A New Approach to Performance Budgeting: Agency Strategic Planning and Service-Based Budgeting Richard D. Brown Director, Virginia Department of Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

National Prevention Strategy
Building a New Payment System: Stakeholder Perspectives on Principles and Elements Robert L. Broadway, FHFMA VP of Corporate Strategy, Bethesda Healthcare.
Superintendent Program Review Committee February 26, 2010.
No 1 IT Governance – how to get the right and secured IT services Bjorn Undall and Bengt E W Andersson The Swedish National Audit Office Oman
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
NSAA/NASC Joint Middle Management Conference Kansas Taxpayer Transparency Act April 20, 2009.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
1 Welcome to this Seminar for Board Members. 2 Board Members and Staff – Sharing of Responsibilities Voluntary Organisations and Volunteers Responsibilities.
BUILDING THE CAPACITY TO ACHIEVE HEALTH & LEARNING OUTCOMES
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
1 ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MARCH, 2006.
1 Commonwealth of Virginia Executive Branch Strategic Planning, Service Area Planning, and Performance-Based Budgeting Productivity Measurement: Cabinet.
Presenter: Beresford Riley, Government of
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodias development challenges 1.
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
The Federal Reserve System Chapter 14 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Building blocks for adopting Performance Budgeting in Canada Bruce Stacey – Executive Director Results Based Management Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada.
Planning for Progress Judith Lindenau, CAE, RCE
Promoting Regulatory Excellence Self Assessment & Physiotherapy: the Ontario Model Jan Robinson, Registrar & CEO, College of Physiotherapists of Ontario.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
Introduction to Program Budgeting Katherine Barraclough Consultant, World Bank Fiscal Management Reform Workshop, Istanbul, Turkey, June 6-8, 2005.
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
Copyright ©2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Overview of a Financial Plan.
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
Controlling as a Management Function
Management Plan: An Overview
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Organization Theory and Health Services Management
Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete in a Single Industry
1 Revenue Update Jody M. Wagner Secretary of Finance Commonwealth of Virginia
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
Enterprise Strategic Planning Digital Government Summit September 14, 2006.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
SEM Planning Model.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Presentation to Connecticut Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee Council on Virginia’s Future Jane Kusiak, Executive Director November.
PAD190 PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Agency Strategic Planning and Service-Based Budget Richard D. Brown Director Department of Planning and Budget.
Jeff Mohlenkamp, CPA Director Department of Administration.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Background KICH was initially established after representatives from Kentucky Housing Corporation (KHC) participated in a Homeless Policy Academy in 2002,
September 2004 Copyright 2004 Antevorte Consulting, LLC Vision for Information Technology Service Delivery in Oregon David Rudawitz Antevorte Consulting,
The Future of Public Services: International Trends Rolf Alter Director Public Governance and Territorial Development 1.
What is the best purpose for VECF? What outcomes do we anticipate and want? How can these best be achieved, measured and communicated? What is our relationship.
Coordinated Health Planning Advisory Committee Fox Wetle, Ph.D. Former Advisory Committee Chair Associate Dean of Medicine for Public Health Brown University.
Environmental Management System Definitions
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Title of Presentation in Verdana Bold Managing the Government Agenda Priorities and Planning Presentation Canada School of Public Service August 1, 2007.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
1 expect the best Briefing to the IT Project Review Committee December 8, 2004 ITIB Recommended Technology Investment Projects (RTIP)
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Federal Transit Administration Robert J. Tuccillo Associate Administrator for Budget and Policy/Chief Financial Officer Performance-Based Reauthorization.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
V03 Toastmasters City Manager, Jeff Fielding Strategic Leadership March 2, 2016.
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
Advances in Aligning Performance Data and Budget Information:
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Research Program Strategic Plan
Leadership and Management for Safety
Changing the Game The Logic Model
Presentation transcript:

A New Approach to Performance Budgeting: Agency Strategic Planning and Service-Based Budgeting Richard D. Brown Director, Virginia Department of Planning and Budget

The Basics Many Factors and Perspectives Influence State Government Budget Development Changes in regulations and laws Demand for services Increase in number of clients Automation Increases/decreases in federal funds Traditional practices Public sentiment Priorities of the Governor and General Assembly

The Basics Most States View Budget Development as a Zero-Sum Game Whereby Competing Demands Must Be Balanced Fiscal Conditions (increases/decreases in available revenues) Fixed Costs (mandatory demands vs. discretionary actions) Economy (efficiency and cost savings, i.e. price per unit of service) Effectiveness (continuing need for existing programs and agencies) Priorities (agency budget requests vs. Governor’s agenda) Overall performance (quality of operations, focus on outcomes and return on investment).

The Issues Agency Strategic Planning vs. State Budget Development Agency strategic plans may not be based on fiscal realities (visionary vs. practical) Agency goals and objectives may not address statewide priorities (agency budget requests vs. statewide priorities) Agency performance measures may not adequately address overall performance (hard to measure desired outcomes and degree of state influence to achieve results may be limited) Agency strategic plans almost never address potential enterprise-wide or efficiency improvements (planning silos)

The Issues All Spending Decisions Are Not Focused on Results Types of Spending Decisions: Maintenance or fixed costs requirements (rent, insurance, gas, retirement/social security, etc.) Case load or unit cost thresholds (school enrollment, cost per unit, $xx per capita, etc.) Political considerations (budgeting is a compromise process) Results oriented actions (true investments, deal or no deal!)

Bringing It Together Guidelines For Improving Performance Budgeting Tie agency planning efforts to state goals (be really strategic in approach) Some things are more important to measure than others (concentrate efforts on what moves the needle; decisions that are true investments and results-oriented) Don’t just record performance, evaluate it (have a thrust for what works and why it works) Look outside agency silos (create new enterprises for desired results) Recognize results and reward performance (promote consistency and desired behavior)

The Virginia Experience

Virginia’s Budgeting System is Evolving 1980: Program Budgeting and Evaluation 1995-96: Agency strategic planning and Performance Measures 2005: Service Planning & Performance-Based Budgeting

Previous Budget Structure Program structure Level of control   Function Subfunction Program   Central budget control (by fund, by positions)   Subprogram Element Cost center Object of expenditure Agency budget control

Previous Performance Budgeting Process

Previous Dual Structure Orientation Budgeting Programs/Subprograms = Accounting System Strategic Planning Activities = Virginia Results

The Task At Hand

Establishing a Vision and Goals for the Commonwealth

Making a Change Establishing a Statewide Vision The Council for Virginia’s Future Created in 2003 (Code of Virginia 2.2-2684) to advise the Governor and the General Assembly on the implementation of a Roadmap for Virginia's Future. Responsibilities include: developing a set of guiding principles that are reflective of public sentiment and relevant to critical decision-making; establishing a long-term vision for the Commonwealth; conducting a situation analysis of core state service categories; setting long-term objectives for state services; aligning state services to the long-term objectives; instituting a planning and performance management system consisting of strategic planning, performance measurement, program evaluation, and performance budgeting; and performing plan adjustments based on public input and evaluation of the results of the Roadmap.

Composition of Council on Virginia’s Future The Council shall be composed of 18 members that include eight legislative members and ten nonlegislative members as follows: The Governor, The Speaker of the House, The majority and minority leaders of the House of Delegates, The Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations, The President Pro Tempore of the Senate, The majority and minority leaders of the Senate, The Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, One nonlegislative citizen member appointed by the Speaker of the House, One nonlegislative citizen member appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules, Two Cabinet Secretaries appointed by the Governor, and Five nonlegislative Citizen members appointed by the Governor.

Organizational Framework LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COUNCIL ON VIRGINIA’S FUTURE EXECUTIVE BRANCH Planning Group Council Steering Committee Planning, Budgeting & Assessment Advisory Sub-Committee Governor’s Performance Leadership Group CEO Advisory Group Private Sector Reengineering Advisory Group Innovation & Improvement Advisory Sub-Committee Performance Leadership Steering Group Private Sector Reengineering Support Teams MAP

The Council on Virginia’s Future Has Articulated Seven Long-Term Objectives For Virginia Be recognized as the best managed state in the nation. Be a national leader in the preservation and enhancement of our economy. Elevate the levels of educational preparedness and attainment of our citizens. Inspire and support Virginians toward healthy lives and strong and resilient families. Protect, conserve, and wisely develop our natural, historical, and cultural resources. Protect the public’s safety and security, ensuring a fair and effective system of justice and providing a prepared response to emergencies and disasters of all kinds. Ensure that Virginia has a transportation system that is safe, enables easy movement of people and goods, enhances the economy, and improves the quality of life.

Scorecard at a Glance

Linking Strategic Planning and Performance Budgeting at State Agency Level

A Mandate for Change at Agency Level HB2097(03) (affecting § 2.2-2681 - 2.2-2687) “…each agency shall develop and maintain a strategic plan for its operations” defined in the legislation as “the systematic clarification and documentation of what a state agency wishes to achieve and how to achieve it. The objective of strategic planning is a set of goals, actions steps, and measurements constructed to guide performance.”  HB1838(03) (affecting § 2.2-1508) “The Executive Budget document is to include a statement of “major goals, objectives, and specific outcomes related to expenditures for programs” in each agency.”

Process Design – Strategic Plan Service area structure is key: Generally, “service areas” are what agencies do for the citizen or for other agencies They consist of allocations of resources toward a specific objective Each service area forms the basic unit of both budgeting and of planning Principal objectives of these plans are: To provide agencies with a tool to assist them in self-management To give decision makers uniform and dependable data for budgeting and accountability To link state resources to results To eliminate current fragmented processes of strategic planning, budget development, workforce planning, capital planning, and technology planning

Service Area Structure Current Structure Programs/Subprograms = Budgeting Accounting System Strategic Planning Activities = Virginia Results Future Structure Budgeting Service Areas = Accounting Strategic Planning Performance Measurement

Service Area Structure Current Programs/Subprograms Recommended Service Structure Proposed Services = “*” Current Activity Planning, Budgeting, and Evaluation Services (71500) Budget Development and Execution Services (715 02) Budget Development and * Budget Execution Services* Budget Development and Budget Execution Legislation and Executive Order Review Service * Legislative Review Service Performance Management Service Forecasting and Regulatory Review Services* Regulatory Review Service Program Evaluation Service * Program Evaluation Service Federal Budget Service Executive Orders Service Administrative Services (71598) Administrative Services * Support Service

Budget Bill Display

Process Design

Agency Strategic Plan Content

Looking At The Enterprise The Executive Progress Report Current Performance Productivity Major Initiatives and Related Progress Virginia ranking Customer Trends and Coverage Future Direction and Priorities Impediments

Agency Strategic Plan Content

The Revised Budget System Will Foster Transparency By Linking Together Expected Results, Funding, and Actual Performance For State Government Service Product Contents Agency Strategic Plan Establishes strategic and operational plan for the agency and its service areas Service Area Plan Articulates expected results (objectives) for each service area and defines performance criteria to measure progress toward expected results (sets baseline and target data for results). Budget Bill Allocates funding among the various service areas of state agencies Budget Document Brings together and begins to explain relationships between expected results and proposed funding in the budget for service areas and state agencies Budget Execution Accounts for actual spending by service area and monitors accomplishments and results though reporting system for performance measured data. The Service Area is the link between all of the above. It is the common unit at which strategic planning, funding (budget), and performance information (results) is presented.

Integrating Planning and Budgeting Old New COVF Vision & Objectives Guiding Principles DPB Data Repository Legislators Agency Strategic Plan Agency Budget & Performance Measures X objectives and measures submitted to DPB/VaResults B U D G E T P R O C S S E R V I T C I E E D A R T E O B S U T D R G C E T T U Service Area Budget Performance Service Area Budget Performance Agency Selects X objectives and measures Service Area Budget Performance Service Area Budget Performance Program Program Service Area Budget Performance

Tying Agency Planning and Budgeting Efforts to Statewide Goals

Virginia’s Performance Leadership System for State Government Organization & Leadership Development (2006) Subject Area Results Teams Analysis and Strategy Formulation to Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes (Transforming Virginia) Management Results Teams Analysis and Strategy Formulation to Improve Management Outcomes (Transforming Government) Planning & Budgeting Innovation & Improvement (2006) Transforming Government Virginia VISION (2003) & LONG-TERM GOALS (2004) Government & Citizens Economy, Education, Health & Family, Transportation Public Safety, Natural / Historic / Cultural Resources ENTERPRISE LEADERSHIP AGENDA High-Level Priorities and Enterprise Quantifiable Objectives AGENCY LEADERSHIP AGENDAS Initial Agency Strategic & Service Area Plans & Budgets (2005) Refinement of Plans and Implementation of Strategies to Improve Outcomes (2006) Enterprise Indicators Agency Management & Programmatic Measures (2005) Societal Indicators Assessment

Virginia’s Performance Leadership System Levels of Results Accountability DESIRED SOCIETAL RESULTS Council’s vision and long-term goals  SOCIETAL-BASED INDICATORS Environmental Scan: How is Virginia doing? AGENCY LEADERSHIP AGENDAS Agencies’ strategic and service area plans AGENCY PERFORMANCE MEASURES Are agency programs that serve our customers producing desired results? ENTERPRISE LEADERSHIP AGENDA Targeted quantifiable objectives for long-term goals (Includes Gubernatorial, Legislative & Cabinet priorities) MEASURES TO MONITOR PROGRESS Are we achieving desired results? Are we improving the factors that influence the results?

Bringing It Together Guidelines For Improving Performance Budgeting Tie agency planning efforts to state goals (be really strategic in approach) Some things are more important to measure than others (concentrate efforts on what moves the needle; decisions that are true investments and results-oriented) Don’t just record performance, evaluate it (have a thrust for what works and why it works) Look outside agency silos (create new enterprises for desired results) Recognize results and reward performance (promote consistency and desired behavior)

VISIT www.dpb.virginia.gov Virginia Department of Planning and Budget www.future.virginia.gov Council on Virginia’s Future