Www.fishsciences.net Klamath Coho Integrated Modeling Framework (IMF)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.
Advertisements

Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Just Below the Four Lowermost Columbia River Mainstem Dams Project PNNL.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
WRIA 8 Fish in/Fish out Monitoring Summary
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
Adult entry Allocated to tribs Return to natal stream or IGH — some straying Spawners in trib Females Fry Fingerlings Parr Smolts Ocean entry Fingerlings.
A life history framework to understand production of juvenile steelhead in freshwater applied to the John Day River, Oregon Jason Dunham, USGS Forest and.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Gopher Tortoise Minimum Viable Population and Minimum Reserve Size Workshop March 2013 Background Participants Process Findings Photo by Dirk J.
National Marine Fisheries Service Steelhead Viability Analysis: Addressing Life History Variability Tom Cooney (NWFSC) March 14, 2012.
Salmon recovery does not just mean more fish Management decisions are driven by politics & logistics—science can only contribute if we provide technically.
Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty Cedar River Sockeye Hatchery Proposed Adaptive Management Plan.
Modeling the impact of future climate change on salmon habitat restoration actions James Battin Mark Scheuerell Krista Bartz Hiroo Imaki Mary Ruckelshaus.
What is Variability ? Change with location or through time in the capacity of a freshwater system to support salmon Spatial Variation –Natural variability.
Population viability analysis of Snake River chinook: What do we learn by including climate variability? Rich Zabel NOAA Fisheries Seattle, WA.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
Hood River County Monthly Meeting Presentation Toni E Turner, M.S., P.E., Project Manager and Technical Lead.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
Technical Memo #2 Simulating Fall Redistribution and Overwinter Survival of Klamath River Coho Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Steve Cramer.
Utilizing Ecosystem Information to Improve Decision Support for Central California Salmon Project Acronym: Salmon Applied Forecasting, Assessment and Research.
Tim Beechie NOAA Fisheries, Seattle Incorporating climate change into restoration planning.
ISAB Snake River Spill-Transport Review ISAB – Presentation to Council September 17, 2008.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
Kevin Kappenman Rishi Sharma Shawn Narum Benefit-Risk Analysis of White Sturgeon in the Lower Snake River Molly Webb Selina Heppell.
1 Some Context for NMFS Ecosystem Modeling Ned Cyr NMFS Office of Science and Technology.
Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.
Modeling physical environmental impacts on survival: the SHIRAZ model Ecosystem based management FISH 507.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
Delta Passage Model: A quantitative framework for integrating and understanding water project effects on migrating salmon Funded by Metropolitan Water.
Development of a water temperature model to predict life- history expression and production of Oncorhynchus mykiss in the John Day River basin, Oregon.
Howard Schaller PSMFC Annual Meeting September 24, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.
CSS Oversight Committee ISAB November 15, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.
Recommendations on export limits San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.
The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
Yakima O. mykiss Modeling Workshop Ian Courter Casey Justice Steve Cramer.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Puget Sound Harvest Status of ESA and NEPA Review Susan Bishop Sustainable Fisheries Division NOAA Fisheries
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
PROGRESS IN THE SIMULATION TESTING OF PENGUIN CLOSURE EFFECT RESPONSE An Introduction.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.
SWRCB Workshop March 2005 Issue #8 CDFG Comments.
Background Historic data sets are really only available for Sandy and Clackamas. Current harvest management uses these populations as drivers, but we know.
Technical Memo #1 Estimation of Returns of Naturally Produced Coho to the Klamath River Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Brian Pyper Ian Courter.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS EXAMPLE.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
1 Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Yolo Bypass Fisheries Enhancement.
PRINCIPLES OF STOCK ASSESSMENT. Aims of stock assessment The overall aim of fisheries science is to provide information to managers on the state and life.
December 14, 2011 California Natural Resources Agency Public Meeting.
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
January 11,2011 Eureka, California
Steelhead Viability: Where are we now and where are we going?
Missing collaborator.
Agent Based Modelling and Scenario Analysis in the Policy Process
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Klamath Coho Integrated Modeling Framework (IMF)

IMF Project Objectives Construct a model that will predict the relative influence of Reclamation Project operation scenarios on Klamath Basin coho production and productivity. The results of this analysis will be used to inform Reclamation’s consultation with NOAA Fisheries. Picture from ODFW

ESA Consultation Analyses Lindley et al. (2006) 1.Use a quantitative framework akin to life- cycle modeling 2.Express quantitative findings in terms of VSP criteria 3.Evaluate a range of circumstances that represent uncertainty 4.Identify and use explicit measures of uncertainty

The Cal-Fed reviewers suggest a “life-cycle” approach. …a biological conceptual framework is necessary to provide a context for integrating diverse types of scientific information into overall assessments of viability and risk at the population and ESU level. 1. Use a quantitative framework akin to life-cycle modeling Life-stage-level effects Population-level effects Predicting how alterations to fish habitat affects populations

…consideration of basic VSP principals will help form an explicit conceptual framework for a BiOp. …even in data-poor situations VSP provides a useful organizing framework for considering risks to salmon populations and ESUs, and clear references to this framework in future Biological Opinions will enhance their transparency as well as their scientific credibility. … actions proposed in a BiOp should be evaluated with respect to their effects on the four VSP viability criteria 2. Express quantitative findings in terms of VSP criteria Abundance Productivity Spatial Structure Diversity

The Cal-Fed reviewers suggest developing a series of scenarios that represent a range of possible future climates and water demand situations. The BiOp should have evaluated whether the populations will be able to bear the increased mortality under the full range of ocean conditions, which will include periods of poor survival as well as good periods. The Cal-Fed reviewers urge that the effects of hatchery fish be analyzed concurrently with the other project impacts 3. Evaluate a range of circumstances that represent uncertainty Climate Change Ocean Conditions Hatchery Fish

Addressing reviewer’s concerns about biological uncertainty will require an iterative process of 1) collecting interdisciplinary scientific observations, 2) building and re-building models of the populations within their environments, and 3) running the models in data assimilation mode to advise the content and design of data collection programs, hence back to step 1… The process of data assimilation not only tests the logic and parameters of the model against reality, but it can also be used to identify which variables are most critical, and the minimum frequency or density of observations necessary to estimate a given parameter. 4. Identify and use explicit measures of uncertainty Statistical uncertainty Biological uncertainty

11/6/06 12/14/06 1/5/07 1/24/07 3/27/07 5/2/07 5/14/07 6/08/07 TBA 7/31/07 Project Begins 12/12/05 Tech Memo 1 Tech Memo 2 TRB 1 Final report and model user guide Tech Memos 3-4 1/18/07 Workshop: Tech Memos 3-4 TRBs 2-3 TRB 4 Tech Memos 5-8 Workshop: Tech Memos 5-8 Workshop: Review first draft of model Release draft final report for comment Coho IMF Project Timeline

Technical Response Briefs Tech Memo 1: Abundance Estimation Tech Memo 2: Fall redistribution and over-winter survival Tech Memo 3: Ocean survival Tech Memo 4: Juvenile emigration survival

Tech Memo 2 Revisions Developing an alternative approach to simulate movement and production of juveniles. Reevaluate limitations of habitat on capacity. Incorporate the bioenergetics growth function described by Sullivan et al. (2000) directly into the life-cycle model. Photo From:

Tech Memo 4 Revisions Increased Baseline Smolt Survival from 0.87/100km to 0.95/100km. Attempt to distinguish patterns of migration timing for different water year types. Request data for the proportion of flow sampled to couple with the catch data, so we that we can adjust the estimates of fish passage accordingly. Explore both linear and hockey-stick flow scalars within the model.

Today’s Agenda 1.Temperature & Flow Dynamics 2.Juvenile Rearing Capacity 3.Disease Effects 4.Adult Entry to Summer Rearing