State System on Protection of Childrens Rights and Legal Interests at Local Level The Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, 12-14 May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE NETWORK ON EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE
Advertisements

Children with Disabilities UNICEFs Approach and Country-level Programming.
FUNDAMENTAL LESSONS AND FORTHCOMING CHALLENGES IN THE PROCESS OF REFORM OF THE CHILD CARE SYSTEM IN BULGARIA SHEREEN MESTAN – CHAIRPERSON OF THE STATE.
Community Based Care for children affected by HIV and AIDS 9 th ICAAP – Bali August 2009 Carol KIDU DBE MP Minister For Community Development Papua New.
Comprehensive family assessment as a prerequisite of individualized planning, monitoring and evaluation of family-visitation program in Croatia Professor.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor and Social Policy GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROTOCOL ON CHILD PROTECTION FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT.
Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science of the RoK Foster Care Implementation: Experience, Lessons Learnt 1.
Costing of services Findings from the questionnaire for social services, finances and budgets, as part of the Assessment of the reform of the child care.
Roadmap for Future Reforms Serbia Ljiljana Lucic, State Secretary, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Sofia, July 2007.
CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM REFORM – MASTER PLAN ON TRANSFORMATION OF RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Azerbaijan Second Child Protection.
Alternative services for children in Azerbaijan Ministry of Education The Republic of Azerbaijan 2 nd Child Protection Forum Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Achievements and Challenges in De-institutionalization of Children below 3 years in Georgia Sofia 2012 Ministry of Labor Health and Social Affairs of Georgia.
1 Child Rights Departments role in ensuring development of gate-keeping and referral system SECOND CHILD PROTECTION FORUM: Building and Reforming Child.
Interaction between state and private social service providers of community- based services for children and families at risk Nelly Petrova-Dimitrova,
SOCIAL WORKER: AN IMPORTANT ACTOR IN THE CHILD CARE REFORM.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
The System of preventive measures Bodies of trusteeship and Guardianship, bodies of education Bodies of social protection of the population Bodies on affairs.
Monika Luik Tallinn, Eesti 2003 Excursion into Child Protection Issues in Estonia from the Perspective of WGCC Priorities.
1 Seminar on urban-rural linkages fostering social cohesion in Europe Brussels, 2 July 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal.
Senate Criminal Justice Committee Interim Charge 1 June 21, 2006.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
Alternative care in Central Asia and Azerbaijan. Policy and legal framework Current situation: Explicit policy, framework law of state programmes favouring.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Legal framework in the field of youth in Estonia Estonian National Youth Council Tampere,
PREVENTING VIOLENCE IN THE FAMILY DAPHNE III Programme ‘Preventing and combating violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims.
Early Childhood Intervention and Early Rehabilitation System in the Republic of Belarus.
Deinstitutionalising the System of Care for Vulnerable Children in the Czech Republic Marta Miklušáková Department of Social and Family Policies Ministry.
1 MINISTRY OF FAMILY AND SOCIAL POLICY OF TURKEY THE RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO LIVE IN A CARING AND SUPPORTIVE FAMILY ENVIRONMENT: EXAMPLES FROM CENTRAL AND.
Strengthening Child Protection Systems in Viet Nam
The introduction of social workers in the primary health care system and its impact on the reduction of baby abandonment in Kazakhstan 10 September 2014,
HOW SOCIAL CHANGES AFFECT THE SOCIAL WORK IN BULGARIA National Development Agency, Berlin, International Conference, 15th May 2014 With financial support.
ONE STEP FURTHER WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM DI IN BULGARIA AND HOW TO DEVELOP PREVENTIVE SERVICES IN COOPERATION WITH MUNICIPALITIES RADOSTINA PANEVA SOS CHILDREN`S.
Rights of Children 21 March 2014 Mgr. Kateřina Šlesingerová Department for Children‘s Rights Protection Ministry of Labour nad Social Affairs.
1 Assessment of the child protection system in Iraq/Kurdistan.
Legal solutions on alternative care in Poland and how to advocate for better ones Beata Kulig Belgrade, 17th of Dec., 2013.
Social Services Administration of the Daugavpils City Council 2012.
Youth policies in Republic of Moldova. Our mission and work Young people shall have real access to welfare, to influence and decision making -Elaboration.
1 DEPARTMENT FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL INSURANCE Department for Social Inclusion.
1 The Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources Development Managing Authority for Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources Development.
Jelena Pešić The Republic Institute for Social Protection Belgrade, 2013.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
The 8 th Annual COMMUNITY FORUM on the Conditions of Children in Orange County WELCOME.
CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC - THE VIEW OF THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ANETA PLAVINOVÁ SECRETARY TO THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHTS.
1 Astana, Development of Gender Equality in the Republic of Kazakhstan The Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Financing and planning of resources in the best interest of the child in the child care system Zhumazhan Zhukenov Chairperson of the Child Rights Protection.
Freedom of Education of Disabled Children In Moldova
Kyrgyzstan priorities in environment protection B. Tolongutov, Director, State Regulation Center on Environment Protection & Ecological Safety Sector State.
Ministry for Women, Youth, Children and Persons with Disabilities.
THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN CARE SITUATION IN LITHUANIA Audrone Bedorf Adviser of the Ombudsman for Children of the Republic of Lithuania.
Children's Rights Protection System in Russia 19 federal and many regional agencies are responsible for the safety and protection of children’s rights.
CASE OF KYRGYZSTAN CARE DEFICIT: LABOUR MIGRANTS AND CHILDREN LEFT BEHIND National Institute for Strategic Studies of the Kyrgyz Republic.
INTERMEDIATE BODY: AGENCY FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007 – 2013.
Addiction Treatment in Israel: An Overview of Services Provision Iris Mordecovitch, MSW.
Redistribution of Resources in the Process of De-institutionalization Halyna Postoliuk Director of “Hope & Homes for Children” in Ukraine Chisinau November.
Search wearelumos.org. Lumos model for deinstitutionalisation: improving the lives of marginalised children Forum on Investing in Young.
Investing in Children’s services - Improving outcomes across Europe 26 November 2015, Paris, ChildONEurope seminar esn-eu.org.
Reform example: Micro- or mezzo level planning for de- institutionalization Viktor Yakzhik Head of the Department of Social and Educational Work of the.
Ministry of Social Development Ministry of Education and Science Moya Semya Public Foundation With the support of UNICEF.
C4A-MD Program: transforming social care for persons with mental disabilities Ludmila Malcoci, PHD KHSIMA Executive Director Ministry of Labor, Social.
ASRH and related policies, legislations, guidelines, standards and plan of action.
SOCIAL WELFARE AND SOCIAL PROTECTION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITATIVES ADDRESSED TO MARGINALISED GROUPS By D. MASUNZU DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE Presented.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
National Plan for the Protection of Women from Violence Palestinian Authority Ministry of Social Affairs.
UN system in the KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
Human Services Delivery Systems and Organizations
Deinstitutionalization – “Still muddling, not yet through” Goals, Pitfalls, Learning, Challenges Radostina Paneva Andro Dadiani SOS Children`s Villages.
Lauris Neikens Children and family policy department senior expert
PATH OF DEINSTITUTIONALISATION ASOCIATIA ALTERNATIVA
Constitutional rights and responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

State System on Protection of Childrens Rights and Legal Interests at Local Level The Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, May 2009

The number of children under 18 years old makes 42% from the total size of 5 mln. people. 2/3 of the population are rural citizens who live in 472 ayil okmotys (village administrations) 10% of population are beneficiaries of allowances for low income families, out of them 97% - are children. There is a growing number of disabled children (from 6,0 thousand in 1990 up to 20,3 thous. children in 2007). There is the increasing number of children deprived of parental care, street children engaged in prostitution, abusing alcohol, drugs, etc.; The juvenile delinquency rate remains to be high and the prevalent vagrancy among children contribute to committing offences; The number of children who dropped schools according to the research findings made 70 thousand children; Annually 40 parents are deprived from parental rights and in more than 4000 families children are left with one of the parents in the result of divorces. There is a trend of decreased parental responsibility for upbringing children. Lack of prevention activities in the places of children residence Such trends adversely affect and reduce the social viability of population and if the government does not pay special attention to childhood challenges all this may lead to degraded society.

Interaction of Agencies Responsible for Protection of Child Rights and Their Interests National Council on Affairs of Women, Family and Gender Development under the President of the KR The Executive Body – the Unit in Presidents Administration Intersectoral Commission The Executive Body - State Agency on Sports, Physical culture, Youth and CP Local State Administrations Executive Body– FCSD Local Self-Governance Executors – a specialist on social issues, Ministry of Labor Ministry of Education Ministry of Health Ministry of Interior ГКМЗ Policy Coordination Метод обеспечение Organizational support Children and Their Families

Administration System At National Level: Child Protection Department – a specially authorized body to protect rights and legal interests of children under the KR Government At District Level: Rayon State Administration Commissions on Childrens Affairs Family and Children Support Units At Local Self-Governance Level): A specialist on social issues

Legislative Framework to Regulate the Public System to Protect Child Rights and Their legal Interests at Local Level The Kyrgyz Republic Child Code as of June 9, 2006; The Law on Local Self-Governance and Local State Administration as of May 29, 2008; The KR Government Decree «On Creation of Family and Child Support Departments and Commissions on Childrens Affairs under the Kyrgyz Republic Rayon State Administrations and Local Self-Governance Executive-Administrative Bodies» (as of June 10, 2008, 285); The Kyrgyz Republic laws as well as international agreements and other legal statutes and regulations of the Kyrgyz Republic.

Goal: To safeguard constitutional, legal rights and interests of children residing on the territory of the Kyrgyz Republic Objectives: To implement public policy on protection of child rights and legal interests of children; To implement and improve state, national programmes related to implementation and protection of child rights and legal interests of children; To coordinate the performance of ministries, state committees, administrative agencies, local self-governance bodies related to child rights and legal interests of children; To identify the future areas of protection of child rights and legal interests of children.

FCSD Goals and Objectives To ensure protection of civil, economic, social and cultural rights, legal interests and freedoms of children To take part in development and implementation of public policy in terms of protection of rights, freedoms and legal interests of children, to develop and implement family and child support territorial strategies, plans, and programmes To facilitate physical, intellectual, mental, spiritual and moral development of children, fostering patriotism and civic identity To coordinate and develop family and child support system of services and facilitate their development at local level

FCSD Functions To coordinate the performance of state institutions and facilities dealing with family and child issues To prevent juvenile delinquency and undertake actions to prevent child abuse in families and residential care institutions; To identify children left with no parental care and children whose parents fail to provide adequate upbringing and care; To deliver services to protect child rights and legal interests of children in crisis including preventive services, rehabilitation and community re- integration services; To award last name, first name and patronymic if both parents are unknown; To decide about the type of placement of children left with no parental care based on childs needs assessment results; To select the guardians, trustees, adoptive parents, foster or adoption families;

The Causes Behind Children Institutionalization (placement of children in residential care institutions such as boarding homes or orphanages) Parentlessness (full orphans) - 12 % Poor living standards of parents, single parents - 44,7 % Refusal from children - 20,8% Children with disabilities are included in single parents and refusals from children Homeless children - 22,5 % - furthermore, 88% of children are social orphans

Children in Need of Alternative Social Services Children who became parentless or left with no parental care; Families which have children with disabilities; Unattended\uncared and homeless children; Children and teenagers with deviant behavior; Children, victimized from inhuman treatment and abuse in families; Low-Income Families; Families-victims of detrimental moral and psychological family climate; Broken families; Families of minor parents; Unwed mothers on child-care leave and others

The Purpose to Develop Alternative Social Services To revert children from entering residential care institutions (to prevent institutionalization); To return children back to their homes or to ensure upbringing of children in the environment approximated to family care as much as possible; To rehabilitate children with special needs from adverse effects of abuse, to provide support to working and street children; To provide social support to children and their families through support services.

Types of Placements of Children Left with no Parental Care, with Special Needs and in Crisis They are supported by the government: Priority – Adoption ; Guardianship and Trustee, Guardianship allowance per child makes 200 som a month (5 USD); Orphanages and state boarding schools (2 psychoneurological, special 18) this type is prevailing where children with disabilities are placed, more than 6000 children; Family-based Orphanage (Foster Family) The KR Gov. Decree 158 as of ; Rehabilitation and Adaptation Centers for Children in Crisis (RAC, Bishkek, Osh cities). Under the support of international organizations : Day care centers for children with special needs (Talas oblast); Centers for temporary placement of street kids (CPC, Bishkek); Mother and baby units (to prevent abandonment).

SOS – Children Village SOS According to the Family Code the Government incurs accountability for children left with no parental care. Currently the international organization provides support, education and socialization services, the government dissociated from fulfilling their legal commitments. Solutions: To enforce legally the pattern or model (the example of Republic of Kazakhstan) SOS – Children Village Other alternative types – Pursuant to the Family Code they should be enforced only through legislation but in reality they emerge on an ad hoc basis

Foster Care - this type of care and upbringing of children left without parental care, children with disabilities and children in crisis. Foster care is implemented based on the agreement between the foster trustee and relevant state administration authority or local self-government, it can be a short-term (up to 6 months) and long-term – until the child becomes of age and reaches 18 years old. The child is placed in a foster family until the adoptive parents are found – primarily they include children of early age, children under rehabilitation from abuse effects, children with special needs during the time of parents annual leave, children of parents in crisis, children whose parents are deprived from parental rights and prisoners, children placed earlier in УИТ, homeless children, children during the period of parents divorce.

Challenges The executive authorities and local self-governments inefficiently implement public policy related to addressing issues of parentlessness, children with disabilities, children in crisis; The public administration authorities and local self-governments lack awareness on advantages and benefits of alternative types of care for parentless children, children with disabilities, children in crisis; Underdeveloped or lack of local child protection infrastructure on the ground; Local self-governments inefficiently implement the KR legislation in terms of addressing issues of child and family; Public administration authorities and local self-governments lack full information on the status of parentless children, children with disabilities, children in crisis which are placed in residential institutions; The civil society is detached from addressing the issues of orphans, children with disabilities, lack capacity to support families in crisis.

Solutions and Future Development Prospects 1. To conduct researches to explore reasons behind parentlessness, children disability, institutionalization of children, social and economic implications of children institutionalization; 2. To develop and adopt Public Family Policy Concept; 3. To elaborate efficient arrangements for intersectoral coordination in terms of protecting child rights and their legal interests; 4. To use efficiently the arrangements to revert children from institutionalization; 5. To develop infrastructure to support adoptive families and children (Social support services, Adoptive Parents Schools). 6. To develop legislation to promote social services (social residential care institutions, semi-residential or respite care institutions, rehabilitation centers, counseling points, etc.); 7. To reform the system of financing alternative social services (decentralization); 8. To increase accountability of local self-governments in terms of addressing issues of parentless children, children with disabilities, and children in crisis.

To prevent the growth of parentless children, children with disabilities, de-institutionalization and revert children from entering residential care institutions and build community- based adequate conditions for their lives and development - these are the priority issues for our society. Thank you for your attention!