Evaluating your 21st CCLC Program and Lessons Learned by Veteran Program Directors FY13 Program Training August 7, 2012 Presenter: Michael Thaler 21st.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Graduate Project Advisor Training. Project Basics What do you already know about the Graduate Project? –List everything you think you know about the project.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Campus Improvement Plans
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Slides originally developed by NJDOE A New Vision For Professional Development.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Reporting and Using Evaluation Results Presented on 6/18/15.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Preceptor Orientation
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Georgia Induction of Beginning Special Education.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” 21 st CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS PROGRAM.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Data Collection Process: Roles and Responsibilities of LEAs GaDOE Data Collections Conference August 17, 2011 Athens,
DPI 21 st Century Community Learning Center New Grantee Orientation: Part 2.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by:
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Building an Effective Evaluation of Your Flexible.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Program.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Iowa 21 st CCLC Local Evaluations Support for Local Evaluators.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Program.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Program.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Spring 2013 OMSP Request For Proposal. The purpose of this PowerPoint is to highlight critical components of the Request for Proposals that have historically.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Federal Programs Q &A’s Presented by: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs and School Improvement.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local evaluators
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local Evaluators
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Washington Reading Corps Site Applicants
Standard Four Program Impact
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating your 21st CCLC Program and Lessons Learned by Veteran Program Directors FY13 Program Training August 7, 2012 Presenter: Michael Thaler 21st CCLC State Program Manager mthaler@doe.k12.ga.us (404) 232-1197

Goals of this Presentation Understand the importance of program evaluation Discuss the components of the evaluation reports Understand the roles and expectations of an external evaluator Learn about tools other 21st CCLC programs are using Receive tips and knowledge that our most veteran program directors wish they had known their first year

“We are doing a great job of running our programs and we are effective, but we aren’t telling our story and that’s hurting us.” Dr. Sylvia Lyles Beyond School Hours XIII Conference February, 2010

Perception vs. Reality - Daycare centers - Unorganized or ineffective activities - Minimal impact on schools, families and community - Adult employment agency Reality - Highly organized out-of-school programs - Utilize research-based activities that specifically target ‘at-risk’ or ‘high opportunity’ students - Provide critical services to a number of stakeholders

Our job is to tell the story of our 21st CCLC programs to our various stakeholders so we can change their perception and help educate them about positive impact of our programs. This is accomplished by developing and utilizing an effective evaluation plan and following the principles of effectiveness.

Why should you do it? Principles of Effectiveness (Sec. 4205 (b)) states ‘the program or activity shall undergo a periodic evaluation to assess its progress toward achieving its goal of providing high quality opportunities for academic enrichment’

Principles of Effectiveness (Sec. 4205 (b)) The program or activity should be based upon: 1. An assessment of objective data regarding the need for the program 2. An established set of performance measures 3. Scientifically-based research that demonstrates the activity will help the students meet State or local standards

What can evaluations provide? In addition to letting you know how you are doing, effective evaluation plans can help: Increase student and parent participation Increase school support Obtain additional partnerships Obtain additional funding Increase the effectiveness of your program

Essential Steps for an Effective Evaluation Plan Determine the needs of your students and families Establish clear goals, objectives, and activities based on the identified needs Develop the timeline for the evaluation plan Collect and analyze baseline, formative, and summative data Disseminate the evaluation results to your stakeholders Refine the program and its activities for next year, based upon the evaluation results

Evaluation Requirements 3 Major Components: - Formative (mid-year) Assessment - Summative (end of year) Assessment - Cayen/Afterschool 21 data entry system Summer Evaluation, if your program will run one in 2013

Formative Assessment Must undergo at least one and it must be written by the external evaluator Evaluates from the beginning of the program year to the time of the evaluation At a minimum, the report must include: Student Attendance: Data on average daily attendance and enrollment at each site; Program Operation: Synopsis of current level of operation at each site; Objective Assessment: Data analysis and indication of progress towards achieving EACH objective (as required, all objectives must include measures that allow for continuous (formative) assessment); and Recommendations: Recommendations for programmatic refinement for all objectives where progress is not being achieved and/or where the program is not likely to achieve the stated objective by the end of the program year.

Formative Assessment Due February 1, 2013 Important to continuously assess your program throughout the year (i.e., grades, attendance) Effective programs make revisions throughout, based upon their formative assessments Share the results with stakeholders

Summative Assessment Each program must submit a summative report by June 28th, 2012 Evaluates the entire program year The results of your summative report will be used to help determine continuation of funding in subsequent years Must be written by your external evaluator and must follow the template on the following slides

Summative Report Template Each summative report must include, at minimum, the following major sections: Overview and History: Provide a general overview of the 21st CCLC program, including a history of previous operation and how the program has progressed and grown over the past year(s) of operation. Student Attendance and Enrollment: Total and Regularly-Participating Student Enrollment (per site); Student Demographics (e.g., gender, ethnicity); Average Daily Attendance (per site) Program Operation: The summative report must include information on operation for EACH site within the program (e.g., days, hours, and weeks of operation for each component). Quality of Staffing: The composition of site staff is one method for assessing the quality and breadth of 21st CCLC programs. For each site within the program, the summative report must include information about staffing (e.g., Staff Demographics, Student: Staff Ratio, Staff Training, and Use of Certified Teachers).

Summative Report Template Objective Assessment: Within the grant application, 21st CCLC programs proposed both objectives and methods of evaluating progress towards achieving the objectives. The summative report must include detailed information for EACH OBJECTIVE approved by GaDOE (e.g., activities, data collected, timeline, analysis and results). Programs are NOT permitted to revise, reword, or otherwise change their objectives without specific written approval from GaDOE. Other Observations (Optional): If appropriate, provide other relevant findings pertaining to this 21st CCLC program. Other findings could include qualitative and/or quantitative data not related to specific objectives; quotes and/or statements from students, parents, and/or teachers; success stories of students within the program; and photographs demonstrating unique program activities and services.

Summative Report Template Progress towards Sustainability: The summative report must provide information about program partnerships (e.g., partnership development, partner maintenance, and contributions to the program). Overall Recommendations: Provide an overall assessment of this 21st CCLC program, as well as any program-wide recommendations to enhance program quality.

Major Outcomes/GaDOE’s Expectations GaDOE expects every 21st CCLC program to demonstrate the following: Increase in grades from fall to spring (no less than 85% of student grades entered) Increase in CRCT/EOCT scores (no less than 85% of students with scores in tested grade levels) Increase in school day and program attendance Improvement in areas such as discipline, homework completion, parent involvement, parent/student satisfaction, etc.

Cayen/ Afterschool 21 Data Entry System Programs must enter data (grades, attendance, activities, etc.) into this system continuously throughout the life of the grant GaDOE uses this to fulfill its requirement of reporting data to US ED All new subgrantees must attend webinars and work closely with their assigned AS21 contractor

External Evaluator Provides a critical service to our programs and should be an experienced professional Contact multiple evaluators and ‘shop around’ - 21st CCLC experience? - Speak with some of their current programs and see if they will provide you with one of the reports - Ensure you hire one early in the program year Can only use 3% of your budget for this and must enter in to one year contracts Cannot be the person who wrote the grant The quality of your evaluator can have a significant impact on the quality your program!

Role of an External Evaluator Remember - They work for you, you don’t work for them They are there to provide guidance and support, but ultimately the success of the program relies on the program administration They are somewhat limited by the quality of data you provide to them Refer to the operations manual for more information requirements/recommendations for the external evaluator

What must they provide? At a minimum: - One formative assessment - Summative assessment after the conclusion of the program year - A list of recommended revisions based upon the results of the formative and summative assessments

Suggestions: What to Request Conduct site visits at least twice a year This can vary depending on the size of your grant or location of your evaluator Assist with developing surveys and other measurement instruments Assist with the dissemination of evaluation results i.e., One page flyer and/or brief PowerPoint presentation

Suggestions: What to Request Participate and present at school/advisory/stakeholder meetings Conduct focus groups with students, staff, and/or parents Provide input in revising objectives and assessments Monthly meetings or teleconferences to ensure the evaluation plan is on track

Helpful Hints Set up your contract so your payments align with deliverables, not just timeframes Clearly explain to them the evaluation requirements If possible, bring them to state/national conferences and state meetings

Other Helpful Hints Disaggregate the results of your summative evaluation based on number of days attended: 0-29 days 30-59 days 60-89 days 90+ days Compare regularly participating students (30+ days) to non-21st CCLC students Track students for the life of your grant

Additional Evaluation Tools Needs Assessments or Interest Surveys Students - determine activities that would interest them Consider pre and post surveys Staff - determine the type of training that would benefit them the most (example) Staff - determine which types of enrichment activities they would like to teach Parents - not only what type of activities, but when and where to hold them

____________________________________ DJJ AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SURVEY INTRODUCTION: This professional development survey was developed for DJJ After-School Program teachers. Survey results will help determine future professional development activities. Read each statement carefully and place a check mark in the appropriate space that best represents your answer for Very Interested (VI), Somewhat Interested (SI) or Not Interested. Professional Development Activity VI SI NI 1. Transition school-day activities to After-School Program activities 2. Integrate related reading and math learning activities for enrichment and non-remediation classes. 3. Evaluate and document learning in enrichment and non-remediation classes 4. Develop course outlines and weekly lessons in accordance with program objectives 5. Identify what teaching techniques promote learning in the After-School Program classroom. 6. Develop additional enrichment activities 7. Promote parental involvement and determine activities to keep them coming back 8. Discover supplemental teaching materials that work 9. Develop/refine classroom management skills for After-School Program 10. Maintain a safe, secure classroom environment while promoting learning and creative expression 11. Understand the influence of school, family and peers with delinquency 12. Gain national, state and DJJ perspectives of After-School Programs 13. How is the After-School Evaluated? 14. Time to share After-School Program experiences with other after-school teachers 15. How to get more community participation for speakers, classroom supplies, etc Comments Suggestions: ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________

Additional Evaluation Tools Student progress reports Classroom/teacher observation forms Parent satisfaction survey

Lessons Learned by Veteran 21st CCLC Program Directors I asked some of our most successful and experienced 21st CCLC program directors to come up with a list of tips and pieces of knowledge they wish they knew their first year Review of Lessons Learned handout This is GOLD

Any Questions? The biggest thing to remember is you have a support system of GaDOE staff and other subgrantees to help you through this process.