Linda Vista Estates Rezoning and Subdivision Policy Issue Discussion April 23, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Purpose of TDR Market Analysis To determine whether and where there is demand for development over and above whats permitted by baseline zoning How that.
Advertisements

Board of County Commissioners
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 23, 2007.
Policy Subdivisions Recently Adopted Amendments June 23, 2009 Miccosukee Community Center Open House.
Alachua County Plat Review – Southampton Traditional Neighborhood Development – Phase 1 February 24, 2009.
Final Plat Amendment for Kings Ranch
Community Development Department CP AND HG RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LLC AND CITY OF PALM COAST Settlement & Development Agreement.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Board of County Commissioners February 9, Alarion Bank PD Preliminary Development Plan for drive-thru bank and office building 1.83 acres Future.
Community Development Department CP AND HG RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LLC AND CITY OF PALM COAST MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 19, 2008.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Alachua County Plat Review – Grand Preserve at Kanapha Planned Development (PD) September 11, 2012.
Alachua County Plat Review Process February 26, 2008.
Alachua County Plat Review Process October 14, 2008.
North East Study Area Staff Recommendation Thursday, June 25, 2009.
Workshop on Sequim Urban Residential – I Zoning Responding to Non-Compliance and Invalidity Ruling of Western Washington Growth Management Hearing Board.
Docket CP-12-01/Z (Martin) Board of Supervisors August 28, 2012.
June 30, 2015 Land Use Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
September 24,  Preliminary Development Plan  Location: North side of NW 39 th Avenue in the 8300 to 9099 block  Zoning Districts: R1-B, HM, PD,
The Alachua County Mobility Plan:
Community Development Department Oare MPD Development Agreement Amendment Application #2719.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Villagio at Waterford Lakes Planned Development Alta Development, LLC.
Oakmont at Gainesville, LLP CPA Location Map.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Request for Plat Abandonment for the Kayenta Estates Minor Subdivision (S-06-02) Board of Supervisors December 4, 2012.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
VOLUSIA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION (TPO) NOVEMBER 27, 2012 Craig Coffey, County Administrator 1.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Rural Settlement Overview Board of County Commissioners January 10, 2012.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Amendments to the Unified Land Development Code Section Multifamily Residential Requirements Section (d) – Planned Developments with Transfer.
TRANSFERRING DENSITY AND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OVERVIEW Creating an effective TDR Program Creating an effective TDR Program Steps.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 5, 2007.
Application CPA (Large Scale Map Amendment) A request initiated by the County to amend Future Land Use Map from Rural/ Agriculture to Preservation.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 12, 2007.
Alachua County Plat Review Process September 9, 2008.
City of Dunnellon Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Future Land Use Element  Conservation Element  Concurrency Management System.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 9, 2008.
Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM & REZ Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Alachua County Plat Review Process April 8, 2008.
Alachua County Plat Review – Greenbrier Subdivision February 24, 2009.
Alachua County Plat Review Process September 23, 2008.
G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Location Map. G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Aerial.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
J5 UDC Amendment Clustering January 20, 2015 Chance Sparks, Director of Planning.
TLZM Crescent Parke December 3, 2015 Planning Commission Work Session.
Item 3 Southlake Subdivision Analysis v.1. Data gathered through: –Official Plat of Record –Tarrant Appraisal District –Geographic Information Systems.
Board of County Commissioners
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
Presented by Kelsey Lang, Planning Associate June 27, 2016
COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Portuguese American Cultural Center Property Rezoning to
Planning Commission November 4, 2010
Board of County Commissioners
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Linda Vista Estates Rezoning and Subdivision Policy Issue Discussion April 23, 2008

Zoning Policy Issues Residential Reserve Residential Reserve Open space Open space

Key Miller Creek Design Principles Motor vehicle access improved prior to or concurrent with significant development. Motor vehicle access improved prior to or concurrent with significant development. Residential focus; growth in clusters; avoid sprawl Residential focus; growth in clusters; avoid sprawl Maintain rural character, especially along major roadways, ridgelines and trails. Maintain rural character, especially along major roadways, ridgelines and trails. Create a logical framework for phased growth (pages 5 and 6) Create a logical framework for phased growth (pages 5 and 6)

Residential Reserve Excerpt from 1997 Miller Creek Area Comprehensive Plan: The residential reserve areas are described as follows (page 72): The flat lands south of Miller Creek Road and north of Miller Creek are recommended for a density of one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres. This land should be set aside as a Residential Reserve for future development. Any development or subdivision occurring in this area should be clustered on smaller tracts allowing for variability in neighborhood designs. These Reserve lands may be developed at a density of one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres in clusters at any time, and when the urban area is built out by 80%, the Reserve area would be reviewed by the governing bodies for a possible increase in density.

Build out “Build-out should be determined by dividing approved platted lots by total potential dwelling units allowed by zoning or recommended by the comprehensive plan. Further, in determining the extent of build-out, the Board of County Commissioners should consider the degree to which approved lots have been developed (page 70).”

Build out by zoning Zoning districts of one du/acre or higher density Zoning districts of one du/acre or higher density Potential build out of zoned capacity – 6,687 dwelling units Potential build out of zoned capacity – 6,687 dwelling units Existing approved platted lots within zone districts – 2,171 lots Existing approved platted lots within zone districts – 2,171 lots 2,171/6,687 x 100 = 33% 2,171/6,687 x 100 = 33% Does not meet “build out test.” Does not meet “build out test.”

Build out by land use Land use designations of one du/acre or highter density Land use designations of one du/acre or highter density Potential build out of land use capacity – 5,677 dwelling units Potential build out of land use capacity – 5,677 dwelling units Existing approved platted lots within land use designations – 2,086 lots Existing approved platted lots within land use designations – 2,086 lots 2,086/5,677 x 100 = 38% 2,086/5,677 x 100 = 38% Does not meet “build out test.” Does not meet “build out test.”

Do we ever reach build out? 115 filed subdivisions – 2,130 lots 115 filed subdivisions – 2,130 lots 5 preliminary plats – 1,186 lots 5 preliminary plats – 1,186 lots Approved platted lots at build out of all subdivisions as submitted – 3,316 lots Approved platted lots at build out of all subdivisions as submitted – 3,316 lots 3,316/6,687 x 100 = 50% (zoning) 3,316/6,687 x 100 = 50% (zoning) 3,316/5,677 x 100 = 58% (land use) 3,316/5,677 x 100 = 58% (land use) Development per preliminary and final plats never reaches build out called for in Plan. Development per preliminary and final plats never reaches build out called for in Plan.

What if we changed the target? Shoot for 80% build out of the development as applied for by the development community Shoot for 80% build out of the development as applied for by the development community 115 filed subdivisions – 2,130 approved platted lots 115 filed subdivisions – 2,130 approved platted lots 5 preliminary plats – 1,186 lots 5 preliminary plats – 1,186 lots Approved platted lots once all plats are filed – 3,316 lots Approved platted lots once all plats are filed – 3,316 lots 2,130/3,316 x 100 = 64% 2,130/3,316 x 100 = 64% Does not meet “build out test.” Does not meet “build out test.” Need to plat 523 additional lots to achieve 80% build out of this lower goal. Need to plat 523 additional lots to achieve 80% build out of this lower goal.

Open space

Miller Creek View PUD Zoning (disputed)

FVLT Conservation Easement Existing

Discussion