Analysis of November 2006 Status of the Resource Summary Report Presentation to Northwest Power and Conservation Council September 11, 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

October 20th 2006 Northwest Power and Conservation Council Stewart Toshach & Peter Paquet NED Project Coordinators Background - for the CBFWA Review of.

Nez Perce Tribal Conservation Enforcement Presentation by Chief Adam Villavicencio for the System-wide Provincial Review July 18, Copyright.

Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.

Using the Fish and Wildlife Agencies and Tribes Program Amendment Recommendations MAG May 2008 Web Ex.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.

Data Management in Support of the Fish & Wildlife Program Summary.

Actions Members Meeting February 7, Members Action: CBFWA Members direct the Technical Committees to evaluate the existing Program: Define and Clarify.

DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.

8/30/20061 Data Needs for the CBFWA Status of the Resource Project August 30, 2006.

Fish and Wildlife Agencies and Tribes Program Amendment Recommendations June 12 Comments NPCC Meeting June 2008 Spokane, Wa.

Coordination Discussion for the Fish and Wildlife Program June 12-13, 2007.

Wildlife Inventory and Habitat Evaluation of Duck Valley Indian Reservation Project #32008 Shoshone-Paiute Tribes.

LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.

Northwest Habitat Institute Interactive Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS) for the Columbia River Basin.

Northern Leopard Frog Distribution and Habitat in the Columbia Plateau Province Project ID Submitted by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

MAPS IN THE UPPER SNAKE HEADWATERS SUBBASIN Tim Reynolds, Ph.D. TREC, Inc. January 23, 2002.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

1 Fish & Wildlife Managers Program Amendment Recommendations January 17, 2008.

1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.

UK 2010 Biodiversity Indicators EIONET Copenhagen 30 October 2007 James Williams Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough,

Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.

1 NC Office of State Budget and Management State Budget Conference October 15, 2008 Mercidee Benton OSBM Expansion Budget Expansion Budget.

SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at

Measure 76 Parks and Natural Resources Fund 15% Lottery Revenue Parks Subaccount Natural Resources Subaccount Grant Fund 65% Operating Fund 35%

Language Assistance Planning and Self Assessment Tool Analysis Summary.

Primary research figuresPrimary research figures These are some of the results from my primary research. percentages of people who like/dislike the show.

Regional TVs lower CPM guarantees higher advertising ROI – 2-3 times higher Index TV market CPM indices National average CPM P18+ = 100 Source: Regional.

12/21/2010 DATA COMPILED BY: FRAN MASIN-MOYER: SAHS TEACHER AARON SCOTT DANIELLE NOTVEST STASHA SOSNOWICZ BRIAN BARR Preliminary Results of 2010 Salford.

YES New Mexico Enterprise Eligibility System

FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMITTEE ASTORIA, OREGON SEPTEMBER 2011 Program Objectives Nancy Leonard and Laura Robinson.

1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.

Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)

7/16/08 1 New Mexico’s Indicator-based Information System for Public Health Data (NM-IBIS) Community Health Assessment Training July 16, 2008.

Marine Resource Advisory Council January 15, 2013 An update on the 2013 Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass recreational fishing regulations.

Number Factors and Multiples Saturday, 09 September 2006 ©RSH.

Fish and Wildlife Program’s Columbia River Basin High Level Indicators Tracking Progress in the Council Fish and Wildlife Program October 2009 Ketchum,

Resident Fish, Data Management, and Regional Coordination Category Review: Preliminary Review of Proposals Presented to WAC February 14, 2012.

2013 TN Prescribed Fire Survey 11 State & Federal Agencies - 18 separate work units or grouped areas 2 Conservation Organizations 5 Private Burn Vendors.

8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.

StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.

Defining CBFWA’s FY09 Workplan Members January 15, 2009.

Bird Conservation on Private Lands Proactive Conservation.

National Wildland Fire Weather Needs Assessment National Wildland Fire Weather Needs Assessment Mr. Mike Babcock Senior Staff Meteorologist, OFCM CCAMS.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

EMPOWERING AND EDUCATING THE URBAN AMERICAN INDIAN POPULATION OF DIABETES National Indian Health Outreach and Education David Harmon December 2014.

Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council September 12-13,

Columbia River Basin White Sturgeon Framework Lynn Palensky Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, Oregon USA July 2013.

: Program Coordination and Facilitation Services January 17, 2012 Tom Iverson Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation.

Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.

Planning and Permitting Part II: Permitting Overview S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 636 Hedburg Way, Suite 22 Oakdale, CA

A Provisional Observational Data Standard to Facilitate Data Sharing and Aggregation Lynn Kutner, Bruce Stein, and Donna Reynolds TDWG Annual Meeting,

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Development of Fish and Wildlife Program Amendments.

1 BPA Fish and Wildlife Division Process Improvement Initiative Overview January 2005.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.

ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.

CBFWA Organization and Staff Satisfaction Survey 2010 Wildlife Advisory Committee Results.

North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.

Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26, 2016 James Capurso, PhD Regional Fisheries Biologist Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service.

An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process

Presentation transcript:

Analysis of November 2006 Status of the Resource Summary Report Presentation to Northwest Power and Conservation Council September 11, 2007

Overview CBFWA staff reviewed the November 2006 CBFWA Status of the Resource Summary Report Identified gaps in the data management system Suggest questions that the Council members may wish to consider in their upcoming FY08-09 data management project funding decisions

Background The Status of the Resources Project (SOTR) gathered data for focal populations from each subbasin plan: Biological objective(s) for each population, Current status and trend in abundance (indicator) for each focal population, The information was presented, by subbasin, in a standardized format.

Data 58 subbasins 31 distinct focal fish species 281 individual focal populations, or population groupings Biological objectives were not consistently reported

Data Acquisition CBFWA staff mined data from all available sources StreamNet was the primary source Data was obtained directly from data collectors Currently much of the data sits on a computer at CBFWA

Data Sources 40% of data provided by the StreamNet project 11% of data provided by Fish Passage Center (mainstem passage data) 30% of the data were obtained directly from the state fish and wildlife agencies 12% of data was provided by tribal entities 5% was provided by federal agencies 3% was provided by a private utility

Funding Source

Types of Data Status and trend data were reported for 51% of the focal populations Snapshot data (i.e, single year index surveys or presence absence data) were reported for 10% of the populations Data were not reported for approximately 39% of the focal populations

Conclusions SOTR project should NOT become another data warehouse project Resident fish data is poorly represented and needs better support Tribal data is poorly represented and needs better support

Questions for the Council What are the priority data needs for the Council? Should BPA fund a channel steward to support those needs? Should StreamNet be used as the primary fish data management project for the Program? What is the most cost effective means for accessing tribal data?