2. ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by: Dr. Jorge A. Cardenas, DBA Dr. Patricia A. Ryan, Ph.D. Forbes School of Business at Ashford University

3. 3 WHAT SHOULD YOU KNOW? Program reviews are not that complicated! Program reviews are not that difficult! Program reviews do require time! Program reviews do require multiple experts and sources! Program reviews do require Objectivity! Program reviews are good stories, logical in thought and process! And most importantly…… Program reviews distinguish Facts from IMPORTANT FACTS and tell us…Are Students Learning What We Say They Are?

4. WHAT IS A PROGRAM REVIEW AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? A program review is an in-depth analysis of the quality and effectiveness of an academic program through the assessment of: a. curriculum quality; b. faculty and teaching quality; c. student learning success and; d. program sustainability. Program reviews allow the University to make informed, data-driven decisions to improve academic programs and keep them current and viable.

5. PURPOSE OF PROGRAM REVIEW To determine if an Academic Program is doing what it was intended to do asking questions such as: Is the curriculum relevant and current? Are the faculty who teach qualified and experts in the discipline? Are students engaged in the program learning and meeting the program objectives? Are there support services that exist for students and faculty? Requirements for Regional Accreditation.

6. SAMPLE PROGRAM REVIEW OUTLINE … have a template to tell your story! Here is ours

7. WHERE DO YOU START? With a hypothesis! The academic program is doing what it was intended to do. How Do You Support or Disaffirm the hypothesis? Collect and analyze data related to the curriculum, students and faculty. Curriculum Students Faculty Academic Program

8. INPUTS MIXED METHODS TRIANGULATION OF DATA Observations that have been confirmed by two or more independent measures TRIANGULATION OF DATA Observations that have been confirmed by two or more independent measures STUDENT LEARNING Quantitative Data Qualitative Data FACULTY DATA ASSESSMENT DATA STUDENT DATA * Notice each tracks with Part A of the Outline: - Curriculum Quality - Faculty & Teaching Quality - Student Learning Success

9. 9 CURRICULUM - Addresses the extent to which students are achieving program goals/learning outcomes based on evidence. Claims made about the program’s strengths and weaknesses must be supported with qualitative and quantitative evidence. Note: To have an impact, data needs to be presented as evidence (i.e., use the data to make your case, rather than just listing numbers in a table, while continuing to be mindful of telling your program’s story). ILOs PLOs CLOs Qualitative End of Course Surveys End of Program Surveys Alumni Surveys Focus Groups Quantitative Retention, Persistence, Graduation Rates Capstone Exams/Assignments Course Completion Rates

10. 10 STUDENT SUCCESS Students Retention, Persistence, Graduation Rates GPA, ACT/SAT scores, Transfer Credits, etc... Demographics Career advancement, Promotions, Facebook feedback Direct and Indirect Assignment Target Achievements

11. 11 FACULTY AND TEACHING QUALITY Faculty Rank Profiles (% terminal degrees), FT/PT, On- ground/line... Program Review Focus Groups Governance, Committee Participation, Training, Recruitment... Demographics Performance Evaluations, Student Satisfaction Surveys Scholarship, Experience, Licenses, Professional Development...

12. 12 PART B: ANALYSIS PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY/VIABILITY ADDRESSES THE PROGRAM’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COMMUNITY AND PROFESSION AS WELL AS ITS’ VIABILITY S ocietal and professional demand for program - Bureau of Labor Statistics - Benchmark Comparison to Comparable Programs/Competitors Contributions of the program to the community and/or profession - What extent are graduates succeeding in relevant careers, community service, creative endeavors, etc… - Student perceptions about reaching their personal and professional goals

13. 13 PART C: SUMMARY REFLECTIONS What did you discover about the program, student learning, faculty, courses, etc… Were there any “AHA” moments and insights? Is the program doing what we say it is? How can it be improved?

14. 14 PART D: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Does the program align with the College/School/University mission? What changes need to be made to ensure and increase student learning? What is working and should be maintained? What resources are needed to make the changes? * Be Specific as Possible

15. GENERAL TIMELINE EXAMPLE Program Review (PR) Cycle 17 months PR Launch Kickoff meeting Present External Reviewers' CVs Qualified faculty CVs Present self-study draft to Executive Dean & Provost Finalize self-study report & submit to Executive Dean & Provost for approval

16. GENERAL TIMELINE cont. External Reviewers Visit Meet with Deans, Chairs, Faculty Incorporate external reviewers recommendations and submit final report for approval by Provost & President 17 month mark

17. DELIVERABLES External Reviewer CVs Must be doctorally qualified and experts in their discipline Located locally (e.g. CA, NV, AZ, CO, NM) Self Study/Program Review Document Length- 25 pages not including cover page, table of contents and appendices Executive Summary Summary of Self Study/Program Review Document Action Plan Report Details with regard to action items based on self study/program review recommendations Overview of Action Plan Summary of action items presented in the Action Plan Report

18. 18 RESOURCES Dr. Cardenas and Dr. Ryan Self-Study Template (happy to share) Interested in becoming an external reviewer for us? See us after

19. FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION! Dr. Michael Reilly, Executive Dean Forbes School of Business