Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

Neighbourhood programme
INTERREG III B, PHARE CBC and TACIS CBC Programme -Combination of EU instruments for transnational co- operation in the BSR CEEC\NIS participation in BSR.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Summary remarks and final conclusions Thematic workshop on transport.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden INTERREG III B General Introduction BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Progress report – structure and contents BSR INTERREG III B Joint.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
1 Macro-regions a new test of the integrated approach territorial cohesion: improving policy coherence on the ground.
EuropeAid European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Cross Border Co-operation within the Baltic Sea Region Programme Hamburg, May 2007 Martin.
AGORA - Network Sustainable Tourism Development in the Baltic Sea Region Tourism – Chances and Challenges, Reykjavik, 15 February 2008 Project part-financed.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat Balticness 9 May 2008, Vilnius.
18 April 2012, Malmö State Committee of the Pskov region for economic development, industry and trade Pskov Region: experience and possibilities Dmitriy.
MEGA Metropolitan European Growth Areas – the Baltic Sea Area.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
A Community Initiative on Transnational co-operation on spatial planning and regional development Mattias ALISCH Joint Secretariat Belarus Denmark Estonia.
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat.
Next steps in the Baltic Biogas Bus project for period : Extending a successful partnership Geert Schaap
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Baltic Sea Region (BSR) Transnational Programme (Interreg IVB) and its strategic projects BaltMet Inno Brainstorming Workshop, 7 November 2007,
Central Baltic Programme & South-East Finland-Russia CBC- programme Toni Vanhala Maritime Assembly Rakvere
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
Part-financed by the European Union Management of the Baltic Sea as a common resource Bo Löwendal, Sweden Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering Committee.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Updated implementation strategy for the remaining Programme period.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme Partner Search Forum Introduction.
Interreg III B for the Baltic Sea Region ( ) Interreg IIC/IIIB BSR Secretariat/W.Görmar, October 2001.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
The INTERREG IVB NWE Programme: an overview. The Lisbon Agenda (Strategy-2020) EU’s blueprint for competiveness and sustainable growth Lisbon StrategyCohesion.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Major drawbacks in the submitted project proposals Wiktor Szydarowski.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region programme 2007 – 2013 by Joint Secretariat.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
ReACCt Regional Action facing Changing Climate Dennis Ehm Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL), Germany BSR INTERREG IV B Project Idea.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden The Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme After EU Enlargement.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
Part-financed by the European Union Investments in projects, strategic projects and extension stage Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar,
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat / Eija Eloranta/Communication coordinator/New bridges kick off 4th March 2009 NEW BRIDGES – Strenghtening.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
 from the Barents Sea to the Mediterranean  5500 km  12 EU member states  63 regions.
Interreg Baltic Sea Region What type of projects can receive funding? Policy-to-project-to-policy Conference Copenhagen| 28 April 2016 Ilze Ciganska, Marta.
Iruma Kravale Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Head of Development Instruments Department 28 November 2013, Riga.
Information Day and Partner Search Forum, 25 October 2001, Riga, Latvia The EU Interreg IIIB and Phare CBC programmes: Joint efforts for joint projects.
20 YEARS OF COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION: Participation of Saint-Petersburg in the development and implementation of programs and projects Saint-Petersburg.
BSR STARS - Programme for the Developement of Innovation, Clusters and SME-Networks Rima Putkienė Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania Maritime.
INTERREG II C Baltic Sea Region Supporting Spatial Planning in the BSR Workshop on Environmental Information in the Baltic Sea Region Hamburg
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BALTIC SEA TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION: RU PERSPECTIVE Irina Karelina.
Interreg IIIB Tacis Phare
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
cbss. st/documents/cbsspresidencies/10russian/dbaFile263
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
South-East European Space
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
Informal Water Directors Meeting Dublin, 22nd June 2004
Cross Border Cooperation under ENPI
TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION:
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR INTERREG III B NP by Eeva Rantama BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat 3 rd Quality Workshop Transnational value of local pilot actions Thursday, 10 th of November 2005 Riga, Latvia

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP The main idea of the BSR INTERREG III B NP is to support transnational co-operation that aims at sustainable development of the Baltic Sea Region CIP The thematic focus of the programme on issues, which call for transnational co-operation (through joint implementation actions). Such as… –Development concepts and concrete pilot actions for strategic development zones (macro regions) –Spatial development concepts for energy and tourism sector

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP -Strategic networking of major urban centres and urban-rural partnerships –Pan-Baltic inter-modal transport strategies and better access to information society –Baltic green networks and corridors/natural and cultural landscapes as attractive environment for business development –Wise management of natural resources of BSR –Integrated management for coastal zones and islands –Institutional building together with CEEC and NIS countries

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP The set-up of each project (rationale, activities, partnership, budget, management structure etc.) must reflect a high level of transnationality => Joint solving of a common problem that leads to common results while involving actors from different countries e. g. Cities and regions located on the BSR coastal areas face declining environmental quality due to economic activities, and are jointly exploring potential solutions for the whole BSR or certain parts of it

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP Requirements on the projects All activities in the projects should be result or part of transnational investigations or concepts and cannot be chosen only from national or regional context The development of the project idea is driven by a transnational consortium and The project activities are a result of co-operation arrangements

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP Requirements on the projects The results of the project have impact across borders The outputs of the project, even if anchored in one place, are transferable to other partners regions Joint implementation will be preferred to networking and exchange of experience

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP Benefits Building on already existing experience (e. g. solving a problem with the solution tested and verified somewhere else) Creating tangible solutions to common problems Better understanding of neighbours leading to better cohesion of the BSR in the different fields Creation a Baltic Sea wide region of co-operating nations and their regions intertwined across borders

Steps to genuine transnational territorial cooperation (NWE programme) Transnational management of a transnational issue Resource pooling Transfer of know-how Exchange of experience

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP Transnational investments CIP: Small-scale infrastructure investments should demonstrate the implementation of transnational investigations and spatial development concepts Definition A transnational investment is an investment made as a result or within the framework of transnational cooperation…

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP Transnational investments …It either… –has a territorial dimension –establishes functional relations between locations not necessary adjacent to each other –or has a model character (verified through demonstration, transferability) Trans-border dimension or impact Involves partners from at least two countries as well as several levels of decision-making, planning, administration or financing

Transnationality in the BSR INTERREG III B NP Transnational investments Examples: Information and innovation centres of transnational importance Large computerised systems and ICT networks Thematic tourist routes (e. g. sign posting) Pilot demonstration on improvement of damaged urban land Pilot demonstration on park+ride facilities

Pilot actions of transnational value Have a model character of solving problems with transnational relevance Are demonstration activities of innovations The method and/or the results are (at least partly) transferable to other regions

Pilot actions of transnational value Should be carried out… within transnational working arrangements with a view to its innovative character (e. g. not an ordinary infrastructure that commonly exists) benefiting other partners through cross-fertilisation or transfer of knowledge at certain/all stages (joint design, joint management/testing, demonstration of effects and shared use of the final output)

Weaknesses in the current pilot actions Some of the pilot actions are: A selection of local projects only linked with each other by the need for EU funding, which could have been funded by national, regional or local money without the need for INTERREG support Activities or investments that have been planned before the start of a transnational project in a national, regional or local context Activities or investments only related to each other through a vague thematic relationship.

Weaknesses in the current pilot actions …Some of the pilot actions are: A series of individual pilots/investments for which there is only an ex-post exchange of experience and no joint implementation or cross-fertilisation.