Seismic Design of Buried Structures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS IN BULDING CODES
Advertisements

Finite element modelling of load shed and non-linear buckling solutions of confined steel tunnel liners 10th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics,
Passive Vibration Control
CALCULATED vs MEASURED ENERGY DISSIPATION.
Finite element seismic analysis of a guyed mast
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
SECME Requirements Building Bridges: SECME Requirements.
Optimising Building Design for Sustainability Using High Performance Concrete Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services Daksh Baweja – The University.
Cracking, Deflections and Ductility Code Provisions and Recent Research October 2006 Serviceability and Ductility The Other Limit States.
Seismic Code Highlights Determining what level of Seismic Restraints are Required Arkansas Fire Prevention Code 2002 Based on the IBC 2000.
Rigid-Frame Structures
Structural Principles and Landscapes Over Structure GSD 6242 Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies IV Spring 2015Niall Kirkwood FASLA Alistair McIntosh FASLA.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
Concrete 2001 Perth September 2001 Barcoo Outlet Culvert The Influence of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Design of a Buried Arch Structure Doug Jenkins.
IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS Stability of a slope can be affected by seismicity in two ways: earthquake and blasting. These seismic motions are capable of inducing.
Concrete Solutions 09 Predicting the Deflection of Concrete Structures in Practice Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services.
CYCLIC LOAD CAPACITY AND ENDURANCE LIMIT OF MULTI-RING MASONRY ARCHES Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor Jinyan Wang School of Computing, Science and.
CYCLIC LOAD CAPACITY AND ENDURANCE LIMIT OF MULTI-RING MASONRY ARCHES Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor Jinyan Wang School of Computing, Science and Engineering,
A new assessment method for masonry arch bridges (SMART) Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of.
Australian Geomechanics Society Mini-symposium Sydney October 2005 Soil Loads on Cut and Cover Tunnels Under High Fills Doug Jenkins Interactive Design.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
Fatigue in Concrete Structures Raquib Ahsan, Ph.D. Professor Department of Civil Engineering BUET.
Static Pushover Analysis
Reinforced Concrete Design
Example: Bridge.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
Optimising Precast Bridge Girders for Sustainability With the use of High Performance Concrete Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services Leigh McCarthy.
Frames and Walls Lateral Stability
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
Design Studies 1A STRUCTURES. Structural Analysis & Design l analyse a structure l design a structure 2/13 l given a structure, determine whether it is.
Earthquake Load Some Basic Definitions:
Prepared By: Mohammed wafiq omer Mahmoud hammad Abd Algani Sami Malath omair An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
Engineering Concepts Chapter 4 Terms. ABUTMENT The part of a structure that directly receives thrust or pressure.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services.
Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services
Two loading Conditions
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns.
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS BY THE PROOF LOAD.
Comparative Study of Chord forces in Flat Slabs due to Seismic loads in buildings of different plan aspect ratios Aman Gupta (B.Tech. student) Dr. S. Mandal.
A Paper from the Transportation Research Record
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
Welcome to Earthquake Engineering
AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
CFHT Pier Building Evaluation
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
S S SUBMITTED BY:- CHARU BHARDWAJ civil engineering
PRINCIPLE PROPERTIES OF BUILDING MATERIALS
Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills
Earthquake resistant buildings
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Transverse Shear Objective:
Presentation transcript:

Seismic Design of Buried Structures Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services

Why Bother? "Results show that the bending moments in the arch from horizontal earthquake loading can be significant in relation to the gravity load actions. These moments are also very sensitive to the backfill and surrounding soil stiffness properties and rather less sensitive to the foundation soils beneath the arch.” John Wood

Collapse of buried structure in Japan Spec Possible earthquake related failure south of Sydney Consequences of failure

Seismic design provisions in AS5100 Specific rules are given for the categorisation of bridges. A formula is given for the fundamental period of bridge structures (for use in category BEDC-1 designs only). Specific structural response factors are given for bridges of different types. Structural detailing requirements relevant to bridges are given.

Problems with application to buried structures The requirements for more detailed analysis methods are related to bridge span, and may not be relevant to buried structures. Vertical earthquake effects may be important for buried structures, but only horizontal effects are required to be considered for almost all buried structures. The formula for the fundamental period is not applicable to buried structures. For static analysis the earthquake design force is not applicable to buried structures. The appropriate response modification factor is not clear.

Buried arch design study Geraldton Southern Transport Corridor 14.5 m span x8 m high 3m and 15 m cover Acceleration 0.10g Site factor 1.5 Bridge Type II

Classification Type III - Bridges and associated structures that are essential to post-earthquake recovery, as determined by the relevant authority. Type II - Bridges that are designed to carry large volumes of traffic or bridges over other roadways, railways or buildings. Type I - Bridges not of Type II or Type III.

Classification

Classification BEDC-1 BEDC-2 BEDC-3 BEDC-4 < 20 m span, no earthquake analysis > 20 m span, static analysis, horizontal forces BEDC-2 Static or dynamic analysis > 35 m span, horizontal and vertical BEDC-3 Static analysis only if a single dominant mode Consider horizontal and vertical loads BEDC-4 Dynamic analysis; horizontal and vertical

Buried arch design study For each fill height (3m and 15 m): Natural frequency analysis Deflection under unit horizontal acceleration Pseudo-static analysis Response Spectrum analysis Push-over analysis

Buried arch design study For each of the analyses the following material stiffness properties were used: Typical soil and uncracked concrete. Soil stiffness reduced by half and uncracked concrete. Soil stiffness reduced by half, and concrete moment-curvature relationship (static analyses), or cracked stiffness (response spectrum analyses) A total of 26 separate analyses were carried out.

Typical Finite Element Mesh

Mesh Detail

Fundamental period, Static Design Force Coefficient

Static analysis, 3m Cover

Dynamic Analysis, 3m Cover

Maximum Moments, 3m Cover

Static analysis, 15m Cover

Dynamic Analysis, 15m Cover

Maximum Moments, 15m Cover

Axial Load - Seismic Increment or reduction, 15m Cover

Animations First mode shape - 3m and 15 m cover, horizontal and vertical Arch + Fill Fill only

Moment-Curvature

Push-over analysis, 15m Cover

Animations Push-over analysis 15 m fill 3 m fill

Conclusions Buried arch structures with low to moderate axial loads have a large reserve ductility. Where the failure mode is concrete compression failure under moderate earthquake loading is a possibility. Bending moments found in the dynamic analyses were up to 50% higher than the static analysis results.

Recommendations T = 0.055 0.5 seconds Structure classification be related to fill height, rather than span. Response modification factor to be related to the capacity reduction factor. BEDC-1 and BEDC-2: design for vertical and horizontal earthquake loads, using static or dynamic analysis. BEDC-3 and BEDC-4: design for vertical and horizontal earthquake loads, using dynamic analysis. Determine the fundamental period from computer analysis or formula for BEDC-1 and 2 structures. T = 0.055 0.5 seconds  = deflection in millimetres at ground surface above the arch under 1g horizontal load.

Further Information www.interactiveds.com.au