1 Topical Call Series: Improving Data Quality and Use Improving Data Use Wednesday, November 19, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

RtI and Title I in Wisconsin
1 Title I, Part D Data: SY 2012−13 Data Preview, Data Quality, and Upcoming CSPR Clarifications Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC.
1 Title I, Part D Data Reporting and Evaluation: What You Need To Know Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC Karen Neilson, California Department of Education.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Workshop Part II: Subgrantee Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Reporting & Evaluation Workshop Lauren Amos, Liann Seiter, and Dory Seidel.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
2013 Office of Special Education (OSE) Fall Forum Tuesday, November 4, 2013  10:15 am – 11:45 am  Ballroom E Jayme Kraus Data Analyst, Performance Reporting.
ND Community Call Data Dashboards: Part 1 September 20, 2012.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
ND Community Call Salmon Community October 23, 2013.
1 Gold ND Community Call June 3, Agenda Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Adapting to the 2014 GED “That Time of Year”: Subgrantee Monitoring A Closer.
Introduction to the Agency Input Pack I Introduction to the Agency Input Pack The purpose of today’s training is to introduce you to the Agency Input Pack.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
1 Topical Call Series: Improving Data Quality and Use Collecting Student Outcome Data After Exit Thursday, August 6, 2015.
1 Gold ND Community Call February 3, Agenda “That Time of Year”: CSPR Data Submission Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Questions from Community Members.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
1 Topical Call Series: Improving Data Quality and Use CSPR Data Collection Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015.
Nutrition Education LAP FY 2016 Our learning objectives for this section of the training are to: 1. Provide an overview on the Nutrition Sessions worksheet.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions for Title I, Part D Nicholas Read and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC Jeff Breshears, California Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Making the Most of Your Data: Strategies for Evaluating Your Program Greta Colombi, NDTAC; and John McLaughlin, ED.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
Using Data for Program Quality Improvement Stephanie Lampron, Deputy Director.
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Educational Benefit Review (ED Benefit). Educational Benefit Purpose To determine if the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) was reasonably.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training Parent Involvement
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 14 October 2014.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection As of June 28, 2012.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 Introductions Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3x5.
Using Pre- and Posttesting To Improve Programming and Student Achievement Anju Sidana.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
ND Community Call Salmon Community April 16, 2014.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community March 8, 2016.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community March 10, 2016.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community March 16, 2016.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
N&D Community Call Salmon Community March 20, 2017.
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM
ND Data Session NDTAC 2017 National Conference
Resource Allocation Strategy & Planning August 2017
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #7
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Presentation transcript:

1 Topical Call Series: Improving Data Quality and Use Improving Data Use Wednesday, November 19, 2014

2 Agenda Overview of coordinator responsibilities and how data could be used Examples of data use by coordinators –Karen Neilsen (California) –Kenya Haynes (Wyoming) Example of using data to change budgeting decisions –Bi Vuong, The School District of Philadelphia Discussion about preferences around access to your CSPR data NDTAC is funded through a contract with U.S. Department of Education. The content of this slide and presentation does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Education, nor does it imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

3 Responsibilities of Title I, Part D State Coordinators 1.Planning and Funding –Include data in application process –Track budgeting data from subgrantees and use data for funding purposes 2.Monitoring and Compliance –Utilize CSPR data as part of desktop monitoring or to inform conversations during monitoring visits 3.Reporting and Evaluation –Review longitudinal outcome data to track what’s working in facilities and where further TA is needed How else can data be used in your responsibilities?

4 Examples of data use: Karen Neilsen (California) Performance data is used in the selection of subgrantees who will be monitored When monitoring use longitudinal performance data to discuss program improvement with subgrantees Refining data collection process for carryover funds

5 Examples of data use: Kenya Haynes (Wyoming) CSPR Monitoring Data State Data Drill Down

6 Example of using data to change budgeting decisions

7 PROBLEM Ensuring that our students receive adequate resources to meet their social, emotional, and educational needs.

8 Are we providing our schools the right level of funding?

9 Are we providing them with the appropriate guidance regarding staffing?

10 How are we helping to guide supplemental program or staffing support?

11 CHANGES We have allocated more staff to decrease class size We have allocated a special education teacher We are providing psychological services to the school

12 Problem: Student Transition

13 Preferences around access to your CSPR data: How can NDTAC best support your data use?

14 Current/Previous methods for accessing Title I, Part D data ED Data express (ED website) CSPR pdf files (ED website) State and National Fast Facts (NDTAC site) Annual Performance reports, overviews, profiles (NDTAC site)

15 ED Data Express (ED website)

16 CSPR PDF Files (ED website)

17 State and National Fast Facts (NDTAC site)

18 Annual Performance Reports, Overviews, Profiles (NDTAC site)

19 Polling question: Current/Previous methods for accessing Title I, Part D data 1. Which methods of accessing Title I, Part D data do you use? ED Data express (ED website) CSPR pdf files (ED website) State and National Fast Facts (NDTAC site) Annual Performance reports, overviews, profiles (NDTAC site)

20 Changes in Fast Facts for SY 2012–13 ED is dedicated to ensuring student privacy and data suppression rules for CSPR data have changed over the past year. Due to these changes the academic and vocational outcomes and math and reading data will not be available on NDTAC’s Fast Facts pages starting in SY 2012–13 Given the other ED venues for accessing data, we are interested in hearing what, if any, needs you have in accessing your data

21 Discussion about data access needs Are you able to access your “raw data” from your data system? What do you want to be able to do with your data? How do you use it now? How do you want to be able to use it?

22 Polling questions: Assistance needed 2. What assistance do you need? Access to the data itself so I can “dig into it” (as in a spreadsheet) Assistance in analyzing the data (workbook of some sort) Pre-prepared graphics to share with others (like a FF page/handout)

23 Program or State level Is it useful to have your state’s data broken out by program type (e.g., juvenile corrections, juvenile detention, adult corrections, etc.)? Yes, I like to analyze my data by program type No, I prefer to see my state data combined

24 Example of State level data

25 Example of program level data

26 Polling Question: Program or State level 3. Is it useful to have your state’s data broken out by program type (e.g., juvenile corrections, juvenile detention, adult corrections, etc.)? Yes, I like to analyze my data by program type No, I prefer to see my state data combined

27 Longitudinal Comparison Is it useful to see the data across multiple years to compare progress over time?* Yes, it is useful to see progress over time No, I just need this year’s data *Note changes in data collection may make some longitudinal comparisons not comparable

28 Example of Longitudinal Comparison

29 Example of this Year’s Data

30 Longitudinal Comparison 4. Is it useful to see the data across multiple years to compare progress over time?* Yes, it is useful to see progress over time No, I just need this year’s data *Note changes in data collection may make some longitudinal comparisons not comparable

31 National Comparison Is it useful to see your state’s data compared to the national data? Yes, it is useful to see how I compare to the national data No, I just need my state’s data

32 Example of National Comparison

33 Example of state data

34 National Comparison 5. Is it useful to see your state’s data compared to the national data? Yes, it is useful to see how I compare to the national data No, I just need my state’s data

35 Polling question: Additional Comments 6. Please write any additional comments around access to CSPR data.* *Comments will not be broadcast to the group

36 Future calls in this topical call series on improving data quality and use Potential topics to cover in future calls: Special education (IDEA) data in the CSPR Pre- and posttesting of long-term students Tracking students after they exit Polling question: 7. What topics around improving data quality and use are you interested in learning more about?