Re connecting with students as essential stakeholders Early engagement and communication strategies 1 Jennifer Hill, Ed.D. Matt Serra, Ph.D. Office of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
SE Name SE Title Blackboard Training: Approaches and Opportunities.
Assurance Services Independent professional services that “improve the quality of information, or its context, for decision makers” Assurance service encompass.
Science Subject Leader Training
1 of 19 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction IMARK How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction © FAO 2005.
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Membership & Roster Maintenance Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Kevin Shanahan 1.
Presented by: Shirley Woika, Director of Clinical Training
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
1 The Promotion and Tenure Process Managing the Academic Career for Faculty Women at Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Institutions CRA-W.
1 The Academic Profession and the Managerial University: An International Comparative Study from Japan Akira Arimoto Research Institute for Higher Education.
1111 National Centre for First Nations Governance rebuilding our nations Facilitation Techniques.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 FUND RAISING THE GAME EVERYONE CAN PLAY – AND MUST! Leadership Institute March 2006.
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
1. 2 Objectives Become familiar with the purpose and features of Epsilen Learn to navigate the Epsilen environment Develop a professional ePortfolio on.
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
Comprehensive Internationalization: A U.S. Perspective
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Presenter: Beresford Riley, Government of
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
The Road to Community Impact: New Answers to Old Questions.
GATE Graduation: A Team Effort School Counselor Summer Institute Red Lion, Olympia, June 27, 2013.
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Reform and Innovation in Higher Education
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Sponsored by CEPA Foundation – Cultural & Educational Programs Abroad CEPA Foundation Webinar #1 on Curriculum Integration Integrating Education Abroad.
Welcome & Introductions: Introduce presenters
1 Developing Tests for Departmental Assessment Deborah Moore, Assessment Specialist Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness University of Kentucky.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
Orientation and Training Susan A. Abravanel Sydney Taylor June 25 th, 2014.
Settlement Program Logic Model
Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
25 seconds left…...
Introduction to Coaching and Mentoring
Student Survey
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Flexible Assessment, Tools and Resources for PLAR Get Ready! Go! Presenter: Deb Blower, PLAR Facilitator Red River College of Applied Arts, Science and.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
Collaborative Communities A DOE and GLRS Collaboration 2013 Fall G-CASE Leadership Conference Kimberly Simmons Kathryn Ellis.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Welcome to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Advising 1001.
Quarry Bay School What is CoIS? The Council of International Schools is an organisation in International Education for the.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Presentation transcript:

re connecting with students as essential stakeholders Early engagement and communication strategies 1 Jennifer Hill, Ed.D. Matt Serra, Ph.D. Office of Assessment, Trinity College Duke University assessment.aas.duke.edu/AACU_presentation_Feb2011.htm

2 Credit: UC San Diego

3 Credit: Denison University

4 Credit: Westminster College

5 Credit: Loyola Marymount University

6 Credit: University of Idaho

7 Credit: UCLA

8 This session Session objectives Session themes Facilitating student engagement Five principles/best practices Start conversations early Integrate with broader learning Minimize over-testing Use strategic incentives and motivators Standardize feedback methods Evaluation and extension

9 General education assessment serve as Institutional Research office of Trinity College provide on-going analysis and research on Duke's undergraduate curriculum, courses, departments and programs in efforts to enhance student learning Supply data products to College leadership Assessment at Duke, Trinity College Program consultation serve as a resource for departments and faculty partner with academic and co-curricular programs to develop and answer questions about student learning share technical expertise on assessment methods and technologies

10 Common consensus on in-class formative and summative assessment High-impact learning practices a (course-level) a See also: University- or College-wide programs Student engagement

11 Common consensus on in-class formative and summative assessment High-impact learning practices 1 (course-level) 1 See also: University- or College-wide programs Student engagement

12 1.Start conversations early in the students tenure Purpose:To introduce to students their responsibility for program enhancement. Set expectations for their roles in the learning community. Introduce and define student learning objectives and outcomes. How to:Use multiple media, formats, and venues for communicating with students. Emphasize voluntary participation. Five principles of early engagement

13 2.Assessment should be integrated into broader learning Purpose: To make assessment a seamless part of the overall learning experience. Connect assessment to curricular and co-curricular experiences. How to: Use strategic partnerships to embed assessment into course or program activities. The administration and the communication of results should be contextualized for students, faculty, and other stakeholders. Five principles of early engagement

14 3.Carefully minimize over-surveying, over-testing Purpose: To reduce assessment burden on students. Increase students motivation and commitment to the task. Enable the collection of necessary data at the appropriate points in the students tenure or program lifespan. How to: Keep comprehensive documentation of completed assessments to prevent redundancy. Develop or commit to College-wide policies or procedures for survey sampling and the timing of an administration. Five principles of early engagement

15 4.Use strategic, targeted incentives Purpose: To engender goodwill among students. To recognize students time and effort as valuable. How to: Non-pecuniary incentives are preferred. Chief incentive should be detailed and contextualized results (communicated to students in a timely manner). Pecuniary incentives should be immediate and commensurate with students time investment. Five principles of early engagement

16 5.Develop standardized, timely, accessible feedback methods a.To student participants Contextualize within the Colleges strategic goals, institutional mission, program objectives, and/or program student learning outcomes Write in accessible language and with easy to follow graphics Make it personalized and prompt Deliver via a secure medium, protecting confidentiality Invite students for optional, confidential discussions of their results. Include resources for further information. Five principles of early engagement

17 5.Develop standardized, timely, accessible feedback methods b.To the college community Online, password-protected warehouse for dissemination of assessment findings Results reported in the aggregate only Includes appropriate research question and/or study context Other ideas include outreach through assessment blogs, student publications, and social media sites. Five principles of early engagement

18 Start conversations early Integrate into broader learning environment Minimize over-testing Use strategic incentives and motivators Standardize feedback Compliance in most assessment studies is voluntary: students should value participation in the process and have a stake in program/course enhancement. These points emphasize the importance of self-reflection and self- assessment. Key points Five principles of early engagement

19 Application to study design PrincipleProject Start conversations early Integrate into broader learning Minimize over-testing Use strategic incentives & motivators Standardize feedback methods

20 PrincipleProject Start conversations early Statement on culture of assessment in matriculate handbook Summer Orientation meetings and social media postings Integrate into broader learning Enculturation into membership in a learning community Project homepage provides introduction to the practice of assessment, explanation of the study, access to instruments, and resources for further reading Minimize over-testing Students are excused from similar assessments over the next year Use strategic incentives & motivators Variety of incentives are used, but remote administration prevents immediate distribution Standardize feedback methods delivery of individual and group results, including explanatory summary Occurs within 6 weeks of project completion Case study 1: New matriculate assessment initiative

21 PrincipleProject Start conversations early Target first-year students in a multi-course interdisciplinary program. Integrate into broader learning Recruitment facilitated by program director. Intended to be closely connected with a shared course, and contextualized in terms of their coursework. A natural part of the course experience. Test itself is based on real problems that are multidisciplinary in nature Minimize over-testing Students are excused from similar assessments over the next year Use strategic incentives & motivators Staggered, personalized incentives used Standardize feedback methods Students are ed individual and group results and an explanatory summary within one term of project completion Case study 2: First-year assessment of critical thinking

22 PrincipleProject Start conversations early Primer from Director of Academic Advising Center Integrate into broader learning Survey items ask students to reflect on multiple curricular and co-curricular learning opportunities, present and future Second-year survey is embedded in the long-range planner required of the declaration process Minimize over-testing Each survey is a full census of first-year and sophomore students Reminders are limited and sent only to non-respondents Use strategic incentives & motivators No incentives provided Standardize feedback methods Students can opt-in to receive a copy of their survey submission via Aggregate report posted on Assessment website Case study 3: Advising surveys

23 PrincipleProject Start conversations early Regular, personal communication with program director emphasizing the process of reflection and self-assessment Integrate into broader learning Artifacts presented to and evaluated within the ePortfolio are drawn from curricular and co-curricular experiences Assessors include program faculty and academic advisors affiliated with the program Minimize over-testing Students are excused from similar assessments over the next year Use strategic incentives & motivators No incentives provided Standardize feedback methods Students receive immediate feedback from assessors within the ePortfolio Case study 4: ePortfolios in four-year professional school preparation program

24 Please gather in small groups to discuss one or two example assessment projects or ideas from your home institutions. Your goal is to deconstruct the project(s) into the five components of engagement. Identify opportunities to expand or enhance the project. Work through anticipated challenges. Document your discussion (worksheet) Exercise: Small group discussion

25 Return to the large group What opportunities do we have in common? Common challenges? Would anyone like to show-and-tell their assessment project or plan, broken down by the five principles?

26 Current issues, common challenges, & good opportunities Apathy, especially among graduating students and faculty Study incentives, limitations of tangible incentives Survey and assessment fatigue Mobile devices in assessment Spread of effect: Measuring the community-wide impact of a course or program Assessing decision-makers use of assessment information Summary

27 Jennifer Hill Associate Dir., Office of Assessment Trinity College Matt Serra Director, Office of Assessment Trinity College assessment.aas.duke.edu Thank you for joining us!