Improving teaching and learning in K-12 education through meaningful technology integration Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Advertisements

Dec. 2, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Research & Evaluation.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
The Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom Copyright  2003 Stevens Institute of Technology, CIESE, All Rights Reserved.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
ESA Region 2 April st Century Skills: More Than Just Computers.
Gregg Festa Project Manager Teaching Matters Program Overview Unique & Compelling Internet Content & Professional Development for Middle School.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
Agenda  Why “re-imagine” your classroom? – Framing The Challenges  Digital STEAM Overview Presentation  Live Tour of the Digital STEAM Workshop Web.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom
Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Community College Pathways to Improved Teacher.
Addressing the Pre-service Learning Needs of Education Majors in Math and Science Through Technology
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
Improve teaching and learning in K-12 science and mathematics through meaningful technology integration Center for Improved Engineering and Science Education.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Afterschool and STEM National Network of Statewide Afterschool Networks.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Mission: Improve teaching and learning in K-12 science and mathematics through the meaningful integration of technology into the curriculum.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
April 2, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Unique & Compelling.
Rethinking Computers and Instruction.  2007 report released by ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).  Indicates ALL students, regardless.
The Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom 1 Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Poll Everywhere
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Learnings from Classroom Connections Findings and Conclusions from Two Studies on the Statewide Laptop Initiative Dr. Wade Pogany – South Dakota DOE –
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
REPORT ON THE OHIO CLINICAL ALLIANCE OCTEO CONFERENCE DUBLIN, OHIO MARCH 6, 2015.
Intel ® Teach Program Thinking with Technology Course Pn. Idawati Che Mat Jabatan Teknologi Pendidikan
CIESE: Creating the Next Generation of Engineers and Innovators.
Debra Brockway, Beth McGrath, Mercedes McKay Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Analysis of a Statewide K-12 Engineering Program:
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
School in Front of Challenges of Knowledge Society, Again and Again Liisa Ilomäki Department of Psychology University of Helsinki EDEN conference.
How to use Thematic Units……. The key to successful thematic unit development and teaching is careful and thoughtful planning, combined with a thorough.
“Growing Student Learning for Life” “Growing Student Learning for Life” Information Literacy/Technology Education Integration Plan Toolkit South Carolina.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Leveraging the Internet for Learning Josh Baron Josh Baron Associate Director for Instructional Technology Center for Improved Engineering.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Copyright © 2005 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Stevens-NJ Community College Strategic Partnership.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
Dec. 2, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Unique & Compelling.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Evidence-based Research. Think Innovation…. The Day 8:30 am Introductions – Orientation for the Day – Expectation: Scenarios Three things about you,
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
March 2004 Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Center for Innovation Engineering.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Professional Development Training: Student Centered Learning Beth Parsons Tech 507 June 14, 2013 Melissa Sands All presentation sources are used in accordance.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
NATIONAL EDUCATION INITIATIVE FOR K–12 CLASSROOMS.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Community College Pathways to Improved Teacher Preparation
Presentation transcript:

Improving teaching and learning in K-12 education through meaningful technology integration Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Dr. Edward A. Friedman Director, Center for Improved Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance+ 3 Alliance+ Overview  Unique, complex, multi-state partnership  5 states  53 school systems in 3 states  5 IHE’s  6 preservice institutions  Collaborations with 5 regional organizations, foundations to augment program

Alliance+ 4

5 Vision “Engaging, authentic, and curriculum- relevant uses of the Internet by teachers and students that improve student achievement in core subjects, and that promote higher-order thinking, critical analysis, collaboration, and problem-solving”

Alliance+ 6 Strategies  Demonstrate and refine a model for widescale teacher training: the two-tiered turnkey training approach  Increase collaboration, linkages, support between community colleges and local schools  Build local capacity within school buildings  Disseminate acclaimed, standards-based curriculum and training materials

Alliance+ 7 Key Aspects  Two-tiered turnkey training model  Training/curriculum content  Implementation and local adaptations

Alliance+ 8 Program Changes  Substantial efforts for training materials upgrades for elementary and middle school  More emphasis on local support, increasing classroom implementation  Significant development efforts for DataFeed system  Less emphasis on high school materials, online version

Josh Baron Associate Director for Instructional Technology, Center for Improved Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance Savvy Cyber Teacher ®  30 hour, graduate-level, hands-on program  Focus on skill-building in the context of content-based classroom applications  Includes Stevens classroom projects  Version 2.0 released (spring ‘01)  Elementary and middle school versions  Core Concept: Unique and Compelling Internet Applications

Alliance Core Concepts UniqueCompelling Core Concepts Unique and Compelling Internet Applications  Real time data – Real world information  Communications tool – Collaboration with students and experts  Publishing student work – Student motivator & tool for authentic assessment  Primary sources– Multidisciplinary Unique - Cannot be done without the technology Compelling - Targets authentic real world problem solving & critical thinking

Unique & Compelling Projects Let’s jump on the web and see an example…. CIESE

Alliance Recognition Recognition Recognition of curriculum materials by:

Alliance Unique and Compelling & Savvy Cyber Teacher ®  Provide students with real world problem solving and critical thinking experiences  Address national and local standards  Help prepare students for profiency exams (e.g. Ohio Proficiency, FCAT, etc.)  Savvy Cyber Teacher ® focuses on unique and compelling applications as well as integration and implementation

Janet Beauchamp Director, Think Tank, Maricopa Community College Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance The Model: Priority Areas  Demonstrate strategy for widescale PD program  Create local capacity  Build/strengthen linkages between CC’s and local schools

Alliance The Model  Two-tiered turnkey training approach  “Core team” lead trainers train “mentor” teachers who train classroom teachers  “Implementation specialist” support for classroom activities & Project Management Plans  Principals and curriculum developers institutes

Alliance Mentor Pairs x10 Core Trainers = 20 teachers The Model: 2 Core Trainers  20 Mentors (10 pairs)  20 Classroom teachers each (200) 20 Classroom teacher x 10 = 200 Classroom + 20 Mentors = 220 Trained

Alliance Implementation  Variations in each of 3 sites  Basic model adapted to local conditions  Integrated, institutionalized within participating districts’ PD programs

Alliance Phoenix & Arizona  14 urban districts in Phoenix + 1 in Tucson  23 suburban districts in Phoenix and Tucson  15 rural districts statewide, 3 on reservations  3 core trainers  Initiated “implementation specialist” model

Pete Diehl Core Team Trainer (retired), Miami Dade Community College Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance Miami  Large, (368,000 students) unified school district + Archdiocese  Implementation and staffing  Initiated Principals Institutes and Curriculum Developers Institute  Integrated within IBM Learning Village portal

Geoff Andrews Co-PI, Fiscal Agent, Polaris Career Center Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance Cleveland  CMSD, East Cleveland, Archdiocese of Cleveland  Implementation and staffing  Joyce Integration Workshops

Alliance Other Key Issues  School system challenges -hardware, connectivity -competition from other programs (Intel, others) -stable cadre of aware administrative leaders -available time for teacher training  Serving disadvantaged populations (closing the Digital Divide)  Preservice  Continuation, expansion and replication

Mario Yepes-Baraya Director of Science R & D, Harcourt Educational Measurement Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance Evaluation Model - #2 Logic Model

Alliance Evaluation Results -# 5 June 2001(mid-point evaluation -- classroom observations in schools with Internet connection -- advanced teachers) Competent teachers and engaged students:  Daily use of technology as an effective means to attain standards-based learning goals  Frequent use of cooperative and collaborative learning techniques  Greater student involvement in learning, more time on task, more student-student communication, and more time making decisions about learning goals, media and resources. (“learning communities”)

Alliance Evaluation Results - #6 (Data collected: May 2001 – teacher survey) Miami (preliminary results) Sample = Population ~ 600 mentors and mentees Received = 182 (30% ) Phoenix and Cleveland data collection in Oct. 2001

Alliance Subjects Taught -- %

Alliance Role within Alliance+ -- %

Alliance Training Experience Evaluation -- %

Alliance Applicability of Training to Main Subject Taught -- %

Alliance Internet Connection in the Classroom and at Home -- %

Alliance Technology Skills (% -- intermediate, advanced, or master)

Alliance Integrates Technology into Core Subject -- (times per month) %

Alliance Student - Does Research via Internet -- (times per month) %

Alliance Student - Participates in TeleCollaborative Projects -- (times per month) %

Alliance Student - Works with Real-Time Data on Internet -- (times per month) %

Alliance Student - Contacts Experts on Internet -- (times per month) %

Alliance Do you spend less time lecturing?

Alliance Are you more comfortable w/ small group activities?

Alliance Do you use more cooperative learning techniques?

Alliance Better instruction for different learning styles?

Alliance Are you a better teacher of problem solving skills?

Alliance Are you a better able to present complex materials?

Alliance Are you better able to manage 1-3 computer classrooms?

Beth McGrath Deputy Director, Center for Improved Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance Important Lessons  Reactions, perspectives of educators, students  Bridging technology & curriculum domains  Promoting classroom implementation (collaborative projects, implementation web pages)  Preservice outreach  Community college role in preservice  New linkages in each local community and program continuation  Replication in other sites

Improving teaching and learning in K-12 education through meaningful technology integration Alliance+ Internet-in-Education Teacher Professional Development

Alliance Real-Time Data Primary Source Publishing Online Collaboratives Projects WebQuests Foreign Newspapers Voting Records Research Online Quizzes Lesson Plans Infusing Technology into the Curriculum Amount of Change Low High Amount of Risk Taking Low High Traditional Unique & Compelling Innovative

Alliance Group #3 Report Need to focus on telling a strong story to the right people…

Alliance Group #3  Strong Story: Focus on learning, not just technology Create video “case study” that compares “old” classroom with a SCT classroom Create the “I wish I was a student again” phenomena Closely align Alliance+ with well known research and reports (CEO Forum, ISTE NETS, g. luc os others????) Stress strong track record of the past four years Use students in presentations

Alliance Group #3  Right People: Need face-to-face interactions where we can show unique and compelling to leadership Can’t hit everyone so who do we target?? State legislators Museums (Tech museum, exploratorium) – unique PD opts Those who will be involved in block grant RFP???? How do we get time from these key decision makers?? – leverage partnerships

Alliance Group #3  Need to measure impact: Ethnographic study Look for recurring themes Use teams that would visit each site Try and identify the “innovation” that makes us stand out Schools Online identifying protocol for case study analysis