Submitted by: Dr. Cleopatra Figgures, Chief Accountability Officer 2008-09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CSIP) Implementing the Missouri Standards for Performance, Process and Resource used in the Missouri School.
Submitted by: Nathalie Means, Special Assignment Dr. Carlinda Purcell, Chief Academic Officer
After School Programs 2/14/20141St. Louis Public Schools.
Submitted by: Dr. Carlinda Purcell, Chief Academic Officer Carol Howard, Coordinator Paula Knight, Executive Director, Curriculum & Instruction
Pre-AP (AVID) and Advanced Placement Dan Edwards, Associate Superintendent John Niemeyer, Coordinator.
Human Resources Division March 17, HR Department in collaboration with Education Officers met with impacted staff (Blewett – Rescheduled for March.
Establish a safe, secure learning environment for the students of Sumner High School 2/14/20142St. Louis Public Schools.
St. Louis Public Schools Accountability Plan October 20, Kelvin R. Adams, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools.
MSIP Accountability Plan
Submitted by: Dr. Dan Edwards and Ms. Betty Shackleford Dr. Carlinda Purcell, Chief Academic Officer
October 8, 2009 James Dishman, Ed.D. Dan Edwards, Ph.D.
February 23, /14/20142St. Louis Public Schools $36M Deficit Spend.
State the purpose of the presentation. State the outcome of the presentation. (expectation – go/no decision) 2/14/20142St. Louis Public Schools.
Summer Leadership Academy Office of Leadership Development Sheila Smith-Anderson, Executive Director.
CREATING THE BEST CHOICE IN URBAN EDUCATION BOARD PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER 6, 2007.
St. Louis Public Schools Comprehensive Assessment Program (CAP) Dr. Cleopatra Figgures Chief Accountability Officer Office of Accountability, Assessment,
An Enhanced Partnership Submitted by: John Windom, Executive Director, Community Education Dr. Carlinda Purcell, Chief Academic Officer
St. Louis Public Schools Student Performance Update December 2009 Dr. Cleopatra Figgures Deputy Superintendent Accountability 1.
Building Our Future: One Community, One School, One Child at a Time Goals of the Special Administrative Board St. Louis Public Schools October 14, 2008.
Submitted by: Paula D. Knight. Executive Director of Curriculum and Instruction Dr. Carlinda Purcell, Chief Academic Officer
AUSD Mathematics Summit Presentation to the Board of Education November 25, 2008.
Comprehensive Success Review Overview Presentation August 2010.
1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
PBM The Staging Process. Check the dates August In late August, districts receive their PBMAS summary report.
Hickman Mills C-1 Parent University: AYP, APR, Accreditation….what does it all mean? Presented by: Casey Klapmeyer.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
. Information from “Countdown to Accountability” Summer Leadership Institute July 2002 Arizona School Boards Association from presentations by Chris Thomas.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
MSIP 5 THE MISSOURI SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Fall 2012.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Teacher Quality Initiative Evaluating Current Practice, SB 6, and the 2011 initiative 1.
Dr. Sheryl Davenport Executive Director, EC/ECSE.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Module #3 Budgeting. What is Budgeting? Budgeting is the process of allocating resources to the prioritized needs of a school district. Budgeting is the.
Developing a New Accountability System
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
1 Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP) Fourth Cycle Becky Kemna, Coordinator School Improvement and Accreditation (573)
Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SIGNIFICANCE OF MAP SCORES PRESENTED BY DR. LEIGH ANNE TAYLOR KNIGHT SOURCE: Linda Lacy – Consultant UMKC Regional Professional Development Center SEPTEMBER.
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
ASSESSMENT Parkway Academic Assessment: Federal and State Influences on the Parkway School District Curriculum Council Parkway School District January.
MSBA/MASA Presentation October 3, 2015 Mr. Micheal Fisk Dr. Marc Doss Dr. Kristee Lorenz.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
 The SPSA has been developed by all stakeholders at AVHS. The SPSA outlines the strategies and instructional practices that the school will establish.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
MSIP 5 and You What it means for your student and the Kansas City Public Schools.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
State Board of Education Progress Update
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presentation transcript:

Submitted by: Dr. Cleopatra Figgures, Chief Accountability Officer

2/14/20142St. Louis Public Schools The Process of accrediting (classifying) districts was mandated by Missouri law through MSIP in MSIP reviews and accredits the 524 school districts within five year review cycles. About 20% of the districts are reviewed each year of a cycle and a report covering the areas of resource, process and performance standards, is developed. The report, called the APR (Annual Performance Report), recommends and presents an accreditation status to the State Board of Education (SBOE).

2/14/20143St. Louis Public Schools Public School Districts in Missouri can be classified as: Accredited, Provisionally Accredited or Unaccredited. Unaccredited means that the district did not meet quantitative and qualitative standards in educational resources, instructional process and education performance outcomes set by DESE. Unaccredited districts must undergo a Full MSIP Review within each 5 year cycle period. The State is currently in the 4 th Cycle of reviews which began in July, 2006.

2/14/20144St. Louis Public Schools Phase I of the 4 th Cycle of the Full MSIP Review will occur April The review is focused on teaching and learning, i.e., performance standards, and will include: Visits to observe instruction in every school and every classroom by a team of educators from across the state Focus groups and interviews with school and central office staff, that are related to teaching and learning in our schools Visits to schools and review of program/budget records reviewed to determine condition and status Phase 2 of the 4 th Cycle of the MSIP Review will occur May 5-7 when reviewers compile findings from the observations and interviews into a report

2/14/20145St. Louis Public Schools The standards looked at during a review outline the states vision and expectations for a quality school district. There are 3 types: Resource Standards - address requirements all districts must met with minimums determined by the State and desired determined by research; they are most operational and quantitative in nature Process Standards - address instructional and administrative processes used in schools and include instruction, school services and supplemental programs Performance Standards - include multiple measures of student performance as determined by DESE

2/14/20146St. Louis Public Schools During the 4 th MSIP Cycle, the accreditation level of a school district will be determined only by performance standards For K-12 districts, 14 performance standards will be evaluated and receive points using status and progress measures to determine if the standard was met. Eight to ten mets are required to gain accreditation. The 14 performance standards are: MAP achievement in reading and math(6 points) Graduation rate (1 point) Subgroup AYP achievement (1 point) ACT, Advance Courses, Career Education Courses, College Placement and Career Education Placement (5 points) Attendance Rate(1 point) Reading level achievement(0 points)

2/14/20147St. Louis Public Schools Solution: The performance standards will be evaluated using status and progress measures: Status measures the districts level of achievement based upon a five year average of performance data H1; H2; Average; Below Average and Floor Progress measures the districts improvement over a five year period in two ways: Annual – improvement from year to year Rolling Average – improvement shown by comparing two year averages. The expectation is for the district to meet/exceed state means and show consistent improvement

2/14/20148St. Louis Public Schools The goal of the MSIP is to promote school improvement within each district and on a statewide basis After the review, the APR will be completed and returned to SLPS SLPS will address issues found from the MSIP Review/APR by completing an Accountability Plan to be followed over the next two years MSIP/APR will use district level data to determine accreditation