A review on magnetic monopoles What is a RPP review good for ? Why are monopoles important ? What is already in the RPP ? Why is a monopole review desirable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Advertisements

First results from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC
Unit 12: Part 3 Quantum Mechanics and Atomic Physics.
AS 4002 Star Formation & Plasma Astrophysics BACKGROUND: Maxwell’s Equations (mks) H (the magnetic field) and D (the electric displacement) to eliminate.
Searching for Magnetic Monopoles
ATLAS Experiment at CERN. Why Build ATLAS? Before the LHC there was LEP (large electron positron collider) the experiments at LEP had observed the W and.
MAGNETIC MONOPOLES Andrey Shmakov Physics 129 Fall 2010 UC Berkeley.
8/5/08Lecture 2 Part 21 Maxwell’s Equations of the Electromagnetic Field Theory Gauss’s Law – charge makes an electric field The magnetic field is solenoidal.
PHY 102: Waves & Quanta Topic 10 The Compton Effect John Cockburn Room E15)
Lecture 3: The Standard Model
PHY 042: Electricity and Magnetism Introduction Prof. Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin.
Italian Physical Society International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
Particles & Antiparticles
Discovery of the Higgs Boson Gavin Lawes Department of Physics and Astronomy.
CMS Masterclass It’s the dawn of an exciting age of new discovery in particle physics! At CERN, the LHC and its experiments are tuning up. CMS –
Particle Physics J4 Leptons and the standard model.
How research is done – two examples. Feynman "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself--and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have.
Joseph Haley Joseph Haley Overview Review of the Standard Model and the Higgs boson Creating Higgs bosons The discovery of a “Higgs-like” particle.
Point 1 activities and perspectives Marzio Nessi ATLAS plenary 2 nd October 2004 Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
1 Experimental and Theoretical Mysteries of Mass: A View From A Contrarian Experimenter Martin L. Perl Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
1 FK7003 Elementary Particle Physics David Milstead A4:1021 tel: /
Quantum Mechanics Chapters 27 and 28. The Beginning  Thomson-Cathode Ray Experiments J. J. Thomson experimented with cathode rays and discovered the.
A Study of the Early Universe Alexander Stameroff James O’Brien
Accelerator Physics with Relativity By Mark, Jack and Frances (Designing the LHC in an hour and a half)
1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Holger Mueller Physics Department, University California-Berkeley Talk.
1 Experimental basis for special relativity Experiments related to the ether hypothesis Experiments on the speed of light from moving sources Experiments.
Particle Physics Quiz EPPOG Hands on Particle Physics Masterclasses 2011.
Presented by Laura Johnson, Catherine Jones, Catherine Cutts and Victoria Green.
Graphic from poster by Sarah Lamb, UConn Honors Program event Frontiers in Undergraduate Research, April 2009 Collimator subtends
Chapter 21 Electromagnetic Waves. General Physics Exam II Curve: +30.
Work partially supported by under Contract 32/2011.
What is the Higgs??? Prof Nick Evans University of Southampton.
LOGO B. I. Stepanov Institute of Physics National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.
Literature Review Taken From: University of Washington Psychology Writing Center.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
8 th Topical Seminar on “Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors” Siena Oct CALIBRATION AND SEARCH FOR EXOTIC PARTICLES WITH CR39 AND MAKROFOL.
PHY th century cosmology 1920s – 1990s (from Friedmann to Freedman)  theoretical technology available, but no data  20 th century: birth of observational.
1 M. Barnett – October 2008 DOE Review 2006 Report Recommendations from the 2006 report. Many recommendations have been implemented, and are not listed.
Introduction Proton decay in the simulation of LAr detector Track reconstruction in the ICARUS detector Particle identification in the ICARUS detector.
A Direct Search for Magnetic Monopoles at H1 HEP03, Aachen, 17-23/7/03 David Milstead The University of Liverpool.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
Anthropology Series In the Beginning How did the Universe begin? Don’t know!
Atomic Physics – Part 3 Ongoing Theory Development To accompany Pearson Physics PowerPoint presentation by R. Schultz
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) the University of Tokyo KAGRA face to face meeting University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan 3 August.
Brian Plimley Physics 129 November Outline  What is the anomalous magnetic moment?  Why does it matter?  Measurements of a µ  : CERN.
Sinai University Faculty of Engineering Science Department of Basic Science 2/5/20161 W1.
ELECTROWEAK UNIFICATION Ryan Clark, Cong Nguyen, Robert Kruse and Blake Watson PHYS-3313, Fall 2013 University of Texas Arlington December 2, 2013.
1 The Origin of Mass: - Inertial Mass - Bonn 2010 by Albrecht Giese, Hamburg The Origin of Mass 1.
Space physics EF2245 Tomas Karlsson Space and Plasma Physics School of Electrical Engineering EF2245 Space Physics 2010.
Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment --a harbinger of new physics Chang Liu Physics 564.
1 Particle Physics, The Mysteries of the Universe, and The LHC Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University.
Sinai University Faculty of Engineering Sciences Department of Basic Sciences 3/8/20161 W1.
31/03/2008Lancaster University1 Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy From Simon Bevan University College London.
The experimental evidence of t+t configuration for 6 He School of Physics, Peking University G.L.Zhang Y.L.Ye.
Systematic study of two-pion production in NN collisions – from single-baryon to di-baryon excitations T. Skorodko, Physikalisches Institut, Univ.Tubingen.
What is Matter? 1.Sequencing the content 2.Challenges 3.Assessment tasks.
What are the only two forces your body has ever experienced??? GRAVITY ELECTRIC.
Part 1: Download a Specification AS and A level combined specification
PHL424: Nuclear angular momentum
Chemistry Part 1 : Download a Specification
Frank Deppisch, Ralph Engel, Paolo Lipari, James Pinfold
Monopoles The Mystery.
Searching for Magnetic Monopoles
Manganites Superlattice
EMR Introduction Lesson One.
Energy and momentum units in particle physics
Dirac and Antimatter In 1927 Paul Dirac was working on the problem of combining the theory of the very small (quantum mechanics) with Einstein’s special.
Particle Physics: Status and Perspectives Part 8: The Precision Frontier Manfred Jeitler SS 2018.
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
Presentation transcript:

A review on magnetic monopoles What is a RPP review good for ? Why are monopoles important ? What is already in the RPP ? Why is a monopole review desirable and what could it look like ?

What is a RPP review good for ? Short review should on an important topic should be a physicist’s executive summary and a good starting point for a detailed survey. –Overview of theory and experiment –Competitive current limits (and associated uncertainties) –Up-to-date and well chosen reference list. Personal perspective –Recent student project on muon g-2. –Wide literature survey and much confusion. –Eased by RPP article.

The importance of monopoles (1) Dirac’s argument (1931): Angular momentum of field of monopole-electron system: One monopole needed to ”explain” electric charge quantisation. Dirac monopole of charge g D (2) Monopoles are also features of BSM theories, eg grand unified theories (GUT monopoles): mass=10 15 though some models predicts lighter monopoles (3) Symmetrise Maxwell equations (4) Catalyse proton decay

What is in the pdg ? 8 page listing of searches (D. Groom) –Accelerator searches –Cosmic ray searches –Astrophysics –Matter searches – >120 limits Short summary (D. Groom) To be expanded –LHC experiments (inc. MOEDAL) –Cosmic ray, eg IceCube. Date No. limits Cabrera’s ”monopole” event

Why the reader needs guidance (1) Many experimental techniques, some more model dependent than others –Ionisation (g D equivalent to 70e) –Induction (SQUID : cosmic ray/matter) –Trajectory (non-parabolic) –TOF –Indirect search through multi-photon final states D0: Phys.Rev.Lett.81: ,1998

Why the reader needs guidance (2) Limits dependent on theoretical ansatzes –Difficulty in calculating monopole processes due to inapplicability of perturbatve field theory. Eg, assumptions on: Binding in matter Multi-photon Direct production mechanisms Important assumptions and uncertainties should be stated.

Possible format of a review A possible monopole review could look like: –Intro –Theoretical overview : Dirac’s argument, monopoles in GUTs, calculations for monopoles at collders etc. – Detection Techniques Ionisation Trajectory Induction … –Limits from experiments Accelerator Cosmic ray Matter Astrophysics limits Length anywhere between pages. Current RPP reviews between 1 and 50 pages.

Reviews Already detailed reviews ”on the market” –Most reflect the authors’ interest in specific aspects of monopoles –Eg Milton, Rept.Prog.Phys.69: ,2006 –Fairbairn et al., Phys. Rept. 438: –Giacomelli and Patrizii, hep-ex/ Nothing like the standard, concise RPP- style review.

Summary Monopole searches have been a feature of experimental particle physics for half a century For every new energy, new collision type, or form of matter a search is made. Searches to be performed at LHC and cosmic ray experiments. RPP maintains an excellent listing of searches A short review would help the reader understand easily the listing and provide the definitive ”starting point” for those interested in the field. I would have benefited from such a review when I made a search at HERA.