“Alaska” LCCs Webinar April 1, 2013 PIs: David McGuire; Co-PI: Scott Rupp; Co-Is: Vladimir Romanovsky, Eugenie Euskirchen, Sergei Marchenko University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
Advertisements

Alaska EPSCoR AHM May 27, 2010 Shannon Donovan University of Alaska Anchorage Department of Geography and Environmental Studies.
Northern Ecohydrology Jessica M. Cable and W. Robert Bolton International Arctic Research Center (Fairbanks) Environment and Natural Resources Institute.
Modeling Changes in Vegetation Dynamics in Alaska: Implications for Arctic Herbivores Eugénie Euskirchen ESPSCoR All Hands Meeting, May , 2010.
The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?
A Synthesis of Terrestrial Carbon Balance of Alaska and Projected Changes in the 21 st Century: Implications for Climate Policy and Carbon Management To.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Improving soils data for better vegetation modeling Wendy Peterman, Dominique Bachelet Conservation Biology Institute  Abstract Over.
Effects of Future Warming and Fire Regime Change on Boreal Soil Organic Horizons and Permafrost Dynamics in Interior Alaska Comparison of Historical and.
RESILIENCE AND INTACTNESS A Manager’s Perspective.
Overview of Proposed Climate Sensitivity Research.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
The Ocean’s Role in Climate Change. Responding to the Kyoto Protocol Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF) Initiatives Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reduce.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Adaptation in Eastern and Southern Africa Supporting ground level and policy change Jo-Ellen Parry, Program Manager
Steering Committee Meeting December 19-20, 2013 UPDATES.
Incorporating Spatial Heterogeneity in Temperature into Climate Vulnerability Assessments for Coastal Pacific Streams NOAA, UW, USGS This project will.
Alaska Landscape Conservation Cooperatives: The Big Picture Approach to Science and Management.
Climate Change: SEAFWA Thoughts? Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission September 2007.
Grinnell Glacier Glacier National Park Climate Change Impacts.
Cryosphere hazards from the perspective of a State Agency Gabriel Wolken Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 3354 College Road, Fairbanks,
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
USFWS’ Arctic Focal Area: Conserving Fish and Wildlife Populations in a Changing Landscape Philip Martin and Jim Zelenak November 2007 U.S. Fish and Wildlife.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.
Climate Feedback Research: Consequences of climate and disturbance changes for the Carbon feedback in Interior Alaska Patrick Endres, AK photographics.
North Slope Rapid Ecoregional Assessment Final Presentation to NSB Planning Commission September 24, 2015.
CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Climate Change Adaptation Across the Landscape Michelle Selmon Regional Climate Change Specialist June.
JULES: Joint UK Land Environment Simulator A community land surface scheme.
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
Science themes: 1.Improved understanding of the carbon cycle. 2.Constraints and feedbacks imposed by water. 3.Nutrient cycling and coupling with carbon.
Future Research at the Toolik Field Station Perspectives from Breck Bowden Science Support Visioning Workshop Portland, Oregon 2-4 August 2012.
DSL Succession Wildfire Urban growth Sea level rise Climate effect on wildfire: A2, A1B, B1 SERAP Succession Wildfire Urban growth Sea level rise (DSL)
Projections of Climate and Vegetation Change Scott Rupp and Paul Duffy, Mathew Leonawicz, Michael Lindgren, Amy Breen, Tom Kurkowski, Angelica Floyd, Alec.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
Charge to Breakout Groups How do we achieve more effective integration? 1. Among climate sensitivity tasks 2. With tasks in successional and threshold.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center Council for Data Integration Meeting Sept 16, 2009 U.S. Department of the.
Department of the Interior Regional Climate Science Centers Secretarial Order 3289 (9/14/09): DoI “protecting our country’s water, land, fish and wildlife,
Demonstration Sites What are they, and who cares?.
Wildlife Response to Environmental Arctic Change November, 2008 Wildlife Conservation Society ABR Inc. UAF Institute of Arctic Biology UAF International.
USFWS’ Arctic Strategy: Managing Fish and Managing Fish and Wildlife Populations in a Changing Landscape SEARCH Science Steering Committee Meeting October.
What Do NGOs Do With FIA Data? (Preview: a lot!) Christine Negra The Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment March 2009 SAF National FIA.
Importance of Recent Shifts in Soil Thermal Dynamics on Growing Season Length, Productivity, and Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial High-Latitude Ecosystems.
Coupling between fire and permafrost Effects of permafrost thaw on surface hydrology between better- drained vs. poorly- drained ecosystems Consequences.
I. Alaska, Yukon and Coastal British Columbia Lightly settled/ water abundant region. Increased spring flood risks Glacial retreat/disappearance in south;
Conservation management for an uncertain future Mike Morecroft.
USGS Role in Framing the Climate Change Challenge Mark Myers Director, USGS.
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
Key Considerations in Linking Permafrost, Ecosystems and Run-off William J. Gutowski, Jr. Dept. of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
Hydrologic Modeling in the Far North: needs, challenges, and progress Hydrologic Modeling in the Far North: needs, challenges, and progress Jessica Cherry.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Hydro-Thermo Dynamic Model: HTDM-1.0
Nplcc.org 11:00 – 12:00 PST/ 10:00 – 11:00 AKST or 1:30 - 2:30 PST/ 12:30 – 1:30 AKST (which ever time fits your schedule – same information will be covered.
Climate change impacts on water resources in the southeastern U.S. – Can we adapt? Peter Caldwell USDA Forest Service, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat.
Science-TEK 2014 Projects and Activities Frank Shipley – Chair S-TEK Subcommittee Mary Mahaffy – Science Coordinator Tom Miewald – Data Coordinator Jill.
Ecosystem carbon storage capacity as affected by disturbance regimes: a general theoretical model Introduction Disturbances can profoundly affect ecosystem.
Results from the Downscaling Needs Assessment Survey April 2011 Sarah Trainor Courtesy of Tony Weyiouanna Sr. & Dave Atkinson.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey October 22, 2015 EROS Fire Science Understanding a Changing Earth.
Climate Sensitivity Succession Regime Shifts Integration Current Proposal: The Dynamics of Change Next Proposal (due in < 4 years!!) Human Dimensions K-12.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
USGS Science for a Changing Everglades
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Presentation transcript:

“Alaska” LCCs Webinar April 1, 2013 PIs: David McGuire; Co-PI: Scott Rupp; Co-Is: Vladimir Romanovsky, Eugenie Euskirchen, Sergei Marchenko University of Alaska Fairbanks The Integrated Ecosystem Model (IEM) for Alaska and Northwest Canada A collaborative research project for the DOI Alaska Climate Science Center and the Arctic, Western Alaska, Northwest Boreal, and North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperatives

Research Team David McGuire, PI Institute of Arctic Biology Scott Rupp, Co-PI Scenarios Network for Alaska & Arctic Planning Vladimir Romanovsky, Co-I Geophysical Institute Eugenie Euskirchen, Co-I Institute of Arctic Biology Sergei Marchenko, Co-I Geophysical Institute

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

What is the IEM? The Integrated Ecosystem Model (IEM) for Alaska and Northwest Canada is designed to help resource managers understand the nature and expected rate of landscape change in Alaska and Northwest Canada through providing: A common framework for forecasting landscape change in the region in response to climate- and land cover/use driven changes in vegetation, disturbance, hydrology and permafrost Production of maps and other products related to landscape changes in ecosystem structure (e.g., composition of shrubs vs. sedges in tundra or conifer vs. deciduous trees in forests) and function (e.g., production of forage used by herbivores) A quantification of the uncertainty in expected outcomes (e.g., by the consideration of different climate scenarios, different climate models, aspects of uncertainty in the IEM framework) A team to help in the development of impact models that can use IEM products to address assessments of specific resource management responses to landscape changes A team to help in conducting climate-change impact assessments that can be used to help identify adaptation and management responses to forecasted landscape-scale changes that are projected to impact the management of natural resources.

Spatial Domain: What is the IEM?

The IEM for Alaska and Northwest Canada will provide a support tool to inform: Response of ecosystems to climate and land cover/use change Processes that affect species and habitats Development of impact models Assessments of natural resource responses Adaptation and management responses What is the IEM?

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

What is the IEM Framework? Projected climate changes will create challenges for natural resource management including: Fish and Wildlife Impacts Wildlife Diseases and Invasive Species Protection of Trust Species Biological Carbon Sequestration Wildland Fire Impacts Water Availability and Water Quality Sea-ice and Glacier Loss Ecosystem Resilience and Ecosystem Restoration Changes to Cultural Resource and Subsistence Species (Society Resilence) Sea-level Rise and Coastal Storm Surge Impacts (Coastal Erosion, Modification of Fish and Wildlife Habitat)

What is the IEM Framework? Many of the resource management challenges require information on how climate and land cover/use change will impact: air and soil temperatures snowfall rain on snow ice-free season growing season permafrost stream flow wildfire coastal erosion glaciers

Climate Change Integrated Ecosystem Model Fire Permafrost Hydrology What is the IEM Framework? Vegetation

Climate Change Integrated Ecosystem Model Fire Permafrost Hydrology canopy cover fire vegetation fire hydrology thermokarst Habitat Change Fire Management Animal Performance vegetation productivity hydrology Hypothetical Model output x output y Impact Models Vegetation What is the IEM Framework

Climate Change Integrated Ecosystem Model Fire Permafrost Hydrology canopy cover fire vegetation fire hydrology thermokarst Habitat Change Fire Management Animal Performance vegetation productivity hydrology Hypothetical Model output x output y Impact Models Vegetation Conservation & Resource Management Decisions Stakeholders Communication of Needs What is the IEM Framework?

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

What are the Components of the IEM? Climate Fire Permafrost Hydrology Vegetation

What are the Components of the IEM? Burned area Fire Severity ALFRESCO DOS-DVM-TEM GIPL-2 Soil moisture Moss & Organics Plant Functional Types Vegetation type Soil Thermal Properties Downscaled GCM Data

What are the Components of the IEM? Vegetation

Climate Change Integrated Ecosystem Model Fire Permafrost Hydrology What are the Components of the IEM? Vegetation =

canopy cover probability of fire species composition vegetation cover probability of fire surface hydrology probability of thermokarst Habitat Change Models Fire Management Models Animal Performance Models vegetation cover biomass productivity surface hydrology Hypothetical Model model output x model output y Impact Models What are the Components of the IEM? Conservation & Resource Management Decisions Other stakeholder groups Communication of Needs Alaska IEM

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

Spatial Domain: Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs

Together, Alaska and northwest Canada LCCs can:  Jointly address state- or region-wide information needs  Serve as a forum for learning and information exchange  At multiple levels  Facilitate communication and collaboration  Among agencies/organizations  Across disciplines  Across jurisdictional boundaries  The IEM for Alaska and Northwest Canada and the Alaska Climate Science Center can help with cross LCC coordination. LCC Coordination

 Assessing the status of baseline data  Coordinated observations (detecting change)  Understanding relationships (understanding change)  Projecting future states (forecasting change)  Adaptation framework and best management practices (responding to change)

Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs Projected climate changes will create challenges for natural resource management including (from Fish and Wildlife Impacts (ALCC, WALCC, NWBLCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Wildlife Diseases and Invasive Species (ALCC, WALCC, NWBLCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Protection of Trust Species (ALCC, WALCC, NWBLCC) (IEM) Biological Carbon Sequestration (ALCC, NWBLCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Wildland Fire Impacts (ALCC, NWBLCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Water Availability and Water Quality (ALCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Sea-ice and Glacier Loss (ALCC, WALCC, NWBLCC, NPLCC) (IEM?) Ecosystem Resilience and Ecosystem Restoration (WALCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Changes to Cultural Resource and Subsistence Species (ALCC, WALCC, NPLCC) (IEM) Sea-level Rise and Coastal Storm Surge Impacts (Coastal Erosion, Modification of Fish and Wildlife Habitat) (ALCC, WALCC, NWBLCC, NPLCC) (IEM) To address these issues requires the development of impact models that can use outputs from the IEM. The IEM team is ready to work with people developing impact models!

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

IEM Activities  Development of Historical and Projected Downscaled Climate (1 km resolution) for Driving Model Applications and for Other Uses.  Coupling Together Component Models (Software Engineering Issue)  Forecasting Tundra Fire and Treeline Dynamics  Model Development ( )  Model Integration and Application ( )  Impact Model Development and Application (Caribou Animal Performance?; )  Development of Alaska Thermokarst Model  Model Development ( )  Model Integration and Application ( )  Impact Model Development and Application (Shorebird Impact Model?; )  Development of Wetland Dynamics Model  Field Studies: Alaska Peatland Experiment (2012 – 2013)  Model Development (2014)  Model Integration and Application ( )  Biological Carbon Sequestration Assessment for Alaska ( ) – Includes Southeast Alaska

IEM Products  Climate  Historical and projected climate data for several scenarios of climate change and for several climate models (available)  Soil Properties  Permafrost distribution, active layer thickness (2013, with updates)  Disturbance  Historical and projected area burned (historical available, projected 2013)  Susceptibility to thermokarst (2013)  Thermokarst disturbance scenarios and landscape change (2014)  Landcover and Vegetation  Projected treeline (2013, updates)  Future distribution of vegetation types (2013, updates)  Ecosystem Dynamics  Carbon fluxes, net primary productivity (2013, updates)

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

IEM Accomplishments and Activities to Date  Development of Historical and Projected Downscaled Climate (1 km resolution) for Driving Model Applications and for Other Uses.   Coupling Together Component Models (Software Engineering Issue)  ALFRESCO and DOS-DVM-TEM are currently exchanging data each time step, next step is to exchange data with GIPL2  Forecasting Tundra Fire and Treeline Dynamics  Model development largely completed in 2012, model calibration and testing are currently occurring, plan is for first model application to be completed by July 2013  Development of Alaska Thermokarst Model  Developed a conceptual approach to model development in 2012 (produced a white paper)  Currently developing the code for the model according to a schedule for completion by end of 2013  Development of Wetland Dynamics Model  Field Studies: Alaska Peatland Experiment (2012 – 2013)  Developed Peatland DOS-TEM for boreal fen application in  Development of Peatland DOS-TEM for boreal bog application in 2013  Biological Carbon Sequestration Assessment for Alaska ( )  Working on Calibrations, model application to be completed in 2013

Acknowledgements Research ScientistsResearch Associates Mark WaldropBob Bolton Postdoctoral FellowsGraduate Students Kirsten BarrettTobey Carman Amy BreenWinslow Hansen Zhaosheng Fan Elchin Jafarov Helene Genet Technical Staff Reginald Muskett Alec Bennett Fengming Yuan Tom Kurkowski Yujin ZhangDustin Rice Stephanie McAfeeMichael Lindgren DOI Alaska Climate Science Center Arctic, Western Alaska, Northwest Boreal, and North Pacific LCCs

Presentation Outline I. What is the IEM Project? II. What is the IEM Framework? III. What are the Components of the IEM? IV. Relationship of the IEM to the Alaska LCCs V. What Types of Products will the IEM generate? VI. What has the IEM Accomplished to Date? VII. Where can You Learn More about the IEM?

Where can you learn more about the IEM? Further information is available at and and soon at a new location on the Alaska Climate Science Center web site. Or contact Dave McGuire ), Scott Rupp ), or Amy Breen Questions?