Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Get Connected: How to Measure Connectivity in your Community Scott McCarey, AICP.
Advertisements

Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
1 Update on Bicyclist & Pedestrian Data Collection and Modeling Efforts Transportation Research Board January 2010 Charlie Denney, Associate Michael Jones,
Secondary Streets and Competing Functions Transportation Advisory Commission April 5, 2011.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Board Transportation Committee Updates on Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Discussion of Converting.
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Proposed Transportation Funding Policy Changes Fairfax County Department of Transportation March.
Regional Policy Common Indicators: Infrastructure Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
Addition Facts
Lec 25: Ch2.(T&LD): Site planning
Road Safety Considerations around a mine site By Richard Jois Transport Mining and Safety Leader.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 28, 2008.
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Checking & Corrective Action
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
F-1545 Petitioner: R.S. Parker Homes, LLC Site: acres located on the east side of Lasater Road, north of Peace Haven Road Request: Special use rezoning.
Public Meeting Presentation March 15, Project Location Project Purpose –Traffic reliever to I-95 –Integrate road with the Northwest Sector Plan.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Overview of Regulations for Water Quality Protection in South Carolina n Federal Clean Water Act/ NPDES Storm Water Program n South Carolina Pollution.
Chapter 10 Site Selection RETAIL MANAGEMENT: A STRATEGIC APPROACH,
Week 1.
HB 1048 / SB 518 Adjustments for Local Programs May 13, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
Urban Sprawl. What is Sprawl? Sprawl is dispersed, auto- dependent development outside of compact urban and village centers, along highways, and in rural.
The National Context for Smart Mobility John V. Thomas, PhD US EPA Smart Growth Program.
Presentation to Suburban Councillors February 2015.
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ROUTE 29.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Using LDRs to Implement Ped/Bike Change. LDRs – Land Development Regulations The collection of laws and regulations that govern the use of land, zoning,
Community Development Department CP AND HG RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LLC AND CITY OF PALM COAST Settlement & Development Agreement.
Proposed CBS Municipal Plan and Development Regulations Amendments for Backlot Development Municipal Plan Amendment No. 9, 2015 Development Regulations.
Once upon a time …. Pyrmont as new urbanism “The new urbanist approach can be applied at many scales, from individual subdivisions to entire regions.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Open Space Residential Development Bylaw Town of Rehoboth.
SITE. Parcel will go from Medium Density Residential to medium high Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office/Business.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Presentation Outline  Recommendation  Project Background  Public Involvement  Proposed Design  Citizen Comments/Questions  Summary and Recommendation.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Dockets R-11-06;07;09 Zoning Regulation Amendments Proposed Amendments to the Cochise County Zoning Regulations regarding Lot Development Administrative.
Community Development Department Dimensional Variance In Connection with The Agreement to Convey Property – City Initiated Application # Palm.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Elliot Road Extension design critique and recommendations Petition to the Town of Chapel Hill Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board March 25, 2014 Geoffrey.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
State Aid Standards Development
Get Connected: How to Measure Connectivity in your Community
Myersville Planning Commission
MS4 OVERVIEW 2015.
Rural Transit Stop Design Guidelines Prof Omer maaitah
Presentation transcript:

Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements Nick Donohue October 2008

Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements Initiative is a result of legislation proposed by Governor Kaine and unanimously approved during the 2007 General Assembly Session Legislation requires the Commonwealth Transportation Board to develop new Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements Regulation will supersede and replace existing Subdivision Street Requirements Intended to ensure streets accepted into state system for perpetual public maintenance provide public benefit

Why Update Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements? Isolated developments cause additional strain on the regional transportation network by forcing local trips onto major roads Requiring all trips – local and regional – to rely on major roads is not sustainable Increased connectivity will allow for context sensitive design neighborhood streets Will help encourage friendly environments for pedestrians and bicyclists, and discourage speeding in neighborhoods

Why Update Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements? Today Goal

Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements To be accepted into state system streets must provide public benefit, defined as: Public service Connectivity* Pedestrian accommodations* *Vary depending on location of development Streets may be accepted as: Network addition (group of streets) Individual street

Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements Network Additions Evaluating connectivity requires consideration of all streets in a proposed development as a whole instead of individually Streets within a development or a phase of a development will be considered as a group for acceptance into the state system

Area Types Proposed regulation: Establishing graduated requirements based on location and conditions, with appropriate flexibility Creating areas based on long-term local, regional and federal planning boundaries Three tiered system – one size does not fit all Compact Area Type Suburban Area Type Rural Area Type Area types may be modified at the request of the local governing body

Connectivity Requirement The goal is to require additional connectivity between developments Connectivity is measured through a connectivity index for compact and suburban area types Connectivity index is the number of street segments divided by the number of intersections and dead ends

Connectivity Requirement Connectivity index increases as connectivity of road network increases

Connectivity Requirements - Examples The highest connectivity index that can be achieved is over 2.5 The lowest connectivity index that can be achieved is 1.0

Connectivity Requirements Compact Area Type Network addition must have sufficient connections to have a connectivity index of 1.6 or greater Suburban Area Type Network addition must have sufficient connections to have a connectivity index of 1.4 or greater Rural Area Type Network addition must have multiple connections All Area Types Developments must connect with adjoining development’s stub-outs to be eligible for acceptance into state system Connections should be in multiple directions to both local and higher order roadways

Connectivity Exceptions Connectivity is not always feasible Automatic reductions would be given for perimeter constraints such as wetlands, existing development, rivers, terrain, railroad tracks, etc In this example 25% of the perimeter is effectively eliminated for connections due to railroad tracks, so the connectivity index is automatically reduced from 1.4 to 1.3 or 25%

Connectivity Exceptions Review related exceptions Incompatible land use Unique characteristics of parcel Access management regulations Consideration would be built into initial conceptual sketch review VDOT would be required to respond within 45 calendar days

Grandfathering Streets within a proffered plan of development, site plan/subdivision plat, preliminary subdivision plat or approved street construction plan may be accepted under former requirements Proposals officially accepted for review by a local government may be accepted under the former requirements at the request of the locality Regulation allows previous area type requirements to apply when area type is modified after approval of development proposal

Pedestrian Accommodations Based on density Accommodations on both sides of the street with two or more units per acre Accommodations on one side of the street with lot sizes of two acres or less Requirements for “missing link” connections Accommodations required along higher order roadways

Street Design These local streets – with multiple on-street and off-street parking spaces for each house – have lane widths effectively six feet wider than most interstates Lane widths of this size can encourage travel at high speeds and increase impervious surface area

Street Design This design and lane widths are necessary in many situations today due to emergency access needs and the lack of connectivity Increased vehicle speeds increase pedestrian injuries and fatalities Studies have also found a correlation between local street widths and accident rates A Colorado locality found its accident rates were significantly higher on wider local streets

Street Design Connectivity allows design of local streets will result in lower vehicle speeds – built-in traffic calming

Recommended Standards Street Design Increased connectivity can allow the use of context sensitive street design which can: Promote safe environments for pedestrians, bicyclists and children Reduce stormwater runoff Discourage high travel speeds within neighborhoods Recommended widths promote context sensitive solutions and are in compliance with engineering principles including AASHTO and Institute of Traffic Engineers Based on understanding that local roads serve access to property and disperse traffic (curb and gutter) Recommended Standards Current Standards Less than 2000 vehicles 29 ft 36 ft 2001 to 4000 vehicles 40 ft * Widths assume on-street parking on both sides of the street

Stormwater Runoff VDOT has worked with DCR and private sector to develop list of innovative stormwater facilities that can be placed within VDOT right of way Today, stormwater facilities are not permitted within VDOT right of way Also includes raintanks and other bio-infiltration facilities within the right of way

Implementation VDOT will produce a guidance document to accompany regulation to assist local staff and developers There will be a 6 month transition period from effective date for the implementation of the regulation VDOT will provide outreach and training similar to the outreach and training that was provided for the Traffic Impact Analysis regulations (Chapter 527)