Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Systems Approach To Training
Advertisements

School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
A Guide to Implementation
CCRS QUARTERLY MEETING CCRS QUARTERLY MEETING ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADES 6-12
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Campus Improvement Plans
Teaching, Learning, and Assessing Peggy Maki Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning AAHE
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
SEM Planning Model.
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Launch of Quality Management System
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Assurance of Learning 報告人:鄭宗記 國立政治大學統計學系
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
WRITING FOR THE REAL WORLD: STRENGTHENING WRITING AND CAREER KNOWLEDGE QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN (QEP) “ Do the Write Thing !”
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
What is the difference between milestones and evaluations? Why do so many struggle with this?
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice

You cant manage what you cant measure.

Program Review: A Discovery Process A Circle that Never Ends Purpose: To assist faculty and staff in providing high demand, quality programs that remain responsive to the needs and interests of students, the workplace, and relevant baccalaureate programs in our region.

Its a Means to an End Not a Deficit Model Purpose: Something we all care about. No assumption that program doesnt measure up – or even needs improvement. About students – having what they need and deserve. Providing instruction Producing Learners

Program Review Authentic Formative Assessment

Assessment Cycle INFORMATION COLLECTION REASSESSMENTANALYSIS (and then perhaps more info. collection) CHANGE PLANNING (problem solving)

Assessment is a Team Sport

Academic Program Review: The Middlesex Process

The Participants Individuals or committees Share a passion for their program and teaching Pre-conceived notions of problems/solutions Attitudes toward assessment

The Program Review Questions Data Discovery and More Questioning Organization Phase

The Document Itself: Major Components Data Elements: Enrollment, Academic Progress, Retention, Transfer, Employment Mission and Goals, including Special Populations, External Input, Recruitment Curriculum - Outcomes-Based Skills and Competencies Scope and Sequence Core Requirements Developmental Courses Workbased-Learning Teaching Methodologies Assessment Strategies Desired/Anticipated Revisions

Instructional Support Staffing Support Services Facilities Professional Development Budget Additional Areas of Inquiry Strengths, Weaknesses, Plans for Revision

Data Enrollment Academic Progress Retention Student Population Student Transfer Student Employment Surveys Focus Groups

Curriculum skills competencies understandings learning experiences requirements assessment

Examples: Question 11 Major Educational Outcomes of the Academic Support Services y Students who participate regularly in the Academic Support Services acquire the skills to manage their own learning. y Students who participate regularly in the Academic Support Services acquire the skills to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. y Students who participate regularly in the Academic Support Services acquire the skills to articulate what they have learned. y Students who participate regularly in the Academic Support Services acquire the skills to formulate and achieve their own educational and vocational goals.

11. Please indicate below the major educational outcomes for students enrolled in this program, how each outcome is attained (i.e., through a specific named course, activity, or project) and how the attainment of each outcome is assessed. Five to ten major programmatic outcomes should be listed. If there is nothing currently in place that is intended to provide for the attainment of a particular outcome or to assess the extent to which the outcome has been realized, please leave the appropriate space blank. The blanks will help to identify areas that need further development. Student Outcome/Competency Assessment Criteria and Methods What should the student be able to do? (Performance/knowledge expectations for program graduates listed in student outcome terms.) What activities/ assignments will enable the student to achieve it? (If the strategy is contained within a particular course, please list the course first, with the relevant activity or activities listed next to each course.) How do the instructor and student know that the competency has been achieved? How is the students performance judged? Strategies for Attainment Section III:Curriculum

Student Outcomes/ Competencies Strategies for Attainment Assessment Criteria and Methods Student applies previewing skills when reading articles. Student is encouraged to identify the title, locate headings and subheadings, identify bold face, illustrations, graphic aids, chapter questions, and summaries. Student can describe the contents of the article, making specific references. Student determines the main idea of a paragraph. Student finds the sentence that tells what the whole paragraph is about if the main idea is stated. Student lists supporting details and generates his/ own sentence if the main idea is not explicitly stated. Student is successful, on practice quizzes, identifying the main idea or creating one when the main idea is not present. READING Objective 1: Students who participate regularly in the Academic Support Services acquire the skills to manage their own learning.

Start to Finish... ParticipantsProgram Program Review Document Questions Data Discovery/Questioning Strengths Weaknesses Recommendations Plans for Improvement Organization Phase

Discovery and Questioning Statements are Supported by Data New Questions Emerge More Information is Gathered Data and Information Determine the Recommendations Reaching Consensus

Organization Phase

I Meeting with Provost Celebration of Effort and Achievement Supportive Discussion of Implementation of Plans for Improvement

Follow-Up II.I. D. of Action Plans, Time Lines, Budget Requests II.Budget Follow-through III.Action Plan Follow-up

Improving Teaching and Learning Revise teaching strategies to improve student achievement Revise course content to assure appropriate attention to areas that need increased attention Replace or revise courses, programs, services Change sequence of courses Add a requirement or required course Enhance the advising process Increase focus throughout the co-curriculum Increase/enhance support services (Jeffrey Seybert, Johnson County Community College)

You cant manage what you cant measure.

Assessment Cycle INFORMATION COLLECTION REASSESSMENTANALYSIS (and then perhaps more info. collection) CHANGE PLANNING (problem solving)