The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Advertisements

Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
New Directions in Prosecution
1 Budget Reduction Proposals James McDonough Secretary Florida Department of Corrections.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
13 Prison and Jails.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
 Parole officers interact with recently-released prisoners and their families in order to help them become productive members of society.  They develop.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry 1.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Criminal Sentencing in N.C.. Structured Sentencing In 2011, N.C. passed the Structured Sentencing law to organize the punishment of criminals. – Sentencing.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
CANADA’S PRISON SYSTEM. Entering Prison Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more.
C ORRECTIONS. A. P ROBATION 1. Someone found guilty of a crime remains free under supervision. 2. There are over 3.8 million people on probation. 3.
Replicating the Concepts Behind Project HOPE Dionne Addison and Stephanie Starr, Grant Administrators Sonya Dunlap, Project Coordinator.
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
PRISON SYSTEM. Are responsible for:  Offenders with sentences of less than 2 years  Incarcerating all offenders  Processing parole applications  Supervising.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more jails, more sentences, throw people in.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
BCJ 3150, Probation and Parole
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Class Name, Instructor Name
Probation and Parole.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections

Rhode Island in a Nutshell  Unified Prison System with 8 jail and prison facilities  3700 inmates (81% sentenced and 19% awaiting trial)  Average sentence is 17 months  Majority receive a sentence of 6 months or less (not parole eligible)  27,000 offenders on probation and parole 145 offenders seen by Parole Board monthly145 offenders seen by Parole Board monthly 387 offenders are under parole supervision387 offenders are under parole supervision 66 offenders are on electronic monitoring66 offenders are on electronic monitoring

Rhode Island Parole Board  Statutory authority to consider the early release of incarcerated offenders who have been sentenced to more than six (6) months and who have served not less than one-third 1/3 of the sentence.  In July 2007 structured decision-making was implemented. The Parole Board continues to exercise broad discretion to determine when and if an offender will be released from imprisonment.  Statutory authority to revoke parole if the parolee has violated state law or violated the terms and conditions of his or her permit.

Parole Risk Assessment  Two components provide an actuarial based risk score. 1. Risk Assessment Instrument static factors (i.e. commitment offense, past history of violence or felonies) dynamic factors (i.e. current age, prison programs completed during incarceration, discipline, scored custody level) 2. Offense severity class Range from low for non-violent crimes to highest for capital crimes.  Both factors are merged into a Severity Risk Matrix  The instrument is scored upon sentenced commitment and then scored a second time about one month before the parole hearing. scored a second time about one month before the parole hearing.

TCU Drug Screen  DOC starts preparing for potential Parole Board consideration the day the inmate is sentenced.  Initial indications is that 70-80% of our sentenced population need substance abuse treatment.  Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Screen is an initial screening instrument to assess need for drug treatment.  TCU Particulars 15 questions administered day after sentencing started January 2007 scoring indicates a need level (low, medium, high)  Results of first study Need Level NumberPercent Low or none (0-2) % Medium (3-5) % High (6-9) %

TCU / Parole Risk Matrix  Factors to determine when and type of substance abuse treatment TCU need level TCU need level initial parole risk level initial parole risk level sentence length sentence length  These 3 factors result in program recommendation for type of substance abuse treatment program recommendation for type of substance abuse treatment recommended start date for treatment recommended start date for treatment  Goal: Inmate can complete recommended program before first parole hearing  Distribution of first study Recommended Program NumberPercent No Program Recommended % Outpatient % Intensive Outpatient % Residential %

Initial Parole Board Release & In-Prison Substance Abuse Treatment Matrix

Average Monthly Parole Population FY06-FY09* *FY09 through February 2009

Results and Hurdles  The number of parolees has increased 10 % over last year and 35% since fiscal year  In initial study, we found more people were paroled who were low risk and had moderate to low crime severity levels. Risk Level HighModerateLow Highest Offense Severity Level Highest n/a ( 0/ 0 ) 25 % ( 2/ 8 ) 26.1% ( 12 / 46 ) High 42.9% ( 3 / 7 ) 32.8 % ( 19 / 58 ) 48.5 % ( 33 / 68 ) Moderate 38.5 % ( 5 / 13 ) 45.2 % ( 66 / 146 ) 64.0 % ( 87 / 136 ) Low – Moderate 20 % ( 1 / 5 ) 48.9 % ( 22 / 45 ) 50.8 % ( 30 / 59 ) Low 100 % ( 3 /3 ) 32.7 % ( 16 / 49 ) 47.6 % ( 20 / 42)

Results and Hurdles (continued)  Offenders with low risk levels and low to moderate crime severity were denied for various reasons: lack of program completionlack of program completion seriousness of crimeseriousness of crime limited insightlimited insight long criminal historylong criminal history recent bookingrecent booking victim impactvictim impact  Not all recommended substance treatment programs are available in each prison facility.  Waiting lists for substance abuse programs both in prison and in community.  Economic downturn making job placement and secure housing more challenging.