OI-Net The European Academic Network for Open Innovation ,
1 The Development of Web-based Resources to Support Students Undertaking Problem-based Learning Carolyn Gibbon Project Manager University of Central Lancashire.
WP9– Evaluation, roadmap & development plan This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula consortium is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution.
Planning for Research Uptake through a Research Communication Strategy (ResCom)
About the NDLR What is the NDLR? The NDLR is a HEA funded national service promoting and supporting the sharing and creation of digital learning.
WP6 – Inter-operability with e-Infrastructures Sergio Andreozzi - WP6 Task Leader Strategy and Policy Manager, EGI.eu Helix Nebula - 1st Year Review 1.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Ellinogermaniki Agogi Research and Development Department DigiSkills Network DigiSkills: Network for the enhancement of Digital competence skills.
Making WAVES: the progress of collaborations to further the use of Virtual Patients Sheetal Kavia e-Learning Unit St George’s, University of London, UK.
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Keeping in touch with NICE
European Forum For Enhanced Collaboration in Teaching
Usage scenarios, User Interface & tools
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
“CareerGuide for Schools”
recommendations for potential pilot network(s)
Peter S. Greene, M.D., Executive Director May 16, 2016
ePBLNet eViP Luke Woodham, St George's University of London
Presentation transcript:

The eViP Consortium

What is a Virtual Patient? “An interactive computer simulation of real-life clinical scenarios for the purpose of medical training, education, or assessment” Ref: An architectural model for MedBiquitous virtual patients by R Ellaway, C Candler, P Greene, V Smothers (2006)

How are they used? Problem-based learning Teaching Learning Exams

Problem-based Learning Sessions

Teaching Sessions

Self-directed Learning

Formative and Summative Exams

Virtual Patients

electronic Virtual Patients 3-Year programme involving 6 separate projects 9 European partners and other collaborators Co-funded by the European Commission “To create a shared online bank of virtual patients, adapted for multicultural and multilingual use, for the improved quality and efficiency of medical and healthcare education across the world” Is repurposing and enriching existing VPs an effective way to share?

eViP Partners 1.St George’s, University of London, UK 2.Karolinska Institutet, Sweden 3.Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany 4.University of Warwick, UK 5.Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands 6.Heidelberg University, Germany 7.University of Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania 8.Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Poland 9.University of Witten Herdecke, Germany

eViP Collaborators MedBiquitous DecisionSimulation, JB McGee, University of Pittsburgh mEducator AAMC and MedEdPORTAL Creative Commons AMEE MedEdWorld Chinese University of Hong Kong Northern Territory General Practice, Australia University of West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago

eViP Work Done WP1: Pilot Case Study WP2: Standard implementation WP3: VP Repurposing and Enrichment WP4: Awareness & Dissemination WP5: Assessment & Evaluation WP6: Exit & Sustainability WP7: Project management What did we do? What were the highlights? What was the impact?

WP1: Pilot Case Study What did we do? 1.Define repurposing (define from a high level) 2.Define different types of VP repurposing 3.Conduct repurposing exercises 4.Tested feasibility of definitions 5.Analysed the efficiency of repurposing 6.Obtained feedback from staff involved in repurposing 7.Obtained feedback from staff and students using VPs 8.Collated feedback and finalised the report

WP1: Highlights Proving the feasibility of VP repurposing and enrichment There was a positive response from staff AND students Established workflows for repurposing and enrichment

Typical Repurposing Workflow

WP2: Standards Implementation What did we do? 1.Established a Technical Reference Group (TRG) 2.Developed the eViP application profile 3.Created eViP metadata profile 4.Developed eViP conformance testing suites 5.Implemented the eViP application profile 6.Constructed a consent and licensing workflow 7.Created Best Practice Guidelines for standards implementation

WP2: Highlights First ever international standard for VPs Successful implementation of the eViP application profile A new licensing model for academia across Europe

WP3: Repurposing & Enrichment What did we do? 1.Identify and publish an inventory of existing VPs 2.Select VPs for repurposing and enrichment 3.Repurpose VPs across different cultures 4.Repurpose across different health care disciplines 5.Adapt VPs to the eViP application profile 6.Develop a peer-review process for quality assurance 7.Contribute to the development of the eViP VP repository

WP3: Highlights 320+ Repurposed and standardised VPs Overcame cultural, linguistic and socioeconomic differences in VPs Contributed towards a systematic peer-review process Optimised metadata for the medical education community

WP3: Impact Proved the hypothesis that repurposing is more efficient than creating VPs ‘from scratch’

WP4: Awareness & Dissemination What did we do? 1.Develop the eViP website 2.Publish all eViP outputs and documentation 3.Develop an online following using a social networking strategy 4.Publishing up-to-date articles, interviews, podcasts and videos about eViP and related VP topics 5.Present eViP activity and documentation at conferences 6.Publish scholarly articles in relevant journals and newsletters

WP4: Highlights Publishing the referatory of 320+ VPs Comprehensive market research and analysis on how people use VPs 42% increase in site traffic eViP website ranks top in Google search International Conference on Virtual Patients

WP4: Impact More than just a website… –No. 1 port of call for all things VP-related –Dedicated online following (>58% new visitors) –Valuable resources for VPs and VP info (interviews, etc)

WP5: Assessment & Evaluation What did we do? 1.Developed an inventory of existing VP types and implementation scenarios 2.Developed evaluation instruments for VP design and curricula integration 3.Evaluated a set of repurposed and enriched VPs 4.Established an Assessment and Evaluation Group (AEG) 5.Present eViP activity and documentation at conferences 6.Publish scholarly articles in relevant journals and newsletters

WP5: Highlights Mini conference on VP research in Maastricht Publishing eViP evaluation instruments Publishing eViP Best Practice Guidelines First reported effort to describe VP design and curricular implementation

WP5: Highlights

WP6: Exit & Sustainability What did we do? 1.Agreed cooperative business and licensing models 2.Agreed copyright and IPR model 3.Agreed awareness & dissemination model

WP6: Highlights Overcoming IPR barriers in sharing digital content across Europe Agreed a sustainability model for eViP

IPR Management Steps involved 1.Evaluate IPRs relating to VPs in partner jurisdictions 2.Agree and adopt common consent form and patient information sheet License resources using Creative Commons 4.Create a best practice workflow Campbell et al., Work towards a clinical commons Led by St George’s University of London involving all partners

WP7: Project Management What did we do? 1.Established a robust project management structure 2.Created effective communication mechanisms 3.Monitor the project development 4.Foster relations with the wider community

WP7: Highlights Organisation of ICVP MedBiq Development of new style of project management Working as part of a successful team

Impact: Repurposing Demonstrated the value and efficiency of repurposing content from one culture to another Showed repurposing from one VP structure to another is less efficient Demonstrated that repurposing VPs must have an educational value purpose and fit Raised awareness of the steps involved in repurposing, and provided guidance for creation and repurposing.

Impact: Standards and IPR Delivered an ANSI –accredited standards for VPs which was practical and effective Proved there is an important practical role for technical standards in medical education –Making VP content more interoperable –Making VP content more accessible by adopting a unified approach for IPR clearance Produced Internationally recognised IPR clearance model for sharing digital content for use beyond VPs Demonstrated value of blended sustainability approach –Open access –Consultancy-driven

Impact: The website and its resources Over 320 virtual patients openly available The main port of call for virtual patients -1 st on Google >2,000 visitors per month 58% new visitors Full guideline on creation, repurposing etc Provides news and views on virtual patients

Impact: Partner activities Increased awareness of pedagogical aspects relating to VPs 4/5 -fold increase in VP presentations at European conferences half involving eViP partners. Special issue on VPs in Medical Teacher, 2009 Ran 1st and 2 nd international conferences on VPs Uptake of partners VP players worldwide Ran VP Workshops on VP creation, worldwide

Impact: Curriculum Implementation Collaborating with other institutions to: Implement VPs Integrate VPs by: –Replacing paper-based PBL –Supplementing lectures –Supplementing clinical bed-side teaching –Replacing paper-based assessment Evaluate process of curricular implementation Disseminate with wider community

Impact: Community of Practice Continue to engage and disseminate with other institutions using the eViP website to: Develop VP implementation strategies Discuss VP innovations and research Share best practice on all areas associated with VPs Secure further ‘international’ grant funding Eg. the FET flsgship initiative Peer-reviewed VPs to be shared via : –eViP website –MedEdPORTAL –Jorum Open

Join Us Website Twitter LinkedIn Facebook