Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Are You (Click).
PORTFOLIO.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Performance management guidance
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Model
What it means for New Teachers
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Quality Improvement Projects for MOC MOC Credit for the Work You Do Every Day * Additional notes added by CPQCC.
Consistency of Assessment
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
for School Library Media Specialists
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
ADEPT Framework
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Renewal Credits CONNECTING Goals-Based Evaluation WITH Recertification Department of Human Resources
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
ADEPT A D E P T Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching.
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
INCLUDED: Components for: Annual Contract (AC) Teachers Professional Service Contract (PSC) Teachers Professional Service Contract Teachers - with special.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
SAFE-T NET Introduction
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Office of Service Quality
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
What it means for New Teachers
Benchmark Lesson #2: Types and Purposes of Assessments
American Institutes for Research
Dissemination Training
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Resident Educator Program
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R) www.scteachers.org

The revised GBE model (GBE-R) is intended to. . . relate professional development to certificate renewal, make professional development more effective and meaningful, and establish explicit criteria and procedures for moving continuing-contract teachers from GBE to formal evaluation.

GBE Cycles Current GBE Revised GBE Educators were on a three-year GBE cycle. Educators are on a five-year GBE cycle, consistent with their certificate validity period.

PGD Plans Current GBE Revised GBE Educators’ professional growth and development plans applied only to GBE. Educators’ professional growth and development plans can apply to both GBE and certificate renewal.

PGD Plans Current GBE Revised GBE Educators rarely modified their professional growth and development plans. Educators may modify their PGD plans at any time. Most common reasons: New job setting New job responsibilities New interests New programs

Number of Goals Current GBE Revised GBE Minimum number of goals required: Three during the three-year period Maximum number of goals that can be required at one time: None Minimum number of goals required: One or more during the five-year period Maximum number of goals that can be required at one time: Three

Goal Content Current GBE Revised GBE Required educators to develop goals in the subject area, instruction, technology, or assessment, and professional service There are no pre-specified goal areas, except when performance weaknesses have been identified and documented over time.

What are goals? Goals are desired end-points; activities and strategies are the means to those ends. Enrolling in a course is NOT a goal. It is an activity. The goal has to do with what should be gained by completing the course (e.g., more knowledge, greater skill).

GBE applies to all classroom-based teachers, special area educators (i.e., library media specialists, school guidance counselors, and speech-language therapists), educators who are participating in the TERI plan, and educators who hold National Board Certification.

What are the two types of GBE-R? They are called Research & Development (R & D) GBE and Competence-Building GBE. All educators who pass SAFE-T should be placed initially in R & D GBE.

Do not wait until the end of the year! When should competence-building GBE begin? For educators who are eligible for GBE, the competence-building GBE process should begin as soon as an administrator has identified and documented performance weaknesses over time. Do not wait until the end of the year!

Difference in Purposes Competence-Building GBE Research & Development GBE Allows administrators and educators to target specific weaknesses (as opposed to a full formal evaluation that encompasses all APSs). Allows educators to engage in inquiry and continual professional development within the context of the performance standards.

Research & Development GBE www.scteachers.org

The R&D GBE Process Step 1: The educator forms a research question, either independently or in collaboration with colleagues. Examples of research questions: Does my new strategy for teaching reading improve students’ reading comprehension? What types of mentoring assistance do beginning teachers find most helpful? What can we as teachers do to increase parent involvement?

The R&D GBE Process Step 2: The educator transforms the research question into one or more goals.

Q: What are the criteria for setting goals? A: There are five: All goals must relate to one or more APSs. All goals must be stated in terms of the educator’s change or improvement over time. At least one goal must be stated in terms of the educator’s influence on students.

Q: What are the criteria for setting goals? A: There are five: At least one goal must support any applicable school or district initiative. Goals should focus primarily on the higher-level cognitive processes of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (i.e, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create).

Vignette 1

A: R&D goals that focus on evaluating might be worded as follows: Q: What do R&D goals look like? A: R&D goals that focus on evaluating might be worded as follows: To determine the impact of (X) on (Y).

Q: What do R&D goals look like? A: R&D goals that focus on creating might be worded like this: To develop (X) to enhance (Y).

Q: What do R&D goals look like? A: In both of the preceding examples (X) might be an instructional strategy, a mentoring strategy, or a strategy for communicating with parents, or the like. There are countless possibilities.

Q: What do R&D goals look like? A: In both of the preceding examples (Y) might be student achievement, beginning teacher performance or satisfaction, or parent participation in school activities. Again, there are countless possibilities.

The R&D GBE Process Step 3: The educator meets with the GBE supervisor to develop the PGD plan. The supervisor may be a school- or district-level administrator, a department chair or lead teacher, a curriculum specialist, or any educator who holds a similar position, at the discretion of the school district.

The R&D GBE Process The PGD plan is based on answers to the following questions: Which goals—and how many—does the educator plan to address during the five-year period? When does the educator plan to begin and end each goal? (Multi-year goals are encouraged.) What types of evidence will the educator present annually to the supervisor to verify progress? How will everyone know when the goal has been accomplished?

Vignette 2

The R&D GBE Process Step 4: The educator begins working on the goal(s), either independently or collaboratively. Typically, the educator will: learn more about the goal and ways in which others have pursued the goal. determine the types of data needed and how the data will be collected. carry out a study and systematically collect, analyze, and interpret the data. disseminate the results (e.g., via presentations, articles, Web sites, newsletters, e-mail).

The R&D GBE Process Step 5: The educator meets at least annually with the GBE supervisor prior to April 15th to discuss progress toward meeting the goal(s). Note. An optional template for R & D GBE is available on the Web at http://www.scteachers.org.

Competence- Building GBE www.scteachers.org

Competence-Building GBE. . . involves teaching competence. is intended to help improve teaching performance.

Competence-Building GBE. . . is NOT intended to address conduct problems. Conduct problems should be addressed through Improvement Plans, not through GBE. Examples of conduct problems (see Standards of Conduct for South Carolina Educators) include, but are not limited to, persistent neglect of duty willful violation of rules and regulations, gross immorality, dishonesty.

Litmus Test If the identified performance weaknesses fall exclusively into APS 10 (Fulfilling Professional Responsibilities), there is a possibility that the problem may be related to conduct rather than to competence. If that is the case, you should develop an Improvement Plan rather than relying on Competence-Building GBE.

PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Good Bad Good COMPETENCE TEACHING Bad IP + R&D GBE Good R&D GBE COMPETENCE TEACHING IP + C-B GBE Bad C-B GBE

During Competence-Building GBE the Supervisor must. . . bring the specific performance weakness(es) to the attention of the educator, establish goals to ameliorate the weakness(es), ensure that reasonable efforts are made to assist the educator, and allow reasonable time for improvement.

Vignette 3

What about competence-building goals? Goals must address ongoing performance weaknesses that have been identified and documented. Goals must relate to one or more APSs. An educator cannot be required to work on more than three goals at one time. Goals focus primarily on the first three levels of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (i.e., Remember, Understand, and Apply).

What about supervisors? The supervisor must be a school- or district-level administrator. This administrator plays a major role in developing and monitoring the educator’s professional growth and development (PGD) plan.

Competence-Building GBE Strategies. . . are included in the PGD plan. are sets of activities that are likely to be useful or helpful in achieving the goal. are likely to involve some activities that may be used for certificate renewal. are NOT to be confused with accomplishing the goal.

About the PGD Plan The PGD plan is typically monitored at least twice annually, with the last monitoring occurring before April 15th. Optional templates for Competence-Building PGD plans are available on the Web at http://www.scteachers.org.

Possible Outcomes Improvement Plan?

Q: Where can I find all of the requirements for GBE-R? A: The requirements for the revised GBE model are located in the ADEPT System Guidelines that were approved by the State Board of Education on June 14, 2006. These Guidelines are available online at http://www.scteachers.org/adept/evalpdf/adept_guidelines.pdf.