CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report (APR) Stakeholder Presentation January 2007

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction SPP – State Performance Plan

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction What is the State Performance Plan (SPP)? State Performance Plan A six-year ( ) State plan that… establishes annual benchmarks and six-year targets for… twenty required indicators Covers the period - July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2011

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction SPP Process Process Requires: –Broad stakeholder input –Public dissemination –Annual public report on progress -statewide and for each local education agency

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction History of the SPP… State Performance Plan Original SPP submitted on time to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) in December 2005 Minor revisions were required by the USDE SPP approved by OSEP in April 2006 OSEP included two tables of items needing attention in SPP

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Present Status SPP (due February 1, 2007) submitted for SBE review at January meeting Includes new baselines and targets for several Indicators Includes OSEP required format changes Includes OSEP require content changes

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Each indicator includes the same, required information: Overview of the Issue/Description of Service or Process Baseline Data for FFY ( )

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Discussion of Baseline Data Measurable and Rigorous Benchmarks and Targets Improvement Activities

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Monitoring Priorities, Indicators and Measurement requirements are specified in the OSEP indicator documents. In most cases, the measures are very specific and allow little latitude.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction How the Content Was Determined

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Contents of SPP – Submitted December 2005

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction If the SPP was approved why did it change? To add baseline and target data as previously scheduled by OSEP –Indicator 4B, 7, 8, 9,10,11,14,18 To modify the SPP due to changed instructions required by OSEP –e.g., Statewide assessment table content and format To aligning SPP data requirements to that of annual Section 618 data collection as required by OSEP –e.g., LRE and Preschool LRE To modifying the SPP based on OSEP comments that accompanied its approval letter –Preschool Assessment and Parent Involvement to include sample information Because it is a dynamic document that can be modified with the approval of OSEP

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Additions/Revisions to the original SPP in

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction What’s Next for the SPP Submit a modified/revised SPP in February 2007 Prepare state and district-level public reports (Indicators 1-14) Submit Annual Performance Report (APR) in February 2007

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The original SPP may be accessed at: ments/spp2005.pdf The SBE approved version may be accessed at: ocuments/blue-jan07item26.doc

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction APR – Annual Performance Report

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction What is the Annual Performance Report (APR)? Annual Performance Report An annual State report that… –serves as a progress report on the SPP to demonstrate if: –annual benchmarks have been met –improvement activities were completed –for the twenty required indicators

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Like the SPP, the APR has required contents for each indicator: -Monitoring Priority - Indicator - Measurement -Target -Actual Target Data -Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed - Explanation of Progress or Slippage - Revisions with Justification

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction For the most part, actual data is analyzed: -statewide, -geographically (north, central, south), -by ethnicity and -by disability.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Generally, a chart summarizing the status of improvement activities is included with each indicator

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Contents of APR Submission

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Indicator Target Actual Indicator #1 - Graduation90% of districts meet KPI 50% of students – HS 34% of students – Unified 91% of districts Indicator #2 - Dropout85% of districts meet KPI 6.8% of students – HS 7.9% of students – Unified 3.8% of students – Elementary 88% of districts Graduation and Dropout

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Indicator Target Actual Indicator #3A. – Assessment – Meet AYP 52% of districts53.9% of districts Indicator #3B. – Assessment – Participation 95% of students96.5% (E) / 96.4% (M) of students Indicator #3C. – Assessment – Proficiency Unified Elementary High School 22.3% (E) / 20.9% (M) 23.0% (E) / 23.7% (M) 24.4% (E) / 26.5% (M) 19.6% (E) / 22.4% (M) 20.8% (E) / 24.8% (M) 16.7% (E) / 14.8% (M) Assessment

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Indicator Target Actual Indicator #4A. - Suspension/Expulsion Overall No more than 10.4% of districts 17.9% of districts Indicator #4B. - Suspension/Expulsion by Ethnicity 0.0 % of Districts(7.3% of districts) Suspension and Expulsion

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Indicator Target Actual Indicator #5A. - LRE - Removed less than 21% 51.1 % or more of students 50.4% of students Indicator #5B. - LRE - Removed more than 60% No more than 24.0% of students 24.2% of students Indicator #5C. - LRE - Separate Facility No more than 4.3% of students 4.3% of students Indicator #6 - Preschool LRE51% of 3-5 year olds 46.3% of 3-5 year olds Least Restrictive Environment

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Indicator Target Actual Indicator #12 - Part C to Part B Transition 100% of 3 year olds (69.2% of data matched with DDS) Indicator #13 - Secondary Transition100% of students age 15 and above 98% of students age 15 and above Transition

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Indicator Target Actual Indicator #15 - General Supervision100% of findings corrected within one year 97.2% of findings corrected within one year Indicator #16 - Complaints100% of complaints within 60 day timeline 84% of complaints within 60 day timeline Indicator #17 - Due Process100% of due process within 45 day timeline 33% of due process within 45 day timeline Indicator #19- Mediation56% of mediation result in agreements Unknown Indicator #20A. - State-reported Data submitted on time 100% of state- reported data State Level Activities

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Implications for CDE/SED Posted on the web Will replace KPIs Will be used to guide planning with stakeholders Will be used by OSEP to monitor states Compliance indicators will be used by OSEP to make Compliance Determinations per IDEA ‘04

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Implications for LEAs Values posted on the web Used to select districts for monitoring Used to identify areas to be addressed in monitoring reviews and improvement planning –Disproportionality –Suspension and Expulsion Will be used to identify districts who are significantly disproportionate Used to establish Compliance Determinations per IDEA 04

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Annual Performance Report The APR is due to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) no later than February 1, 2007 Reporting period covers –July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006 Has been reviewed and approved by the SBE

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Okay – so what does all this mean to you? This stakeholder group is a primary source of input regarding changes to the to the SPP and improvement activities to address federal indicators

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction What we hope to accomplish through this meeting Stakeholders will be acquainted with the general structure and purposes of the SPP and APR Stakeholders will participate in a review of the indicators with particular emphasis on improvement activities Stakeholders will be prepared to go back to their organization and represent the SPP and APR Stakeholders will be prepared to review new data in Spring 07 and provide comment and updates to data analysis and improvement activities for newly calculated Indicator values

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction In your groups, today, you will be given a summary derived from the SPP and APR. It contains the: -Indicator -Measurement -Baseline data -Target -Actual Target Data -Brief analysis -Improvement Activities Today is a day to absorb as much as you can about the indicators that interest you.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tomorrow Evaluate improvement activities –What is working? –Where are the gaps? Holes? What needs to be done to stimulate/support improvement –Policies, procedures, structures –Inservice training and professional development –Recruitment and retention of qualified staff

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction After Tomorrow Information will be summarized for use in Spring Stakeholders Meeting Spring Stakeholder meeting will look at data about the indicators derived from December 2006 data collections –LRE –Preschool LRE –Disproportionality –Eligibility Evaluation –Secondary Transition