The Safety Valve process Delaying Customer Service A discussion of the Safety Valve Process and the need for change. Mike Whaley Qwest NANC - November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 12, 2000 Supplier Meeting Parma Aggregation Group.
Advertisements

Managing Processes and Capabilities CHAPTER THREE McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
NANC Safety Valve IMG January 19, Safety Valve IMG2 Issue During the November 4, 2004 NANC, Qwest made a presentation on the current safety valve.
1 National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting March 15, 2005.
INC Report to the NANC – May 18, INC Report to the NANC May 18, 2004 Ken Havens - INC Chair Adam Newman - INC Vice Chair.
National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting September 25, 2003.
NANC Future of Numbering (FoN) Working Group July 19, 2005 Co-Chairs Hoke Knox, Sprint Karen Mulberry, MCI.
INC Report to the NANC November 2000 Norman Epstein INC Moderator.
PANI IMG Report to NANC November 30, 2006 pANI IMG Co-Chairs Don Gray – Martin Hakimdin Natalie McNamer – Bill Shaughnessy.
NANC Report of the pANI IMG November 30, 2005 by Hoke Knox & Karen Mulberry pANI IMG Co-Chairs.
National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting January 13, 2004.
NANC Change Order 400 Joint FoN/LNPA WG Meeting April 14, 2005 Tom McGarry NeuStar, Inc.
1 INC Report to the NANC October 2001 Norman Epstein INC Moderator.
ENSURING THE EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF TOLL FREE NUMBERS A market-based approach LESLIE SELZER COMMON CARRIER BUREAU FEBRUARY 26, 2001.
National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting July 15, 2003.
INC Report to the NANC – July 19, Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC July 19, 2005 Ken Havens - INC Chair Adam Newman - INC Vice.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) November 30, 2006 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Sprint Nextel Natalie McNamer, T-Mobile Karen Riepenkroger,
INC Report to the NANC January 16, 2001 Norman Epstein INC Moderator.
National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting March 19, 2003.
National Thousands Block Number Pooling Services NANC Meeting November 5, 2003.
CIC IMG Presentation to the NANC November 29, 2000.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) February 21, 2013 Tri-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Communications Natalie McNamer, T-Mobile USA Karen.
INC Report to the NANC – July 13, Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC July 13, 2004 Ken Havens - INC Chair Adam Newman - INC Vice.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) November 4, 2004 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Nextel Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint.
INC Report to the NANC May 24, 2000 Shawn Murphy INC Moderator.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC September 20, 2012 Natalie McNamer, INC Chair Dana Crandall, INC Vice Chair.
NANC Report Numbering Administration Oversight Working Group November 19, 2002 Co-Chairs: Karen Mulberry, WorldCom Jim Castagna, Verizon.
NANC Report Number Oversight Working Group (NOWG) January 22, 2003 Co-Chairs: Karen Mulberry, WorldCom Jim Castagna, Verizon.
North American Numbering Council Charter Peter Guggina May 22, 2001.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
1 Energy Efficiency and Iowa Utilities Presentation to the Energy Policy Advisory Forum, convened by Governor-Elect Chet Culver January 4, 2007 Presented.
Order No Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation by Transmission Owning and Operating Public Utilities Strategic Planning Committee Task Force.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Development of an Illinois Energy Efficiency Policy Manual A Proposed Process and Approval Plan Presented by: Karen Lusson Illinois Attorney General’s.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Ann Bishop Vermont.
North American Portability Management LLC 1 NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION.
INC Report to the NANC April 26, 2000 Shawn Murphy INC Moderator.
N FCC Numbering Symposium State of the NANP Presented by the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) and the National Pooling Administrator.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC September 15, 2011 Natalie McNamer, INC Chair Dana Crandall, INC Vice Chair.
1 Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Natalie McNamer, INC Chair Dana Crandall, INC Vice Chair December 13, 2012.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) June 4, 2015 Co-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Communications Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint 06/04/2015.
WEI 2009 Joint Use Conference Boise, Idaho September 28, 2009 Richard J. Busch Busch Law Firm PLLC Kirkland, WA
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Direct Access to Numbers Trial Limits, Results & Conclusions Of the Six-Month Technical Trial John Visclosky June 17, 2014 NANC Meeting FCC Headquarters.
1 The Benefits of an SOA in the Contact Center Brian Garr Program Director, IBM Speech Solutions.
INC Report to the NANC September 2000 Norman Epstein INC Moderator.
1 INC Report to the NANC January 22, 2003 Dana Smith - INC Moderator Ken Havens - INC Assistant Moderator.
INC Report to the NANC 02/13/ Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC February 13, 2007 Ken Havens, INC Chair Adam Newman, INC Vice.
NANPA Oversight Working Group 2000 NANPA Performance Review June 18, 2001 Pat Caldwell, Chair.
MPSC Licensing Issues Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
1 Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Natalie McNamer, INC Chair Dana Crandall, INC Vice Chair February 21, 2013.
INC Report to the NANC - September 25, INC Report to the NANC September 25, 2003 Dana Smith - INC Moderator Ken Havens - INC Assistant Moderator.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Connie Hartman, INC Co-Chair December 1, 2015.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Connie Hartman, INC Co-Chair September 28, 2015.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) December 10, 2013 Co-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Communications Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint 12/10/20131.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) March 24, 2016 Co-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint 03/24/20161.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)
Adam Newman, INC Vice Chair
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
FCC Regulations and Multi-band Operation
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Adam Newman, INC Vice Chair
Adam Newman, INC Vice Chair
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)
Presentation transcript:

The Safety Valve process Delaying Customer Service A discussion of the Safety Valve Process and the need for change. Mike Whaley Qwest NANC - November 4, 2004

2 Meeting the Customers Need for Numbers New technology can drive customer demand for telephone numbers upward Large businesses continue to need blocks of sequential numbers. New opportunities like VoIP require numbering resources. The industry is growing and expanding in new ways.

3 Meeting Customers Need for Numbers Rules must evolve in support of the consumers Speed of getting service to the customer is a must in a competitive environment. Carriers follow regulations when obtaining numbers. The Safety Valve regulation needs to be reviewed and changed for the customers. Safety Valve delays can be avoided.

4 The Safety Valve The FCC has established a safety valve mechanism to allow carriers to obtain numbering resources when they do not otherwise qualify.* The FCC delegated authority to state commissions to hear and resolve waivers filed under the safety valve process.* * From the FCCsThird Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket No and CC Docket No

5 The Safety Valve The FCC recognized that failure to address a request for additional numbering resources can impair a carriers ability to expand or for customers to meet business needs.* The FCC advised the states that a ten business day interval from receipt of a detailed and complete safety valve waiver request is sufficient time to review and act upon the request.* * From the FCCsThird Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket No and CC Docket No

6 When is the Safety Valve is Used The Safety Valve is used when: Carriers cannot satisfy the demand from within their existing inventory. Large major customers need entire sequential blocks of numbers to grow. NANPA and the Pooling Administrator reject requests when months to exhaust or utilization levels are not met. Only after rejection can waiver be filed.

7 What needs to be changed? The safety valve waiver process requires carriers obtain waivers from state commissions for customer specific requests. Safety Valve waivers may not have the highest priority with state regulators. Delays prevent carriers from providing numbering resources in a timely manner to the customer. By giving authority to the NANPA or PA to approve customer specific requests will permit carriers to meet todays market demands.

8 A Minimal Rule Change Needed Rule change is needed because: Carriers are already required to provide documentation from the customer with the current proof of utilization to obtain waivers from state regulators. The current documentation is sufficient. Waivers are not for vanity numbers, but for contiguous blocks of numbers.

9 A Minimal Rule Change Needed For Customer Specific Request Waivers The safety valve regulatory review process varies from state to state. The process creates an unnecessary amount of regulatory involvement resulting in delays in getting customers their service. The eminent exhaust of the NANP was delayed due to the NRO orders.

10 Why Change the Rule? Waivers delay meeting customer needs Qwests experience shows the interval for these requests has varied from as little as 5 days to as many as 313 days with over 70 waivers filed, averaging 35 days each. Only 9 request were processed in 10 days or less, less than 13% of the time. Every waiver for a customer specific request was approved.

11 To satisfy customer specific requests Our experience demonstrates the Safety Valve Process for customer specific requests needs to be revisited. Very important in light of the rapidly growing demands for numbers and for applications such as VoIP. Process should be consistent across all states. Why Change the Rule?

12 An Easy Rule Change In most cases, the waiver request provides the same information as the application and the process used for an NXX or a 1K block. By providing one additional piece of information – the customer specific request – to the NANPA or the Pooling Administrator, valuable time will be saved. Every waiver filed by Qwest for customer specific requests has been approved.

13 A Simple Solution Give NANPA and the PA authority to grant customer specific requests. The customer letter should satisfy the FCCs requirement of the customers need. It can be handled in the 10 day processing cycle for NANPA and the PA. Reduces rejections by the NANPA and PA. Eliminates delays in serving customers. Saves Regulators time and the regulators have approved all of the waiver requests.

14 The Change Improves Customer Service By changing the Safety Valve process to speed up customer specific requests: Means that existing customers needs can be met. Permits more rapid deployment of new services that customers demand today. Maintains the integrity of the NRO orders. Reduces regulatory delay.