Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIR POLLUTION AND METEOROLOGY
Advertisements

Introduction Irina Surface layer and surface fluxes Anton
FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
P LUME R ISE. P URPOSE OF A IR Q UALITY M ODELING Policy Analysis Regional Planning Supplementary Control Systems / Air Quality Prediction System Emergency.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
X/Q for Releases From Area Sources 2008 RETS-REMP and NUMUG Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Session 8, Unit 15 ISC-PRIME and AERMOD. ISC-PRIME General info. PRIME - Plume Rise Model Enhancements Purpose - Enhance ISCST3 by addressing ISCST3’s.
Dispersion and Deposition Estimation Issues Presented at NUMUG San Francisco, CA 2009.
2. Dispersion We’re going to move on to the second major step in doing dose assessment.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
X/Q for Releases From Area Sources 2009 RETS-REMP Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
Using ARCON96 for Control Room Radiological Habitability Assessments
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Module 9 Atmospheric Stability Photochemistry Dispersion Modeling.
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Toxic Release and Dispersion Models
高等輸送二 — 質傳 Lecture 3 Dispersion
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Derivation of the Gaussian plume model Distribution of pollutant concentration c in the flow field (velocity vector u ≡ u x, u y, u z ) in PBL can be generally.
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Air Quality Modeling.
1 U N C L A S S I F I E D Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas John Hargreaves Analyst Safety Basis Technical Services Group LA-UR
CHAPTER 5 Concentration Models: Diffusion Model.
Stack Design Done by Eng. Mohamed AbdElRhaman. Content Definition of the stack Applications of stack Dispersion Model Selection of stack design Conclusion.
EFCOG Safety Analysis Working Group May 10, 2012 Jeremy Rishel Bruce Napier Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in Safety Analyses: GENII.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Dispersion of Air Pollutants The dispersion of air pollutants is primarily determined by atmospheric conditions. If conditions are superadiabatic a great.
Cases 1 through 10 above all depend on the specification of a value for the eddy diffusivity, K j. In general, K j changes with position, time, wind velocity,
Air Dispersion Primer Deposition begins when material reaches the ground Material from the lower stack reaches the ground before that of the taller stack.
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Meteorology & Air Quality Lecture-1
Ashok Kumar Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj Abhilash Vijayan
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Session 5, Unit 9 Modeling in the Presence of Stable Layers.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar University of Toledo Introduction.
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
11/17/ Air Quality Modeling Overview of AQ Models Gaussian Dispersion Model Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Models.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
Prof. Jiakuan Yang Huazhong University of Science and Technology Air Pollution Control Engineering.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
Transport and dispersion of air pollution
Surface Inversions, Atmospheric Stability, and Spray Drift.
Air quality models DETERMINISTIC MODELS EULERIAN MODELS
Richard Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA Dynamical Mesoscale Mountain Meteorology.
EnE 301: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 3.0 Air Pollution and Control 3.1 Physical and Chemical Fundamentals 3.2 Major Air Pollutants and their Effects 3.3.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.
Example 2 Chlorine is used in a particular chemical process. A source model study indicates that for a particular accident scenario 1.0 kg of chlorine.
Various Methodologies for Calculating the Impacts on Delta-T From Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI) Jim Holian and Steve Mirsky, SAIC.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Meteorological Variables 1. Local right-hand Cartesian coordinate 2. Polar coordinate x y U V W O O East North Up Dynamic variable: Wind.
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
TOXIC RELEASE & DISPERSION MODELS (PART 3) Prepared by;
Neutrally Buoyant Gas Dispersion Instructor: Dr. Simon Waldram
Consequence Analysis 2.1.
Assessing Volcanic Ash Hazard by Using the CALPUFF System
Emma Taila & Nicolas Petruzzelli
Air Pollution Dispersion Lab
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
XOQDOQ Calculation Method, Tools and Pitfalls
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Dispersion Models Dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere Models
Presentation transcript:

Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise

Qualitative Descriptions Plume rise h H=hs + h Driving forces Buoyancy Momentum Different phases Initial phase Thermal phase Breakup phase Diffusion phase

Qualitative Descriptions Influencing factors When there is no downwash Exit velocity Stack diameter Stack gas temperature Ambient temperature Wind speed Atmospheric stability Wind shear Downwash

Holland Plume Rise Formula Simple More suitable for power plant For neutral conditions The wind speed ū is adjusted to the stack height. For non-neutral conditions

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas More complicated Buoyancy flux parameter Momentum flux parameter

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas Determination of buoyancy dominated or momentum dominated plumes Calculate (T)c For unstable or neutral (A-D) For Fb <55 For Fb55 For stable (E,F) If T (=Ts-Ta)  (T)c , it’s buoyancy dominated If T (=Ts-Ta) < (T)c , it’s momentum dominated

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas For buoyancy dominated plume under unstable or neutral conditions (A-D) x* = distance at which atmospheric turbulence begins to dominate entrainment For Fb55 m4/sec3, x*=34 Fb2/5 For Fb<55 m4/sec3, x*=14 Fb5/8 xf=distance to the final rise, m xf=3.5x* Final plume rise:

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas For buoyancy dominated plume under stable conditions (E and F) Stability parameter, s Default values for 0.02 K/m for E stability 0.035 K/m for F stability

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas Final plume rise Distance to final rise

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas For momentum dominated plume under unstable or neutral conditions (A-D) For momentum dominated plume under stable conditions (E,F) Calculate both and use the lower one.

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas Gradual rise Distance < distance to final rise (i.e., x<xf) and Buoyancy dominated plume

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas Distance < distance to final rise (i.e., x<xf) and momentum dominated plume Jet entrainment coefficient Unstable conditions (A-D)

Briggs Plume Rise Formulas X=downwind distance with max value of: Xmax=49Fb5/8 for 0<Fb<55 m4/sec3 xmax=119Fb2/5 for Fb> 55 m4/sec3 Stable conditions (E,F) with

Briggs Plume Rise Summary Unstable and neutral Stable Buoyancy Momentum

Buoyancy Induced Dispersion Air entrainment due to “boiling-like action” enlarges the plume Small impact on ground level concentration in most cases The impact can be reflected in  Initial plume size Effective dispersion coefficients

Session 4, Unit 8 Averaging Time, Multiple Sources, and Receptors Chimney, Building, and Terrain Effects

Averaging Time The concentration calculated from the Gaussian equations should represent the averaging time that is consistent with the averaging time of  Short-term:  1 month Long-term: > 1 month

Averaging Time If longer averaging time is desired, use the following power law P=0.17-0.75, suggested value is 0.17

Crosswind Averaging Integrate y from - to  Average over a sector

Crosswind Averaging Average over a sector considering distribution of wind speeds and stability classes ISCLT3 and STAR

Crosswind Averaging Smoothing transition from sector to sector Weighted smoothing function, WS Smoothed average concentration

Multiple Sources The max from each source do not exactly overlap Use of multiple stack factor More accurate method – modeling with a consistent coordinate system

Receptors Receptor grid Cartesian coordinate system Polar coordinate system Single stack, but the origin of the coordinate system is not at the stack base Multiple stacks Presentation of results Concentration isopleths

Example Calculation Chapter 10

Chimney Effects Stack tip downwash Avoid stack tip downwash Low pressure behind stack ū is at the stack top level No plume rise (“plume sink”) Avoid stack tip downwash

Building Effects General description Expanded meaning of “building” Reduce building effects – rule of thumb hs>2.5hb Too conservative for tall thin buildings

Briggs Procedure to Minimize Downwash Five steps: Correction for stack induced downwash Correction for building effects Determine if plume is entrained in the cavity. If entrained, treat it as a ground level source Buoyancy effect Calculate downwind concentration

Cavity Description Cavity length Short buildings (L/H2) L affects cavity length xr Long buildings (L/H>2) L does not affect cavity length xr

Cavity Max cavity width It’s location long x direction Max height

Cavity Concentrations within cavity

Wake Downwind of Cavity Treated as a ground level source Turner method (virtual source) Gifford method Gifford-Slade method (total dispersion parameters) Huber-Snyder method

Sources Downwind of Buildings Briggs method Beyond 3b  no building effect Within 3b  treat them as ground level sources

Complex Terrain Definition Plume behavior in complex terrain Simple terrain Complex terrain Intermediate terrain Plume behavior in complex terrain

Complex Terrain Modeling approaches Briggs Egan Bowne Modified dispersion coefficients ISC3 (COMPLEX 1) – to be discussed later

GEP Stack Height Definition Greater of 65 m HG=H+1.5L (for stacks in existance on Jan 12, 1979, HG=2.5H) Structures to be considered: within 5L In modeling analyses, no credit is given for stack height above the GEP