doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 1 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros Section 21 Procedure (formerly Procedure 10) Request for P802.11j Conditional Submission to RevCom Sheung Li Task Group J Chairperson July 29, 2004

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 2 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros P802.11j Conditional to RevCom D1.5 Sponsor Ballot Summary –Ballot closed on July 2, 2004 –Vote tally was 88% Yes (66), 12% No (9), 3 Abstain 83% Return Rate (78 out of 93) –69 total comments, 11 disapprove comments w/resolution not accepted –Unresolved disapproves in document r3 (attached) D1.6 Recirculation Schedule –LMSC 15-day Recirculation started on July 30, 2004 and will close August 14, 2004 Comment resolution group will meet starting August 13 in San Jose area with telephone dial-ins and continue as long as necessary to resolve all comments Resolution schedule based on prior announcement with 30-day notice, which noted that it would continue as long as necessary

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 3 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros Motion requests conditional approval from the SEC, per Section 21 of the LMSC P&P, to forward P802.11j to RevCom following completion of further recirculation ballot(s)

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 4 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros Backup Material on P802.11j Letter Ballot History

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 5 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros History P802.11j furthers IEEE 802s mission of creating worldwide standards Addresses requirements of newly allocated 4.9 and 5.0 GHz bands in Japan that postdate and are not provided for by existing standard Study Group began work in July 2002 PAR and 5 Criteria approved in November 2002

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 6 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros P802.11j-Draft 1.0 Draft 1.0 selected by TG at Mar 03 Plenary and sent to Letter Ballot 56 by WG 394 Voters in Ballot Pool, 62% return rate 79% Yes Vote, 21% No Votes (11% Abstain) 279 original comments addressed in r6 and D1.1 created

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 7 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros P802.11j-Draft 1.2 Draft 1.2 selected by TG at Nov 03 Plenary and sent to Recirculation Ballot by WG Organizational issues in r6 resolved by moving text from Clause 17 to Annex J – thereby red-lining the entire Draft 1.0 document At chairs discretion, Letter Ballot issued instead of Recirculation Ballot even though actual changes limited

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 8 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros P802.11j-Draft 1.3 Draft 1.3 selected by TG at Jan 04 Interim and sent to Recirculation Ballot by WG Ballot held open due to low return rate when return requirement increased from 50% to 75%, and 46% of non-voters in ballot pool no longer voting members. Return rate used by prior LB authorized by 802 chair 1 new disapprove by a voter who has never voted before; did not raise any issues not already addressed Style guide homogeneity requested by IEEE SA; draft 1.4 issued as a Recirculation Ballot

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 9 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros P802.11j-Draft 1.4 Draft 1.4 selected by TG at Mar 04 Plenary and sent to Recirculation Ballot by WG No new disapproves, 12 new approves including 4 converted from disapproves Ballot closed at 95% Yes, 5% No (5% Abstain)

doc.: IEEE /854R3 SubmissionSlide 10 July 2004 Sheung Li, Atheros P802.11j LB Progression D1.2/LB64D1.0/LB56 Date closeMay 12, 03 79% (172) 21% ( 45) 11% ( 28) Yes No Abstain 62% return rate Jan 14, 04 89% (213) 11% ( 27) 5% ( 24) 66% return rate D1.3/LB66 Mar 18, 04 94% (261) 6% ( 17) 6% ( 29) 57% return rate 67% return rate D1.4/LB68 Apr 20, 04 95% (273) 5% ( 13) 5% ( 25)