GK-12 Annual Reports Who What, Where, When How Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEP Planning Process Beginning at age 14 the IEP should be focused on meeting the student’s postsecondary goals. The IEP is a plan for preparing the student.
Advertisements

Initiative on K-12 Teacher Preparation Natasha Speer, Univ. of Maine Tim Scott and Omah Williams, Texas A & M Noah Finkelstein, Univ. Colorado-Boulder.
Preparing Tomorrows Scientists and Engineers for the Challenges of the 21 st Century Preparing Tomorrows Scientists and Engineers for the Challenges of.
NSF Division of Graduate Education Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education Preparing Tomorrows Scientists and Engineers For the Challenges of the 21 st.
Georgia Tech STEP: Student and Teacher Enhancement Partnership 2006 GK-12 Grantees Conference (2)Llewellyn.
HEA STEM: Update of HEA activities in Physics Paul Yates, Discipline Lead for the Physical Sciences.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas
October 14,  BUT you still need to participate in IEP meetings in a well-documented, meaningful manner.
Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering Program Engineering Education NSF Awardees Conference-Sept , 2007 Mary Poats, Program Manager-RET.
Cross-Cutting and Special Interest Programs NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
HARRINGTON d e p a r t m e n t of b I o e n g i n e e r i n g Eric J. Guilbeau, Ph.D. Olin Professor and Chair Bioengineering Seed Grant Program.
Defining Goals and Expectations: Program Leaders Kimberly Kerstann, Ph.D. and Paula Vertino, Ph.D. Winship Cancer Institute Emory University Atlanta, GA.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
1 NIH Grant-Writing Workshop Leora Lawton, Ph.D. Executive Director, Berkeley Population Center Summer 2015 Dlab Workshop Session 5: Human Subjects and.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
2011 Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Research Plan and Curriculum Vitae – What to Take into Account? Prof. Kaisa Miettinen
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
TAC NEASC 126 TH ANNUAL MEETING & CONFERENCE LEARNING THAT TRANSFORMS Prior Learning Assessment December 7, 2011 THIS PORTION OF THE PANEL IS PRESENTED.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
William Pooler and Heidi Imker PhD Department of Research Data Service & Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at.
Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Session Materials  Wiki 
ISCB-SC - Saraswathi.S Saraswathi S PhD Student Iowa State University Ames, Iowa, USA Chairperson: ISCB-SC-RSG.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Academic Program Review Chair’s Workshop John E. Sawyer, Ph.D. Associate Provost Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Workshop for all NSF-funded PIs regarding new NSF policies and requirements. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those funded.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Making Applications: Research Plan, Curriculum Vitae, List of Publications etc. Prof. Kaisa Miettinen
MSP Annual Performance Report: Online Instrument MSP Regional Conferences November, 2006 – February, 2007.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Careers Class. What is Careers ? A class to help you: Prepare for post secondary and careers Achieve Academic Success Make the most of your High School.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
ActionWebs : Education and Outreach ActionWebs Meeting July 23, 2010 │Berkeley, California Education Overview Kristen Gates, Ed.D University of California,
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
WASC FBHS Accreditation September 12, 2012.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation MSP Project Description FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Vision, Goals and Outcomes  Vision, Goals.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
APHL Workforce Development Programs and Resources
Communities In Schools MOSPA Conference May 2017
IRIS Education and Outreach
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Office of Sponsored Projects
Using Google Classroom To Risk Students
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
How Shall we prepare teachers for deeper community partnerships?
Tammy Custer Grant and Contract Officer
Picture or Graphic that illustrates the research or concept
  PREM Annual Reporting “These guidelines were developed to provide a uniform reporting structure for the Partnerships in Research and Education in Materials.
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
NUAcT Fellowship Scheme
Presentation transcript:

GK-12 Annual Reports Who What, Where, When How Results

Annual Data Collection Macro International (otherwise known as QRC) You can generate a PDF after you submit your data. This is the bean counting –You input names of participants –Fellows input information –Teachers input information They have a table at the conference

NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form Report Guidelines & Highlights Form One-stop shopping

GK-12 Reporting Guidelines A. Participants (Can be attached as part of Macro PDF for Years 2 - 5) With updates table for current participants 1.) Senior Personnel - A table which includes each PI, Co-PI, Post Doc, Evaluator, Project Manager or other personnel associated with the project activities over the last year of funding. Include the list in a data table that also includes the following for each participant: 1. Part I – Principal Investigator Report Use the NSF Fast Lane Reporting Structure, attach relevant documents as PDFs a. A description of the position of each b. Length of time each worked on project c. Institutional affiliation and position d. Contribution statement

GK-12 Reporting Guidelines A. Participants 2.) Graduate Student – A list of all graduate fellows funded over the last year of the project. A separate list of prior graduate fellows funded and their progress towards career goals. Include the list in a data table with the following for each participant: 1. Part I – Principal Investigator Report Use the NSF Fast Lane Reporting Structure, attach relevant documents as PDFs a. Year in graduate program (masters or PhD) b. Major c. Research Topic d. Statement of graduate location and nature of graduate work e. Race/Ethnicity and gender f. Fellows Tracking – include past Fellows, graduation status, degree obtained, current position, and phone (separate table)

Example Only Tailor to Project

GK-12 Reporting Guidelines A. Participants 3.) Organizational Partners – A list of each partner including schools, zoos, museums, and industry. Include the list in a data table that also includes the following: 1. Part I – Principal Investigator Report Use the NSF Fast Lane Reporting Structure, attach relevant documents as PDFs a. Characteristics of partner school (urban, suburban, rural, socioeconomic data, academic standing) b. Description of activities c. Number of fellows and teachers at each location d. Name of fellow and teacher teams at each location if applicable e. Subject areas and grade level fellow and teacher teams teaching

Example Only Tailor to Project

GK-12 Reporting Guidelines A. Participants 4.) Other collaborators – A list of each collaborator or institution contributing dollars, goods or services. Include the list in a data table that also includes a statement of contribution. 1. Part I – Principal Investigator Report Use the NSF Fast Lane Reporting Structure, attach relevant documents as PDFs

GK-12 Reporting Guidelines B. Project Summary -What are your project goals? -How are you meeting them? -What are the challenges and outcomes? 1. Part I – Principal Investigator Report attach relevant documents as PDFs

B. Project Summary (contd) Bringing Research into classroom –What research? What class? How the research is integrated into curriculum? Training and development activities (fellows, teachers, fellows and teachers) Fellows progression and/or results (such as scientific publications) in their graduate research Growth of Partnership(s) Achievements, Challenges, and Responses New, Concise, Complete

Example Only Tailor to Project

Evaluators Report Executive Summary Responses by the project team Next step plan

NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form NSF GK-12:Annual Report GuidelinesFinal Report GuidelinesGK-12 ProfilesHighlights Form Report Guidelines & Highlights Form One-stop shopping