CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance. Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Systems 2002 Facts and figures on the basis of a survey conducted in 40 Council of Europe Member States.
Advertisements

1 Providing robust data to support evidence based policies for child friendly justice.
European Day of Justice The crystal scales of Justice Award.
1 EuroMed Justice II OPENING CONFERENCE Brussels, 30 June 2008 Working Group II Resolution of cross-border family conflicts Mr. Khaled ABOUALI Project.
Strasbourg The Various European Systems of Enforcement Professor of Urals State Law University Vladimir Yarkov (Yekaterinburg) 1.
Civil Proceedings Criminal Proceedings.
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Overview and Purpose of Market.
● PROS &CONS ● Uroš Živković, LL.M. Lecturer at the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
Data Collection and Court Management
Customer Satisfaction Performance Measures Workgroup Final Report.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow. Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes - Different Measures Robert D. Behn Harvard University Public Administration.
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS COURT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT SYSTEM Guiding the Courts Into the Future.
Performance Framework Part 1 – System Performance Multi Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support in Serbia.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
 Mediation is a dispute resolution process in which, as an alternative to judicial or administrative decision-making process, the parties are assisted.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
Goals: Session 1 (Legal & Evidentiary Challenges Obtain contributions on the particular successes and challenges on key L&E issues in different jurisdictions;
Efficiency of Justice and Trust in Justice across Europe: the CEPEJ (Eurojustis, Parma, 7 May 2010) François Paychère WORKING GROUP ON QUALITY OF JUSTICE.
Court User Satisfaction  Evaluation of general satisfaction level in final users  Determination of users' degree of trust towards court system.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools. CEPEJ Guidelines.
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe.
INTERNAL AUDIT IN UKRAINE State Financial Inspection of Ukraine
LITIGATION COSTS IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AND PRINCIPLE OF OBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION MARTA OŠLEJA LEGAL DEPARTMENT,
Tasks:  analyse the judicial systems in member states  identify the difficulties they meet  define concrete ways to improve the functioning of these.
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
The judge in the European Judicial Area: Civil and Commercial matters. (9 th edition )
European judicial systems: 2008 findings and regional analysis Commission Européenne pour l’efficacité de la Justice European Commission for the Efficiency.
Study Visit of the Jordanian Justice Delegation March 2014, Bologna and Turin, Italy Present and future challenges to the justice administration.
The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice and evaluation of legal systems (Council of Europe) Dr. Pim Albers Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands.
“The professional home of dispute resolution – worldwide” Alternative Dispute Resolution Tutors: Charles Brown LLB(Hons) FCIArb and Philip Fidler FRICS.
Corruption, Democracy and justice Pim Albers Special advisor European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ)
2012 edition of the Crystal Scales of Justice Prize awarding ceremony Cérémonie de remise du Prix Balance de cristal 2012 Explanations by jury member Lidija.
Brussels IIa Regulation Outcomes of the public consultation Michael Shotter, Joanna Serdynska European Commission DG Justice Civil Justice Policy Unit.
Cross-border Cooperation of Judges Andrej Kmecl. Cross-border Cooperation of Judges Different aspects of judicial cooperation in environmental cases:
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Key Individual Chapter 2. Purpose of FAIS Consumer protection Professionalize intermediary and advisory services in Financial Services industry Regulate.
Representation in Court Wilbert van de Donk Chairman Royal Professional Board of Judicial Officers, The Netherlands.
2015 edition of the Crystal Scales of Justice Prize awarding ceremony Cérémonie de remise du Prix Balance de cristal 2015 Explanations by Fabio Bartolomeo,
Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015.
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
PROGRAMMING OF INTERNATIOAL ASSISTANCE Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Justice 25 th September, 2007.
JUDICIAL REFORMS IN TANZANIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
1 Quality of justice and courts Checklist Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts.
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
Monitoring of Judicial Reform Citizens’ view of the judicial system in Montenegro March 2016 Telephone survey The project "Monitoring of Judicial Reform"
Republic of Macedonia Reduction of backlog and enforcement cases Sarajevo, November 2012.
MEDIATION and other forms of ADR.
Customer Satisfaction Performance Measures Workgroup
The Civil Courts and other forms of Dispute Resolution
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Data Collection and Court Management
A special form of dispute resolution The Commission of Procurement Experts Dr. E.M. Bruggeman, The Netherlands Institute for Construction Law, The Hague.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe Dear Excellencies, Dear Colleagues and guests!
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools
COURT PERFORMANCE Does size matter?
Judicial Powers of Case Management
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
Funded by the Justice Programme of the European Union
LEGAL AID QUALITY INDICATORS AND CONTROL INSTRUMENTS : FINNISH VIEW
COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow
HWC - Brussels meeting Session 1
Towards a methodology for performance measurement in judiciaries
Data collection and President's Dashboards
Presentation transcript:

CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance

Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time management Judicial time management Quality of justice Quality of justice Enforcement Enforcement Mediation Mediation Targeted co-operation Targeted co-operation

CEPEJ – recommends especially Evaluation of Judicial Systems – Report Evaluation of Judicial Systems – Report “Time Management Checklist“ “Time Management Checklist“ SATURN – European Uniform Guidelines for Monitoring of Judicial Timeframes (EUGMONT) SATURN – European Uniform Guidelines for Monitoring of Judicial Timeframes (EUGMONT) GOJUST – Guidelines on Judicial Statistics GOJUST – Guidelines on Judicial Statistics

CEPEJ – recommended indicators Type of case Cases pending on New cases initiated in 2008 Resolved cases in 2008 Cases pending on Civil cases 1aLitigious divorces 1bDismissals

CEPEJ – recommended indicators Efficiency rate, Total backlog, Backlog resolution, Case per judge, Standard departure …

CEPEJ indicators – applied to TK I

CEPEJ indicators – applied to TK II

And what about the Quality?

Comprehensive court quality models The Netherlands: measurement system court quality and RechtspraaQ The Netherlands: measurement system court quality and RechtspraaQ Finland: Quality Benchmarks Rovaniemi Courts Finland: Quality Benchmarks Rovaniemi Courts

NL Quality indicators for evaluating courts (and judges): measurement system court quality Independence and impartiality Independence and impartiality Timeliness of proceedings Timeliness of proceedings Expertise of the judges Expertise of the judges Treatment of the parties at court sessions Treatment of the parties at court sessions Judicial quality Judicial quality Tested in three district courts (1999 – 2001) Tested in three district courts (1999 – 2001)

NL RechtspraaQ (2002) Normative framework; Normative framework; Quality regulations Quality regulations Measurement system for court quality Measurement system for court quality Measuring instruments: Measuring instruments: Court-wide positioning study Court-wide positioning study Client satisfaction survey Client satisfaction survey Visitation Visitation Audit Audit Other elements: Other elements: Complaints procedure Complaints procedure Peer review Peer review

Finland: Quality Benchmarks (2003) The process The process The judicial decision The judicial decision The treatment of the parties and the public The treatment of the parties and the public Promptness of the proceedings Promptness of the proceedings Competence and professional skills of the judge Competence and professional skills of the judge Organisation and management of adjudication Organisation and management of adjudication

Finland: Methods of evaluation Self-evaluation Self-evaluation Surveys Surveys Evaluation by a group of expert evaluators Evaluation by a group of expert evaluators Statistics Statistics Statement by the courts itself Statement by the courts itself In 2005 the courts received the European Crystal Scales of Justice Award

Thanks for your attention!